My husband wants to shave me!
Kathy Mosesian
hairs. He says I look like a have a jungle between my legs. So he
bought all this weird shaving equipment that looks like torture
devices and he said he's going to shave me tonight. It's the only way
he'll continue to make love to me. Otherwise he says if I don't let
him shave me down there he won't touch me again. He also told me that
he prefers the clean shaved look because it looks like a little girl
and that turns him on. This has me worried. Do you think my husband
is a pedophile?
Kathy Mosesian
Newport Coast, CA
PorchMonkey4Life
> M He also told me that
> he prefers the clean shaved look because it looks like a little girl
> and that turns him on. This has me worried. Do you think my husband
> is a pedophile?
>
> Kathy Mosesian
> Newport Coast, CA
>
The ex-Mrs. John Karr has spoken
D. Kirkpatrick
Kathy Mosesian <an...@comments.header> wrote:
+-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| FAQ Maintainer | /`-vvv-'\
+-------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | jgs (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
=====================================================================
Blair...@neatto.net
Tell him he can shave yours if you can wax his...:)
BaJoRi
Well of course he does. You have a heavier beard than he does. Makes him
feel less manly
Cally
Yes.
Kathy Mosesian
Thi...@just.silly
He sounds like a Masochistic Pedophile/Necrophiliac.
CasaBlancaHotSpring
"PorchMonkey4Life" <pm4...@yousuckbutidont.com> wrote in message
news:06JFg.2057$Te.1693@trnddc07...
> Kathy Mosesian wrote:
>> M He also told me that
>> he prefers the clean shaved look because it looks like a little girl
>> and that turns him on. This has me worried. Do you think my husband
>> is a pedophile?
He could be, with suspect statements like that.
Bill
CasaBlancaHotSpring
Dear Kathy,
"K" <blahbl...@blahblahblah.com> wrote in message
news:26ydnTbQJ-fX-nrZ...@giganews.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
> "Kathy Mosesian" <an...@comments.header> wrote in message
> news:EKPZC9ED38948.6149189815@twistycreek.com...
I don't know if he's a pedo or not, but I do know that if any man ever tried
to control and manipulate me in the way you describe, I would be g-o-n-e!
Either that, or he would be.
Lynn
cyndiann
Who is Lynn?
Anna
I think you should divorce him immediately. Unfortunately we can't do
anything against him until he actually does something (and I wouldn't
want to live in a nation with "thought crimes") but his pre-pubescent
sex fantasies does show that he is a pedophile.
Either divorce him or get him mental health. But, l don't think mental
treatment is possible with people like him. Like homosexuality, there
might be a genetic element in his desires. Well regardless, studies
have proven that at least current methods of treatments are largely
unsuccessful.
I guess there is a third option since you can't do anything to him
until he damages a child. That would be to go along with his perverse
fantasies in hopes that by you providing an outlet, he will not feel
the need to go after children. That would be pretty self-sacrifcing of
you, but I don't think it would work. It has been shown that stuff
that you may think provides an outlet for sexual pervs most often just
add fuel to the fire. After trying it with you he will have more
desire to try it with a real child.
Oh, if you do have any children, well divorce and a restraining order
is what you must do. You have to think of your children first and like
I said, mental health treatment most often doesn't work.
Zee
male and having experience with the male and his plight with sexuality
over the last fifty years.....it may not be the genes but rather the
environment of legal nudity and pornography.....there has always been
perverts but it must have been suppressed in the old days and women may
not have had an opportunity to voice their complaints ....if you notice
on tv and news....it is apparent that men have degenerated to the point
where it seems that all they want is a blow job from a big tittied
whore....even the humor about sex nowadays seems to reflect that
perversion.....i feel the big tit thing is a moma complex and reflects
the little boy in men....and the pornography split in the late
seventies going child porn in one direction and hard bodies and muscle
girls in the other direction ....i notice the hwy porn shops have only
a vehicle or two in the parking lots nowadays which says porn has
reached the end of the road with cyndianns leather and violence being
about that last thing there is legally to excite the male....so can we
blame the male or all of society for tolerating nudism involving naked
children and the pornography....resulting in promoscuity....because a
society does have opportunity in a democracy to stand against social
behavior that is not appropriate ....but if they dont then everyone is
to blame.....may be these perversions are so prevalent that it would
break up most of the families and children would become the victims of
a broken home so thinking of the children..... that is a court of last
resort in my opinion.....jonZeee.
