Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  12 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Mike C.  
View profile
 More options May 10, 5:24 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: "Mike C." <Funkifi...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 17:24:13 -0400
Local: Sat, May 10 2008 5:24 pm
Subject: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?

I just got a copy of the Gordon Beck Quartet's Experiments With Pop on which Johnny Mac plays. It's interesting, a bit pedestrian, but I find it more interesting than Emergency, anyway. The tunes are These Boots Are Made For Walking, Norwegian Wood, Sunny, Up Up And Away, Michelle, I Can See For Miles, Good Vibrations, and Monday Monday. The recording was apparently made in August 1967 (a month before I was born). Did McLaughlin do any sessions before this time?

--
Mike C.
http://mikecrutcher.com
"A great percentage of people don't want a challenge. They want
something done to them, they don't want to participate. But there'll
always be maybe 15% that desire something more, and they'll search it
out. And maybe that's where art is."
- Bill Evans


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Keith Freeman  
View profile
 More options May 10, 5:38 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: Keith Freeman <smtp.cablewanadoo.nl>
Date: 10 May 2008 21:38:39 GMT
Local: Sat, May 10 2008 5:38 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?

> I just got a copy of the Gordon Beck Quartet's Experiments With Pop on
> which Johnny Mac plays. It's interesting, a bit pedestrian, but I find
> it more interesting than Emergency, anyway.

I don't find it pedestrian. The only bad thing about it is the twee title -
Experiments With Pops!

> Did
> McLaughlin do any sessions before this time?

The earliest I have is 1963 with Graham Bond (on alto, not organ), Jack
Bruce on bass (acoustic!) and Ginger Baker. It was an LP twofer, don't know
if it's been rereleased.

There's a recording by Mike Carr, Bebop from the East Coast (1962), where
he apparently plays on one track.

From 1967 there's the Danny Thompson Quartet Live.

-Keith

Clips, Portable Changes, tips etc.: www.keithfreemantrio.nl
e-mail: info AT keithfreemantrio DOT nl


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pmfan57  
View profile
 More options May 10, 7:52 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: pmfan57 <jwrag...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 16:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 10 2008 7:52 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
On May 10, 5:24 pm, "Mike C." <Funkifi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I just got a copy of the Gordon Beck Quartet's Experiments With Pop on which Johnny Mac plays. It's interesting, a bit pedestrian, but I find it more interesting than Emergency, anyway. The tunes are These Boots Are Made For Walking, Norwegian Wood, Sunny, Up Up And Away, Michelle, I Can See For Miles, Good Vibrations, and Monday Monday. The recording was apparently made in August 1967 (a month before I was born). Did McLaughlin do any sessions before this time?

> --
> Mike C.http://mikecrutcher.com
> "A great percentage of people don't want a challenge. They want
> something done to them, they don't want to participate. But there'll
> always be maybe 15% that desire something more, and they'll search it
> out. And maybe that's where art is."
> - Bill Evans

I like that "Pops" album and everything, but more interesting that
Emergency!?  Even if Tony Williams' drum parts were all that was on
that Emergency! album, it would be a great album.  Then add some of
the most amazing guitar ever recorded and the great Larry Young.  That
album is so great that DeJohnette and Sco made a two CD tribute to it.

Of course, I could have done without Tony's "vocals".  Great lyrics
like: "Why don't you say what you mean; and mean what you say." Or:
"They say that everything is said in the bed..." etc.

I have a recording of JM with a sax player playing pretty straight
ahead material that is earlier than the Beck album.  I love that early
JM.  No one played anything like that before, or even after.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike C.  
View profile
 More options May 11, 12:01 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: "Mike C." <Funkifi...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 12:01:25 -0400
Local: Sun, May 11 2008 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
I was ready for the Emergency disc to be something great, but the hippie
"spoken word" vibe and the lack of structure really throws me. I think it's
pretty self-indulgent and I can't find anything interesting about it. I'm
much happier with the Trio Of Doom disc, as well as just about anything else
of McLaughlin's.

The Gordon Beck disc is pretty cool, though. Trying to breathe jazz life
into "Good Vibrations" is, er, interesting, but not necessarily in a bad
way.

--
Mike C.
http://mikecrutcher.com
"A great percentage of people don't want a challenge. They want
something done to them, they don't want to participate. But there'll
always be maybe 15% that desire something more, and they'll search it
out. And maybe that's where art is."
- Bill Evans

"pmfan57" <jwrag...@aol.com> wrote in message

news:b1aa1c73-e4ef-487d-9796-165ce2369c5f@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pmfan57  
View profile
 More options May 11, 8:00 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: pmfan57 <jwrag...@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 17:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, May 11 2008 8:00 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
On May 11, 12:01 pm, "Mike C." <Funkifi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Maybe you don't want a challenge?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
george4908  
View profile
 More options May 12, 9:42 am
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: george4908 <george4...@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 06:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 9:42 am
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
You want some early Johnny Mac?  Check this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7vlaA-H-dU

He's somewhat evident in the first piece, much more on display in the
second.  You might recognize one or two other players as well ...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pmfan57  
View profile
 More options May 12, 10:09 am
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: pmfan57 <jwrag...@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 10:09 am
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
On May 12, 9:42 am, george4908 <george4...@aol.com> wrote:

> You want some early Johnny Mac?  Check this:

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7vlaA-H-dU

> He's somewhat evident in the first piece, much more on display in the
> second.  You might recognize one or two other players as well ...

He was in that group for sure with Bond, Bruce and Baker.  But I have
never been able to spot JM in this video (it has been cited in the
group previously).

This is an absolute classic video, that's for sure.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Funkallero  
View profile
 More options May 12, 12:03 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: Funkallero <funkmeisterm...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 12:03 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
On May 11, 8:00 pm, pmfan57 <jwrag...@aol.com> wrote:

I don't think that's the issue. I like just about all of McLaughlin's
output, as well as much avant garde, such as 70's Miles, Ornette,
Shorter, etc. I just can't get myself into Emergency. I don't find
that amazing guitar in light of McLaughlin's overall body of work,
including Live At Albert Hall, Shakti, and even the newest disc, which
I'm loving.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Funkallero  
View profile
 More options May 12, 12:08 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: Funkallero <funkmeisterm...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 12:08 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
On May 10, 5:38 pm, Keith Freeman <smtp.cablewanadoo.nl> wrote:

Maybe "pedestrian" was a bad word. I think I like McLaughlin better as
a leader than a sideman. Of course, with Miles is a different story,
but I just don't hear McLaughlin as really ripping when given the
confines of "These Boots Are Made For Walkin'". Not that complex is
necessarily always better, but the tunes here are a bit too steeped in
the pop tradition to really be a vehicle for jazz interpretation,
excepting "Sunny", which would have been nice to hear McLaughlin blow
over.

Hmmm, I think I'd like to hear McLaughlin teamed with Martino. *That*
would be some blowing!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Al  
View profile
 More options May 12, 7:32 am
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: "Al" <dataviewresea...@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 07:32:19 -0400
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 7:32 am
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
I read that he played the guitar part on Winchester Cathedral.  Can anyone
verify that?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
george4908  
View profile
 More options May 12, 1:47 pm
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz
From: george4908 <george4...@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, May 12 2008 1:47 pm
Subject: Re: Is this John McLaughlin's first official recording?
On May 12, 7:32 am, "Al" <dataviewresea...@charter.net> wrote:

> I read that he played the guitar part on Winchester Cathedral.  Can anyone
> verify that?

I'd heard that and also that he played on the Stone's "Heart of
Stone."

    Reply to author    Forward