[LH] indian fashion

[Sadia Saeed]

fashion, Fashion accessory, Bracelets, Brooches, Cufflings, Leather
Sandals, Ring (jewellery), Fashion History

http://fashionstylishwork.blogspot.com/2009/09/indian-fashion.html
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To unsubscribe from this group or for more info about it, see
http://groups.google.com/group/love-hounds/web/faq
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Richard Messum]

Yay! More spam. Just what i need...

Richard

[Douglas Alan]

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Richard Messum <spri...@cyg.net> wrote:

Yay! More spam. Just what i need...
>

You don't really have to worry about a massive influx of spam. *Every*
person who posts to the mailing list has to be manually approved by me.

Google's software occasionally messes up and lets someone post before I
approve them or ban them as a spammer, but I currently see about 100X the
amount of spam that you do!

|>ouglas

[Don Williams]

So, you're saying that you approved the spammer. Got it.

[Richard Messum]

|>ougie, i already have a massive influx of spam. I would say that at least 70% of my e-mail is from people i've never heard of who want my money, and my ISP's spam filter, filters out exactly none of them.

It's ok, though, i don't care, spam away Ms Saeed. I wish you well. We all have to make a living and there's something about shafting the gullible that appeals to me ;o)

Richard
----- Original Message -----

From: Douglas Alan
To: love-...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 3:41 PM
Subject: [LH] Re: indian fashion

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Richard Messum <spri...@cyg.net> wrote:

Yay! More spam. Just what i need...

You don't really have to worry about a massive influx of spam. *Every* person who posts to the mailing list has to be manually approved by me.

Google's software occasionally messes up and lets someone post before I approve them or ban them as a spammer, but I currently see about 100X the amount of spam that you do!

|>ouglas

[Douglas Alan]

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Don Williams <donwi...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> So, you're saying that you approved the spammer. Got it.
>

No, what I said--if you had bothered to read it--is that Google's software
*occasionally* fucks up.

|>ouglas

P.S. When it does so, it typically lets a *single* message from the offender
through, before that offender is permanently banned. 99% of the time,
however, posts from newcomers are correctly held for approval by the Google
Group software.

[Don Williams]

There you go...blaming someone else.

[Douglas Alan]

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Don Williams <donwi...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> There you go...blaming someone else.
>

Believe it or not, Google is sometimes fallible, even though I am not.

[Richard Messum]

This is the 21st century, Don. Attributing blame is the art form.

Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: Don Williams
To: love-...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 5:34 PM
Subject: [LH] Re: indian fashion

There you go...blaming someone else.

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Douglas Alan <do...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Don Williams <donwi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> So, you're saying that you approved the spammer. Got it.
>
> No, what I said--if you had bothered to read it--is that Google's software
> *occasionally* fucks up.
> |>ouglas
> P.S. When it does so, it typically lets a *single* message from the
> offender
> through, before that offender is permanently banned. 99% of the time,
> however, posts from newcomers are correctly held for approval by the
> Google
> Group software.
>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Douglas Alan <darkw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Richard Messum <spri...@cyg.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yay! More spam. Just what i need...
>> >
>> > You don't really have to worry about a massive influx of spam. *Every*
>> > person who posts to the mailing list has to be manually approved by me.
>> >
>> > Google's software occasionally messes up and lets someone post before I
>> > approve them or ban them as a spammer, but I currently see about 100X
>> > the
>> > amount of spam that you do!
>> >
>> > |>ouglas
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~

[Douglas Alan]

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Richard Messum <spri...@cyg.net> wrote:

>
> This is the 21st century, Don. Attributing blame is the art form.
>

To whom do I attribute the blame that everyone around here is a wise-ass?