Message from discussion
Brahms Violin concerto-Oistrakh vs.Vengerov
Received: by 10.66.77.227 with SMTP id v3mr1412086paw.11.1349331787519;
Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.244.73 with SMTP id xe9mr1944321pbc.10.1349331787477; Wed,
03 Oct 2012 23:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: t10ni23601286pbh.0!nntp.google.com!kr7no3904697pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a0988e8c-2be8-4921-bb25-44157345e1a1@b8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.208.174.103;
posting-account=cE5-FwoAAACF_js9gD5WRebNdjLSpL55
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.208.174.103
References: <1d0f8ef3-67a1-4838-8444-ccf226c23e39@l32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
<c2f26dae-56c6-40b5-9e4f-945c55dd8ba3@i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
<01427e56-b9f8-4840-bfa1-d9686fff904d@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
<f9b73c6f-673b-4027-b255-7e3fca9cf37c@googlegroups.com> <a0988e8c-2be8-4921-bb25-44157345e1a1@b8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <230e5fad-7c0d-4182-9f6c-7cf30e842f09@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Brahms Violin concerto-Oistrakh vs.Vengerov
From: Oscar <oscaredwardwilliam...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:23:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 3:34:21 PM, basnperson wrote:
>=20
> > It's a very good and exciting performance overall, though not uniquely =
so.=20
>=20
> so what would be a 'unique' performance that you could point out to
> all of us?
My current favorite is a 1946 performance by Efrem Zimbalist w/ the Boston =
Symphony Orchestra and Serge Koussevitzky, restored last year by Mark Obert=
-Thorn http://tiny.cc/y84mlw
<<The source for the Brahms was a CD-R copied from a tape transfer of the o=
riginal broadcast acetates. Although there are some intermittent problems, =
the basic sound quality is notably above average for broadcast transcriptio=
ns of that era. There is a wealth of audible detail, including Koussevitzky=
=92s spoken =93Bravo=94 at the end of Zimbalist=92s sublime performance of =
the second movement.>>
Caveat: those uncouth Bostonians clap between movements =97 the nerve!