Barney Kessel fans

drthoma...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 23, 2010, 9:05:33 PM4/23/10

to

If you like the Barney-and-bass Julie London date, you should like the
Barney-and-bass Sarah Vaughan date even better:

http://tinyurl.com/299am39

Gerry

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 1:23:44 AM4/24/10

to

Audacious! I don't think I've ever seen that done on rmmgj.
--
Dogmatism kills jazz. Iconoclasm kills rock. Rock dulls scissors.

hw

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 4:50:20 AM4/24/10

to

"Gerry" <some...@sunny.calif> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:2010042322234470151-somewhere@sunnycalif...

> On 2010-04-23 18:05:33 -0700, tomb...@jhu.edu said:
>
>> If you like the Barney-and-bass Julie London date, you should like the
>> Barney-and-bass Sarah Vaughan date even better:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/299am39
>
> Audacious! I don't think I've ever seen that done on rmmgj.

never seen what done on rmmgj?

skrohn

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 7:01:17 AM4/24/10

to

Thanks, that has long been one of my favorites.

I ripped my old worn lp a few years back. The only time I ever \]
came across this other than my lp was part of the tune Key Largo as
background for a car commercial.

Scott

thuss

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 10:10:31 AM4/24/10

to

Many thanks!!!! BK is Mr. The in guitar comping. Students would be
wise to study this collection, as well as the Julie London-BK numbers.

Joe Finn

unread,

Apr 23, 2010, 10:56:15 PM4/23/10

to

"tomb...@jhu.edu" <drthoma...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6fa2f4fd-dd75-40f8...@b33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...

> If you like the Barney-and-bass Julie London date, you should like the
> Barney-and-bass Sarah Vaughan date even better:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/299am39

Thank you Tom. .....joe

--
Visit me on the web www.JoeFinn.net

Gerry

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 1:21:25 PM4/24/10

to

Given a link to a direct-download recording.

Gerry

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 1:22:12 PM4/24/10

to

It's a classic, and because of the voice, I far prefer it to his work
with London.

drthoma...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 3:04:35 PM4/24/10

to

On Apr 24, 12:23 am, Gerry <somewh...@sunny.calif> wrote:

> On 2010-04-23 18:05:33 -0700, tombr...@jhu.edu said:
>
> > If you like the Barney-and-bass Julie London date, you should like the
> > Barney-and-bass Sarah Vaughan date even better:
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/299am39
>
> Audacious! I don't think I've ever seen that done on rmmgj.

Someone else ripped and uploaded. I simply link.

thuss

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 6:10:56 PM4/24/10

to

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:22:12 -0700, Gerry <some...@sunny.calif>
wrote:

>On 2010-04-24 07:10:31 -0700, thuss said:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:05:33 -0700 (PDT), "tomb...@jhu.edu"
>> <drthoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If you like the Barney-and-bass Julie London date, you should like the
>>> Barney-and-bass Sarah Vaughan date even better:
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/299am39
>> Many thanks!!!! BK is Mr. The in guitar comping. Students would be
>> wise to study this collection, as well as the Julie London-BK numbers.
>
>It's a classic, and because of the voice, I far prefer it to his work
>with London.

I'm about equal on both. I do, however, recall fondly Julie's music
as being very soothing to me when I would get my delidate feelings
hurt when I was young. And none of her other recordings, good as they
were, would match those she did with BK.
I discussed this with a lady online some years back, who was familiar
with him, as her dad was a professional musician, and she made the
statment, "BK can make anybody sound good...."
So whethere it was Sarah, Julie, or anyone else, it was BK that made
them sound so good. (Though I will say that Sarah could match BK's
tone with an eerie accuarcy.)

Gerry

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 9:01:40 PM4/24/10

to

I assumed that. Not that it matters to me. I had just never seen a
direct-download link on usenet here. Normally you click on a link
regarding an artist and find yourself reviewing a video, or maybe an
mp3 somewhere.

