In article <
XnsA05EA811C9334am...@209.197.15.254>,
Alan Cooper <amco...@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
> >> It is, of course, entirely possible to have and treasure more
> >> than one reading of these pieces. And then there is Brendel,
> >> whose reputation in Haydn is hardly diminished since his
> >> retirement.
> >
> > I don't know about his reputation, but the actual playing
> > doesn't do that much for me. In several cases I'd rather hear
> > Eschenbach; to say nothing of Levy, Backhaus, Ranki,
> > Weissenberg, Rosen and a variety of others. Although
> > unfortunately most of the just-mentioned did only about an LP's
> > worth.
>
> Somewhat more than a single LP in Ranki's case (54-62 on Hungaroton plus some
> fantastic live performances). The two sonatas in Lili Kraus's "Rarissimes"
> collection are in the same class as those named (all of which are among my
> favorites as well). And Steve, do I infer that you're not a Kalish fan?
I think if you culled Kalish's set down to the best of it (and I don't
think they used the best work from his five LPs for the one commercial
CD issue) -- he'd probably be close. Which might be true for Timofeyeva
as well.
There isn't much in either of those two that approaches Queffelec and
the best of Bavouzet, IMO. (--I'm still discouraged that Bavouzet Vol. 3
is so much less than the other two and his Harmonic disc.)
Have you gotten the Queffelec yet? She isn't exactly revelatory, but her
playing is full of so many alert, small delights as to be an utter
treat. The Variations may in fact be revelatory, so thoroughly romantic
and evocative does she make them.
Re: Akl -- a good many terrific movements.
SE.