I had a really late puberty, Zee. I didn't reach puberty until a month
before my 18th birthday. A lot later than most people. We age slow, in
my family.
Unlike most people, I can still remember what it felt like, to some
degree, to be a child.
And it did not include ANY interest in sex. Children are not interested
in sex, in the normal sense of the word, prior to puberty. The
strongest feeling they have in respect to the subject is extremely
abstract curiousity. The crap you wrote is little more than a sick
fantasy.
Nudist children are not interested in sex. Textile children are not
interested in sex. NO children are interested in sex. The whole
category, as far as children below the age of puberty is concerned,
falls under the file marking of 'does not apply'.
You are so full of shit that it must be leaking out of your ears every
time you turn a corner.
children are preyed upon by adults, like yourself, perhaps?
Do you still act upon your 'honest' belief that the 9 year old girl in
the family 'wants' to have sex with you, while the WELL ARMED parents
are watching?
Well?
Hmm... I didn't think so.
I suggest you bear that in mind, over 50% of all Americans own a
firearm of some sort, pervert, they simply might not have it on their
person at any given moment. And you have no idea of whom they are. Even
those who don't own a gun personally can often obtain one very quickly.
Just a little something for Zee, the current lying pervert and future
morgue statistic to bear in mind.
Oh, and Zee? I note you still haven't learned to use the English
language. I told you specifically that I didn't reach puberty until a
month before I turned 18, so it's a bit irrelevent to bring into the
argument people who reach puberty at half that age. Furthermore, having
reached puberty that young, I suspect most of them really don't
remember what their thoughts and feeling BEFORE puberty were like. I
do. So anything you say about the subject is simply more of your
irrational, perverted Zee crap.
As for being 'inhuman' Zee, you fail the definition of humanity
yourself, on several counts, being unable to properly use language,
unable to control your perverted sexual urges, and unable to
distinguish between reality, and your sick, pedophile fantasies. I
suppose you should count yourself lucky that you live in the
mollycoddled 21st century, and not such a world as, say Frank Herbert's
Dune, where the Bene Gesserit would make short work of you with the Gom
Jabbar.
Evasion noted.
> and then you ramble and rave about
> me being a fraud....and a liar.....this is absolute lunacy....
jonZee, you are a liar and a fraud in the same way that the Pope is a
Catholic. Nothing that you post carries any credibility whatsoever.
David.
> they say the nudist fucks their kids
Is that really the best you can manage jon? - you *are* losing your touch.
"They" don't say anything of the kind, *you* do. And since it is total
bollocks (as you very well know) it just *proves* that you are a liar. (In
addition, of course, to being a pathetic coward who doesn't even have the
courage to put his name to his bullshit). Add that your racist and sexist
comments and what do we have, a racist, sexist, lying, bigoted, pathetic
coward. Not much to be proud of is it? No wonder you couldn't ever get a
woman to look at you.
David.
--
Regards,
Dario Western
http://www.icq.com/38318214
http://www.myspace.com/25155501
http://theglamgod.spaces.msn.com
http://360.yahoo.com/larrikin70
Why should I believe that? Apart from the fact that textiles *don't* say
that I have only your word that anyone said that to you, and your word
counts for nothing.
>.so apparently he had
> experience with the textiles and that is something you do not
> have......
What an idiotic thing to say!. We all have "experience with the textiles".
We live with them, we work with them. They are our friends, our neighbours,
our colleages and our families. How could we NOT know what they think about
nudism, and it is nothing like what you say it is. Which is how I know you
to be a liar and a fraud.
...and if you dig around in natura...there is
> where i read the mindset of nudist about doing all the evil things and
> after a hundred or so years ...
What the ***** does natura have to do with it? Bill Martin is almost as much
of a kook as you are.
then evil will burn out and good will
> take over.....
The evil is in your mind jonZee - deal with it!.
David.
>septithol.....your continued rambling about naked parents carrying guns
>to a person that is attracted sexually to persons of the opposite sex
>under the age of 18..DEFINED AS A PEDOPHILE...makes no sense ...
You come sniffing around my grandchildren, and it'll make a lot of
sense, briefly.
>and especially when you state that you are not
>a nudist or have interest in NUDE....
Well, Jon, YOU aren't a nudist. And this sure as hell isn't
rec.pedo.misogyny.racist. Are you lost?
