Re: Queer Democrat traitor Bradley Manning should hang by the neck until dead.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <q7lih79478ou5kteu...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2012 06:29:31 -0000, "Lying" <Lyyyii...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >The truth is, Bradley Manning violated his personal and
> >professional oaths ...
>
> That's false, liar.
>
> A soldier sworn to defend the US Constitution
> has no option of

deciding when and where his oath applies.

The oath is unconditional.

> http://www.executebradleymanning.org
> http://blog.uksaysfuckbradleymanning.org/about/
> http://www.commoncriminals.org/view/2011/12/25
> http://cowardice.org/donate/bradley-manning.html
> http://www.globalfaggots.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28339
> http://consortingtraitors.com/2011/12/24/americas-debt-to-bradley-manning/
> http://www.alternut.org/news/153539/history_will_judge_bradley_manning_and_he_will_still_be_dead
> http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/145977/bradley-manning-and-julian-assange-both-should-be-killed/

Bradley Manning is guilty of consorting with the enemy and must
die.

--
Bradley Manning violated his oath of service, and federal law,
by giving state secrets to enemies of the United States, enemies
in time of war. Why did Bradley Manning do this? Bradley is a
homosexual. His already dubious character was further
established when he lied to gain enlistment into the United
States Army. Lying or concealing disqualifying information to
enter the armed forces is a violation of federal law and the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. Bradley Manning was weak,
mentally and emotionally unstable.

In any armed service but the Army he would have been processed
for discharge as unsuitable for military service not even
considering his homosexual deviance. The Army assigned this
mental misfit to safeguard classified material. Bradley Manning
put his dress on and found another queer to consort with.
Apparently the other queer found Bradley lacking in many areas
important to homosexuals and dumped him. Bradley decided to get
revenge by taking the secret material he was charged with
safeguarding and placing it where enemies of the United States
had access to it.

Uniform Code Of Military Justice, Article 104 — Aiding the
enemy. "Any person who —

(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition,
supplies, money, or other things; or

(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or
gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or
holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or
indirectly; shall suffer death or such other punishment as a
court-martial or military commission may direct."

Bradley Manning should be tried, sentenced and killed for his
crime.

[D. LaCourse]

Is that you, "One Trick?"

Hiding under yet another pseudonym, eh?

Davey

[Datesfat Chicks]

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:10:17 +0100, "Hanoi Jane Fonda"
<murdering-l...@cnn.com> wrote:
>
>Bradley Manning is guilty of consorting with the enemy and must
>die.

Lots of young folks (and even old folks) make profound mistakes. It
happens and it is part of being human.

Nothing about "consorting with the enemy" automatically implies that a
death sentence is necessary or appropriate. Lots of folks in recent
history have provided harmful information to foreign governments, and
a typical sentence is in the 10-20 year range.

I don't think he should get 30 days in the county jail, but having him
swinging from a rope is ... not really necessary or productive.
Naturally, it should be a felony conviction and naturally he should
never get a security clearance again. But it isn't necessary that he
be swinging ...

DFC

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

Besides which - he's the HERO who single-handedly got Iraq's
leaders angry enough to kick ALL of the U.S. troops OUT of their
sovereign nation -- thus SAVING the lives of countless innocent
Iraqis and out troops.

He should be given an Honorable Discharge... and then the Medal
of Freedom!

[Bill Taylor]

In article <98cth7d9ddgfbu1m8...@4ax.com>
"(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

<http:oi8l;us4tp0u9sh09eyupeiourg>" <b...@b.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:07:31 -0500,
> Datesfat Chicks <datesfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:10:17 +0100, "Hanoi Jane Fonda"
> ><murdering-l...@cnn.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Bradley Manning is guilty of consorting with the enemy and must
> >>die.
> >
> >Lots of young folks (and even old folks) make profound mistakes. It
> >happens and it is part of being human.
> >
> >Nothing about "consorting with the enemy" automatically implies that a
> >death sentence is necessary or appropriate. Lots of folks in recent
> >history have provided harmful information to foreign governments, and
> >a typical sentence is in the 10-20 year range.
> >
> >I don't think he should get 30 days in the county jail, but having him
> >swinging from a rope is ... not really necessary or productive.
> >Naturally, it should be a felony conviction and naturally he should
> >never get a security clearance again. But it isn't necessary that he
> >be swinging ...
>

> Besides which - he's the ZERO who single-handedly got a bunch of
> troops killed in Iraq.
>
> He should be given a Dishonorable Discharge... and then the Medal
> of Benedict Arnold!

Fixed your post for you.

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

On 24 Jan 2012 17:28:04 -0000,

Bill Taylor <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:


>> He should be given a Dishonorable Discharge... and then the Medal

>> of Freedom.

> Fixed your post for you.

No you didn't, lying lowlife. But I repaired that LIE, so that
it again is TRUTHFUL.

[*us*]

A soldier sworn to defend the US Constitution

has no option of complicity in crimes against
the United States. The neocons are traitors.

http://www.bradleymanning.org
http://syd4bradley.posterous.com/
http://blog.ukfriendsofbradleymanning.org/about/
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/25
http://couragetoresist.org/donate/bradley-manning.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28339
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-hails-bradley-manning-as-true-patriot/
http://consortiumnews.com/2011/12/24/americas-debt-to-bradley-manning/
http://www.thefastertimes.com/politics/2011/12/28/in-defense-of-bradley-manning/
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/22/133877/seriousness-of-wikileaks-suspect.html
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/24/the_intellectual_cowardice_of_bradley_mannings_critics/
http://www.alternet.org/news/153539/history_will_judge_bradley_manning_and_laud_him_for_telling_the_truth
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/145977/bradley-manning-and-julian-assange-both-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize/

[*us*]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:07:31 -0500, Datesfat Chicks <datesfa...@gmail.com> wrote:

He exposed crimes including robberies of US Taxpayers.

He's a whistleblower who should get a medal.

[*us*]

On 24 Jan 2012 17:28:04 -0000, Bill Taylor <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:

>... Benedict Arnold!

You'd hide crimes against the USA
out of admiration for traitors,
wouldn't you.

[*us*]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:26:43 -0600, "(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@b.com> wrote:

> Besides which - he's the HERO who single-handedly got Iraq's
>leaders angry enough to kick ALL of the U.S. troops OUT of their
>sovereign nation -- thus SAVING the lives of countless innocent

>Iraqis and our troops.

>
> He should be given an Honorable Discharge... and then the Medal
>of Freedom!

Even the Nobel Prize ...

Subject line corrected.

[*us*]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:40:49 -0600, "(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@b.com> wrote:

>... But I repaired that LIE...

No, not quite.

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:27:23 -0500,
* US * wrote:
> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

> <http://www.TravelForPay.org> wrote:


>> ... But I repaired that LIE...

> No, not quite.

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <m31di7lui6f6l9j2a...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:40:49 -0600, "(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> <http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@b.com> wrote:
>

> >... But I repeated that LIE...
>
> No, not quite.

You're both losers.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <f01di7hp1rqti6f24...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:26:43 -0600, "(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> <http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@b.com> wrote:
>

> > Besides which - he's the ZERO
> >
> > He should be given a Dishonorable Discharge... and then the Medal
> >of Fagdom!
>
> Even the Nobelt Prize ...
>
> Subject line corrected.

So it was.

You've already lost this one. Manning is a walking dead traitor.

[Giles]

moron

g.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <121di7lif5bf5ngng...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On 24 Jan 2012 17:28:04 -0000, Bill Taylor <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:
>
> >... Benedict Arnold!
>

> I'd hide crimes against the USA

> out of admiration for traitors,

> wouldn't you?

Will the prisoner please rise?

Private Manning, you have been charged with passing secrets to
the enemy in time of war. A jury of your peers has found you
guilty as charged.

It is now time to pronounce sentence. Have you anything to say?

"BUT! BUT! BUT!"

Yes, Private Manning. It was your queer butt that got you into
all this trouble. Homosexuals are not, and have never been,
suitable for military service or classified material handling.
You knowingly lied your way into the Army and violated the trust
of your fellow soldiers and the citizens of the United States of
America. You are a disgrace to all mankind. You are a traitor.
I sentence you to death by hanging, firing squad, lethal
injection or beating by your former soldiers. Which would you
prefer?

"BUT! BUT! BUT!"

"Butt" is no longer an option for you, Private Manning. You are
hereby sentenced to death by all four options, to be carried out
upon completion of review by convening and supervisory
authorities.

"BUT! BUT! BUT!"

Return the prisoner to his cell. See to it that he is advised
of his right to appeal. Court is adjourned.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <qpcdi7tjg77q4h0vj...@4ax.com>

"(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>"

<b...@c.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:27:23 -0500,
> * US * wrote:
> > (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> > <http://www.TravelForPay.org> wrote:
>
>

> >> ... But I repeated that LIE...

>
> > No, not quite.
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Guilty. Homosexual Bradley Manning is guilty of aiding the
enemy.

Happy now?

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Don't Allow the HERO, Bradley Manning, to be RAILROADED!!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:47:38 -0800 (PST),
"Stan de SD" <stan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

> <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:

>> "Stan de SD" <stand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>  (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

>>>  <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>>>>  RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:


[ ... ]

>>>>>    In WW2, he'd...

>>>>       BZZZzzztttt!!!

>>>>       In 2011, he's a national HERO!!!

>>>      Only in the minds of...

>>       ...INTELLIGENT people.
>>
>>                                             = = = =
>>
>>              HEROIC Army Pfc. Bradley Manning May INDEED
>>            Have Helped to Change the World for the BETTER!

