On Nov 10, 10:08 pm, 3Bs <threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2:25 am, "Praetorius" <praetoriusN...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > I have been listeningto the Bruckner Symphony No. 9 [which is currently (and
> > probably will remain) my favorite]. I recently acquired the
> > Haitink/Concertgebouw, and am amazed that there are such a variety of
> > pleasing (valid?) interpretations. I say this after having enjoyed the the
> > Giulini/VPO (DG), Schuricht VPO (EMI) , Von Hausegger/Munich Philharmonic
> > and Furtwangler/BPO (among others). What am I missing (i.e., are there
> > other recordings to which I should expose myself)?
> I'm not a dedicated Wand fan, but his Köln recording is concentrated
> and has real power. The coda of the first movement is about as
> powerful as it gets.
Indeed it is, and Wand also emphasizes the clashes between D and Eflat
at the end of the first movement more than I have heard in any other
performances, including his own later ones, this and many similar
details making this one of the starkest, most "modern sounding"
Bruckner 9s. The horn calls and timpani/trumpet responses at the
beginning of the first movement also sound the most "misterioso" to me
of all the recordings I know, although I find it hard to put my finger
on justwhy that is.
On Nov 10, 10:09 pm, 3Bs <threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 9:59 pm, "Sol L. Siegel" <vod...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Some others that somehow haven't been mentioned yet:
> > Barenboim/Berlin/Teldec (I think I'm the only in this ng who likes it)
> > Blomstedt/Leipzig GHO/Decca (the remake in his Querstand cycle would
> > have to go a long way to top it)
> > The Harnoncourt set is essential for the lecture on the actual
> > finale materials as we currently have them.
> Completely agree on these three. The Barenboim is just about the best
> Bruckner he has recorded, no?
I am not a big fan of this performance. I was in the live concert when
this was recorded, and even though the orchestra produced massive
waves of sound which Barenboim directed quite effectively, I felt that
Barenboim wasn't really able to shape the inner detail of the music,
it just lowed past him. When I listened to the recording when it came
out, it confirmed that impression for me, and again every time I
revisited it later.
I don't know which of his Bruckner is "the best" since I have only
listened to about half of each of his CSO and BP cycles, but the ones
that left the best impression on me were the BP 5th and 6th. They are
both very tricky and Barenboim showed that he was able to control and
shape both the inner detail and the outer structure, they show him as
a very solid craftsman, but in the 9th, he just went into grand
gesture mode but I think he overreached a little with that.
On Nov 11, 1:54 am, M forever <ms1...@gmail.com> wrote:
A live 9th next week with which to compare the extant recordings. From
BBC Radio 3 :
" Live from The Bridgewater Hall, Manchester
The BBC Philharmonic, conducted by Juanjo Mena, performs Bach's
Cantata No 147, and Bruckner's Symphony No 9.
Julia Doyle (soprano) Robin Blaze (counter tenor) Nicholas Mulroy
(tenor) Roderick Williams (bass) Manchester Chamber Choir (chorus
master Justin Doyle)"
> On Nov 11, 1:54 am, M forever <ms1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A live 9th next week with which to compare the extant recordings. From
> BBC Radio 3 :
> " Live from The Bridgewater Hall, Manchester
> The BBC Philharmonic, conducted by Juanjo Mena, performs Bach's
> Cantata No 147, and Bruckner's Symphony No 9.
> Julia Doyle (soprano) Robin Blaze (counter tenor) Nicholas Mulroy
> (tenor) Roderick Williams (bass) Manchester Chamber Choir (chorus
> master Justin Doyle)"
> On Nov 10, 10:08 pm, 3Bs<threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
(snip)
>> I'm not a dedicated Wand fan, but his Köln recording is concentrated
>> and has real power. The coda of the first movement is about as
>> powerful as it gets.
> Indeed it is, and Wand also emphasizes the clashes between D and Eflat
> at the end of the first movement more than I have heard in any other
> performances, including his own later ones, this and many similar
> details making this one of the starkest, most "modern sounding"
> Bruckner 9s. The horn calls and timpani/trumpet responses at the
> beginning of the first movement also sound the most "misterioso" to me
> of all the recordings I know, although I find it hard to put my finger
> on justwhy that is.
M forever <ms1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, November 9, 2012 12:10:12 PM UTC-5, weary flake wrote:
> > jrsnfld <jrsn...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 8, 6:51?pm, whiskynsplash <whiskynspl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > What I'd really like to see discussed are good recordings of the
> > > > choral work "Helgoland" which don't require buying an entire box set
> > > > of the symphonies (as is the case with the Barenboim recording).