>and then you ramble and rave about
>me being a fraud....and a liar....
Cause you are.
>...i am not
>a child molester
But you'd like to be.
> and apparently you have it in your feeble mind that
>sexually active children are constantly raped as they enjoy
>masturbating and having sex with who ever...an
>adult.....
A view shared by the vast majority.
>where nudism is a favorite place to see this kind of
>activity.....
Except for most of us on this group. One wonders at that. Why don't we
see it, Jon? We're active and none of us are stupid, so why don't we
see what you see???? Could it be because it doesn't exist????
>....how can we help you
Go away. Far, far, away.
-T.
When the man said alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, I just naturally assumed he was making a delivery.
>they say the nudist fucks their kids
NO, you say that. There is no they, only your incoherent, demented
ramblings.
-T.
(and you are a liar after all)
>.....yeah you nudist actually think you can sell that evil to
>the world...
said the man who only sees women and female children as sex objects.
-T.
(what a maroon)
> You come sniffing around my grandchildren, and it'll make a lot of
> sense, briefly.
Bwah ha ha! LMAO!!
> Go away. Far, far, away.
T, you are funny as hell! You should read the story I'm writing, I
think you might like it. Email me at sept...@yahoo.com and I'll send
you some links to what I have done.
- Ann
That's interesting, Zee. There are actually people who do this. One of
them came to my mother once, asking her advice on whether or not she
should do this. She was a textile. As are most of the citizens of
countries such as Thailand, where parents often sell their unwanted
girl children to brothels.
So, is that what your family did to you, Zee, and now you are
projecting it on to everyone else?
Which is more likely? That nudist facilities are a front for child
prostitution, and that NO-ONE out of thousands and thousands of
nudists, including former child victims of this supposed practice has
EVER blown the whistle on it, and they are in addition so diabolically
clever that they have the FBI completely fooled, despite your posting
all the details about this supposed practice right on the internet? Or
is it more likely that none of this crap you write about exists, save
only in your own demented imagination, and that is the reason why it
has not been heard about from any reliable, verifiable source?
Time to go back into your corner and take your prozac like a good
little Zee. I think I hear Nurse Ratchett calling you....
Then we get those claims of his that "nudist parents" are incestuous, that
the sexual favours of children are sold to paedophiles by nudist club
owners, and that children (well girls anyway, he never mentions boys) are
turned-on by seeing adult men naked and willingly engage in group sex with
them. No-one else in the history of organised nudism has ever made those
claims and he cannot offer one shred of evidence to support any of them. But
just see the righteous indignation when anyone accuses him of being less
than scrupulously honest! I still can't quite make up my mind whether he's
simply an unusually persistent troll, or actually believes the bullshit he
posts. If the later then he needs help, and fast.
David.
>
>erroneous fact that .....IT HAPPENS EVERYWHERE AND IT IS NOT MORE
>PRONOUNCED IN CROTCH EXPOSING BEHAVIOR THAN OTHER HUMAN
>BEHAVIORS....
If it's erroneous, present your data. Put up or shut up. It's as easy
as that.
>most of you nudist have admitted that the nude body is a turn on to
>most of these textiles....
Um, nope. Nudists as a group have admitted no such thing and, in fact,
neither have the textiles. Again, if you have the data, produce it.
-T.
...
>The sexual abuse of children is sadly not that uncommon and it would be
>remarkable in the extreme if there had never been a case of child sex abuse
>by someone connected with nudism in some way.
Indeed. What is remarkable is that nudist parents began prosecuting
those who went after their children over 40 years ago, and have been
the only group AFAIK to steadfastly do so. All the other groups hid
the problem, allowing offenders to repeat their crimes over and over,
and we are hearing of new cases every day that happened year after
year in these groups, hundreds of cases, but not so with nudists.
>..all the arrest that have occured in nudist camp child
>molestations was the result of police coming to the camp as a resutl of
>child porn or connections to outside sourses....
You, of course, can document ALL of the arrests?
>T....why does aanr and years of nudist web sites address the issue of
>guys with hard ons....
Mostly, from what I've seen, they address people's concerns over what
MIGHT happen which, as it turns out, doesn't happen all that often.
Given that men have spontaneous erections while fully clothed, sans
any visual stimulation, you cannot make the argument that an
occasional erection in a nudist venue is the result of arousal.