> People who were willing to provide info to us to...

...be A-HOLES who wage UNdeclared and GENOCIDAL "wars"
that kill more than 100,000 INNOCENT people...

> ...have been compromised, and will probably be killed, by Pfc.
> Manning's actions.

TUFF!! Collateral damage that could have been avoided by our
NOT having butted into other *sovereign* lands ILLEGALLY. That's
the breaks. *Our* STUPIDIT caused that collateral damage, if it
occurs.

So as TO those "compromised" schmucks, figure that if they buy
it, it was their OWN unique way of contributing to the overall quality
of posterity by earning Darwin Awards.

See: http://www.darwinawards.com/

>>       It MAY have been braggadocio -- or it MAY be Manning's
>> *accurate* perception that he has made a very REAL contri-
>> bution to putting well-DERERVED **omelet** on the USA's
>> Presidents and Congress for its waging of GENOCIDAL, MUR-
>> DEROUS, UNCONSCIONABLE and ILLEGAL (i.e., UNdeclared!!)
>> "wars" that it very much *deserved* to LOSE.
>>
>>      We were just OUSTED by Iraq, and that *should* have
>> happened 10 years SOONER!

> We weren't "ousted" by Iraq.

We were TOTALLY, IGNOMINIOUSLY, and VERIFIABLY **kicked
OUT* of Iraq, BY the Iraqi government! --

Even the "conservatives" are admitting it!! (And *they* USUALLY
are the *dimmest* birthday-cake candles in the Beacon Shop!!)

http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/10/u-s-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://
conservativedailynews.com/2011/10/
u-s-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-20124360/michele-bachmann-u.s-got-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://
www.
cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-20124360/
michele-bachmann-u.s-got-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/23/1029293/-Getting-kicked-out-of-Iraq-credit-where-it-is-really-due

http://
www.
dailykos.com/story/2011/10/23/1029293/
-Getting-kicked-out-of-Iraq-credit-where-it-is-really-due

And NOTE *this* comment from the last source of the three listed
above:

"It became clear, however, that one of the primary reasons
why the Iraqis didn't want us around anymore was because of
what was leaked."

"The negotiations were strained following WikiLeaks' release of
a diplomatic cable that alleged Iraqi civilians, including children,
were killed in a 2006 raid by American troops rather than in an
airstrike as the U.S. military initially reported."

"You may remember this incident outlined by WikiLeaks. From
Glenn Greenwald* --

"That description from CNN of the cable's contents is,
unsurprisingly, diluted to the point of obfuscation. That
cable was released by WikiLeaks in May, 2011, and, as
McClatchy put it at the time, 'provides evidence that U.S.
troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman
in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an air-
strike to destroy the evidence, during a controversial 2006
incident in the central Iraqi town of Ishaqi.' The U.S. then
lied and claimed the civilians were killed by the airstrike."

"As Glennzilla points out, whoever leaked this to WikiLeaks is,
in large part, responsible for finally getting out asses out of this
mess that cost us some $3 freakin' trillion dollars. And yet, this
Administration is prosecuting whistleblowers like Bradley Manning
who helped with these noble causes of getting the truth out and,
consequently, finally getting us out of a war.

"So before we continue to pat this Administration on the back
for their terrific foreign policy, perhaps we should consider the
noble causes of others who've directly contributed and altered
our foreign policy for the better (and getting tortured and pro-
secuted for it by this Administration)."

*
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/23/wikileaks_cables_and_the_iraq_war/singleton/

http://
www.
salon.com/2011/10/23/
wikileaks_cables_and_the_iraq_war/singleton/

SO -- as I pointed out before, Bradley Manning is a HERO!!

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

-- Craig Chilton (E-Mail me if you wish, from top 5 websites below.)
Tens of thousands of posts to Usenet since 1994 -- *ALL* made
under my REAL, FULL, and easily-VERIFIABLE name. Because
as a fair-minded egalitarian, I have NOTHING to be ashamed-of!

[[ Readers: If you respond to my post, and you wish for me to
SEE your response, you'll need to make sure that you include
alt.politics.homosexuality in the cross-postings, and that the
total number of groups in the cross-postings is five or fewer.
That's because the vilest and most irrational of the Anti-Human
& Civil Rights bigots are those seeking to deny EQUAL rights to
gays. So in defending those rights, as one of their straight
egalitarian allies, I monitor and post almost exclusively from
that group. ]]

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

••• Winston Churchill said it PERFECTLY! •••

"When you find a job you love, you'll never work again!"

THIS is just such a job... and it's AVAILABLE right now,
throughout the USA & Canada... and in Europe and Aus-
tralia:
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>

One of the world's...

-- BEST-loved
-- LEAST-known
-- MOST- easily-accessible... jobs.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Other highly-informative Resources:

http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the hateful RRR Cult!
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Cult Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/ -- Abortion-Provider Database!
http://www.bradleymanning.org -- Accord FAIRNESS to a HERO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnziHJV0n44 -- More on that.
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481 -- Excellent article!
http://themindlesspraetorianblog.blogspot.com/ -- Excellent blog!
http://tinyurl.com/6v3m4uo -- Excellent Video! (Or if link doesn't
work, reassemble these components in your browser):

http://
front.moveon.org/two-lesbians-raised-a-baby-and-
this-is-what-they-got/?id=33426-1654150-W3_xbnx

And -- Read this, and then take future action accordingly:

Regarding: http://base8.lavenderliberal.com/index.html

It currently is down, but when active, it provides a very USEFUL
Searchable Database of the Proposition Hate (8) ENEMIES of Human
Rights! KNOW the enemies... and then HARASS and BOYCOTT the
enemies, as much as it is legally possible to do so! Watch my SIGs
for updates on this.

Last, but far from least, here are some
sites for PATRIOTIC Americans to visit! --

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Don't Allow the HERO, Bradley Manning, to be RAILROADED!!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:47:38 -0800 (PST),

"Stan de SD" <stan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

> <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:

>> "Stan de SD" <stand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>  (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <dqk2i7lfje435gbr6...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:07:31 -0500, Datesfat Chicks <datesfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:10:17 +0100, "Hanoi Jane Fonda"
> ><murdering-l...@cnn.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Bradley Manning is guilty of consorting with the enemy and must
> >>die.
> >
> >Lots of young folks (and even old folks) make profound mistakes. It
> >happens and it is part of being human.
>

> He exposed his asshole and took cocks in it.
>
> He's a whistleblower who should get an axe through his neck.

Let the families of the men whose lives he placed in jeopardy
decide what to do with him.

10-1 they say kill the little traitorous queer.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <snk2i753mpvldaljp...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> A soldier sworn to defend the US Constitution
> has no option of

deciding when he will uphold his oath. The oath is

unconditional.

> http://www.executebradleymanning.org
> http://blog.uksaysfuckbradleymanning.org/about/
> http://www.commoncriminals.org/view/2011/12/25
> http://cowardice.org/donate/bradley-manning.html
> http://www.globalfaggots.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28339
> http://consortingtraitors.com/2011/12/24/americas-debt-to-bradley-manning/
> http://www.alternut.org/news/153539/history_will_judge_bradley_manning_and_he_will_still_be_dead
> http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/145977/bradley-manning-and-julian-assange-both-should-be-killed/

Liberals believe laws don't apply to them and that their oath
once given can be revoked for any frivolous reason they choose.
How wrong they are.

[*us*]

Still entirely undisputed:

[*us*]

Entirely undisputed:

[*us*]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:43:29 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:

>... the
>enemy.

Your satanist neocon idols are the worst enemies of the USA.

You're merely their ineffectual pawn, useful as an example of failure.

[*us*]

Repair the lie in the subject field.

Yes, you can change the subject line,
to remove the lie(s), and still have it
remain with the thread.

Click on Options in the menu system.
Click on General Preferences.
Click on Message List.
Click on Start a New thread ... to deselect.

It's okay to start a new thread anyway, and
certainly better than adding to the count of
posts with lies in the subject lines.

[*us*]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:03:34 -0800, Alan Moore <alan.s...@comcast.net> wrote:

>On 1/30/2012 6:43 PM, bushkultie wrote:
>> Guilty... guilty of aiding the
>> enemy.
>>
>Which enemy is that?
>
>> Happy now?
>
>I'd be a lot happier if we were taking some of our war criminals to task
>for their crimes.
>
>Al Moore
>DoD 734

You're in good company, indeed.

[*us*]

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:49:46 +0100, "Loser Posterboi" <murdering-s...@neo.con>
wrote:

>... losers.

You're the posterboi.

You certainly can't dispute any of this:

[*us*]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:10:53 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:

> I'd hide crimes against the USA

> out of admiration for traitors...
>the enemy ...

You do have problems, obvious to everyone except you.

[*us*]

The bushkultie wants killings because he can't think.

[*us*]

[*us*]

Subject line corrected.

[*us*]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:37:41 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:

>... the men whose lives he placed in jeopardy

Bush and Cheney betrayed thousands of US military personnel
to their sicknesses, injuries, and deaths, to cash in on it.

Manning exposed crimes including robberies of US Taxpayers.

He's a whistleblower who should get a medal.

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:47:15 -0500,

* US * wrote:
> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> <http://www.TravelForPay.org>wrote:
>> * US * wrote:
>>> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
>>> <http://www.TravelForPay.org> wrote:


>>>> ... But I repaired that LIE...

>>> No, not quite.

>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

> Repair the lie in the subject field.
>
> Yes, you can change the subject line,
> to remove the lie(s), and still have it
> remain with the thread.
>
> Click on Options in the menu system.
> Click on General Preferences.
> Click on Message List.
> Click on Start a New thread ... to deselect.

