Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
When songs collide
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Rich Brown
Feb 1, 2012, 10:31:05 AM2/1/12
to
This is the sound of voices two:
Mud, mud, glorious mud
Mud, mud, glorious mud
Bob BobDJ
Feb 4, 2012, 6:58:34 AM2/4/12
to
On Feb 1, 3:31 pm, Rich Brown <rab...@freemars.org> wrote:
> This is the sound of voices two:
> Mud, mud, glorious mud
http://spacedglazedradio.blogspot.com/
> This is the sound of voices two:
> Mud, mud, glorious mud
Kay Shapero
Feb 9, 2012, 2:58:21 AM2/9/12
to
Whilst working on the list of previous kazoo awards, I'm adding links to
pages with photos or further commentary on the kazoos of each year that
I've got them for. I just put up one for the first year I made the
kazoos for, and thus have photos of the lot, ConChord 19 (2005). I'd
like everybody to go take a look at the layout and let me know if this
seems reasonable as a format before I make up the rest of them.
In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
(frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
that.
--
Kay Shapero
http://www.kayshapero.net/filkfaq.htm
Address munged; to email use kay at the above domain.
pages with photos or further commentary on the kazoos of each year that
I've got them for. I just put up one for the first year I made the
kazoos for, and thus have photos of the lot, ConChord 19 (2005). I'd
like everybody to go take a look at the layout and let me know if this
seems reasonable as a format before I make up the rest of them.
In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
(frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
that.
--
Kay Shapero
http://www.kayshapero.net/filkfaq.htm
Address munged; to email use kay at the above domain.
Kay Shapero
Feb 9, 2012, 3:22:36 AM2/9/12
to
In article <MPG.299d1c76...@news.eternal-september.org>,
k...@invalid.net says...
http://www.kayshapero.net/Conchord19.html
--
Kay Shapero
http://www.kayshapero.net
Address munged, to email use kay at the above domain (everything after
the www.)
k...@invalid.net says...
>
> Whilst working on the list of previous kazoo awards, I'm adding links to
> pages with photos or further commentary on the kazoos of each year that
> I've got them for. I just put up one for the first year I made the
> kazoos for, and thus have photos of the lot, ConChord 19 (2005). I'd
> like everybody to go take a look at the layout and let me know if this
> seems reasonable as a format before I make up the rest of them.
>
> In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
> current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
> labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
> the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
> you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
> (frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
> majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
> that.
OK, that was brilliant - it's here:
> Whilst working on the list of previous kazoo awards, I'm adding links to
> pages with photos or further commentary on the kazoos of each year that
> I've got them for. I just put up one for the first year I made the
> kazoos for, and thus have photos of the lot, ConChord 19 (2005). I'd
> like everybody to go take a look at the layout and let me know if this
> seems reasonable as a format before I make up the rest of them.
>
> In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
> current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
> labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
> the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
> you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
> (frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
> majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
> that.
http://www.kayshapero.net/Conchord19.html
--
Kay Shapero
http://www.kayshapero.net
Address munged, to email use kay at the above domain (everything after
the www.)
Barney Evans
Feb 11, 2012, 2:19:46 PM2/11/12
to
On 2/9/2012 12:22 AM, Kay Shapero wrote:
>> In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
>> current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
>> labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
>> the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
>> you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
>> (frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
>> majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
>> that.
>
> OK, that was brilliant - it's here:
> http://www.kayshapero.net/Conchord19.html
>
>
The site seems fine, works good for me. Sometimes the float translucently
>> In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
>> current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
>> labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
>> the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
>> you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
>> (frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
>> majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
>> that.
>
> OK, that was brilliant - it's here:
> http://www.kayshapero.net/Conchord19.html
>
>
covers the award. (Mainly due to the camera being a little to close to
the award, but not a major deal.)
I have video of the award ceremony from ConChord in 1990. Would you want
to put that on your site?
Barney
Kay Shapero
Feb 13, 2012, 1:38:53 AM2/13/12
to
In article <jh6f0i$pfd$1...@dont-email.me>, barney...@gmail.com says...
need to take better photos of the awards. I'll be giving myself more
distance next time. As for the cover, they ALL cover portions of the
photo - would it look better or worse to add an extra block of space
beneath (well, actually TO) the photograph (probably just plain black)
for the labels?
>
> I have video of the award ceremony from ConChord in 1990. Would you want
> to put that on your site?
Ooh yeah - how long is it? (For that matter, how large.)
Address munged; to email use kay at the above domain.
>
> On 2/9/2012 12:22 AM, Kay Shapero wrote:
> >> In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
> >> current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
> >> labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
> >> the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
> >> you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
> >> (frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
> >> majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
> >> that.
> >
> > OK, that was brilliant - it's here:
> > http://www.kayshapero.net/Conchord19.html
> >
> >
>
> The site seems fine, works good for me. Sometimes the float translucently
> covers the award. (Mainly due to the camera being a little to close to
> the award, but not a major deal.)
The main thing I've discovered whilst working on this project is that I
> On 2/9/2012 12:22 AM, Kay Shapero wrote:
> >> In particular, I want to know about the photo gallery/slideshow. Is the
> >> current format ok, or should I add extra space on the bottom for the
> >> labels, which currently float translucently on top of the bottom part of
> >> the photo? Is the transition too fast, too slow, or fine as is? Would
> >> you prefer the thumbnails on top or to the side rather than underneath
> >> (frankly *I* find them a lot more convenient where they are, but if the
> >> majority prefers otherwise I can move them easily enough)? Stuff like
> >> that.
> >
> > OK, that was brilliant - it's here:
> > http://www.kayshapero.net/Conchord19.html
> >
> >
>
> The site seems fine, works good for me. Sometimes the float translucently
> covers the award. (Mainly due to the camera being a little to close to
> the award, but not a major deal.)
need to take better photos of the awards. I'll be giving myself more
distance next time. As for the cover, they ALL cover portions of the
photo - would it look better or worse to add an extra block of space
beneath (well, actually TO) the photograph (probably just plain black)
for the labels?
>
> I have video of the award ceremony from ConChord in 1990. Would you want
> to put that on your site?
Address munged; to email use kay at the above domain.
0 new messages