Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion OT ~ King: Petraeus Said CIA's Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down Terrorism
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
nothermark  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2012, 1:35 pm
Newsgroups: rec.outdoors.rv-travel
From: nothermark <notherm...@not.here>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:35:06 -0500
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2012 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: OT ~ King: Petraeus Said CIA's Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down Terrorism

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:13:58 -0700, MaxD <gmdi...@att.net> wrote:
>On 11/17/2012 6:17 AM, bill horne wrote:
>> Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:36:48 -0500, bill horne<redy...@rye.net>
>>> wrote:

>>>> Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:33:11 -0500, bill horne<redy...@rye.net>
>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>> Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:15:02 -0500, bill horne<redy...@rye.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>> Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article<50a6b2c7$0$27185$c3e8da3$66d3c...@news.astraweb.com>,
>>>>>>>>>      MaxD<gmdi...@att.net>     wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On 11/16/2012 12:42 PM, Jan Orme wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2:23 pm, Jan Orme<JanOrm...@aol.com>     wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 8:49 am, Jan Orme<JanOrm...@aol.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:>     On Nov 15, 8:47
>>>>>>>>>>>> am, Jan Orme<JanOrm...@aol.com>     wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       Petraeus To Testify Behind Closed Doors On Benghazi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fridayhttp://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57550090/petraeus-to-testify-beh

>>>>>>>>>>>>> i...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>       McCain 'goes after' Obama's Failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Leadershiphttp://video.foxnews.com/v/1969794239001/mccain-goes-after-obama

>>>>>>>>>>>>> s-fai...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>       Jan

>>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>>> Benghazi Buck Stops With Obama? (But they pass the Buck
>>>>>>>>>>>> anyway...see
>>>>>>>>>>>> below)http://video.foxnews.com/v/1969791011001/benghazi-buck-stops-with-oba

>>>>>>>>>>>> ...

>>>>>>>>>>>> WH Refers Scandal Questions to Other Agencies 10 Times in 10
>>>>>>>>>>>> Minuteshttp://cnsnews.com/news/article/wh-refers-scandal-questions-other-ag

>>>>>>>>>>>> e...

>>>>>>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>>>>>> King: Petraeus Said CIA's Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down
>>>>>>>>>>> Terrorism
>>>>>>>>>>> http://mrctv.org/videos/king-petraeus-said-cias-talking-points-were-e...

>>>>>>>>>>> lay-down-terrorism

>>>>>>>>>>> Jan

>>>>>>>>>> And that from no less a reliable source than Peter King.  LMAO.

>>>>>>>>> So, the story is the King got a classified briefing and which he
>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>> disclosed????

>>>>>>>>> Snork.

>>>>>>>>> PS for the wingnuts whining about the POTUS disclosing
>>>>>>>>> classified info.
>>>>>>>>> Ah, you really need to learn how the government handles
>>>>>>>>> classifying and
>>>>>>>>> de-classifying information. It's a function of the Executive
>>>>>>>>> branch, not
>>>>>>>>> the Judicial or Legislative. So it's ultimately the President's
>>>>>>>>> call
>>>>>>>>> what is, and is not, classified.

>>>>>>>> What, exactly, is classified about "It was terrorists" as opposed to
>>>>>>>> the lie of "It was extremists reacting to a video"?

>>>>>>> bill, I agree with you.  HOWEVER, as all of us that have worked for
>>>>>>> DOD know in spades....... their superiors lie like a coon dog basking
>>>>>>> on the porch..... it just comes all too natural for them.

>>>>>>> I can remember preparing briefs for Admirals and not recognizing the
>>>>>>> comments when they were delivered.  Absolutely nothing resembling the
>>>>>>> truth or facts of the matter........ but they are the ones that are
>>>>>>> masters at telling people what they want to hear.  That is how they
>>>>>>> get into those positions.

>>>>>> Except in this case, they were not telling people what they want to
>>>>>> hear - they were telling people what they wanted them to hear.
>>>>> -------------------------

>>>>> bill, I think it happens all the time.  I seem to remember Colin
>>>>> Powell delivering a speech to the UN (was it the UN?)  In any event he
>>>>> had been fed "talking points" also.

>>>> But you seem to misremember that most leading Democrats and most of
>>>> the leaders of the Western World also believed what he said. And they
>>>> believed it well before he said it.

>>>>> As I recall he was one pissed off
>>>>> puppy when he found that he had actually been lying with the talking
>>>>> points he had been provided.

>>>> -------------------------------------------------
>>>> During an interview with The Daily Show host Jon Stewart, former
>>>> Secretary of State Colin Powell said he regretted telling the United
>>>> Nations that Iraq was harboring weapons of mass destruction.

>>>> "I, of course, regret the U.N. speech that I gave," he said, "which
>>>> became the prominent presentation of our case. But we thought it was
>>>> correct at the time. The President thought it was correct. Congress
>>>> thought it was correct."
>>>> ------------------------------------------------

>>>> So who was "lying"?

>>>>> Of course that was under a different administrations so we should
>>>>> probably forget that one.

>>>> No, we should probably remember the facts rather than what you "seem
>>>> to remember".

>>> bill, here is a quote from his interview with Barbara Walters:

>>> "Asked further how he felt upon learning that he had been misled about
>>> the accuracy of intelligence on which he relied, Mr. Powell said,
>>> "Terrible." He added that it was "devastating" to learn later that
>>> some intelligence agents knew the information he had was unreliable
>>> but did not speak up."

>> So who was "lying"? Who "misled" him?

>> Why did the intelligence agencies of other nations think the same thing?

>Um...Foreign Aid??

If you remember back to that time Saddam was working hard to maintain
the image that he had weapons of mass destruction.  I would bet he was
caught in a bind where if he said there were none he would have been
in trouble as fast or faster with his neighbors.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.