(1) Only the first two, above, are in my "Agent" program.

(2) Even if what you described WERE possible, it would
have no effect whatsoever on the subject header of
the FIRST post in a given thread... and THAT is the
verbiage that everyone sees. Beneath that are seen
only the posters' names, and dates, of posts made
subsequent to that.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <h4nfi713kk5qajaf9...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:43:29 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:
>
> >... the
> >enemy.
>

> My satanist liberal idols are the worst enemies of the USA.
>
> I'm merely their ineffectual pawn, useful as an example of failure.

Liberal is synonymous with loser. Nothing new there.

> Bradley Manning Charge Sheet
> http://www.microworkz.com/files/charge-sheet-pvt-bradley-manning-1.pdf
> Treason's Poster Boy
> http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/treason-s-poster-boy
> Execute PFC Bradley Manning for Treason
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=148566115160640&v=wall
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor
> http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-23/news/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123_1_bradley-manning-private-manning-traitor
> Fag traitor Bradley Manning's gender identity comes up in testimony
> http://www.freak-search.com/en/thread/6238053/fag_traitor_bradley_mannings_gender_identity_comes_up_in_testimony
> Bradley Manning is a pathetic traitor
> http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2011/12/bradley-manning-is-pathetic-traitor.html
> Bradley Manning committed treason
> http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/22/bradley-manning-committed-treason/
> Bradley Manning: Angry Gay Traitor
> http://www.melaniemorgan.com/latest/2098-bradley-manning-angry-gay-traitor.html
> PFC Bradley Manning Is A Traitor
> http://www.microworkz.com/richard_keith_latman_the_/2010/12/pfc-bradley-manning-is-a-traitor.html
> Bradley Manning has “gender issues”
> http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/18/bradley-manning-has-gender-issues/
> Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
> http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.27.11.html
> American Traitor: Bradley Manning
> http://republicanloudmouth.com/2012/01/15/traitor/
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor
> http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123,0,419782.story
> Bradley Manning’s WikiLeaks Case: The Larger Issue
> http://patriotupdate.com/16214/bradley-mannings-wikileaks-case-the-larger-issue
> The Feds Have the Goods on Manning – And Assange Too
> http://www.belch.com/blog/tag/bradley-manning/
> Bradley Manning, whack job, unstable.
> http://www.militarycorruption.com/manning3.htm

The worst traitor in American history, homosexual Bradley
Manning.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <s0nfi7tk4u6rnf2am...@4ax.com>
* US * wrote:
>
> Entirely undisputed:

No disagreement there.

There is no excuse for what Bradley Manning did.

[Giles]

On Jan 31, 3:59 am, "Hanoi Jane Fonda" <murdering-liberal-
s...@cnn.com> wrote:
> In article <snk2i753mpvldaljp8mq16umdgc7ohm...@4ax.com>

>
> * US * wrote:
>
> > A soldier sworn to defend the US Constitution
> > has no option of
>
> deciding when he will uphold his oath.  The oath is
> unconditional.
>
> >http://www.executebradleymanning.org
> >http://blog.uksaysfuckbradleymanning.org/about/
> >http://www.commoncriminals.org/view/2011/12/25
> >http://cowardice.org/donate/bradley-manning.html
> >http://www.globalfaggots.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28339

> >http://consortingtraitors.com/2011/12/24/americas-debt-to-bradley-man...
> >http://www.alternut.org/news/153539/history_will_judge_bradley_mannin...
> >http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/145977/bradley-manning-and-julian-ass...

You boys ever wonder what it's like to dwell among the living?

There are worse thing.

g.
trust me on this one

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <jinfi751p330qrmjj...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:48:55 -0600, "(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> <http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@c.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >

> > Don't Allow the ZERO, Bradley Manning, to escape DEATH!!

> >
> > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> >
> >On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:47:38 -0800 (PST),
> >"Stan de SD" <stan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> >> <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >>> "Stan de SD" <stand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>  (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> >>>>  <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >>>>>  RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >[ ... ]
> >
> >>>>>>    In WW2, he'd...
> >
> >>>>>       BZZZzzztttt!!!
> >

> >>>>>       In 2011, he's a national QUEER!!!

> >
> >>>>      Only in the minds of...
> >
> >>>       ...INTELLIGENT people.
> >>>
> >>>                                             = = = =
> >>>

> >>>              FAGGOT Army Pfc. Bradley Manning May INDEED
> >>>            Have Helped to kill AMERICANS!

> >
> >> People who were willing to provide info to us to...
> >
> > ...be A-HOLES who wage UNdeclared and GENOCIDAL "wars"
> >that kill more than 100,000 INNOCENT people...
> >
> >> ...have been compromised, and will probably be killed, by Pfc.
> >> Manning's actions.
> >
> > TUFF!! Collateral damage that could have been avoided by our
> >NOT having butted into other *sovereign* lands ILLEGALLY. That's
> >the breaks. *Our* STUPIDIT caused that collateral damage, if it
> >occurs.
> >

> >>>      We were just OUSTED by Iraq, and that *should* have
> >>> happened 10 years SOONER!
> >
> >> We weren't "ousted" by Iraq.
> >
>

> Subject line corrected.

Excellent!

Volunteers need for executioner. Everyone gets one whack with a
baseball bat. First one to hit the head completely off gets a
free all expense paid trip to downtown Seattle.

[Giles]

On Jan 31, 7:25 pm, "Hanoi Jane Fonda" <murdering-liberal-
s...@cnn.com> wrote:
> In article <s0nfi7tk4u6rnf2amikkka43jj3adcr...@4ax.com>

>
> * US * wrote:
>
> > Entirely undisputed:
>
> No disagreement there.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Bradley Manning Charge Sheet
> >http://www.microworkz.com/files/charge-sheet-pvt-bradley-manning-1.pdf
> > Treason's Poster Boy
> >http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/treason-s-poster-boy
> > Execute PFC Bradley Manning for Treason
> >http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=148566115160640&v=wall
> > Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> >http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-23/news/bs-ed-manning-letter...

> > Fag traitor Bradley Manning's gender identity comes up in testimony

> >http://www.freak-search.com/en/thread/6238053/fag_traitor_bradley_man...

> > Bradley Manning is a pathetic traitor

> >http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2011/12/bradley-manning-...
> > Bradley Manning committed treason
> >http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/22/bradley-manning-committed-t...

> > Bradley Manning: Angry Gay Traitor

> >http://www.melaniemorgan.com/latest/2098-bradley-manning-angry-gay-tr...

> > PFC Bradley Manning Is A Traitor

> >http://www.microworkz.com/richard_keith_latman_the_/2010/12/pfc-bradl...

> > Bradley Manning has “gender issues”
> >http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/18/bradley-manning-has-gender-issues/
> > Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
> >http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.27.11.html
> > American Traitor: Bradley Manning
> >http://republicanloudmouth.com/2012/01/15/traitor/
> > Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> >http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-manning-letter-201...

> > Bradley Manning’s WikiLeaks Case: The Larger Issue

> >http://patriotupdate.com/16214/bradley-mannings-wikileaks-case-the-la...

Hm.....

And just what reward should a grateful nation and people bestow for
the above included scintillating analysis?

g.
who remembers a time when abject idiots were grateful for a nod of
recognition from the neighborhood dogs.

[Giles]

On Jan 31, 6:47 am, * US * wrote:
> Still entirely undisputed:

Hm.....

O.k......moron.

g.
yes, it takes time.......but tha'ts what time is
for.....ainna? :)

[Giles]

On Jan 31, 6:47 am, * US * wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:43:29 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-satanist-s...@neo.con> wrote:
> >... the
> >enemy.
>
> Your satanist neocon idols are the worst enemies of the USA.

Well, leave us not forget about the unholy so-called "New England
Patriots".....and literacy.

> You're merely their ineffectual pawn, useful as an example of failure.

Failure is grossly underrated. After all, most of us have spent a
lifetime fawning on its doorstep and then licking spittle on the way
in.

g.
who, if he has failed in delivering a bit of live-birthed meaning, can
only grin in fatuous self-satisfaction. :)

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <8jnfi7d8o4dk2n0nl...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> The bushkultie wants killings because

Bradley Manning deserves to.

> Bradley Manning Charge Sheet
> http://www.microworkz.com/files/charge-sheet-pvt-bradley-manning-1.pdf
> Treason's Poster Boy
> http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/treason-s-poster-boy
> Execute PFC Bradley Manning for Treason
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=148566115160640&v=wall
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-23/news/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123_1_bradley-manning-private-manning-traitor

> Fag traitor Bradley Manning's gender identity comes up in testimony

> http://www.freak-search.com/en/thread/6238053/fag_traitor_bradley_mannings_gender_identity_comes_up_in_testimony

> Bradley Manning is a pathetic traitor

> http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2011/12/bradley-manning-is-pathetic-traitor.html
> Bradley Manning committed treason
> http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/22/bradley-manning-committed-treason/

> Bradley Manning: Angry Gay Traitor

> http://www.melaniemorgan.com/latest/2098-bradley-manning-angry-gay-traitor.html

> PFC Bradley Manning Is A Traitor

> http://www.microworkz.com/richard_keith_latman_the_/2010/12/pfc-bradley-manning-is-a-traitor.html

> Bradley Manning has “gender issues”
> http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/18/bradley-manning-has-gender-issues/
> Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
> http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.27.11.html
> American Traitor: Bradley Manning
> http://republicanloudmouth.com/2012/01/15/traitor/
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123,0,419782.story

> Bradley Manning’s WikiLeaks Case: The Larger Issue

> http://patriotupdate.com/16214/bradley-mannings-wikileaks-case-the-larger-issue

> The Feds Have the Goods on Manning – And Assange Too
> http://www.belch.com/blog/tag/bradley-manning/
> Bradley Manning, whack job, unstable.
> http://www.militarycorruption.com/manning3.htm

Is everyone else amused by the idiots who leaped to Bradley
Manning's defense?

