>>On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:07:33 -0500, Mike Hendrix <mike (at) travellogs
>>(dot) us> wrote:

>>>On 10 May 2012 07:45:01 -0500, nothermark <notherm...@not.here> wrote:

>>>>On Wed, 09 May 2012 20:52:02 -0500, Mike Hendrix <mike (at) travellogs
>>>>(dot) us> wrote:

>>>>>On 9 May 2012 17:19:00 -0500, nothermark <notherm...@not.here> wrote:

>>>>>>And neither you nor Lon understand what I have written let alone what
>>>>>>I think.  
>>>>>-------------------------

>>>>>Mark, I am convinced that you do not understand what you write.
>>>>>Seriously.

>>>>>mike

>>>>Seriously, I do.  What I do not understand is how some folks can
>>>>interpret it.  

>>>Mark, there is absolutely no way you can understand the stuff you
>>>write.  Now way.

>>>>I enjoy poking holes in some ideas but what I really enjoy is
>>>>discussing them by looking at them from different angles.

>>>I have yet to see you poke a hole in anything.  If you could see
>>>yourself as others see you.......... you would pass out from fright.

>>>> It is one
>>>>way to learn things as well as to keep stimulated.  

>>>From some of the things you write I would be surprised if you have
>>>learned anything new since grammar school.

>>>>Bruce has a set of views different from mine

>>>I will say amen to that.  

>>>>and is fun to discuss
>>>>things with because I get other points of view laid out and we can go
>>>>back and fourth. Other folks fall somewhere in between.    

>>>Most of us are totally mystified that there are individuals like you
>>>out there.  I think that is the major infatuation with you and your
>>>line of thinking.

>>>mike

>>Am I supposed to find that disturbing?

>I would suspect that you would find that normal.

>mike