"Paul K" <
fake...@none.com> wrote:
> On 2/5/12 9:20 PM, David J. Littleboy wrote:
>> "Gerry"<
add...@domain.com> wrote:
>>> On 2012-02-05 21:40:09 +0000, Tim McNamara said:
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed this too, it seems to have affected some of my other
>>>> newsgroups as well. Usually when this sort of thing happens it is due
>>>> to a snafu with Google Groups (since most Usenet posters seem to use
>>>> it).
>>>
>>> I notice also that all posts over the past short while are coming from
>>> people who use dedicated newsreaders. Even more rationale for your
>>> assumption.
>>
>> Yep. I'd guess that the folks at Google have no reason to play nice and
>> forward messages posted on Google Groups to usenet and lots of reason not
>> to. I guess they waited until there were enough people posting through GG
>> that the squawk wouldn't be loud enough to bother them.
>>
>> Requiescat in Pacem usenet.
>>
> is this right?
Dunno. I'm just guessing. But from what I'm reading about social media, I'd
imagine that Google is terrified of being left in the dust and depserate to
leverage everything they've got.
> I figured this was a glitch that would get sorted out, and I can't find
> any official confirmation that google stopped forwarding messages to
> usenet. (on google, anyway!)
Well, times change. And maybe usenet's past its sell-by date. I'm more than
a bit of a fuddy-duddy: the idea of putting all one's data in the cloud
(e.g. gmail, iPhone) strikes me as nuts . And letting Google or Apple or
Facebook or Twitter know that much about you seems insane beyond words. The
Mac-ophiles spent the last 20 years screaming how evil M$ was, and then run
like lambs to the Facebook slaughter. I don't get it.
There are other things in life besides usenet and social media, so we'll all
survive. Even me.
--
David J. Littleboy
An MIT Comp. Sci. grad whose only concession to the brave new electronic
world is a Kindle, since I don't have the space for the dead trees.
Tokyo, Japan