Manning sold them down the river, marked them for death. Yet,
the insane liberal lobby makes noises about his "heroics" while
stealing the very money they collect for his "defense" fund.
America! What a great country!

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <6knfi759c4e6712cf...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:37:41 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:
>
> >... the men whose lives he placed in jeopardy

Traitor Bradley Manning did that.

> Bush and Cheney

have nothing to do with a faggot selling out his own country
after his boy friend dumped him.

> Manning exposed his anus and took a lot of cocks in it.
>
> He's a meat whistle blower who should get a lot more.

It's pretty said when a "man" makes the same excuses a 6-year-
old would after selling out his country.

Bradley Manning will die, sooner than later.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <uf3gi7hkec85hirvm...@4ax.com>

"(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>"

Two clowns from the same pod. Bradley Manning, meet your
saviors.

> > It's okay to start a new thread anyway, and
> > certainly better than adding to the count of
> > posts with lies in the subject lines.
> >

The entire world knows Bradley Manning is a traitor who opted to
throw away the lives of every American citizen.

Why? Because his boyfriend pulled his dick out of his ass and
left.

[Giles]

On Jan 30, 4:49 pm, "Hanoi Jane Fonda" <murdering-liberal-
s...@cnn.com> wrote:
> In article <m31di7lui6f6l9j2a46chaai76h363e...@4ax.com>
>
> * US * wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:40:49 -0600, "(¯`·.¸  Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> > <http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@b.com> wrote:
>
> > >...  But I repeated that LIE...
>
> > No, not quite.
>
> You're both losers.

Actually, in point of fact, you're all morons.

Don't let that go to your heads though.....we think you're funny
anyway.

g.
and.....yes.....it's FREE! :)

[Giles]

On Jan 31, 10:29 pm, "Hanoi Jane Fonda" <murdering-liberal-
s...@cnn.com> wrote:
> In article <uf3gi7hkec85hirvmrtcadrf5ckecas...@4ax.com>

> > >http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-23/news/bs-ed-manning-letter...

> > > Fag traitor Bradley Manning's gender identity comes up in testimony

> > >http://www.freak-search.com/en/thread/6238053/fag_traitor_bradley_man...

> > > Bradley Manning is a pathetic traitor

> > >http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2011/12/bradley-manning-...
> > > Bradley Manning committed treason
> > >http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/22/bradley-manning-committed-t...

> > > Bradley Manning: Angry Gay Traitor

> > >http://www.melaniemorgan.com/latest/2098-bradley-manning-angry-gay-tr...

> > > PFC Bradley Manning Is A Traitor

> > >http://www.microworkz.com/richard_keith_latman_the_/2010/12/pfc-bradl...

> > > Bradley Manning has “gender issues”
> > >http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/18/bradley-manning-has-gender-issues/
> > > Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
> > >http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.27.11.html
> > > American Traitor: Bradley Manning
> > >http://republicanloudmouth.com/2012/01/15/traitor/
> > > Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> > >http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-manning-letter-201...

> > > Bradley Manning’s WikiLeaks Case: The Larger Issue

> > >http://patriotupdate.com/16214/bradley-mannings-wikileaks-case-the-la...

So.....um.....your point is that boring an entire species is to be
regarded as a mark of distinction......right?

Well.....dang.....ain't you distinct!

g.
who, truth be told, doesn't give a rat's ass where they come
from.....so long as they keep on keepin' on. :)

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <48nfi7hai2km6mu4s...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:00:21 -0600, "(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> <http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@c.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> >

> > Don't Allow the HERO, Bradley Manning, to LIVE!!

> >
> > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
> >
> >On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:47:38 -0800 (PST),
> >"Stan de SD" <stan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> >> <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >>> "Stan de SD" <stand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>  (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)
> >>>>  <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >>>>>  RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >[ ... ]
> >
> >>>>>>    In WW2, he'd...
> >
> >>>>>       BZZZzzztttt!!!
> >

> >>>>>       In 2011, he's a national ZERO!!!

> >
> >>>>      Only in the minds of...
> >
> >>>       ...INTELLIGENT people.
> >>>
> >>>                                             = = = =
> >>>

> >>>              FAGGOT Army Pfc. Bradley Manning

That's about all we need to know right there. A faggot sold his
very own homeland down the river.

> Bradley Manning Charge Sheet
> http://www.microworkz.com/files/charge-sheet-pvt-bradley-manning-1.pdf
> Treason's Poster Boy
> http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/treason-s-poster-boy
> Execute PFC Bradley Manning for Treason
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=148566115160640&v=wall
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-23/news/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123_1_bradley-manning-private-manning-traitor

> Fag traitor Bradley Manning's gender identity comes up in testimony

> http://www.freak-search.com/en/thread/6238053/fag_traitor_bradley_mannings_gender_identity_comes_up_in_testimony

> Bradley Manning is a pathetic traitor

> http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2011/12/bradley-manning-is-pathetic-traitor.html
> Bradley Manning committed treason
> http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/22/bradley-manning-committed-treason/

> Bradley Manning: Angry Gay Traitor

> http://www.melaniemorgan.com/latest/2098-bradley-manning-angry-gay-traitor.html

> PFC Bradley Manning Is A Traitor

> http://www.microworkz.com/richard_keith_latman_the_/2010/12/pfc-bradley-manning-is-a-traitor.html

> Bradley Manning has “gender issues”
> http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/18/bradley-manning-has-gender-issues/
> Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
> http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.27.11.html
> American Traitor: Bradley Manning
> http://republicanloudmouth.com/2012/01/15/traitor/
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor

> http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123,0,419782.story

> Bradley Manning’s WikiLeaks Case: The Larger Issue

> http://patriotupdate.com/16214/bradley-mannings-wikileaks-case-the-larger-issue

> The Feds Have the Goods on Manning – And Assange Too
> http://www.belch.com/blog/tag/bradley-manning/
> Bradley Manning, whack job, unstable.
> http://www.militarycorruption.com/manning3.htm

Try him, kill him. It's the right thing to do.

[*us*]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:07:47 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>....moron.

You're going to vote for Neut, aren't you.

[*us*]

This is all still entirely undisputed:

[*us*]

Of course this is all still entirely undisputed:

[*us*]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:57:43 -0600, "(�`�.� Craig Chilton �.���)
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <b...@c.com> wrote:

>... Even if what you described WERE possible...

It's possible. Learn if you can.

[*us*]

It takes courage to expose crimes.

[*us*]

[*us*]

On 1 Feb 2012 01:20:05 -0000, "subservient loser bushkultie"
<murdering-sa...@neo.con> wrote:

> My satanist... idols are the worst enemies of the USA.
> I'm merely their ineffectual pawn, useful as an example of failure.. synonymous with loser. Nothing new ...

You needn't reiterate.

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:43:29 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:

>... the
>enemy.

Your satanist neocon idols are the worst enemies of the USA.

You're merely their ineffectual pawn, useful as an example of failure.

[*us*]

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... most of us have spent a
>lifetime fawning ...

Sucks to be you.

[*us*]

It's brave to refuse to hide crimes.

[*us*]

On 1 Feb 2012 02:03:08 -0000, "blathering bushkultie" <murdering-sa...@neo.con>
wrote:

>Volunteers need [sic] for executioner ...

You hate America too much to learn English, don't you.

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:38:35 +0100, "homosexual bushkultie"
<murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:

>... homosexual ... I do have problems... dishonest.

Don't advertise here.

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:05:16 +0100, "The Traitors
Bush and Cheney Unethically Profited From All Their
War Crimes and Masses of Dead Innocents Including
Those Of 9/11" <unethical-...@neo.con> wrote:

>... Ellsberg. Ellsberg ...

His heroism upsets the bushkultie because the
neocon pawn is a coward.

>... ignore all laws...

You seem particularly uncomfortable with the
findings of the Nuremberg Tribunals.

>... rant and rave ...words are just foul empty air.

You do have problems.

>... selling out his country in
>time of war.

Bush and Cheney betrayed the USA and are
still cashing in on it.

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:35:58 +0100, "Bush and Cheney Unethically Profited From Their War
Crimes and Masses of Dead Innocents Including Those Of 9/11"
<unethical-...@neo.con> wrote:

>... plug for homosexual pederasty in support of
>buttfucker ... homosexual traitor ... sold out ... his gay lover dumped...

Don't advertise here.

Ellsberg was a hero, too.

A soldier sworn to defend the US Constitution

has no option of complicity in crimes against
the United States.

http://www.bradleymanning.org
http://syd4bradley.posterous.com/
http://blog.ukfriendsofbradleymanning.org/about/
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/25
http://couragetoresist.org/donate/bradley-manning.html
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28339
http://www.infowars.com/ron-paul-hails-bradley-manning-as-true-patriot/
http://consortiumnews.com/2011/12/24/americas-debt-to-bradley-manning/
http://www.thefastertimes.com/politics/2011/12/28/in-defense-of-bradley-manning/
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/12/22/133877/seriousness-of-wikileaks-suspect.html
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/24/the_intellectual_cowardice_of_bradley_mannings_critics/
http://www.alternet.org/news/153539/history_will_judge_bradley_manning_and_laud_him_for_telling_the_truth
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/145977/bradley-manning-and-julian-assange-both-nominated-for-nobel-peace-prize/

All entirely undisputed, of course ...