>...you are
>becoming a real bore with your stupidity.....
Hey Jonboy, you could always take your bored ass down the road. Don't
respond. I'll shred your stupid arguments anyway.
>and when these guys get
>hard ons looking at naked bodies it is not the elbows ..ears...knees or
>feet but is the crotch that gives them the hard ons....
You are projecting YOUR feelings on others again.
>deny them to participate in nudism and the result is they will not
>be molested because they turned on some pedo that otherwise would not
>have been turned on....
Produce any data that substantiates your claim that children are
molested more often in nudist venuses than clothed ones.
>pedos do not molest unless they are turned
>on.....
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! It's the victims fault, right. The poor
misunderstood peod couldn't help himself. Is that how you get to sleep
at night, blaming the world for your pathological response to
children?
>...and molestations in the textile world do happen because the pedo
>gets the kid to play nudist and they take their clothes off...
Pedos get the kid naked because they want to molest them.
>i had gobs of nudist men and women that frequented my strip clubs
Apparently he owns not just one, but an entire CHAIN of strip clubs.
Which I guess explains why he is anti-nudism, if people actually had a
healthy and mature attitude about sexuality and the human body, he
would go out of business.
I do care if the sexual behavior involved is *hurting* people, which
would include rape and pedophilia.
Violating the Zero Aggression Principle, or the initiation of force or
fraud against others is the only 'golden standard' of morality. Not
what the most popular unproven diety of the moment supposedly tells the
televangelists.
> septic.....the world can glorify homo,...cross
> dressing..bdsm....pain..scat..and pedophilia in conjunction with sex as
> long as they coo and coddle the marriage bed as being the protected and sacred of all sex
I don't care about other people's supposed hypocricy, either.
>....IOW the marriage bed is square one
Nope. Square one when it comes to sex involves bacteria, which don't
even have any gender, exchanging part of their genetic material. In the
hundreds of millions of years since THAT behavior first evolved, there
have been countless other forms of sex, among countless species, until
getting to your much vaunted 'marriage bed' of H. Sapiens. Which would
make it somewhere after square 100.
> about fifty years ago hotel and motel vice detectives
> checked for marriage licenses and it was against the law to have sex if
> not married
Which is a violation of several clauses of the constitution. If you
want to live in a theocracy, move to Afghanistan. Otherwise, grow up
and shut up.
>......so the more the marriage bed is trashed
Seems to me that a couple must have a pretty weak marriage in the first
place, if it is 'trashed' by things that other people do amongst
themselves.
> religion is at the root of a proper sex behavior
Organized religion is a con game devised to enrich the few, and the
source of almost all ABNORMAL sexual behavior that exists. If you think
that God cares what people do with their genitals with other consenting
people, you must think of God as a rather petty and psychotic entity.
Frankly, if I were God, I would not be pleased at the poor opinion you
have of him.
>...man left to his own devices will surely destroy himself
It's strange that most people manage to do quite well for themselves,
until interfered with by your precious church and state.
>...ref aids and promoscuity world wide
You better wake up and smell the coffee, asshole. We have your precious
anti-sex religions to thank for the fact that AIDS has become an
epidemic, because they have opposed, on 'moral grounds', EVERY real
measure shown to prevent it's spread, including sex education in
schools, the widespread distribution of condoms, anonymous testing, and
the legalization of prostitution, accompanied by health regulations and
inspections for those in that line of work. These are things that have
been PROVEN to slow or stop the spread of AIDS. The alternative
suggested by the church 'monogamy or abstinence' has not worked, it
does not work, because it cannot work, because it is contrary to human
nature.
