Message from discussion OT ~ The Obama Jobs Strangle: 6,125 Proposed Regulations
Received: by 10.66.83.35 with SMTP id n3mr9241167pay.23.1352820697611;
Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:31:37 -0800 (PST)
From: "Technobarbarian" <Technobarbarian-ztopz...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OT ~ The Obama Jobs Strangle: 6,125 Proposed Regulations
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:31:37 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <agdfjcFou1oU1@mid.individual.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:31:36 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4a4c90ba7659c035fac3605da8182708";
logging-data="18801"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/A9NojTkzSJ+FisAZxkdRg8QndKvvLz04="
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726
"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:15:49 -0800, "Technobarbarian"
> <Technobarbarian-ztopz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>"nothermark" <notherm...@not.here> wrote in message
>>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:38:20 -0500, Owen McKenzie
>>> <owenwmcken...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On 11/12/2012 5:59 PM, nothermark wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:35:57 -0800 (PST), Jan Orme <JanOrm...@aol.com>
>>>>>> 6,125 Proposed Regulations and Notifications Posted in Last 90 Days--
>>>>>> Average 68 per Day
>>>>> When did a request for comment become a rule change?
>>>>Counting the subject line, I see the word *proposed* 3 times. How did
>>>>you miss it?
>>> Point was that requests for comments are not necessarly changes in
>>> rules. I will add that changes are not always bad. They can be
>>> simplifications and clarifications as well as "you mean I have to"
>> Yep. Time for a little perspective on this propaganda:
>>Obama Wrote 5% Fewer Rules Than Bush While Costing Business
>>By Mark Drajem and Catherine Dodge - 2011-10-25T20:20:01Z
>>President Barack Obama's "tsunami" of new government regulations looks
>>like a summer swell.
>>Obama's White House has approved fewer regulations than his predecessor
>>George W. Bush at this same point in their tenures, and the estimated
>>of those rules haven't reached the annual peak set in fiscal 1992 under
>>father, according to government data reviewed by Bloomberg News.
> Damn Tech. Jan ain't going to like that.
> It certainly ain't going to back up anything he has posted.
> Of course Jan should be getting used to that since he has not posted
> anything for the past 6-months that has not proven to be false.
> If you think about it Jan has a record for being wrong that rivals
Yep. We have a number of political ideologues here who make Richard
look like a genius. Jan "pack your bags" Worny is an outstanding example.
Bruce is also out standing in his field. He used to be capable of making
intelligent cogent posts. He has sunk so deeply into his ideological
fantasies that those days seem to be long gone. I read Richard's posts
because he's frequently entertaining. Most of the ideologues have gotten to
be boringly repetitive. With Jan I often wonder what bullshit he's latched
onto now, but after the first post his responses make Richard sound