On Apr 13, 5:07 am, Dufus <
steveha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well-received Carnegie recital this week of all 3 last piano sonatas :
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/13/arts/music/mitsuko-uchida-plays-sch...
>
> "She played with crackling intensity and steely fortissimos ( D.
> 958 ).......all the more gripping here for the balance of sinew and
> sensitivity in Ms. Uchida’s playing ( D.959 ).......Ms. Uchida’s
> elegant artistic temperament brought exquisite shadings (D.960 ) ...."
>
> My cd's of her playing the Debussy Etudes and last 3 LvB Sonatas are
> treasures, but surprising she is so at home in the thicker textures of
> these Schubert ? She's recorded the Schuberts as well, of course ;
> accolades for those recordings as well ? Thanks.
>
> Dufus
I love these three sonatas as much as any music I know, but I think
programming all three in one evening is a horrible idea. I don't even
like the idea of programming TWO in one recital. If a performer wants
to perform all three, I think it's best done in three separate
recitals in combination with other Schubert piano works. I've gone to
several Op. 109-111 recitals as well. While they take less time to
perform than D.958-D.960, they are quite dense, musically and
emotionally. I prefer them served up individually as well.
This trend of performing cycles in a single evening - whether they be
Bach's Violin or Cello solo sonatas, the WTC, the Beethoven Cello
Sonatas, the Brahms Violin Sonatas, Chopin's 4 Ballades or Scherzi,
and a slew of others - makes little sense to me. They weren't written
to be performed this way and they lose something being performed one
after another after another. The forces at play to create such
programs have little to do with what I enjoy about music.
DF