Anna wrote
Going For Broke
"Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1156880731....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Anna
It isn't my problem, it is Kathy Mosesian's problem although I really
don't believe her.
I think she made it up to see the reaction.
But still, I thought it was deserving of a response regardless of
whether she was asking an honest question or not. Unfortunately
"smoothes" are become more common at nudist venues and I really believe
it has to do at least in part with "age play"pre-pubescent sex
fantasies and even perhaps some pedophile tendencies especially if the
person wants his partner to shave. Sounds sick to me but some get off
on it unfortunately.
Terry J. Wood
$d80c0a41$24...@NAXS.COM:
> Is your husband John Karr........???
Husband? You could have just as easily asked is she was John Karr.
Anna
I wasn't the original poster and I am not a "smoothy" (or is it
"smoothie")
I don't need to pretend that I have not yet reached puberty in order to
have satifying sex. Those who need to engage in such "age play" I fear
may also be susceptible to engaging in actual pedophilia with young
children.
Milhouse G
> "smoothes" are become more common at nudist venues and I really believe
> it has to do at least in part with "age play"pre-pubescent sex
> fantasies and even perhaps some pedophile tendencies especially if the
> person wants his partner to shave.
No. It doesn't.
If you enjoy a mouthfullahair, though, that's your beeswax.
--
Milhouse Guidry of the mWo
"If it takes you more than two, *MAYBE* three posts
to say what you think needs to be said,
you don't know what you're talking about and should shut up."
--The Bede
mWo. It's not just the coolest, it's fa lyfe, so survey says
whether you like it or don't like it, never E-e-e-ver tell
me he did *not* just SMELL what mWo 3:16 reeks of.
the Bede
>
>
>
> I wasn't the original poster and I am not a "smoothy"
>
avery
So if a woman sleeps with a man who shaves his face, she's probably at risk
for wanting to have sex with a little boy? What about women who shave their
armpits and legs -- are they likely to attract pedophiles because of their
smooth, infant-like skin?
bruno
Anna
Milhouse G wrote:
> Anna wrote:
>
> > "smoothes" are become more common at nudist venues and I really believe
> > it has to do at least in part with "age play"pre-pubescent sex
> > fantasies and even perhaps some pedophile tendencies especially if the
> > person wants his partner to shave.
>
> No. It doesn't.
>
> If you enjoy a mouthfullahair, though, that's your beeswax.
Oral sex is sick.
FunkyM
FunkyM heard somewhere that it's not really sex either.
Milhouse G
You're a dude pretending to be a chick, aren't you?
Rich...@no.address
I AGREE!
From the urban dictionary
SICK
1)crazy, cool, insane
1)man, that trick was sick yo
the Bede
"Kathy M." <tres...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:BomdndOTj6xIa2jZ...@giganews.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
> "the Bede" <rspwsow...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:9QkJg.25328$C6....@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> You should have known this was a troll forging my name.
> Kathy Mosesian
>
>
putting forth that sort of effort would imply that I care.
-T.
>..but being a
>male and having experience with the male and his plight with sexuality
>over the last fifty years....
Would that be AS a male? Or as a female? Enquiring minds want to know.
>.it may not be the genes but rather the
>environment of legal nudity and pornography....
Those are certainly new...um, not.
>.there has always been
>perverts but it must have been suppressed in the old days and women may
>not have had an opportunity to voice their complaints ....
Spoken like a true feminist. Your mask is slipping again.
>if you notice
>on tv and news....it is apparent that men have degenerated to the point
>where it seems that all they want is a blow job from a big tittied
>whore....
What news shows are you watching? Maybe you're just a little over
sensitive? Like someone always looking at men as the enemy, the
supressors, etc.....
>even the humor about sex nowadays seems to reflect that
>perversion.....
Probably has something to do with the people you hang out with. Maybe
you should get some friends, er, I mean NEW friends.
