Message from discussion Nats
Received: by 10.68.242.68 with SMTP id wo4mr2286653pbc.1.1350181905436;
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.125.164 with SMTP id mr4mr1937321pbb.19.1350181905422; Sat,
13 Oct 2012 19:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=188.8.131.52;
Subject: Re: Nats
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:31:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 6:39:09 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:22:11 -0700 (PDT), amuraw...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Saturday, October 13, 2012 3:29:08 PM UTC-7, (unknown) wrote:
> >> I continue to be amazed how mad people get over a GM of a team they
> >> have no interest in, while those with an actual vested interest (i.e.
> >> Nats fans) are very supportive of doing the right thing for the team
> >> and the individual.
> >Yeah, sure. But that wasn't the right thing for the team or the individual.
> Yes it was. History will prove it. No way Strasburg would have made
> a difference this year, that much I am certain. He was wearing out...
> getting shelled fairly regularly before he got shut down. Somehow he
> was gonna morph into Justin Verlander in the playoffs? Sure.
The major fuckup is not shutting down Strasburg after however many innings he was shutdown after, it is allowing him to get to that many innings way before the playoffs. If you're not playing to win titles, why the fuck even play?