The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.music.compose
From: Samuel Vriezen <sqv.doesnt.want.s...@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 20:32:31 +0100
Local: Tues, Nov 4 2003 2:32 pm
Subject: Re: Not really composing
knud wrote: But new works do have to be new. >>It seems hard to be "original," > Original and good are not neccesarily synonymous. Brahms wrote some good > At this point in music history, the reliance on "sound Any value can serve as an excuse for bad music. But I can't see how one > effects" and novelty has lost it's appeal for many. Now the meat seems to take > center stage again. Novelty is only good in a meaty context. Novelty for it's > own sake has spawned endless orchestral works with xylophone obbligato. Excuse > me while I yawn. can tire of newness. It seems almost logically impossible. Unless the definition of new would be having a xylophone, but that's not the case. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||