>i feel the big tit thing is a moma complex and reflects
>the little boy in men....and the pornography split in the late
>seventies going child porn in one direction and hard bodies and muscle
>girls in the other direction ....i notice the hwy porn shops have only
>a vehicle or two in the parking lots nowadays
Used to be a woman here who was overly interested in porn. What was
her name again?
> which says porn has
>reached the end of the road with cyndianns leather and violence being
>about that last thing there is legally to excite the male....so can we
>blame the male or all of society for tolerating nudism involving naked
>children and the pornography.
So news, jokes, defunct pornoshops, and BDSM are to be blamed on
tolerating nudism.... Yeah, there's a well reasoned argument for you.
>.because a
>society does have opportunity in a democracy to stand against social
>behavior that is not appropriate ....but if they dont then everyone is
>to blame.....may be these perversions are so prevalent that it would
>break up most of the families and children would become the victims of
>a broken home so thinking of the children.....
Maybe the perversions are not as prevalent nor as dire as you so
desperately want the world to believe....
Of course that would render your efforts here (and elsewhere) entirely
without value. A lifetime of tilting at the windmills, only to realize
they were nothing but windmills after all. That must really haunt you.
-T.
When the man said alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, I just naturally assumed he was making a delivery.
~昢昏觟坍
~昢昏觟坍
wrote:
>x-no-archive: yes
>"the Bede" <rspwsow...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:9QkJg.25328$C6....@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>>
>I also was not the original poster. Check properties before responding.
>You should have known this was a troll forging my name.
>Kathy Mosesian
That wasn't you it was someone spoofing your nick right? So um, well
I'm puzzled now, are you shaved or not?
leaf...@hotmail.com
Well hi there! I dont really believe that ur husband is a pedo, cause
well most guys
young girls turn them on well i know 4 me for sure, cause really girls
19 20 n upward normally look cute and innocent in a turn on kind off
way. but then again i dont really see why he has to say if u dont let
him shave u he would make love to u again, i think that is childish
definately. or if he has something else in mind than just making love
mabe sucking or something, but i dont think is anything to get worried
about, cause u would be supprised what goes on in we guys mind and very
surprise to the different stuff that turns us on ok. so u can cut him
alittle slack on that one ok. lol.
Terry J. Wood
it. For instance, I think that people in the breastfeeding groups were
really surprised at how supportive naturists are of their cause. The
crosspost between rec.nude and their groups worked in our favor, not the
trolls.
It's possible that many new people came away with a very positive view
of naturism. They may have seen true naturism for the first time.
For instance, they got to see why it's a "nudist camp" and not a "nudist
colony". That's a good first step in demystifying naturism/nudism.
So while it's always best to ignore a troll, never waste an opportunity
to use a troll for a positive purpose. It's sort of like making
lemonade if all you have are lemons.
In fact, I myself am always happy to squeeze a few trolls until they
turn into lemonade -- or turn blue -- whichever comes first. :-)
Terry "Troll Busters" Wood
Terry J. Wood
news:gq7df2980drp3tjoa...@4ax.com:
> And what do we win with all these points we're collecting? Redeem
> them for valuable prizes?
That's how I got this nifty computer I'm using!
Start collecting your points TODAY!
Terry "S&H USENET STAMPS GIVEN HERE!" Wood
Terry J. Wood
news:890df2p077cah71sj...@4ax.com:
> On 30 Aug 2006 11:08:32 -0700, "Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>I don't need to pretend that I have not yet reached puberty in order to
>>have satifying sex. Those who need to engage in such "age play" I fear
>>may also be susceptible to engaging in actual pedophilia with young
>>children.
> Oh grow the fuck up and take a hedge trimmer to your overgrown bush.
Or his head.
Anna
JMiller wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:43:36 GMT, Stuffed
> Tiger<No...@NotAnAddress.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 06:28:54 GMT, JMiller <in...@bigassbroadcast.com>
> >wrote:> >...
> >
> >I just post once on a post that goes to multiple newsgroups.
> >
> >Anna's a he. He's trolling. By involving multiple newsgroups, he gets
> >replies from more places with less work. On the plus side, it does get
> >people posting who might not otherwise even talk to each other.