> > > Barenboim has recorded Helgoland twice (in the Berlin cycle on Teldec,
> > > and in the Chicago cycle on DG). Both of these Helgoland recordings
> > > were issued on single CD's (coupled with Symphony No. 1 on Teldec,
> > > Symphony No. 0 on DG). Both of those discs are easily available at
> > > reasonable prices from Amazon's affiliated sellers.
> > That's what I did, bought the two separate CDs for both of
> > Barenboim's Helgoland. Helgoland has only been recorded
> > three times and Barenboim did two of them. Wyn Morris also
> > conducted it and recorded it to a CD with Wagner's Apostel.
> On 11/10/12 11:49 PM, M forever wrote:> On Nov 10, 10:08 pm, 3Bs<threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
> (snip)
> >> I'm not a dedicated Wand fan, but his K ln recording is concentrated
> >> and has real power. The coda of the first movement is about as
> >> powerful as it gets.
> > Indeed it is, and Wand also emphasizes the clashes between D and Eflat
> > at the end of the first movement more than I have heard in any other
> > performances, including his own later ones, this and many similar
> > details making this one of the starkest, most "modern sounding"
> > Bruckner 9s. The horn calls and timpani/trumpet responses at the
> > beginning of the first movement also sound the most "misterioso" to me
> > of all the recordings I know, although I find it hard to put my finger
> > on justwhy that is.
> It strikes me as having many of the same virtues as the Cologne recording.
> Bob Harper
No, I haven't heard this one, but I just ordered it. It was recorded
in the huge Basilika Ottobeuren so I fear the sound might be as
reverberant and washed out as in the recordings of 8 and 9 made in the
Lübecker Dom.
> On Nov 11, 12:34 pm, Bob Harper<bob.har...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On 11/10/12 11:49 PM, M forever wrote:> On Nov 10, 10:08 pm, 3Bs<threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
>> (snip)
>>>> I'm not a dedicated Wand fan, but his K ln recording is concentrated
>>>> and has real power. The coda of the first movement is about as
>>>> powerful as it gets.
>>> Indeed it is, and Wand also emphasizes the clashes between D and Eflat
>>> at the end of the first movement more than I have heard in any other
>>> performances, including his own later ones, this and many similar
>>> details making this one of the starkest, most "modern sounding"
>>> Bruckner 9s. The horn calls and timpani/trumpet responses at the
>>> beginning of the first movement also sound the most "misterioso" to me
>>> of all the recordings I know, although I find it hard to put my finger
>>> on justwhy that is.
>> It strikes me as having many of the same virtues as the Cologne recording.
>> Bob Harper
> No, I haven't heard this one, but I just ordered it. It was recorded
> in the huge Basilika Ottobeuren so I fear the sound might be as
> reverberant and washed out as in the recordings of 8 and 9 made in the
> Lübecker Dom.
I don't think you'll find that to be the case, but I'll be interested in your comments.
> On Nov 10, 10:09 pm, 3Bs <threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 7, 9:59 pm, "Sol L. Siegel" <vod...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> Some others that somehow haven't been mentioned yet:
>>> Barenboim/Berlin/Teldec (I think I'm the only in this ng who
>>> likes it) Blomstedt/Leipzig GHO/Decca (the remake in his
>>> Querstand cycle would have to go a long way to top it) The
>>> Harnoncourt set is essential for the lecture on the actual
>>> finale materials as we currently have them.
>> Completely agree on these three. The Barenboim is just about the
>> best Bruckner he has recorded, no?
> I am not a big fan of this performance. I was in the live concert
> when this was recorded, and even though the orchestra produced
> massive waves of sound which Barenboim directed quite effectively, I
> felt that Barenboim wasn't really able to shape the inner detail of
> the music, it just lowed past him. When I listened to the recording
> when it came out, it confirmed that impression for me, and again
> every time I revisited it later. I don't know which of his Bruckner
> is "the best" since I have only listened to about half of each of
> his CSO and BP cycles, but the ones that left the best impression on
> me were the BP 5th and 6th. They are both very tricky and Barenboim
> showed that he was able to control and shape both the inner detail
> and the outer structure, they show him as a very solid craftsman,
> but in the 9th, he just went into grand gesture mode but I think he
> overreached a little with that.
He gave a superb concert with the 8th Symphony in Paris in 1984, still
my most vivid and overwhelming live music memory with Liszt's B minor
sonata by M.A. Estrella, his first series of concerts after his release
from the South American fascist jail.
--
Les mots qui vont surgir savent de nous des choses que nous ignorons
d'eux.
