Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Orchestra tuning
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Briggs  
View profile  
 More options Jun 17 2008, 10:49 am
Newsgroups: rec.music.makers.bowed-strings, rec.music.early
From: "John Briggs" <john.brig...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:49:47 +0100
Local: Tues, Jun 17 2008 10:49 am
Subject: Re: Orchestra tuning

BestStudentViolins.com wrote:
> On Jun 16, 10:48 pm, Terry <b...@clown.invalid> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:35:57 +1000, BestStudentViolins.com wrote
>> (in article
>> <a1cf1a3d-62e7-4eab-a67d-62b15a92e...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com>):

>>> This remark was made on YahooAnswers:

>>> Lots of orchestras tune to 442 for a brighter tone. Also, apparently
>>> the Boston Symphony Orchestra tunes to 444, NY Phil tunes to 443,
>>> and Berlin Phil tunes to 445

>>> ...this is not true, is it.

>>> My response was the following:

>>> Orchestras tune to 440. Baroque performance groups can tune to less
>>> than 440 (438 or less), but not higher than 440.

>>> No?

>> No.

>> Baroque pitch was anything between about A = 392Hz and A = 466Hz. As
>> a general (but not reliable) rule, the French opted for the lower
>> end of the spectrum and the Italians for the higher end.

> Terry, I appreciate the information, which is something one should
> know.  My real concern, however, is the following:

>>> Lots of orchestras tune to 442 for a brighter tone. Also, apparently
> the Boston Symphony Orchestra tunes to 444, NY Phil tunes to 443, and
> Berlin Phil tunes to 445

> Is this true??

They wouldn't admit it, and the numbers are probably not accurate, but yes,
it is broadly true (442 is more believable than 445.)
--
John Briggs

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google