[*us*]

Bush and Cheney are still cashing in on betraying the USA.

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:37:41 +0100, "bushkultie" <murdering-s...@neo.con> wrote:

>... the men whose lives he placed in jeopardy

[*us*]

On 1 Feb 2012 03:11:34 -0000, "noisy idiot" <murdering-bu...@neo.con> wrote:

>... amused ... idiots ... insane ... makes noises...

It's not about you, though.

The bushkultie wants killings because he's irrational with hysteria.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <15b574aa-3e0f-44e2-8790-
61d69d...@s7g2000vby.googlegroups.com>

Bradley Manning would certainly fail in that regard.

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <7c7f8c75-8ed5-4dae-b9a8-
3f3cd2...@j14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>

Indeed, but he's been a moron since he began polluting Usenet.

[(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>]

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Don't Allow the HERO, Bradley Manning, to be RAILROADED!!

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 05:47:38 -0800 (PST),
"Stan de SD" <stan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

> <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>> "Stan de SD" <stand...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>  (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)

>>>  <http://www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>>>>  RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:


[ ... ]

>>>>>    In WW2, he'd...

>>>>       BZZZzzztttt!!!

>>>>       In 2011, he's a national HERO!!!

>>>      Only in the minds of...

>>       ...INTELLIGENT people.
>>
>>                                             = = = =
>>

>>              HEROIC Army Pfc. Bradley Manning May INDEED
>>            Have Helped to Change the World for the BETTER!

> People who were willing to provide info to us to...

...be A-HOLES who wage UNdeclared and GENOCIDAL "wars"
that kill more than 100,000 INNOCENT people...

> ...have been compromised, and will probably be killed, by Pfc.
> Manning's actions.

TUFF!! Collateral damage that could have been avoided by our
NOT having butted into other *sovereign* lands ILLEGALLY. That's
the breaks. *Our* STUPIDIT caused that collateral damage, if it
occurs.

So as TO those "compromised" schmucks, figure that if they buy
it, it was their OWN unique way of contributing to the overall quality
of posterity by earning Darwin Awards.

See: http://www.darwinawards.com/

>>       It MAY have been braggadocio -- or it MAY be Manning's
>> *accurate* perception that he has made a very REAL contri-
>> bution to putting well-DERERVED **omelet** on the USA's
>> Presidents and Congress for its waging of GENOCIDAL, MUR-
>> DEROUS, UNCONSCIONABLE and ILLEGAL (i.e., UNdeclared!!)
>> "wars" that it very much *deserved* to LOSE.

>>
>>      We were just OUSTED by Iraq, and that *should* have
>> happened 10 years SOONER!

> We weren't "ousted" by Iraq.

We were TOTALLY, IGNOMINIOUSLY, and VERIFIABLY **kicked
OUT* of Iraq, BY the Iraqi government! --

Even the "conservatives" are admitting it!! (And *they* USUALLY
are the *dimmest* birthday-cake candles in the Beacon Shop!!)

http://conservativedailynews.com/2011/10/u-s-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://
conservativedailynews.com/2011/10/
u-s-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-20124360/michele-bachmann-u.s-got-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://
www.
cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-20124360/
michele-bachmann-u.s-got-kicked-out-of-iraq/

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/23/1029293/-Getting-kicked-out-of-Iraq-credit-where-it-is-really-due

http://
www.
dailykos.com/story/2011/10/23/1029293/
-Getting-kicked-out-of-Iraq-credit-where-it-is-really-due

And NOTE *this* comment from the last source of the three listed
above:

"It became clear, however, that one of the primary reasons
why the Iraqis didn't want us around anymore was because of
what was leaked."

"The negotiations were strained following WikiLeaks' release of
a diplomatic cable that alleged Iraqi civilians, including children,
were killed in a 2006 raid by American troops rather than in an
airstrike as the U.S. military initially reported."

"You may remember this incident outlined by WikiLeaks. From
Glenn Greenwald* --

"That description from CNN of the cable's contents is,
unsurprisingly, diluted to the point of obfuscation. That
cable was released by WikiLeaks in May, 2011, and, as
McClatchy put it at the time, 'provides evidence that U.S.
troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman
in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an air-
strike to destroy the evidence, during a controversial 2006
incident in the central Iraqi town of Ishaqi.' The U.S. then
lied and claimed the civilians were killed by the airstrike."

"As Glennzilla points out, whoever leaked this to WikiLeaks is,
in large part, responsible for finally getting out asses out of this
mess that cost us some $3 freakin' trillion dollars. And yet, this
Administration is prosecuting whistleblowers like Bradley Manning
who helped with these noble causes of getting the truth out and,
consequently, finally getting us out of a war.

"So before we continue to pat this Administration on the back
for their terrific foreign policy, perhaps we should consider the
noble causes of others who've directly contributed and altered
our foreign policy for the better (and getting tortured and pro-
secuted for it by this Administration)."

*
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/23/wikileaks_cables_and_the_iraq_war/singleton/

http://
www.
salon.com/2011/10/23/
wikileaks_cables_and_the_iraq_war/singleton/

SO -- as I pointed out before, Bradley Manning is a HERO!!

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

-- Craig Chilton (E-Mail me if you wish, from top 5 websites below.)
Tens of thousands of posts to Usenet since 1994 -- *ALL* made
under my REAL, FULL, and easily-VERIFIABLE name. Because
as a fair-minded egalitarian, I have NOTHING to be ashamed-of!

[[ Readers: If you respond to my post, and you wish for me to
SEE your response, you'll need to make sure that you include
alt.politics.homosexuality in the cross-postings, and that the
total number of groups in the cross-postings is five or fewer.
That's because the vilest and most irrational of the Anti-Human
& Civil Rights bigots are those seeking to deny EQUAL rights to
gays. So in defending those rights, as one of their straight
egalitarian allies, I monitor and post almost exclusively from
that group. ]]

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

••• Winston Churchill said it PERFECTLY! •••

"When you find a job you love, you'll never work again!"

THIS is just such a job... and it's AVAILABLE right now,
throughout the USA & Canada... and in Europe and Aus-
tralia:
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>

One of the world's...

-- BEST-loved
-- LEAST-known
-- MOST- easily-accessible... jobs.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Other highly-informative Resources:

http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the hateful RRR Cult!
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Cult Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/ -- Abortion-Provider Database!
http://www.bradleymanning.org -- Accord FAIRNESS to a HERO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnziHJV0n44 -- More on that.
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481 -- Excellent article!
http://themindlesspraetorianblog.blogspot.com/ -- Excellent blog!
http://tinyurl.com/6v3m4uo -- Excellent Video! (Or if link doesn't
work, reassemble these components in your browser):

http://
front.moveon.org/two-lesbians-raised-a-baby-and-
this-is-what-they-got/?id=33426-1654150-W3_xbnx

And -- Read this, and then take future action accordingly:

Regarding: http://base8.lavenderliberal.com/index.html

It currently is down, but when active, it provides a very USEFUL
Searchable Database of the Proposition Hate (8) ENEMIES of Human
Rights! KNOW the enemies... and then HARASS and BOYCOTT the
enemies, as much as it is legally possible to do so! Watch my SIGs
for updates on this.

Last, but far from least, here are some
sites for PATRIOTIC Americans to visit! --

[*us*]

On 1 Feb 2012 21:10:12 -0000, "bushkultie" <murdering-sa...@neo.con> wrote:

>... been a moron ...

You still are. You're not the subject, though.

Still entirely undisputed:

[*us*]

Don't propagate traitor teabagot propaganda.

[*us*]

On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:53:48 +0000 (UTC), bushkultie <fai...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

>... certainly fail ...

You can't help that.

Meanwhile:

[Giles]

On Feb 1, 6:57 am, * US * wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... most of us have spent a
> >lifetime fawning ...
>
> Sucks to be you.

Hm.....

When's the last time you were me?

g.

[*us*]

One needn't be. Perspective persists.

Why do you imagine you'd represent "most of" anyone?

[Giles]

On Feb 7, 1:28 pm, * US * wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:22:40 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 1, 6:57 am, * US * wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >... most of us have spent a
> >> >lifetime fawning ...
>
> >> Sucks to be you.
>
> >Hm.....
>
> >When's the last time you were me?
>
> One needn't be.

One appears not to have understood the question.

> Perspective persists.

Profound.

> Why do you imagine you'd represent "most of" anyone?

I don't.

Your turn.

g.

[*us*]

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:50:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... not to have understood the question.

Then let's rephrase it:

Whom do you believe you'd represent?

Obsequiousness isn't working in your favor.

On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:22:40 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Feb 1, 6:57 am, * US * wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >... most of us have spent a
>> >lifetime fawning ...
>>
>> Sucks to be you.
>
>Hm.....
>
>When's the last time you were me?

One needn't be. Perspective persists.

[Giles]

On Feb 9, 9:34 am, * US * wrote:

> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:50:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... not to have understood the question.
>
> Then let's rephrase it:

O.k., let's.

> Whom do you believe you'd represent?

About what and under what circumstances?

> Obsequiousness isn't working in your favor.

We shall endeavor to do better, mahstuh.

> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:22:40 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 1, 6:57 am, * US * wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >... most of us have spent a
> >> >lifetime fawning ...
>
> >> Sucks to be you.
>
> >Hm.....
>
> >When's the last time you were me?
>
> One needn't be.  Perspective persists.
>
> Why do you imagine you'd represent "most of" anyone?

This is starting to sound familiar.

g.

[*us*]

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:29:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>About what and under what circumstances?