Ren Char
> Le 11/11/2012 08:54, M forever a écrit :
>> On Nov 10, 10:09 pm, 3Bs <threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> On Nov 7, 9:59 pm, "Sol L. Siegel" <vod...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> Some others that somehow haven't been mentioned yet:
>>>> Barenboim/Berlin/Teldec (I think I'm the only in this ng who
>>>> likes it) Blomstedt/Leipzig GHO/Decca (the remake in his
>>>> Querstand cycle would have to go a long way to top it) The
>>>> Harnoncourt set is essential for the lecture on the actual
>>>> finale materials as we currently have them.
>>> Completely agree on these three. The Barenboim is just about the
>>> best Bruckner he has recorded, no?
>> I am not a big fan of this performance. I was in the live concert
>> when this was recorded, and even though the orchestra produced
>> massive waves of sound which Barenboim directed quite effectively, I
>> felt that Barenboim wasn't really able to shape the inner detail of
>> the music, it just lowed past him. When I listened to the recording
>> when it came out, it confirmed that impression for me, and again
>> every time I revisited it later. I don't know which of his Bruckner
>> is "the best" since I have only listened to about half of each of
>> his CSO and BP cycles, but the ones that left the best impression on
>> me were the BP 5th and 6th. They are both very tricky and Barenboim
>> showed that he was able to control and shape both the inner detail
>> and the outer structure, they show him as a very solid craftsman,
>> but in the 9th, he just went into grand gesture mode but I think he
>> overreached a little with that.
> He gave a superb concert with the 8th Symphony in Paris in 1984, still
> my most vivid and overwhelming live music memory with Liszt's B minor
> sonata by M.A. Estrella, his first series of concerts after his release
> from the South American fascist jail.
On Monday, November 12, 2012 6:22:40 AM UTC-5, RVG wrote:
> Le 11/11/2012 08:54, M forever a écrit :
> > On Nov 10, 10:09 pm, 3Bs <threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 7, 9:59 pm, "Sol L. Siegel" <vod...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>> Some others that somehow haven't been mentioned yet:
> >>> Barenboim/Berlin/Teldec (I think I'm the only in this ng who
> >>> likes it) Blomstedt/Leipzig GHO/Decca (the remake in his
> >>> Querstand cycle would have to go a long way to top it) The
> >>> Harnoncourt set is essential for the lecture on the actual
> >>> finale materials as we currently have them.
> >> Completely agree on these three. The Barenboim is just about the
> >> best Bruckner he has recorded, no?
> > I am not a big fan of this performance. I was in the live concert
> > when this was recorded, and even though the orchestra produced
> > massive waves of sound which Barenboim directed quite effectively, I
> > felt that Barenboim wasn't really able to shape the inner detail of
> > the music, it just lowed past him. When I listened to the recording
> > when it came out, it confirmed that impression for me, and again
> > every time I revisited it later. I don't know which of his Bruckner
> > is "the best" since I have only listened to about half of each of
> > his CSO and BP cycles, but the ones that left the best impression on
> > me were the BP 5th and 6th. They are both very tricky and Barenboim
> > showed that he was able to control and shape both the inner detail
> > and the outer structure, they show him as a very solid craftsman,
> > but in the 9th, he just went into grand gesture mode but I think he
> > overreached a little with that.
> He gave a superb concert with the 8th Symphony in Paris in 1984,
I know Barenboim did a lot of Bruckner with the Orchestre de Paris in the 70s and 80s at a time when Bruckner apparently was still very rarely performed in France. I would actually like to hear some live recordings of some of those concerts, e.g. that 8th. There is a poster from Paris on Concertarchive who has a lot of French broadcast recordings from that era, so I will contact him to find out if he has any of those.
Barenboim did a Wagner album with the OdP back then which has generally been somewhat negatively received because the sound of the orchestra, especially the bright and slender brass is not what most people expect for Wagner. But that is what makes it all the more interesting for me.
Alex Brown wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 08:25, Praetorius wrote:
> > I have been listening to the Bruckner Symphony No. 9 [...]
> > and am amazed that there are such a variety of pleasing
> > (valid?) interpretations.
> > are there other recordings to which I should expose myself)?
> Well, you've already listed what many would regard as the cream
> of the crop of recordings. However, if it is *variety* in particular that > you're after you might want to consider adding, as a priority:
> - a Karajan recording (a lofty and mystical studio recording from 1966, or > a tougher more overtly powerful studio recording from 1975 -- both on DG; > there are some recorded live performances also available).
> - a Celibidache recording (uniquely slow, especially in his later years; > the widely-available EMI recording for instance has a 1st movement lasting > 32'53" as against Haitink's digital timing of 23'17" !)