Frankly, I don't give a crap about your whining that 'immoral' behavior
threatens your pet religion of choice or your 'marriage bed' or
whatever other fantasy you want to whine about. I do care that your
unprovable religious fantasies, and those of others, are being used to
justify obstructing necessary means to fight a fatal disease in the
real world. The religious stance is that people 'deserve' to get AIDS'
because they are gay, or adulterous, or whatever other private behavior
your religion wants to spread hatred about, because they find that
selling hatred and fear to gullible people is easier than ever actually
trying to come up with a meaningful insight about what God actually
might be like. Oh, I do hate to tell you this, sweetcheeks, but AIDS
does not work the way your pet anti-sex religion claims it works. A
virus doesn't give a crap about WHOM it infects. Those with AIDS
include those who got it from blood transfusions, bites, from their
dentists, and the completely faithful spouses of those who might have
been unfaithful. And unless the minister of your pet religion has a
degree in biology, he is in no way qualified to talk about AIDS in the
first place, making the words that come out of his mouth regarding it
about as meaningful as those that would come out of the mouth of a
trained parrot. Quite honestly, I think every minister who has EVER
given lip service to the idea of a virus as 'vengeance from our lord'
ought to be dragged up in front of a courtroom and sued for multiple
counts of wrongful death. The first amendment does not protect
FRAUDULENT speech, in particular, FRAUDULENT speech that creates a
hazard, which would include screaming 'FIRE' in a theater, when there
is no fire, or making false claims about an unprovable diety that
hinder efforts to deal with a public health hazard such as AIDS.
>....so what you say is abnormal is probably normal considering the human condition.
The only thing that is 'abnormal' is someone thinking that their
assorted fantasies (of whatever sort) gives them the right to control
other people's lives.
>yeah T....you might try reading the newpaper or rec nude and find this
>to be correct.....jz
Your inability to document the arrests duly noted.
>T...i can remember in the seventies when the indoor pool at glen eden
Arrests, Jon. Tell us about all the arrests that you were claiming.
And how about something from this century, dinosaur boy?
> ...you can
>actually state that a guy fucking a kid was having a piss hard
Actually, I stated no such thing. You simply constructed an argument
and then argued with it. In short, you are talking to yourself, again.
Not very compelling at any rate.
>
>Zee wrote:
>
>>i had gobs of nudist men and women that frequented my strip clubs
>
>Apparently he owns not just one, but an entire CHAIN of strip clubs.
Owned. Maybe. One suspects he is also the Emporer of Europe. The fact
is, no one can vouch for Jon or his history.
========================
Care to provide some real examples?
I have a degree in biology, Zee. What are your qualifications for
discussing bacteria?
Promoting yourself again are you Zee
Michael T.
I cannot see that Septithol has promoted any behavior that would have
resulted you Zee.
Michael T,
> Then we get those claims of his that "nudist parents" are incestuous, that
> the sexual favours of children are sold to paedophiles by nudist club
> owners,
Sadly, there are some nudist parents who are incestuous. I came across
a whole bunch of them on Yahoo! about a year and a half ago. They
listed interests such as "Kinki Kids", "Cherry Poppin' Daddies", and
"The Young Ones" on their profiles. The first two interests listed are
co-incidentally the names of underground music groups whose genres are
poles apart from each other. I think there was a whole police
investigation done on this, because when I checked again a few months
later the populace of these categories had dropped dramatically.
JonZeee is of the mentality "it takes one bad apple to ruin it for the
rest". Therefore, because a minority of nudist parents are incestuous
it must mean the rest of them are as well. This is absolute bullshit.
> and that children (well girls anyway, he never mentions boys) are
> turned-on by seeing adult men naked and willingly engage in group sex with
> them. No-one else in the history of organised nudism has ever made those
> claims and he cannot offer one shred of evidence to support any of them.
That's just a sick fantasy of his. I've *never* witnessed anything
like this at any of the nudist clubs or beaches that I've attended. If
it happened, the perpetrator would have the police on his back in no
time at all!
> But
> just see the righteous indignation when anyone accuses him of being less
> than scrupulously honest! I still can't quite make up my mind whether he's
> simply an unusually persistent troll, or actually believes the bullshit he
> posts. If the later then he needs help, and fast.
I would say 'yes' to both, David. JonZeee has been on this group
longer than I have (I joined it in early 2001), and he still has not
changed or matured beyond when I first knew about him. And it is
doubtful that he will.
He really is a sad, deranged character. But like all mentally ill
people, he thinks that everyone has problems except for him.
Dario Western
Since parent-child incest is not merely illegal in just about every
jurisdiction on the face of the planet, but is also guaranteed to get the
child protection people involved in double-quick time it seems highly
unlikely to me that anyone would boast about that sort of thing on the
internet. So I'm inclined to the view that these people were, like jonZee,
simply unable to distinguish their fantasies from reality. And what makes
you think they were nudists?
David.
They had listed 'Naturists And Nudists' in their profile, and some of these
types wanted to gain entry into the groups that I moderate. I told them in
a no-holds-barred fashion where to go.