I've started "skipping the middleman" when I provide large files to
others. This, rather than sending them to a site (mine or another)
where they can figure out on their own how to download it, decompress,
and all the rest.

drthoma...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 24, 2010, 10:07:29 PM4/24/10

to

On Apr 24, 8:01 pm, Gerry <somewh...@sunny.calif> wrote:

Also, I would have bought a legit copy of this one decades ago if I
knew where to find one. I paid Japanese import prices for the Annie
Ross record I linked in the other thread, and it was worth every
penny.

Gerry

unread,

Apr 25, 2010, 3:41:56 AM4/25/10

to

On 2010-04-24 19:07:29 -0700, tomb...@jhu.edu said:

>> I've started "skipping the middleman" when I provide large files to
>> others. This, rather than sending them to a site (mine or another)
>> where they can figure out on their own how to download it, decompress,
>> and all the rest.
>

> Also, I would have bought a legit copy of this one decades ago if I
> knew where to find one. I paid Japanese import prices for the Annie
> Ross record I linked in the other thread, and it was worth every
> penny.

I did find the Sarah/Barney CD a number of years ago, actually informed
of its existence right here. It was one of those momentary rebirths
these sides have gotten over the past 15-20 years.

May they continue.

hw

unread,

Apr 25, 2010, 4:35:47 AM4/25/10

to

"Gerry" <some...@sunny.calif> schrieb im Newsbeitrag

news:2010042418014034952-somewhere@sunnycalif...

direct links have been posted here before. but if someone else uploaded the
file the decent thing to to is to link to his blog or website and *not*
provide a direct link here.

drthoma...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 25, 2010, 3:21:44 PM4/25/10

to

On Apr 25, 3:35 am, "hw" <nos...@home.net> wrote:
>
> direct links have been posted here before. but if someone else uploaded the
> file the decent thing to to is to link to his blog or website and *not*
> provide a direct link here.

Point taken, but his blog is going offline any minute now.

Gerry

unread,

Apr 25, 2010, 5:12:55 PM4/25/10

to

Whose was it?

drthoma...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 25, 2010, 5:33:29 PM4/25/10

to

On Apr 25, 4:12 pm, Gerry <somewh...@sunny.calif> wrote:

> On 2010-04-25 12:21:44 -0700, tombr...@jhu.edu said:
>
> > On Apr 25, 3:35 am, "hw" <nos...@home.net> wrote:
>
> >> direct links have been posted here before. but if someone else uploaded the
> >> file the decent thing to to is to link to his blog or website and *not*
> >> provide a direct link here.
>
> > Point taken, but his blog is going offline any minute now.
>
> Whose was it?

http://tinyurl.com/23llr3j

Gerry

unread,

Apr 25, 2010, 7:24:18 PM4/25/10

to

On 2010-04-25 14:33:29 -0700, tomb...@jhu.edu said:

>>> Point taken, but his blog is going offline any minute now.
>>
>> Whose was it?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/23llr3j

How about that! Between this morning (when I last checked it) and
now--it's gone "private"! I assume you have his newest hideout...

Blogspots shenanigans are buckling fast. Over the past 4 or 5 weeks a
number of [blogs/points of distribution] have dissappeared.

hw

unread,

Apr 26, 2010, 8:15:13 AM4/26/10

to

"Gerry" <some...@sunny.calif> schrieb im Newsbeitrag

news:2010042516241844735-somewhere@sunnycalif...

> On 2010-04-25 14:33:29 -0700, tomb...@jhu.edu said:
>
>>>> Point taken, but his blog is going offline any minute now.
>>>
>>> Whose was it?
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/23llr3j
>
> How about that! Between this morning (when I last checked it) and
> now--it's gone "private"! I assume you have his newest hideout...
>
> Blogspots shenanigans are buckling fast. Over the past 4 or 5 weeks a
> number of [blogs/points of distribution] have dissappeared.

the "bloggers" should stick to out-of-print stuff imo.

Gerry

unread,

Apr 26, 2010, 11:14:55 AM4/26/10

to

On 2010-04-26 05:15:13 -0700, hw said:

>> Blogspots shenanigans are buckling fast. Over the past 4 or 5 weeks a
>> number of [blogs/points of distribution] have dissappeared.
>
> the "bloggers" should stick to out-of-print stuff imo.

I concur. And some of them do a hell of a good job at providing oop stuff.