>
> I have to admit that I don't care all that much about trolls. So he's
> trolling. Big deal. If someone says something I feel like
> addressing, I don't care if they're a troll or not.
>
> >He get's points if you repeat his post (making people read it again)
> >and quote him or repeat his subject line (notice I changed mine). He
> >looses points if the replies you give promote your ideas and not his.
>
> And what do we win with all these points we're collecting? Redeem
> them for valuable prizes?
>
> >unless I want to. I do see yours. From what I can see, he's not doing
> >to well, but at least everybody's having fun.
>
> Right!
> --
> The Big Ass Broadcast
> www.bigassbroadcast.com
> The biggest internet radio show in the world.
I am a she.
And I was not trolling. I was just answering the question as if it the
person was being serious about it.
Smoothies have no place in nudism. The fact that they would want to
shave that part of their body indicates that they probably have some
sick ideas about sex as it relates to childhood.
Terry J. Wood
news:g9eef21crb3l20e4o...@4ax.com about Anna:
>I think what you're saying is absolutely retarded.
That didn't take long.
Terry "http://tinyurl.com/kolzo" Wood
David Looser
>
>
> I am a she.
>
Yeah, right, and I'm the Empress of China.
If you really want to fool people into thinking that "Anna" isn't the same
person as Max Jefferson and Jeff Jenson why do you write the same bullshit
about "evil" liberals and the "Frankfurt School" etc in all of your various
aliases?
David.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>On 30 Aug 2006 11:08:32 -0700, "Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>>I don't need to pretend that I have not yet reached puberty in order to
>>have satifying sex. Those who need to engage in such "age play" I fear
>>may also be susceptible to engaging in actual pedophilia with young
>>children.
>
>Oh grow the fuck up and take a hedge trimmer to your overgrown bush.
Jimmy the ladies' man rears his head once again...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
BBp
Anna wrote:
>
> I am a she.
So you had a sex change opertion did you? I still wonder if one goes
through a so called sex change operation do they really become a member
of the oposite sex? I think not.
Do you check the female box on your 1040?
> And I was not trolling. I was just answering the question as if it the
> person was being serious about it.
>
> Smoothies have no place in nudism. The fact that they would want to
> shave that part of their body indicates that they probably have some
> sick ideas about sex as it relates to childhood.
And you should know about sick idea first hand...
BBp
Terry J. Wood
news:4lq799F...@individual.net:
>> I am a she.
> Yeah, right, and I'm the Empress of China.
>
> If you really want to fool people into thinking that "Anna" isn't the
> same person as Max Jefferson and Jeff Jenson why do you write the same
> bullshit about "evil" liberals and the "Frankfurt School" etc in all
> of your various aliases?
Excuse me your empresss -- what you fail to understand is that everyone
in the Seattle area thinks exactly alike. They all sound the same,
write the same and even LOOK the same. Well, everyone except Richard,
perhaps. Oh, and they all use NoCharge.com for their posts -- but only
to rec.nude! :-)
Terry "Living in the Forbidden City" Wood
Anna
Terry J. Wood wrote:
> "David Looser" <david....@btinternet.com> wrote in
> news:4lq799F...@individual.net:
>
> >> I am a she.
>
> > Yeah, right, and I'm the Empress of China.
> >
> > If you really want to fool people into thinking that "Anna" isn't the
> > same person as Max Jefferson and Jeff Jenson why do you write the same
> > bullshit about "evil" liberals and the "Frankfurt School" etc in all
> > of your various aliases?
I don't know what you are talking about. My name is Anna and I live
outside of Portland Oregon. Not that it's any of your business.
And of course liberals are evil. I am not saying that I always agree
with the far right (obviously I don't on nudity) but the Left is a far
greater threat to America (and not always a friend of nudism for if
they were Seattle would have a nude beach by now).
Liberals aren't merely wrong. They are indeed evil. I can make a big
list of all the evil they have caused in the world but I just don't
want to right now.
David Looser
>
> I don't know what you are talking about. My name is Anna and I live
> outside of Portland Oregon. Not that it's any of your business.
>
> And of course liberals are evil. I am not saying that I always agree
> with the far right (obviously I don't on nudity) but the Left is a far
> greater threat to America (and not always a friend of nudism for if
> they were Seattle would have a nude beach by now).