--
Regards,
Dario Western
http://www.icq.com/38318214
http://www.myspace.com/25155501
http://theglamgod.spaces.msn.com
http://360.yahoo.com/larrikin70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
"David Looser" <david....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:4tos9cF...@mid.individual.net...
> ..... then you would not have jonZeee around to make
> these truths bite you in the ass.....jonZeee
>
==========================
Nothing that spews forth from you is "truth"!
>
>Zee wrote:
>>
>> ....and read NUDISMS HALL OF SHAME by Nikki Craft ..
(1) That fact that Nikki had documented not only every crime but also
every suspicion of a crime, every possibility of a crime and every
guilt by association she could dream up - over 40 years - and still
has only a small number of issues (only a handful of which are crimes)
that fit all on one page (including out-takes), demonstrates that:
Nudists have been dealing with the problem over 40 years,
unlike other groups who have been in denial; Nikki's cases
and recollections seem extensive, but they cover a lot of
years and a lot of territory, the entire USA and Canada;
The proportion of incidents among nudists is way less than
among the general population of the USA as a whole; again,
few cases in a long span of time and in many, many places;
but a lot of scary writing full of conspiratorial associations;
Nudists have dealt effectively with lesser incidents, such
as unwanted photography (e.g. cell phones), while the
population as a whole ignores much greater issues.
(Just turn to "escort services" in most Yellow Pages);
Nudists have espoused a higher standard of protection
and safety for the women and children, and have kept
raising the bar; Nikki prefers to focus on the exceptions,
however few, where the standards have not been met;
and twist that to make people think that is the general
case, a lie that she knows full well is a lie;
There are real nudists who are criminals and deserve
to be punished for their crimes and treated accordingly;
Nudists must continue to remain vigilant in the face of
a society that might not provide police protection for nude
citizens in the same way it used to say a women in pants
were "asking for it".
(2) In the incidents that Nikki documents, there are many examples of
nudists, including Nikki herself, exposing a situation to public
scrutiny and of individuals being censured for infractions that no
prosecutor would touch without a lot more criminal intent and proof.
Nikki's grousing aside, no other organization was doing so much at
those times.
(3) In a number of the cases Nikki documents, she skips over any and
all positive contributions from the nudist community to the successful
outcomes of these cases, except for her own contributions, which she
certainly toots on about. I have followed up, and in case after case,
when you get down to it, it was the nudists themselves that brought in
the police (rather than taking the law into their own hands).
(4) Unlike Nikki, most nudists have not acted as police. Nudists
exercised appropriate care, understanding that people's reputations
and positive contributions were also at stake. Just because an
accusation is leveled does not mean a wrong has been done. Too many
women have been burned at the stake as witches on those grounds. In
Salem, it was children, five girls, who sent so many to their death.
A few months ago, a school principal near me, who was well-liked, and
had turned around a failing inner-city high school, was accused of
molestation, had his career ruined, and had to leave, even though
there was no evidence or corroboration. Only too late, after vitriolic
outbursts from the media, the righteous administrators above him,
frightened parents and anyone he moved aside, did the girl confess on
her own to having made it up. When people dug deeper, her story just
did not add up, but the damage done to his work relations and could
not be repaired, you see. These kinds of thing make people take sides
in a rush to judgment. This community lost an important leader who was
successful in an area where others were failing the children.
In situations like this, Nudists have been one of the few groups that
have kept their heads and have kept their standards and engaged in
appropriate action befitting the situation and their status as
citizens, alerting the police rather than acting as judge and jury.
> .....pertaining to a pedophile member and being in the local
> newspaper and then you lying about it
================================
The articles in the local papers are all favorable.
Our club is a member of the Issaquah Chamber of Commerce.
We have been a Washington State Corporation since 1937.
There has NEVER been any real problem at our club.
================================
>....makes one wonder why you
> would ever mention the credibility of someone else....you have
> consistently lied about that sno qualmie nudist camp in wa....and i
> have not lied about anything......i have even given police departments
> to check record to back up what i say....and there is no better proof
> than court records....try shutting your mouth and stop the
> lying....jonZeee
==================================
Actual facts?
Guess not.........................
