Digital "art"??

[Matt Ion]

Anyone who doesn't think digital cameras are capable of producing "art"
needs to take a look at this shot:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1317528

[Roland Karlsson]

Matt Ion <sou...@moltenimage.com> wrote in news:jw7ad.62500$a41.5863
@pd7tw2no:

> Anyone who doesn't think digital cameras are capable of producing "art"
> needs to take a look at this shot:
> http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1317528
>
>

Unfortunately - we cannot view the image as it is
more than 72 hours old.

/Roland

[Fredrick Garvin]

I love these sites that want you to subscribe, they must be insain.

[Gene Palmiter]

But....first you must define "Art". For me...its what takes the viewer
beyond what is represented. This one does.

"Matt Ion" <sou...@moltenimage.com> wrote in message
news:jw7ad.62500$a41.5863@pd7tw2no...

[Linda_N]

"Gene Palmiter" <palmit...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:%9aad.4715$gI6.2750@trndny09...

> But....first you must define "Art". For me...its what takes the viewer
> beyond what is represented. This one does.
>

I tend to think art can't really be defined by anyoen but the individual
(which your definition implies because only the individual can determine if
they in that state or not when viewing something.)

To some people a dead rat in the basement is art, to others it is justice,
and yet to others it is a shame. To me it's just plain gross to think that
some people have rats in their basement.

Linda

[Böwsér]

This shot, obviously, took more than a camera. How does a sky darken as it
rises towards the sun? Hmm.....

BTW, anything that can produce an image is capable of producing art.
Arguments to the contrary are moronic.

"Matt Ion" <sou...@moltenimage.com> wrote in message
news:jw7ad.62500$a41.5863@pd7tw2no...