>
> Liberals aren't merely wrong. They are indeed evil. I can make a big
> list of all the evil they have caused in the world but I just don't
> want to right now.
>
of crap that you have posted so often under all of your numerous aliases.
Why do you think we are too stupid to notice?
David.
Terry J. Wood
@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> Liberals aren't merely wrong. They are indeed evil.
Gee, who else has said this? Let me think. Let me think.
I better search for this on Google groups...
Yeah, I knew I had read this somewhere before! Here are the results:
-----
In article <1135569548.2...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Jeff Jenson jeffjenson...@yahoo.com from IP 71.197.154.67 in Oregon
said:
>I have often said that liberals aren't merely wrong - they are evil.
see: http://tinyurl.com/qj4ll
-----
In article <1128024213.2...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Jeff Jenson jeffjenson...@yahoo.com from IP 67.160.76.14 in Oregon
said:
>I have come to realize that liberals aren't merely wrong, they are
>evil.
see: http://tinyurl.com/myla5
-----
In fact, it appears that Jeff and Anna are the only ones who have ever said
this in all of USENET. That's right; EVER; since the beginning of USENET.
(Well, since Google/dejanews started an archive).
Wow. Both seem to live in the same city, use the same ISPs and have the
same views! You see! EVERYONE where they live looks the same, talks the
same and even POSTS the same.
It's America's #1 homogenous city!
Maybe everyone there is cloned?
Terry "Card Carrying Member of the ACLU" Wood
Anna
I am not the only one who realizes that Liberals are Evil so why does
it surprise you that more than one person might have made that comment?
David Looser
>
>
> I am not the only one who realizes that Liberals are Evil
You and who else?, your twin?, or the other loonies in your asylum?
so why does
> it surprise you that more than one person might have made that comment?
>
Using exactly the same words?, with the same obsessive trawling of the web
for irelevant crap?
Frankly you don't fool anyone.
David.
Bert Clanton
"Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote:
Hey! That must be why I'm a "perv". I'm a liberal!
Best wishes,
Bert
--
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
- Robert Anton Wilson
Terry J. Wood
news:eubiotis-59861B...@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net:
>> Liberals aren't merely wrong. They are indeed evil. I can make a big
>> list of all the evil they have caused in the world but I just don't
>> want to right now.
> Hey! That must be why I'm a "perv". I'm a liberal!
A "perv"? I thought you said you were a "Pepper"!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQDAStpSj-8
Terry "Be a Pepper. Drink Dr. Pepper" Wood
naturist
Actually Liberals are mentally and morally superior to conservatives in
every way.
You owe the computer you are using and all the other technology
enhancing your life to Liberals. As well as the personal freedoms and
liberties you enjoy every day.
See that "lib" thingy at the beginning of "LIBERAL" and "LIBERTY"?
Anna
naturist wrote:
> > > I am not the only one who realizes that Liberals are Evil
>
> Actually Liberals are mentally and morally superior to conservatives in
> every way.
>
> You owe the computer you are using and all the other technology
> enhancing your life to Liberals. As well as the personal freedoms and
> liberties you enjoy every day.
You are so full of shit. Liberals have brought this country to the
brink of destruction.
So FUCK OFF!
Anna
Bert Clanton wrote:
> In article <1157127102.5...@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
> > Terry J. Wood wrote:
> > > "David Looser" <david....@btinternet.com> wrote in
> > > news:4lq799F...@individual.net:
> > >
> > > >> I am a she.
> > >
> > > > Yeah, right, and I'm the Empress of China.
> > > >
> > > > If you really want to fool people into thinking that "Anna" isn't the
> > > > same person as Max Jefferson and Jeff Jenson why do you write the same
> > > > bullshit about "evil" liberals and the "Frankfurt School" etc in all
> > > > of your various aliases?
> >
> > I don't know what you are talking about. My name is Anna and I live
> > outside of Portland Oregon. Not that it's any of your business.
> >
> > And of course liberals are evil. I am not saying that I always agree
> > with the far right (obviously I don't on nudity) but the Left is a far
> > greater threat to America (and not always a friend of nudism for if
> > they were Seattle would have a nude beach by now).
