> Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 10:23:32 UTC-7, dsi1 a écrit :
>> On 10/7/2012 5:49 AM, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
>>> I was wondering if a "rapprochement" would be made!
>>> Maybe (and who am I to emit such a proposal) the American polarized political landscape needs a third party, one that will lean to the left. But you guys are so scared of the word socialists ...
>> We is ascared of that word. That fact is clear to my Swedish step-mom.
>> What is unclear and perplexing to her is how we could have not have
>> medical care available to all our citizens. To her it goes against logic
>> and nature.
>> OTOH, Romneycare is a reality for the uninsured. we have friends that I
>> suspect are homeless and that's their only medical option. They've been
>> to the emergency room 5 times in the last couple of months. My wife and
>> daughter have had to drive them there for most of those times. It's one
>> of the few times where Romney got his facts straight. Yay!
> You guys have started this weird habit of using the name of the president (or in this case the running opposite party contender to the presidency) followed by the word "care" ... up here above the ?? parallel we just call it Healthcare ... Our universal healthcare is far from being free from having problems but ...
> at least ... it's available for almost all of our citizens ...
Americans iz crazy! "Obamacare" is the mocking name that the republicans use to make fun of universal health coverage. As it goes, the democrats have chosen to use it to mock the republicans.
This is what we've come to in American politics. The republicans have been reduced to name calling and trying to come up with "zingers." If you think that America has been reduced to it's most idiotic, sad, and most dishonorable level in our lifetime, I can't disagree.
> Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 10:23:32 UTC-7, dsi1 a écrit :
>> On 10/7/2012 5:49 AM, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
>>> I was wondering if a "rapprochement" would be made!
>>> Maybe (and who am I to emit such a proposal) the American polarized political landscape needs a third party, one that will lean to the left. But you guys are so scared of the word socialists ...
>> We is ascared of that word. That fact is clear to my Swedish step-mom.
>> What is unclear and perplexing to her is how we could have not have
>> medical care available to all our citizens. To her it goes against logic
>> and nature.
>> OTOH, Romneycare is a reality for the uninsured. we have friends that I
>> suspect are homeless and that's their only medical option. They've been
>> to the emergency room 5 times in the last couple of months. My wife and
>> daughter have had to drive them there for most of those times. It's one
>> of the few times where Romney got his facts straight. Yay!
> You guys have started this weird habit of using the name of the president (or in this case the running opposite party contender to the presidency) followed by the word "care" ... up here above the ?? parallel we just call it Healthcare ... Our universal healthcare is far from being free from having problems but ...
> at least ... it's available for almost all of our citizens ...
Did you miss the Republican primary season, in which the other Republican candidates were denigrating the Massachusetts health system as "ObamneyCare"?
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:17 PM UTC-7, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
> It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net.
I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more! Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans. Everyone else in this thread has been processed. What's more, they believe that THEY occupy the moral high ground. Amazing indeed!
Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 16:38:04 UTC-7, Alphonsus Jr. a écrit :
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:17 PM UTC-7, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
> > It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net.
> I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more! Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans. Everyone else in this thread has been processed. What's more, they believe that THEY occupy the moral high ground. Amazing indeed!
Com'n Alphonsus Jr. ... You were just waiting for this glorious opportunity to make a triumphal re-entree ... and here you are with the exact same words, the exact same attitude, and the exact same strategy! Double amazing, indeed!!
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:38:04 PM UTC-4, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
>Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans.>
And that one person is also the only heterosexual poster who has never managed to get a woman pregnant.
> > Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 10:23:32 UTC-7, dsi1 a �crit :
> >> On 10/7/2012 5:49 AM, Fadosolr�lamisi wrote:
> >>> I was wondering if a "rapprochement" would be made!
> >>> Maybe (and who am I to emit such a proposal) the American polarized political landscape needs a third party, one that will lean to the left. But you guys are so scared of the word socialists ...
> >> We is ascared of that word. That fact is clear to my Swedish step-mom.
> >> What is unclear and perplexing to her is how we could have not have
> >> medical care available to all our citizens. To her it goes against logic
> >> and nature.
> >> OTOH, Romneycare is a reality for the uninsured. we have friends that I
> >> suspect are homeless and that's their only medical option. They've been
> >> to the emergency room 5 times in the last couple of months. My wife and
> >> daughter have had to drive them there for most of those times. It's one
> >> of the few times where Romney got his facts straight. Yay!