> Hi David,
>
> > Then we get those claims of his that "nudist parents" are incestuous, that
> > the sexual favours of children are sold to paedophiles by nudist club
> > owners,
>
> Sadly, there are some nudist parents who are incestuous.
Believe it or not, there are some nudists who are Republicans!
--
Dan Abel
da...@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA
> Believe it or not, there are some nudists who are Republicans!
I'm one.
Terry "Goldwater Republican" Wood
> Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote in
> news:dabel-AFF1A1....@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net:
>
> > Believe it or not, there are some nudists who are Republicans!
>
> I'm one.
Yeah, I was aiming that at you.
:-)
The point is (and I know that you know this already), that nudists and
non-nudists are exactly the same, except that nudists sometimes don't
wear clothes socially and non-nudists are compulsive about wearing
clothes. Any other generalization about nudists is probably not totally
valid.
I'm not a Democrat.
You did an extensive thread on this awhile back IIRC. She had no
explanation for her libelous statements.
>...i will take a hit here and allow everyone to totally assume i
>am a pathological liar....
We're WAY ahead of you!
>......but why do you question the
>credibility of others that state they are nudist ....
Why not?
>...ref cameras everywhere and certainly everyone is in a
>throw em in jail and throw a way the key mentaility......
So it's not about doing the right thing, it's about getting
caught?????
> ... why do you think these incestuous
>families are lying about being nudist
Conflicting values???
-T.
When the man said alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, I just naturally assumed he was making a delivery.
>yeah yeah yeah....richard...where there is smoke there is or was
>fire....
Your inability to substantiate your claims duly noted.
>
>I'm one.
>
I'm two.
-T.
(but considering registering independent)
>(1) That fact that Nikki had documented not only every crime but also
>every suspicion of a crime,
<rest of excellent post snipped>
Nikki has apparently authored an entry about <what else> Nikki Craft
in Wikkipedia. She seems to have a need to validate herself on a grand
scale. I suspect she and Jon Zee are related on some level. I can't
prove it. Yet.
-T.
> Any other generalization about nudists is probably not totally
> valid.
For some reason I seemed to be compelled to make some comment about
organizing nudists is like herding cats. But I have no idea why I must say
this.
Alien mind probe. No doubt about it. And, no, the tinfoil hat ain't
gonna fix it.
-T.
hope this helps ;-)
"David Looser" <david....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:4tj4r0F...@mid.individual.net...
> you are a liar and a fraud in the same way that the Pope is a Catholic.
> Nothing that you post carries any credibility whatsoever.
You are exactly correct.
Bill Pennington
I'm Three
>>For some reason I seemed to be compelled to make some comment about
>>organizing nudists is like herding cats. But I have no idea why I
>>must say this.
> Alien mind probe. No doubt about it. And, no, the tinfoil hat ain't
> gonna fix it.
D*mn! That just leaves the tin foil underwear!
> Nikki has apparently authored an entry about <what else> Nikki Craft
> in Wikkipedia. She seems to have a need to validate herself on a grand
> scale. I suspect she and Jon Zee are related on some level. I can't
> prove it. Yet.
Well, she's SURE he doesn't belong in her Hall O' Shame, even though she's
SURE what he says is true, even though she's SURE they've never met, even
though she's SURE she interviewed him. Anything about that to make you
suspect something? Seems perfectly crafty to me!
But then again, YOU are a suspicious person. You probably have suspicions
about a mild mannered reporter of a great metropolitan newspaper and a
certain red caped superhero being one and the same. You and Lois Lane.
Tsk, Tsk, Tsk.
> You and Lois Lane.
>Tsk, Tsk, Tsk.
HEY!!!! I was out of town that weekend. I don't care what Lois says.
We weren't even formerly introduced.
> The sexual abuse of children is sadly not that uncommon and it would be
> remarkable in the extreme if there had never been a case of child sex abuse
> by someone connected with nudism in some way. And of course there have been
> such cases, cases which jZ will use to "prove" his claim.
<typical rambling incoherent Zee post sniped)
You couldn't make a reasoned rational argument if your life depended on it.
It's been interesting seeing septithol making mincemeat of your half-baked
arguments - and you are too thick even to notice, as you just repost the
same tired old discredited BS time and time again. I could waste my time
pointing out all the fallacies and logical inconsistencies in your post, but
it'd be about as pointless as explaining it to my cat, anyway life is too
short.
David.