> >
> > Liberals aren't merely wrong. They are indeed evil. I can make a big
> > list of all the evil they have caused in the world but I just don't
> > want to right now.
> >
>
> Hey! That must be why I'm a "perv". I'm a liberal!
>
> Best wishes,
> Bert
Well it certainly makes you evil.
By the way not all nudists are liberal. There are nudists from across
the political spectum but some people won't go to nudist places fearing
that they are all liberals there. We must somehow convince them that
this simply isn't true.
David Looser
>
>
> You are so full of shit. Liberals have brought this country to the
> brink of destruction.
>
> So FUCK OFF!
Ah!, the true unpleasant & bigoted nature of nw/Max/Jeff/Larry/Anna is
revealed in all it's tawdry reality.
David.
>
naturist
> > enhancing your life to Liberals. As well as the personal freedoms and
> > liberties you enjoy every day.
>
> You are so full of shit. Liberals have brought this country to the
> brink of destruction.
>
> So FUCK OFF!
Funny how the sting of truth always prompts the use of FUCK OFF by
those who don't want to face it.
Sorry, but conservative bigots and fundamentalists are the ones who are
destroying the country. Not freedom loving liberals.
so HAVE A NICE DAY!
naturist
> the political spectum but some people won't go to nudist places fearing
> that they are all liberals there. We must somehow convince them that
> this simply isn't true.
All true nudists are liberals. Just comes with the territory. Nudism
requires one to have an open and enlightened mindset, accepting and
tolerant of others who are different than oneself.
Conservatives do not fit that description.
There may be conservatives who go nude but they are *not* nudists.
Sorry Charlie.
Stuffed Tiger
He couldn't stay in character could he! He's been trying hard, though.
I have to give him credit for that.
Terry J. Wood
news:g8lkf2l7olta759bl...@4ax.com:
> He couldn't stay in character could he! He's been trying hard, though.
> I have to give him credit for that.
But what would possess someone to make so many aliases? And what's the
fascination with naturism? In other words, why us and not the Star Trek
newsgroups? It's much easier to troll them or just about any other
newsgroup because the audience is so much bigger. Rec.nude is a
miniscule newsgroup in the grand scheme of things.
This has to be more than just trolling because this has been going on
for quite some time. First it was "Nw", then "Jeff", then a sock puppet
named "George" that argued with "Jeff" and now "Anna". (And who knows
how many other aliases in between). I can understand why people
"troll", when Usenetters take themselves so seriously. It's just too
much fun to pass up sometimes; but this is just strange.
Let's face some facts "Anna", it's very hard to believe that you aren't
all these other posters when you've been using the same words and
phrases and you use the same ISPs. There are just too many coincidences
for this to be chance.
"Anna", do you want to come clean about all this?
Terry J. Wood
@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> You are so full of shit. Liberals have brought this country to the
> brink of destruction.
When I read this post my first thought was "Dick Cheney is a liberal?"
Terry "Goldwater Republican" Wood
Anna
naturist wrote:
Liberals don't love freedom. They love THEIR FREEDOM.
If you don't think that's the case, try smoking in a public restaurant.
Anna
naturist wrote:
So, you are saying that no one who doesn't share your exact political
views should be allowed at nudist venues,
How "tolerant" of you.
Anna
Terry J. Wood wrote:
I am just Anna, and quite honestly I couldn't care if you think I am
someone else.
Anna
Terry J. Wood wrote:
George Bush Sure IS!
I certainly didn't vote for him in 2000. Yeah, I did in 2004. Kerry was
just so so bad and unlike 2000 we were suposed to be at war in 2004.
But by the way Bush has been fighting it (or I should say not fighting
it) lately, it sure seems like we aren't.
I knew from day one that Bush was too Liberal for America. I had hoped
that 9-11 had changed him. It might have for a little bit, but now he
is back to his liberal ways.
David Looser
>
> I am just Anna, and quite honestly I couldn't care if you think I am
> someone else.
Bollocks!. You really do think we were born yesterday don't you?