Any.

>We shall endeavor to do better...

May you succeed.

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:50:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... not to have understood the question.

Then let's rephrase it:

Whom do you believe you'd represent?

Obsequiousness isn't working in your favor.

[Giles]

On Feb 15, 5:59 am, * US * wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:29:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >About what and under what circumstances?
>
> Any.
>
> >We shall endeavor to do better...
>
> May you succeed.
>

> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:50:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... not to have understood the question.
>
> Then let's rephrase it:
>
> Whom do you believe you'd represent?
>
> Obsequiousness isn't working in your favor.
>

> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:22:40 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 1, 6:57 am, * US * wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >... most of us have spent a
> >> >lifetime fawning ...
>
> >> Sucks to be you.
>
> >Hm.....
>
> >When's the last time you were me?
>
> One needn't be.  Perspective persists.
>
> Why do you imagine you'd represent "most of" anyone?

Or, let's look at it from another perspective. Why do you suppose it
is that you (and all of the fuckwits who followed you here.....or vice
versa) are as dull as you are tedious.....or vice versa?

g.
yeah, yeah, we've heard it before, hookin' 'em is easy......it's all
in how you play 'em. :)

[*us*]

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... fuckwits ... dull ... tedious...

Your fallacies aren't substitutes for valid arguments.

The valid argument is that certain people are obligated
to expose, not hide, crimes against themselves and others.

The fawning servile cultist isn't capable of whistleblowing.

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:29:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>About what and under what circumstances?

Any.

>We shall endeavor to do better...

May you succeed.

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:50:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... not to have understood the question.

Then let's rephrase it:

Whom do you believe you'd represent?

Obsequiousness isn't working in your favor.

[Giles]

On Feb 16, 7:00 am, * US * wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... fuckwits ... dull ... tedious...
>
> Your fallacies aren't substitutes for valid arguments.

And we're eager to present you with valid arguments about something or
other because.......?

g.
no, it ain't usda prime.....but what the hell, it's fresh.

[*us*]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>And we're

You and your fleas?

> eager to present you with valid arguments

Well, no, you aren't, since you don't.

>about something or
>other ...?

You're not expected to understand.

You may need more nutrients conducive to cognition.

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... fuckwits ... dull ... tedious...

Your fallacies aren't substitutes for valid arguments.

[Giles]

On Feb 16, 5:26 pm, * US * wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >And we're
>
> You and your fleas?

Fleas?

> > eager to present you with valid arguments
>
> Well, no, you aren't, since you don't.

Could it be? The dawning of comprehension?

> >about something or
> >other ...?
>
> You're not expected to understand.

So, you're doing this purely for its entertainment value. Not a bad
effort so far.

> You may need more nutrients conducive to cognition.

Hows about we cut to the chase. Why don't you just go ahead and tell
us what it is we are supposed to be cognifying?

g.

[*us*]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:55:18 -0800, Alan Moore <alan.s...@comcast.net> wrote:

>On 2/16/2012 6:00 PM, Giles wrote:
>> On Feb 16, 5:26 pm, * US * wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles<g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> And we're
>>> You and your fleas?
>> Fleas?
>

>You know. Fleas. As in "Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas."

Indeed.

>> ... just go ahead and tell

>> us what it is we are supposed to be cognifying?
>

>Maybe it's that bit of law that says that if you have knowledge of a
>crime and fail to reveal that knowledge, you become an accessory to the
>crime.
>
>Al Moore
>DoD 734

Absolutely.

[*us*]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>...comprehension?

It allows acknowledgement of courage.

>... doing this purely for its entertainment value...

You'll need more than your non sequiturs.

>Hows about we

Why should anyone care what you want?

>...Why don't you just go ahead and tell
>us ...

I already have: you've merely missed it.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>And we're

You and your fleas?

> eager to present you with valid arguments

Well, no, you aren't, since you don't.

>about something or
>other ...?

You're not expected to understand.

You may need more nutrients conducive to cognition.

[Giles]

On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:

Trenchant.

g.

[Giles]

On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >...comprehension?
>
> It allows acknowledgement of courage.

Well, maybe, but it also diptifies refulgent reproversity.

So?

> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
>
> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.

Got more. Got you.

> >Hows about we
>
> Why should anyone care what you want?

Should? Sorry, not my desk.

> >...Why don't you just go ahead and tell
> >us ...
>
> I already have: you've merely missed it.

And I can say with confidence verging on certitude that I can continue
to do so till you gag on your own stupidity, Shall we test that
theory?

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >And we're
>
> You and your fleas?

Fleas?

> > eager to present you with valid arguments
>
> Well, no, you aren't, since you don't.
>
> >about something or
> >other ...?
>
> You're not expected to understand.

Thus leaving the majority of us, benighted souls that we are, to
wonder what your objectives are here.

> You may need more nutrients conducive to cognition.

No shortage of beer here in Curdistan.

> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... fuckwits ... dull ... tedious...
>
> Your fallacies aren't substitutes for valid arguments.

Actually, I'm monopenile.

> The valid argument is that certain people are obligated
> to expose, not hide, crimes against themselves and others.

I've been right on the cusp of exposing my crimes against myself for
some decades now. The trouble is that I suspect I am more dangerous
than I look. Who knows what sort of bestial acts I might unloose upon
myself if I were to squeal on me. :(

> The fawning servile cultist isn't capable of whistleblowing.

But the ciel fawn dwelleth not thereupon. And that really ain't my
fault.

g.
and thus, back to the business at hand.....as it were.

[*us*]

>> Absolutely.
>
>Trenchant.

Undisputed.

[*us*]

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:38:35 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >...comprehension?
>>
>> It allows acknowledgement of courage.
>
>Well, maybe, but it also diptifies refulgent reproversity.
>
>So?

Make your car payments.

>> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
>> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.
>

>Got...Got ...

If all one has is disdain for courage, one has nothing.

>And I can say with ... stupidity...
>wonder what your objectives are ...

Irrelevant.

>No shortage of beer here...

That's an explanation.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>...comprehension?

It allows acknowledgement of courage.

>... doing this purely for its entertainment value...

You'll need more than your non sequiturs.

>Hows about we

Why should anyone care what you want?

>...Why don't you just go ahead and tell
>us ...

I already have: you've merely missed it.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>And we're

You and your fleas?

> eager to present you with valid arguments

Well, no, you aren't, since you don't.

>about something or
>other ...?

You're not expected to understand.

You may need more nutrients conducive to cognition.

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:14:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... fuckwits ... dull ... tedious...

Your fallacies aren't substitutes for valid arguments.

The valid argument is that certain people are obligated
to expose, not hide, crimes against themselves and others.

The fawning servile cultist isn't capable of whistleblowing.

[Giles]

On Feb 21, 8:26 am, * US * wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:38:35 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >...comprehension?
>
> >> It allows acknowledgement of courage.
>
> >Well, maybe, but it also diptifies refulgent reproversity.
>
> >So?
>
> Make your car payments.

I have car payments due?

> >> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
> >> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.
>
> >Got...Got ...
>
> If all one has is disdain for courage, one has nothing.

Well, on the face of it, one would have at least one thing. One thing
is not the same thing as nothing.

And courage is hardly worth the bother of disdain.

> >And I can say with ... stupidity...
> >wonder what your objectives are ...
>
> Irrelevant.

But then, if your objectives are irrelevant, why pursue them
here.....or anywhere else for that matter?

> >No shortage of beer here...
>
> That's an explanation.

No, an explanation begs a question of sorts. This was a mere
statement of fact.

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >...comprehension?
>
> It allows acknowledgement of courage.

We hope that courage is what you are displaying here. The alternative
view is that the threshhold of your appreciation for low comedy lies
somewhere below your comprehension of your own actions. :)

> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
>
> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.

Need......for what?

g.
am i the only one here who hopes that this will go on forever and ever?

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <2fu2j7tc14q618d4e...@4ax.com>

* US * wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:22:40 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 1, 6:57 am, * US * wrote:
> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >... most of us have spent a
> >> >lifetime fawning ...
> >>
> >> Sucks to be you.
> >
> >Hm.....
> >
> >When's the last time you were me?
>
> One needn't be. Perspective persists.
>
> Why do you imagine you'd represent "most of" anyone?
>

> Bradley Manning Charge Sheet
> http://www.microworkz.com/files/charge-sheet-pvt-bradley-manning-1.pdf
> Treason's Poster Boy
> http://www.conservativecrusader.com/articles/treason-s-poster-boy
> Execute PFC Bradley Manning for Treason
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=148566115160640&v=wall
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor
> http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-23/news/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123_1_bradley-manning-private-manning-traitor
> Fag traitor Bradley Manning's gender identity comes up in testimony
> http://www.freak-search.com/en/thread/6238053/fag_traitor_bradley_mannings_gender_identity_comes_up_in_testimony
> Bradley Manning is a pathetic traitor
> http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2011/12/bradley-manning-is-pathetic-traitor.html
> Bradley Manning committed treason
> http://www.washingtonblade.com/2011/12/22/bradley-manning-committed-treason/
> Bradley Manning: Angry Gay Traitor
> http://www.melaniemorgan.com/latest/2098-bradley-manning-angry-gay-traitor.html
> PFC Bradley Manning Is A Traitor
> http://www.microworkz.com/richard_keith_latman_the_/2010/12/pfc-bradley-manning-is-a-traitor.html
> Bradley Manning has “gender issues”
> http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/18/bradley-manning-has-gender-issues/
> Ron Paul Under Fire for Praising Accused Traitor
> http://www.usasurvival.org/ck12.27.11.html
> American Traitor: Bradley Manning
> http://republicanloudmouth.com/2012/01/15/traitor/
> Bradley Manning is nothing more than a traitor
> http://www.southbendtribune.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-manning-letter-20120123,0,419782.story
> Bradley Manning’s WikiLeaks Case: The Larger Issue
> http://patriotupdate.com/16214/bradley-mannings-wikileaks-case-the-larger-issue
> The Feds Have the Goods on Manning – And Assange Too
> http://www.belch.com/blog/tag/bradley-manning/
> Bradley Manning, whack job, unstable.
> http://www.militarycorruption.com/manning3.htm

Traitors all need to be hung. Especially queer traitors.

