Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Religion of Hate.......

0 views
Skip to first unread message

grtflmark

unread,
Jul 15, 2005, 1:01:15 AM7/15/05
to
These people (yes, I said "these people") are absolutely chilling. The
hate and absolute disrespect for life they have makes the abortionist
in Kansas who was killing children in the 3rd trimester and the idiot
that shot the abortionist doctor look like charitable and kind people.


Tuesday, July 12, 2005
Evil confesses in open court


Mohammed Bouyeri, suspected [admitted] killer of Dutch filmmaker Theo
van Gogh, is seen in this image from the Dutch television program
'Opsporing Verzocht', which was aired on Monday, Nov. 29, 2004. Police
received more than 50 tips about the murder of van Gogh after an
estimated 2 million viewers watched the program. Dutch Justice Minister
Piet Hein Donner approved the publication of the photo, generally
banned under Dutch privacy laws, which prohibit the release by
authorties of a suspect's identity.

Bouyeri, shown by the Norwegian military to have ties with al Qaeda,
had this to say:

Mohammed Bouyeri also turned to Van Gogh's mother, Anneke, in court and
told her: "I don't feel your pain."

"I can't feel for you because I think you're a nonbeliever," he said.

Bouyeri, 27, faces life imprisonment in the Nov. 2 killing of Van Gogh,
who was found shot and stabbed. He has not mounted a defense.

"I did it out of conviction," Bouyeri said. "If I ever get free, I
would do it again."

More interesting, perhaps, is the reported reaction of the Dutch
spectators:

Some spectators rose to their feet as he spoke, visibly stunned by his
comments.
They are "stunned," perhaps, to see the enemy up close and personal. If
they are surprised, though, it is only because -- like many Westerners
-- they have intentionally refused to comprehend the ambitions of our
enemy. One can only hope that Bouyeri's trial, like the murder of Theo
Van Gogh itself, will convert at least some of those who think that it
is the hawks who misunderstand the jihadis.

Bouyeri did not act alone. If you are laboring under any
misapprehension that he is quite representative of the enemy we face,
read the Norwegian Defence Establishment's English-language
report(pdf).

UPDATE: Dutch blog Peaktalk is covering the trial -- Day two here. Or
just go to his main page and scroll down. Via Glenn.


Permalink By TigerHawk at 7/12/2005 11:39:00 AM
Main
2 Comments:
Hi,

To days trial was an amazing spectacle. Yesterday all Dutch news
reporters said they where so desperate to hear some explanation from
Bouyeri. Like that would be very explanatory? What are these people
waiting for? It was like they where hanging on his lips, desperately
waiting for the miracle man to explain to them the obvious.

But today, they where served by terrorist Mohammed. He told them plain
and simple, the obvious: Don't mess with Allah or we kill you. These
guys have only 1 law, the Sharia. Hey what is new here, I would say!
But the hypocrite PC community was shocked anyway, they are not used to
so much frankness.

But Mr. terrorist did explain more than this obvious remark. After
speaking to the mother of late Theo van Gogh. He turned around to the
policeman and woman who arrested him. Some of these policeman, had
earlier in the trial used their right as "victim" to address the court
(no no, not as a witness!), just like the mother of Theo van Gogh (this
is relatively new court procedure in The Netherlands, it is for
informing the court of the impact of the crime, but is not part of the
evidence of the trial, hence there is no cross examination). These
police officers had told the court that they had been very scared
during the arrest, because he had shot at them several times, one said:
"I never had used my police weapon, but now Mohammed forced me to use
it for the first time", he was deeply shocked. Two of the arresting
policeman, still are not able to work due to the stress of being shot
at.

Any way, Mohammed the terrorist, he wanted to clear up some of the
rumours around his shooting at the officers. After talking to the
mother of Theo van Gogh he turned is head to them, looked them in the
eyes and told them: There are rumours that during my arrest, I was
aiming low when I shooting at you, just to provoke you to shoot me
dead. But that is not true, I was really trying to shoot you guys dead
and was hoping to die in the process.

