Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Take the $100,000.00 Challenge!!!
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Pendragon
May 22, 2012, 9:14:49 AM5/22/12
to
Tom Blumenthal (a.k.a. Nick N. Kosloff, et al.) has offered to pay
$100,000.00 to anyone who can produce a photograph of him at Woody's
(alternative lifestyle) bar.
Here's his original post:
"$ 100,000 to you if you can produced a non-forgery picture of me at
Woody's. Hiring some goons to drag me in there and snap the photo
wouldn't count. It (the photo) has to exist before this moment."
I've got a picture of "Pete Markham" there, Tommy. Does that count?
$100,000.00 to anyone who can produce a photograph of him at Woody's
(alternative lifestyle) bar.
Here's his original post:
"$ 100,000 to you if you can produced a non-forgery picture of me at
Woody's. Hiring some goons to drag me in there and snap the photo
wouldn't count. It (the photo) has to exist before this moment."
I've got a picture of "Pete Markham" there, Tommy. Does that count?
Rick Salomon
May 22, 2012, 10:52:06 AM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 9:14 am, Michael Pendragon
I've got a video ... only it's *after* we'd left Woody's ... in a
hotel room ... in flagrante ...
Does that count?
Please note: if that doesn't count, I'm considering releasing it as a
dvd.
-- Rick Salomon, esq.
hotel room ... in flagrante ...
Does that count?
Please note: if that doesn't count, I'm considering releasing it as a
dvd.
-- Rick Salomon, esq.
Nick Kosloff
May 23, 2012, 10:35:23 AM5/23/12
to
On May 22, 10:52 am, Rick Salomon <onenightinkocks...@gmail.com>
wrote:
No! No! No! "Rick Salomon" or Michael Skunkly or whomever you are.
Videos of me off-premises from Woody's don't count. Nor do any
pictures of me taken at Woody's after the date of May 21, 2012. I'm
am only promising to pay out for undoctored photographs of me at
Woody's (and not any other gay bar, but ONLY Woody's in Philadelphia)
on or before the date of May 21, 2012.
Pictures of me engaging in any sexual or compromising activity,
homosexual or otherwise (and that includes photoshopped gerbil
pictures) won't get you dick. For that you can contact me privately.
-- N.N.K.
wrote:
Videos of me off-premises from Woody's don't count. Nor do any
pictures of me taken at Woody's after the date of May 21, 2012. I'm
am only promising to pay out for undoctored photographs of me at
Woody's (and not any other gay bar, but ONLY Woody's in Philadelphia)
on or before the date of May 21, 2012.
Pictures of me engaging in any sexual or compromising activity,
homosexual or otherwise (and that includes photoshopped gerbil
pictures) won't get you dick. For that you can contact me privately.
-- N.N.K.
starga...@gmail.com
May 23, 2012, 12:33:07 PM5/23/12
to
(Scarlotti) in the authorship of the so-called "Nick Kosloff" (not
me), who wrote this from the email address
stargazer268(AT)gmail.com? Mike Full-O'Shitzky apparently never gets
tired of this stuff. You can always tell my posts by 2 things (1) I
don't use a handle or pen-name in the authorship field of my posts, as
Pendragon (Michael Rogan) is using here pretending to be me, and (2) I
am only and ALWAYS posting as stargazer267(AT)gmail.com. One little
numeral makes all the difference.
Recommended: KILLFILE stargazer268(AT)gmail.com, unless you enjoy
reading the fraud Michael Scarlotti under another guise.
Michael Pendragon
May 23, 2012, 1:40:10 PM5/23/12
to
On May 23, 12:33 pm, "stargazer...@gmail.com" <stargazer...@gmail.com>
wrote:
If the "counterfeit" is a "fraud," that would make it the real deal.
> (Scarlotti) in the authorship of the so-called "Nick Kosloff" (not
> me), who wrote this from the email address
> stargazer268(AT)gmail.com? Mike Full-O'Shitzky apparently never gets
> tired of this stuff. You can always tell my posts by 2 things (1) I
> don't use a handle or pen-name in the authorship field of my posts, as
> Pendragon (Michael Rogan) is using here pretending to be me, and (2) I
> am only and ALWAYS posting as stargazer267(AT)gmail.com.
Does this mean you're keeping "stargazer267" forever ... or only until
your next name change?
> One little numeral makes all the difference.
That's what she said.
> Recommended: KILLFILE stargazer268(AT)gmail.com, unless you enjoy
> reading the fraud Michael Scarlotti under another guise.
No, Tom, it's the real Scarlotti under another guise.
wrote:
> (Scarlotti) in the authorship of the so-called "Nick Kosloff" (not
> me), who wrote this from the email address
> stargazer268(AT)gmail.com? Mike Full-O'Shitzky apparently never gets
> tired of this stuff. You can always tell my posts by 2 things (1) I
> don't use a handle or pen-name in the authorship field of my posts, as
> Pendragon (Michael Rogan) is using here pretending to be me, and (2) I
> am only and ALWAYS posting as stargazer267(AT)gmail.com.
your next name change?
> One little numeral makes all the difference.
> Recommended: KILLFILE stargazer268(AT)gmail.com, unless you enjoy
> reading the fraud Michael Scarlotti under another guise.
0 new messages