On Oct 11, 1:09 pm, "William Sommerwerck" <
grizzledgee...@comcast.net>
wrote:
> >>>> Mr Daniels, how do you feel about the last movement of Beethoven's
> >>>> Eighth? It wasn't written for organ, but it sure sounds like organ
>
> music.
>
> >>> A regular Beethoven finale, nothing particularly organy about it...
> >> To me, it sounds like a virtuoso organ piece.
> > In what way? How so more than any other Beethoven finale?
>
> This is very subjective. If we could listen together, I could explain it
> more easily.
>
> One thing that sounds virtuoso-organy is the way Beethoven treats groups of
> instruments as if they were clusters of stops. (I can't explain it better
> than that.) And then there's the end...
But how is that different from any other orchestral work of the
period? The instruments were used in choirs! (This summer the
Washington Square Music Festival played a rarely heard Divertimento of
Mozart's -- a fairly early one, which I suspect related to his visit
to Italy -- in which not only sections of movements, but entire
movements were scored for only the strings, only the woodwinds, or
only the brass, and they were used in contrasting choirs. It's
probably rarely heard becajse chamber ensembles might not have the
luxury of, or budget for, so many players at once.)
> "doodle-oot... doodle-oot... doodle-oot... wham!" It's as if "all the stops"
> have been abruptly pulled out.
But organists don't do that -- if they're aiming for a big climax,
they _gradually_ add stops. (And in Beethoven's day there were no
mechanical aids, i.e. modern-day pistons, so they _couldn't_ do that:
the most stops you could add at once would be two (one with each hand,
but then the tone would stop while you were doing it), or 2x as many
assistants as were standing by.
> You don't have to agree. I was just expressing my reaction.
Fine -- so long as you recognize that the other finales are handled
similarly.