The policeman where devastated and some started to cry....(REALY!!!)

I bet you didn't hear that on the MSM! But I do not make this up, it
was reported on Dutch TV channel SBS6.

You might wonder what else you missed? Well a lot, because all media
focused on the terrorist. But that is not the truly interesting part,
the really interesting stuff is how the Dutch, Europe and the West in
general is handling cases like these. Thus the real news was in
questions like:

"What did the prosecutor say?" and "What did the Islam expert of
the prosecutor office tell the court?"

Well the prosecutor said a lot, I think his final speech lasted for
more than four hours. It gave a great insight in the current
multicultural political consensus in the Netherlands. It talked about
discrimination of the Islamic people and lack of respect and that kind
of stuff. This really needs some further scrutiny. I just hearth some
parts of it, and an amazing example of what he was telling the court
was that he told them that some opinion makers / writers did not
enhance the debate about integration of immigrants and actually
obstructed a government solution (he must mean Theo van Gogh!).
Although he also said that this was allowed in a democracy, it stays a
pretty amazing remark. He clearly defended a predetermined position in
this 'democratic' debate. Why?

But also the Islam expert, mr. Ruud Peters, was an amazing choice. The
media I read, did not report much on what he actually said. But to take
him as a prosecutors expert is an amazing choice (he is also an expert
in the other Hofstad terrorist trials). Not long a go, this expert,
worked as an hostile expert in an anti terrorist trial. At that trial a
other prosecutor accused him of ties with extremist himself!

But I must be honest, Peters is a respected Islamic law expert, they
even respect him in Iran. During the time he works for the prosecutor
on very sensitive Dutch terrorist cases he still visits terrorist
country number #1: Iran. And the love him in Iran! The mullah press
even quoted him during his visit in May 2005:

http://iqna.ir/NewsBodyDesc_en.asp?lang=en&ProdID=19312

On the other hand, he does not like all Iranians. He does not like
Iranian dissidents for example. One of them, an in the Netherlands well
known Iranian dissident, Ellian, who criticizes the political islam, he
called an "Isfahanic dog".

But he does like people like, Benzakour, who is a friend of him.
Benzakour is a Duth fundamentalist who glorified the 9/11 attacks and
compared the 9/11 attacks with sex and the conception of a woman.. I
could go on, about his 'expert' but I think you get the picture by
now.

I hope that I contributed to some more insight in this high profile
Dutch trial and showed that this trial is really not about Mohammed
Bouyeri but about Dutch society and freedom.

By Anonymous, at 6:27 PM

Thank you for the excellent and thoughtful comment. It was very
interesting.

By TigerHawk, at 6:59 PM

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

VAN GOGH TRIAL: DAY TWO
The prosecution has just delivered its closing arguments and demanded a
life sentence for Bouyeri. Let's just summarize what the defendant is
actually accused of:

(1) The premeditated murder of Theo van Gogh - with the aggravating
condition that he proceeded to kill Van Gogh after the latter pleaded
for his life; (2) The attempted murder of a number of policemen - after
the killing a serious firefight erupted between Bouyeri and a number of
cops who had rushed to the scene; (3) the attempted murder of a number
of bystanders; (4) Obstructing he work of a member of parliament - this
refers to the threats uttered to Ayaan Hirsi Ali in the letter Bouyeri
pinned on Van Gogh's body with a knife after he had killed him.
Apparently there's a 19th century statute on the books that makes
this a pretty serious crime.

Well, the prosecutor considers that all four points have been proven
and that in addition to a life sentence Bouyeri should lose his right
to vote. In a statement to the court Bouyeri explained he would do
exactly the same thing if he was ever paroled, and addressed Van Gogh's
mother directly:

He argued that he did not killl her son, "but I have chopped off his
head according to the law that orders me to do so to everyone who
offends Allah. I do not not feel your pain as I do not know what it is
to suffer the loss of a child"
As I said, alive and chilling.
The panel of three judges will sentence in two weeks. Note that it was
a particularly short trial as Bouyeri waived all his rights to a
defense.

0 new messages