What I don't understand is *why*, what do you get out of it?, Do you get
some sort of kick out of pretending to be a woman, a sort of intellectual
cross-dressing?
The trouble is you don't do it very well. Only a man would hold the idiotic
views that you do.
David.
David Looser
See what we mean Jeff?, no woman wrote that. Women have too much
intelligence. It takes a man to be a total smackhead like you.
David.
naturist
> >
> > Sorry Charlie.
>
> So, you are saying that no one who doesn't share your exact political
> views should be allowed at nudist venues,
No actually I was just doing an experiment in reverse psychology and a
little "trolling of the trolls"
You just got a taste of your own medicine. Kinda sour isn't it?
Terry J. Wood
@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:
>> "Anna", do you want to come clean about all this?
> I am just Anna, and quite honestly I couldn't care if you think I am
> someone else.
Come on, dude. The game is over.
If you want to continue with even a shred of credibility then explain
why you and Jeff Jenson post from the same ISP and use the same words
and phrases in the following posts:
*****
"Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote in news:1157127102.501258.111070
@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
> Liberals aren't merely wrong. They are indeed evil.
-----
In article <1135569548.2...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Jeff Jenson jeffjenson...@yahoo.com from IP 71.197.154.67 in
Oregon said:
>I have often said that liberals aren't merely wrong - they are evil.
see: http://tinyurl.com/qj4ll
-----
In article <1128024213.2...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Jeff Jenson jeffjenson...@yahoo.com from IP 67.160.76.14 in
Oregon said:
>I have come to realize that liberals aren't merely wrong, they are
>evil.
see: http://tinyurl.com/myla5
*****
(Just explain this ONE instance. You know there are plenty of other
examples. This wasn't the first time people could see though you.)
In the Google archive the two of you are the only ones to have EVER had
said this.
Sure, today you are using a service in Australia. It's a bit too late
for that. There are plenty of examples of where you and Jeff, NW,
George and Larry and all the other "here today and gone tomorrow"
posters have used NoCharge.com.
Look, we know you've never tried naturism. That's obvious. You know
nothing of the practical, everyday side of this life. Your posts scream
that. That's why you ALWAYS get tripped up and people ask "What
naturist venues have you EVER attended?" They know you never been to
one. It's so OBVIOUS. This happens time and time again.
Who do you think you are you fooling? Certainly not the regulars of
rec.nude.
So who are you really? Got a phone number? Got an address? Do you
want to meet someone from rec.nude face to face?
Why the games?
Are you really interested in naturism?
Are you lonely? Don't you have anything to do with your time?
We're not nasty people, but we are tired of the b*llsh*t.
You can dodge this, but the game *is* over.
Bert Clanton
"Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
> I knew from day one that Bush was too Liberal for America. I had hoped
> that 9-11 had changed him. It might have for a little bit, but now he
> is back to his liberal ways.
>
No! She can't be real!
Terry J. Wood
> In article <1157320280....@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>,
> "Anna" <annal...@lycos.com> wrote:
>> I knew from day one that Bush was too Liberal for America. I had hoped
>> that 9-11 had changed him. It might have for a little bit, but now he
>> is back to his liberal ways.
>
> No! She can't be real!
No, it's true. Bush isn't far enough right for the TRUE Republican party!
He's a RINO or a Buffalo or some such animal.
David Looser
news:Xns9994D502844...@216.168.3.30...
I wonder what a "true" Republican President would do?
To satisfy "Anna" I guess he would have to:
Declare the US to be a one-party state.
Execute anyone who spoke against the party line
Make it a criminal offence NOT to be a "born-again" Christian
Invade every country on earth that doesn't accept US hegemony.
David.
Mark
"David Looser" <david....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:5j57p3F...@mid.individual.net...
>
> I wonder what a "true" Republican President would do?
>
> To satisfy "Anna" I guess he would have to:
>
>
> Declare the US to be a one-party state.
>
> Execute anyone who spoke against the party line
>
> Make it a criminal offence NOT to be a "born-again" Christian
>
> Invade every country on earth that doesn't accept US hegemony.
>
>
> David.
Well David, I think you just about have "Anna" pegged.......
(doesn't Anna sound a little 'Hitler-esque' or "Saddam-esque' to you?)