Thanks. I'll check out one of the von Karajan's. Just received the EMI Celibidache Bruckner box - I'll start with the 9th.
Frank Decolvenaere
To reply by e-mail, replace NMBR with 1612.
"You are no bigger than
the things that annoy you."
Jerry Bundsen
Ray Hall wrote:
> Praetorius wrote:
>> I have been listeningto the Bruckner Symphony No. 9 [which is currently >> (and
>> probably will remain) my favorite]. [snip]
> It might pay to seek out Walter's 1959 Bruckner 9. Still sounds pretty > good for its age.
> Ray Hall, Taree
Thanks. I've got that, and the February 1957 and March 1946 recordings on Music & Arts. Interesting to follow his tempo changes over time.
Frank Decolvenaere
To reply by e-mail, replace NMBR with 1612.
"You are no bigger than
the things that annoy you."
Jerry Bundsen
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:25:02 AM UTC-5, Praetorius wrote:
> I have been listeningto the Bruckner Symphony No. 9 [which is currently (and probably will remain) my favorite]. I recently acquired the Haitink/Concertgebouw, and am amazed that there are such a variety of pleasing (valid?) interpretations. I say this after having enjoyed the the Giulini/VPO (DG), Schuricht VPO (EMI) , Von Hausegger/Munich Philharmonic and Furtwangler/BPO (among others). What am I missing (i.e., are there other recordings to which I should expose myself)? Fra
Praetorius, you ask a wrong question. There are tones of B9 of all imaginable qualities. The question is what you are looking for? In order to have your question consider lucid you need to express what you do like and which direction you would like to take it further. Than something might be recommended to you. To ask generic question about this marvels work and receive generic advise from very generic people serve very little purpose.
> "RVG" <not.h...@themoment.invalid.org> wrote in message
> news:k7qm5v$pg9$1@blueduskconspiracy.eternal-september.org...
>> Le 11/11/2012 08:54, M forever a crit :
>>> On Nov 10, 10:09 pm, 3Bs <threebs...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> On Nov 7, 9:59 pm, "Sol L. Siegel" <vod...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>> Some others that somehow haven't been mentioned yet:
>>>>> Barenboim/Berlin/Teldec (I think I'm the only in this ng who
>>>>> likes it) Blomstedt/Leipzig GHO/Decca (the remake in his
>>>>> Querstand cycle would have to go a long way to top it) The
>>>>> Harnoncourt set is essential for the lecture on the actual
>>>>> finale materials as we currently have them.
>>>> Completely agree on these three. The Barenboim is just about
>>>> the best Bruckner he has recorded, no?
>>> I am not a big fan of this performance. I was in the live
>>> concert when this was recorded, and even though the orchestra
>>> produced massive waves of sound which Barenboim directed quite
>>> effectively, I felt that Barenboim wasn't really able to shape
>>> the inner detail of the music, it just lowed past him. When I
>>> listened to the recording when it came out, it confirmed that
>>> impression for me, and again every time I revisited it later. I
>>> don't know which of his Bruckner is "the best" since I have only
>>> listened to about half of each of his CSO and BP cycles, but the
>>> ones that left the best impression on me were the BP 5th and 6th.
>>> They are both very tricky and Barenboim showed that he was able
>>> to control and shape both the inner detail and the outer
>>> structure, they show him as a very solid craftsman, but in the
>>> 9th, he just went into grand gesture mode but I think he
>>> overreached a little with that.
>> He gave a superb concert with the 8th Symphony in Paris in 1984,
>> still my most vivid and overwhelming live music memory with Liszt's
>> B minor sonata by M.A. Estrella, his first series of concerts after
>> his release from the South American fascist jail.
> Just so we know which fascist jail... there have been so many. Still
> are quite a few, we run some ourselves tx to smirking simian and
> pusillanimous Barry
He explained us before the concert, that in order to keep his pianistic
skills, he had carved a keyboard on the table of his cell with his fork
and "played" on it, hearing the music in his head all the time during
all these years.
This concert was about 25 years ago but I remember it like it was
yesterday. There was a young punk with his parents. During the first par
of the concert he was quite agitated, but didn't make noise.
Then after the intermission when Mr Estrella played Liszt's Sonata, he
just fell in tears. When the concert ended, he jumped from his seat
crying and went to the pianist and told him aloud: "Thank you, Sir,
you've just given a meaning to my life!"
Several people in the public shed a tear too at that moment.
--
Les mots qui vont surgir savent de nous des choses que nous ignorons
d'eux.
Ren Char