[*us*]

On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:26:14 +0100, "bushkultie traitor"
<murdering-sa...@neo.con> wrote:

>... Treason's Poster Boy...Treason... traitor... pathetic traitor... Traitor...

You can't help that.

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:32:09 +0100, "bushkultie traitor"
<murdering-sa...@neo.con> wrote:

>...l homosexual obsession with George Bush... performed in front ...I... I... I... I will obey the ... violating ... traitor ...flushed.

You do have problems, but it's not about you.

Meanwhile:

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:27:02 -0000, "Phil Saunders" <philip....@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>bushkultie wrote:
>> ...The oath is
>> binding and unconditional ...
>
>The oath is neither unconditional or binding per se.
>
>We know this because at war trials soldiers are executed for following
>orders when the court deems that they should, since they are rational and
>moral beings, have refused those orders and acted according to what is
>morally correct.
>
>I refer reads to the various pieces of international legislation on the
>matter.
>
>A soldier must not follow an order where either the act of doing so or the
>consequences of doing so are a breach of Law, either military or
>international with regards to human rights as attested in the Hague
>Convention and various other legal documents.
>
>Let us look at Guantanamo Bay. Any soldier assisting or failing to fulfil
>his duty and prevent or report war cimes such as torture is himself guilty
>of a crime under international law.
>
>Keeping people in cages, hooding people, detention without trial or
>representation, kidnap etc are all crimes.
>
>Eventually the US will have to admit that the military that they crow about
>so much (despite the fact that the US has never won a war on its own) has a
>long history of war crimes and this history is ongoing.
>
>A US military person was convicted of murder, the penalty for this is death.
>His sentence was less than 2 years. This is because the US has stated that
>it considers itself outside of international law and has threatened military
>action against anyone who attempts to apply it to them.
>
>Fortunately the world keeps turning and the US is in decline, hopefully soon
>the war criminals will be brought to justice.
>
>Of course some people, who claim to be patriots, wish to hide and ignore and
>condone war crimes such as those shown in the material given to Wikileaks.
>By doing so they merely increase the hatred that the rest of the world has
>for the Good Ole US of A. Your government is a contemptible thing, your
>democracy is a sham where the money buys the country and your courts are a
>joke.
>
>I do not say this because you are alone in being so corrupt as a nation
>because most other governments are just as corrupt.
>
>Even now your govt persecutes Cuba, harbours Cuban terrorists, and seeks to
>kill Cuban leaders because they had the affrontery to kick out an American
>controlled government which harboured the mob leaders and their money and
>provided a place to hide the truth about corrupt deals between politicians
>and business etc.
>
>Wake up, smell the coffee, get mad and argue for a real democracy. Fight the
>war for real independance and against slavery and help take down the
>corporations and vested interests that oppress, imprison and impoverish the
>majority so that they can live in safety and comfort.
>
>How many more Americans will you let kill and be killed in the name of
>profit? Remember that it was the US that harboured and funded the IRA etc
>who were blowing up innocent women and children in the UK and all because a
>special interest group (Irish Americans) controlled enough power to prevent
>you doing the right thing.
>
>Phil

Well said.

Undisputed.

[*us*]

On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:50:09 -0800 (PST), Giles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... payments due?

Those who supported the neocons' illegal invasions
should have to pick up the tab for them.

>... One thing is not the same thing as nothing.

How long did that take?

>But then, if your objectives are irrelevant, why pursue them
>here.....or anywhere else for that matter?

Why not?

The irrelevance remains.

What's relevant is that loyalty to the USA requires
a person to expose crimes against Americans.

>statement of fact.

Bush and Cheney are effective enemies of the USA.

>We hope

You and your fleas?

>...courage...

It takes courage to expose crimes.

>... you ... your ...your ... your ...

Irrelevant.

The message is not the messenger.

The message is that those who are brave
enough to expose crimes deserve kudos.

>Need......for what?

Contemplate.

>g.
>am i the only one here who hopes that this will go on forever and ever?

No doubt.

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:38:35 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >...comprehension?
>>
>> It allows acknowledgement of courage.
>
>Well, maybe, but it also diptifies refulgent reproversity.
>
>So?

Make your car payments.

>> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
>> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.
>
>Got...Got ...

If all one has is disdain for courage, one has nothing.

>And I can say with ... stupidity...
>wonder what your objectives are ...

Irrelevant.

>No shortage of beer here...

That's an explanation.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>...comprehension?

It allows acknowledgement of courage.

>... doing this purely for its entertainment value...

You'll need more than your non sequiturs.

[Giles]

On Feb 21, 4:50 pm, Giles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 21, 8:26 am, * US * wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:38:35 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >...comprehension?
>
> > >> It allows acknowledgement of courage.
>
> > >Well, maybe, but it also diptifies refulgent reproversity.
>
> > >So?
>
> > Make your car payments.
>
> I have car payments due?
>
> > >> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
> > >> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.
>
> > >Got...Got ...
>
> > If all one has is disdain for courage, one has nothing.
>
> Well, on the face of it, one would have at least one thing.  One thing
> is not the same thing as nothing.
>
> And courage is hardly worth the bother of disdain.

And aptitude is most decidedly antecedent to zymurgy.

> > >And I can say with ... stupidity...
> > >wonder what your objectives are ...
>
> > Irrelevant.
>
> But then, if your objectives are irrelevant, why pursue them
> here.....or anywhere else for that matter?

Well......fuck.....why not?

g.
you ever get that strange feeling that whatever you say, you're
arguing with yourself.......and losing badly? well, that's never
happened to me. strange.

[*us*]

"studies have shown that electronic voting machines are less reliable than paper ballots
in accurately counting votes"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1101_041101_election_voting.html

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:37:42 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... losing badly... me. strange.

It's not about you, though.

It's about how Americans need to restore real ballots
and send the traitor neocon profiteers to the Hague.

On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:50:09 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... payments due?

Those who supported the neocons' illegal invasions
should have to pick up the tab for them.

>... One thing is not the same thing as nothing.

How long did that take?

>But then, if your objectives are irrelevant, why pursue them
>here.....or anywhere else for that matter?

Why not?

The irrelevance remains.

What's relevant is that loyalty to the USA requires
a person to expose crimes against Americans.

>statement of fact.

Bush and Cheney are effective enemies of the USA.

>We hope

You and your fleas?

>...courage...

It takes courage to expose crimes.

>... you ... your ...your ... your ...

Irrelevant.

The message is not the messenger.

The message is that those who are brave
enough to expose crimes deserve kudos.

>Need......for what?

Contemplate.

>g.
>am i the only one here who hopes that this will go on forever and ever?

No doubt.

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:38:35 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Feb 17, 3:44 pm, * US * wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >...comprehension?
>>
>> It allows acknowledgement of courage.
>
>Well, maybe, but it also diptifies refulgent reproversity.
>
>So?

Make your car payments.

>> >... doing this purely for its entertainment value...
>> You'll need more than your non sequiturs.
>
>Got...Got ...

If all one has is disdain for courage, one has nothing.

>And I can say with ... stupidity...
>wonder what your objectives are ...

Irrelevant.

>No shortage of beer here...

That's an explanation.

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:00:59 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>...comprehension?

It allows acknowledgement of courage.

>... doing this purely for its entertainment value...

You'll need more than your non sequiturs.

[Giles]

On Feb 25, 7:28 am, * US * wrote:
> "studies have shown that electronic voting machines are less reliable than paper ballots
> in accurately counting votes"
>

> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1101_041101_election_...

>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:37:42 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... losing badly... me.  strange.
>
> It's not about you, though.

Ah, but it is! Why else would you still be here?

> It's about how Americans need to restore real ballots
> and send the traitor neocon profiteers to the Hague.

Last I heard, they could afford their own passage. No need for Merkin
taxpayers to subsidize yet another junket.

> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:50:09 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... payments due?
>
> Those who supported the neocons' illegal invasions
> should have to pick up the tab for them.

Sounds like you're saying they already did....."Those who
supported..." You think they, whoever they might be, should pay
twice? Well, I guess I don't object to that.

> >... One thing is not the same thing as nothing.
>
> How long did that take?

Six seconds.....roughly.

> >But then, if your objectives are irrelevant, why pursue them
> >here.....or anywhere else for that matter?
>
> Why not?

You answer my question, I'll answer yours.....fuckwit.

> The irrelevance remains.

Maybe so, but that's irrelevant.

> What's relevant is that loyalty to the USA requires
> a person to expose crimes against Americans.

I've checked my copy of the United States constitution.....and various
other potentially relevant documents. I don't see that anywhere.

> >statement of fact.
>
> Bush and Cheney are effective enemies of the USA.

Which Bushes and Cheneys would those be? In any cases, a close
examination of their effectiveness might lead to all kinds of debate.

> You and your fleas?

Nyuck, nyuck.....you certainly ARE some kind of wit.....ainna?

> >...courage...
>
> It takes courage to expose crimes.