> > You guys have started this weird habit of using the name of the president (or in this case the running opposite party contender to the presidency) followed by the word "care" ... up here above the ?? parallel we just call it Healthcare ... Our universal healthcare is far from being free from having problems but ...
> > at least ... it's available for almost all of our citizens ...
> Americans iz crazy! "Obamacare" is the mocking name that the republicans
> use to make fun of universal health coverage. As it goes, the democrats
> have chosen to use it to mock the republicans.
> This is what we've come to in American politics. The republicans have
> been reduced to name calling and trying to come up with "zingers." If
> you think that America has been reduced to it's most idiotic, sad, and
> most dishonorable level in our lifetime, I can't disagree.
A positive point for me in all that is that I've learn the word zinger!
(Was not that the brand of a sewing machine?)
> > Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 10:23:32 UTC-7, dsi1 a �crit :
> >> On 10/7/2012 5:49 AM, Fadosolr�lamisi wrote:
> >>> I was wondering if a "rapprochement" would be made!
> >>> Maybe (and who am I to emit such a proposal) the American polarized political landscape needs a third party, one that will lean to the left. But you guys are so scared of the word socialists ...
> >> We is ascared of that word. That fact is clear to my Swedish step-mom.
> >> What is unclear and perplexing to her is how we could have not have
> >> medical care available to all our citizens. To her it goes against logic
> >> and nature.
> >> OTOH, Romneycare is a reality for the uninsured. we have friends that I
> >> suspect are homeless and that's their only medical option. They've been
> >> to the emergency room 5 times in the last couple of months. My wife and
> >> daughter have had to drive them there for most of those times. It's one
> >> of the few times where Romney got his facts straight. Yay!
> > You guys have started this weird habit of using the name of the president (or in this case the running opposite party contender to the presidency) followed by the word "care" ... up here above the ?? parallel we just call it Healthcare ... Our universal healthcare is far from being free from having problems but ...
> > at least ... it's available for almost all of our citizens ...
> Did you miss the Republican primary season, in which the other
> Republican candidates were denigrating the Massachusetts health system
> as "ObamneyCare"?
> S.
Yes ... I miss that! I cannot keep up with all this political wit!
> >> >> And then ask yourselves: "Do I really support the legal option to do that? I do? What's happened to me? What have I become? How did this happen? And how is it that I support that, yet I still believe that I occupy the moral high ground?"
> >> >I seriously doubt that an egocentric guy like you would choose to devote
> >> >your life to raising a kid for nearly 20 years. The only high ground
> >> >you'd occupy is when you run for the hills if faced with a future like
> >> >that.
> >> >You only get to occupy the the moral high ground by making the correct
> >> >choices and living a clean life. You're just figuring on taking the easy
> >> >way out by denying others the ability to make their own choices. It
> >> >ain't gonna work. In most cases, taking the easy way out is not the most
> >> >moral way to go. That's the breaks.
> >> Regrettably, my newsreader's kill filters only seem to block messages
> >> submitted by the original poster. Responses from others to the orignal
> >> post which quote the original still sneak through, unfortunately.
> >Eh! As far as I know ... I could be on your kill file system!
> >Technology will provide ... eventually ... a way to customize our computer to the extant that we will be able to hear only what we want to hear ...
> >I for one have never screen someone out through a kill filter ... but ... I have to concede that I have put to work my "ignore" natural selective umbrella more than once ...
> >It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net. Daily, on the web, it is possible to witness social behaviours that would absolutely not be allowed in the real world.
> Alain, there is only one RMCG individual on my killfile list, and it
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:38:04 PM UTC-4, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:17 PM UTC-7, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
> > It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net.
> I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more! Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans. Everyone else in this thread has been processed. What's more, they believe that THEY occupy the moral high ground. Amazing indeed!
What exactly were you expecting when you started this thread?
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:09:47 PM UTC-7, Jonathan wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:38:04 PM UTC-4, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:17 PM UTC-7, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
> > > It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net.
> > I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more! Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans. Everyone else in this thread has been processed. What's more, they believe that THEY occupy the moral high ground. Amazing indeed!
> What exactly were you expecting when you started this thread?
Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 17:14:52 UTC-7, dsi1 a écrit :
> On 10/7/2012 1:53 PM, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
> > A positive point for me in all that is that I've learn the word zinger!
