Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Mat size, border widths vs print size

1 view
Skip to first unread message

lew

unread,
Oct 26, 2005, 1:10:24 PM10/26/05
to
I'm sure this is a total can of worms, but:
1. Please share you ideas and practices
2. Reference to on line/printed material discussing same.

Thanks.

-Lew


Chris Ellinger

unread,
Oct 26, 2005, 2:05:41 PM10/26/05
to
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:10:24 -0400, "lew" <l...@speakeasy.net> wrote:

>I'm sure this is a total can of worms, but:
>1. Please share you ideas and practices

I like lots of whitespace. My latest project places 6x6 inch prints
somewhat above center in 14x18 inch vertical mats.

Chris Ellinger
Ann Arbor, MI
USA

Nicholas O. Lindan

unread,
Oct 26, 2005, 3:32:17 PM10/26/05
to
"lew" <l...@speakeasy.net> wrote

> [Mat size, border widths vs print size]


> 1. Please share you ideas and practices

It is a matter of taste & de gustibus non est disputantum.

Personally, it depends on the size of the print and where it goes.
A desktop 5x7 gets by fine with 1/2". A formal 20x24 on the wall looks
about right with 4" and other 20x24's work best borderless and frameless.

IMO _really big borders_ border on the pretentious, but that is just
my gustibus.

Take a trip to the art museum or gallery and see what grabs you.

--
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com
Fstop timer - http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/index.htm

Ken Hart

unread,
Oct 26, 2005, 2:20:04 PM10/26/05
to

"lew" <l...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
news:LtidnUG5Law...@speakeasy.net...

My personnal preference is the frame should be the next standard size up:
11x14 print-->16x20 frame, 16x20 print-->20x24 frame. As for mat borders, I
like same width all around. My former photography teacher (back in the
'70's!) taught that the top and sides widths should be the same, the bottom
larger.

A technique that I like is to mount the photo on a piece of colored stock
approximitely 1/8" larger than the print all around, then mount that on a
larger mount board, and framing all that without glass.

If you are using a thick over-mat, (perhaps cut from a piece of 1/4" thick
foamcore) you can carefully color the cut edge of the mat with a marker or
paint.

For a cheap source of color mats, buy a supply of white mat board and get
some spray paint. If you practice, you can get a nice effect by applying the
spray paint solidly at the outside edge and lighter as you get to where the
print will be (basically, a bad spray paint job!)

I also check the flea markets and tractor-trailer truck sales for cheap
"art" (velvet Elvis, etc) frames. Throw away the "art", reuse the frame. I
got a half-dozen nice 24x30 art frames at a going-out-of-business sale last
week for $2 each (the art was pretty bland!).

You're right, it is a can of worms; mostly it's personnal tastes and how it
fits into the room decor.


--
Ken Hart
kwh...@aec.nu


Ray

unread,
Oct 27, 2005, 8:25:42 AM10/27/05
to
"Ken Hart" <kwh...@aec.nu> wrote in
news:c47be$43602c85$3febc508$28...@DIALUPUSA.NET:

Re: "cheap art"... That is a great idea!!!

Thanks

Nicholas O. Lindan

unread,
Oct 27, 2005, 1:23:20 PM10/27/05
to
"Ray" <sp...@spam.invalid> wrote

> Re: "cheap art"... That is a great idea!!!

http://www.museumofbadart.org/

0 new messages