Thus making you some sort of paragon of unsung heroes.....right? And
thus, every night, just before you drop off to a much deserved and
tranquil slumber, it's you sucking your dick that you fantasize
about......right? :)

> >... you ... your ...your ... your ...
>
> Irrelevant.

Irreverant.

> The message is not the messenger.

Nor is it interesting.

> The message is that those who are brave
> enough to expose crimes deserve kudos.

Well, and probably billions of dollars, too. Right?

> >Need......for what?
>
> Contemplate.

Kaopectate will do that.

> >g.
> >am i the only one here who hopes that this will go on forever and ever?
>
> No doubt.

And no doubt others will see to it that it is so.

Some things don't change.

It's a wonderful life.

g.
and some folks STILL insist that usenet is moribund! :)

[*us*]

If it's electronic, it's no election.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:08:20 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... still be here...

You seem so desperate for attention,
but at least you serve as a placeholder
for topics relevant to others.

>... they already did...

The moocher/leech neocon pawns let
everyone else pay for the war crimes.

>... my ... I'll ...fuckwit... irrelevant...I've ... I don't see...Nyuck, nyuck... sucking ... dick ...
>... will do that.
>g.

Don't advertise here.

"studies have shown that electronic voting machines are less reliable than paper ballots
in accurately counting votes"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1101_041101_election_voting.html

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:37:42 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... losing badly... me. strange.

It's not about you, though.

It's about how Americans need to restore real ballots
and send the traitor neocon profiteers to the Hague.

On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:50:09 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... payments due?

Those who supported the neocons' illegal invasions
should have to pick up the tab for them.

>... One thing is not the same thing as nothing.

How long did that take?

>But then, if your objectives are irrelevant, why pursue them
>here.....or anywhere else for that matter?

Why not?

The irrelevance remains.

What's relevant is that loyalty to the USA requires
a person to expose crimes against Americans.

>statement of fact.

Bush and Cheney are effective enemies of the USA.

>We hope

You and your fleas?

>...courage...

It takes courage to expose crimes.

>... you ... your ...your ... your ...

Irrelevant.

The message is not the messenger.

The message is that those who are brave
enough to expose crimes deserve kudos.

>Need......for what?

Contemplate.

>g.
>am i the only one here who hopes that this will go on forever and ever?

No doubt.

[Giles]

On Feb 26, 5:26 am, * US * wrote:
> If it's electronic, it's no election.
>

> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:08:20 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... still be here...
>
> You seem so desperate for attention,

No need to be desperate; I get all the attention anyone could want
here.

Now, if I could just get YOU to notice me.....

> but at least you serve as a placeholder
> for topics relevant to others.

Yeah, between us we're generating a stupifying barrage of attention
and response, ainna?

> >... they already did...
>
> The moocher/leech neocon pawns let
> everyone else pay for the war crimes.

Think about this.....take your time. In what we will charitably call
your entire life, has there ever been anyone (aside from me, of
course) that you haven't visibly bored to distraction?

> >... my ... I'll ...fuckwit... irrelevant...I've ... I don't see...Nyuck, nyuck... sucking ... dick ...
> >... will do that.
> >g.
>
> Don't advertise here.

No need. I'm well known here.

> "studies have shown that electronic voting machines are less reliable than paper ballots
> in accurately counting votes"

Bullshit. Paper ballots have never been shown to possess the capacity
to count.

> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1101_041101_election_...

>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:37:42 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... losing badly... me.  strange.
>
> It's not about you, though.

Hm.....

O.k. then, who is it you're responding to here?

> It's about how Americans need to restore real ballots
> and send the traitor neocon profiteers to the Hague.

Thus prompting the question; do you really think that anyone would pay
any attention to you at all if you weren't hilariously stupid?

g.

[*us*]

On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:39:49 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... desperate; I ...

It's not about you. It's about governance.

>... generating a stupifying barrage ...

It's not about you. It's about democracy.

>... bored to distraction...

It's not about you. It's about representation.

>Bullshit...

It's not about you. It's about how stupid it is
of you to place trust in a blackbox.

>... never been shown to possess the capacity
>to count.

It's not about you. It's about how blackboxes
are not suitable for use in elections.

>... hilariously stupid...

It's not about you. It's about how others who
will wonder if anyone objected to the lack of
real ballots in American elections.

[Thanks for serving as a placeholder.]

If it's electronic, it's no election.

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:08:20 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... still be here...

You seem so desperate for attention,

but at least you serve as a placeholder
for topics relevant to others.

>... they already did...

The moocher/leech neocon pawns let
everyone else pay for the war crimes.

>... my ... I'll ...fuckwit... irrelevant...I've ... I don't see...Nyuck, nyuck... sucking ... dick ...
>... will do that.
>g.

Don't advertise here.

"studies have shown that electronic voting machines are less reliable than paper ballots
in accurately counting votes"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/11/1101_041101_election_voting.html

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:37:42 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... losing badly... me. strange.

It's not about you, though.

It's about how Americans need to restore real ballots
and send the traitor neocon profiteers to the Hague.

[Giles]

On Feb 27, 5:56 am, * US * wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:39:49 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... desperate; I ...
>
> It's not about you.  It's about governance.
>
> >... generating a stupifying barrage ...
>
> It's not about you.  It's about democracy.
>
> >... bored to distraction...
>
> It's not about you.  It's about representation.
>
> >Bullshit...
>
> It's not about you.  It's about how stupid it is
> of you to place trust in a blackbox.
>
> >... never been shown to possess the capacity
> >to count.
>
> It's not about you.  It's about how blackboxes
> are not suitable for use in elections.
>
> >... hilariously stupid...
>
> It's not about you.  It's about how others who
> will wonder if anyone objected to the lack of
> real ballots in American elections.
>
> [Thanks for serving as a placeholder.]

See, that's what we love about you. NOBODY here gives a fuck what I
think......and I've been here for a long long time.....and they care a
great deal less about you.

Seriously.

g.
god, i love this place! :)

[*us*]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:50 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... about you ...

It isn't.

It is about how Americans know better
than to elect neocons, but they're forced
to give up their ballots for blackboxes.

>...NOBODY here gives a fuck what I
>think...

Some would certainly wish you could.

>...about you...

It isn't.

It is about how Americans know better
than to elect neocons, but they're forced
to give up their ballots for blackboxes.

On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:39:49 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... desperate; I ...

It's not about you. It's about governance.

>... generating a stupifying barrage ...

It's not about you. It's about democracy.

>... bored to distraction...

It's not about you. It's about representation.

>Bullshit...

It's not about you. It's about how stupid it is
of you to place trust in a blackbox.

>... never been shown to possess the capacity
>to count.

It's not about you. It's about how blackboxes
are not suitable for use in elections.

>... hilariously stupid...

It's not about you. It's about how others who
will wonder if anyone objected to the lack of
real ballots in American elections.

[Thanks for serving as a placeholder.]

[Giles]

On Feb 21, 8:26 am, * US * wrote:

moron.

g.

[Giles]

On Feb 28, 7:08 am, * US * wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:50 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >... about you ...
>
> It isn't.
>
> It is about how Americans know better
> than to elect neocons, but they're forced
> to give up their ballots for blackboxes.

OOH! A suggestion of meaning! wow.

> >...NOBODY here gives a fuck what I
> >think...
>
> Some would certainly wish you could.

Wishin' ain't gittin'.....ainna? :)

g.

[*us*]

On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:31:24 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Wishin' ain't gittin'.....ainna? :)

Americans need to do more than wish
for representation in government.

They need to ban blackboxes and restore
real ballots and counts.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:50 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>... about you ...

It isn't.

It is about how Americans know better
than to elect neocons, but they're forced
to give up their ballots for blackboxes.

>...NOBODY here gives a fuck what I
>think...

Some would certainly wish you could.

>...about you...

It isn't.

It is about how Americans know better
than to elect neocons, but they're forced
to give up their ballots for blackboxes.

[*us*]

The blackboxes in Ohio worked for
"Joe 'The Plumber'" and allowed the
neocons to avoid a need to wellstone
Kucinich for now ...

On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 16:29:18 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>moron.

Otherwise no doubt you'd have something
more than ad hominem fallacy ...

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:37:06 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>And we're

You and your fleas?

> eager to present you with valid arguments

Well, no, you aren't, since you don't.

>about something or
>other ...?

You're not expected to understand.

You may need more nutrients conducive to cognition.

[sandy.pi...@gmail.com]

As soon as the election is over we'll be working on relocation camps for right wing redneck morons. We talked about performing lobotomies first, similar to the way animal shelters spay all incoming female pets. But then we realized it wasn't really necessary.

[jeff]

On 3/7/2012 2:02 PM, sandy.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
> As soon as the election is over we'll be working on relocation camps for right wing redneck morons. We talked about performing lobotomies first, similar to the way animal shelters spay all incoming female pets. But then we realized it wasn't really necessary.

now that there is funny! ... thanks for the chuckle sandy! trust all
is well with you.

jeff

[Hanoi Jane Fonda]

In article <2fb7627a-3ef7-4952-a0cb-
bf969d...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Giles <g_go...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 5:59 am, * US * wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:29:12 -0800 (PST), Piles <g_goat...@yahoo.com> wro
> te:

> >
> > Why do you imagine you'd represent "most of" anyone?
>

> Or, let's look at it from another perspective. Why do you suppose it
> is that you (and all of the fuckwits who followed you here.....or vice
> versa) are as dull as you are tedious.....or vice versa?
>
> g.
> yeah, yeah, we've heard it before, hookin' 'em is easy......it's all
> in how you play 'em. :)

He's not one of the brighter bulbs...