> > (Was not that the brand of a sewing machine?)
> That's SINGER, ya crazy Canadian! :-)
Crazy Canadian you bet! Thanks giving week-end, can you imagine that? (Of course no!) Our first turkey, a shifting turkey I call it (as we usually go to my wife's parent's place to celebrate this out of sinc, at least from you guys, Thanks giving day)... good wine, too much food as usual ... and the joy of discovering the extended family (no kids yet) just the boy friend, girl friend ... cool new voices added to the harmony ... all good laughter! Ha! The fine balance of the SINGER!
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:38:04 PM UTC-4, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
>> Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans.>
> And that one person is also the only heterosexual poster who has never managed to get a woman pregnant.
I'll be right back. I have to check my FB privacy settings.
Haha ... good montage ... this guy Looks like a good candidate for the intelligence, ignorance thread!
I hope that you are aware of the influence it has on us, good neighbors!
> Le dimanche 7 octobre 2012 17:14:52 UTC-7, dsi1 a crit :
>> That's SINGER, ya crazy Canadian! :-)
> Crazy Canadian you bet! Thanks giving week-end, can you imagine that? (Of course no!) Our first turkey, a shifting turkey I call it (as we usually go to my wife's parent's place to celebrate this out of sinc, at least from you guys, Thanks giving day)... good wine, too much food as usual ... and the joy of discovering the extended family (no kids yet) just the boy friend, girl friend ... cool new voices added to the harmony ... all good laughter!
> Ha! The fine balance of the SINGER!
I like Thanksgiving - it's the only holiday that makes any sense to me. Hope you have a great Canadian thanksgiving and eat a pasty for me, or whatever the hell it is that you guys eat up there on this special day!
Wasting your time? Don't be silly! You've entered an online forum dedicated to the discussion of Classical Guitar, which includes but is not limited to classical guitars, players of that instrument, composers for that instrument, music for the instrument and accessories for the instrument. You then, of your own free will, within the classical guitar forum and without invitation, started a discussion about abortion and provided direct links to pictures of little babies torn to pieces, with their little bloody heads, limbs and torsos scattered about the screen like so many bits of....well, like so many bits of mangled little babies.
Why would you call that a waste of your time? Silly boy! That's what we're here for! You've cracked the code! You have discovered the truth. This is a secret forum of people who want to be lectured on abortion by the morally righteous but hide like cowards behind derived newsgroup titles like rec.music.classical.guitar. None of us even play guitar! We post recordings of other people playing, and pretend like it's our own playing. Remember that time you posted recordings of someone else's playing and pretended it was your own? When that happened I just knew you were THE ONE. Frankly I never thought anyone would be smart enough to find us here, but you have proven to be extremely intelligent! You're like a Messiah to us.
I'll let you in on a little secret. We also want to be lectured about the downfall of mail-order brides, the error of wearing top-siders, and the dangers inherent to claiming that the Mazda MX-5 (aka Miata) is a sports car. I know you have experience with these subjects and are anxious to provide guidance.
> Haha ... good montage ... this guy Looks like a good candidate for the intelligence, ignorance thread!
> I hope that you are aware of the influence it has on us, good neighbors!
On Monday, October 8, 2012 10:31:07 AM UTC-7, dufres...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Forget it. I'm wasting my time.
> Wasting your time? Don't be silly! You've entered an online forum dedicated to the discussion of Classical Guitar, which includes but is not limited to classical guitars, players of that instrument, composers for that instrument, music for the instrument and accessories for the instrument. You then, of your own free will, within the classical guitar forum and without invitation, started a discussion about abortion and provided direct links to pictures of little babies torn to pieces, with their little bloody heads, limbs and torsos scattered about the screen like so many bits of....well, like so many bits of mangled little babies.
> Why would you call that a waste of your time? Silly boy! That's what we're here for! You've cracked the code! You have discovered the truth. This is a secret forum of people who want to be lectured on abortion by the morally righteous but hide like cowards behind derived newsgroup titles like rec.music.classical.guitar. None of us even play guitar! We post recordings of other people playing, and pretend like it's our own playing. Remember that time you posted recordings of someone else's playing and pretended it was your own? When that happened I just knew you were THE ONE. Frankly I never thought anyone would be smart enough to find us here, but you have proven to be extremely intelligent! You're like a Messiah to us.
> I'll let you in on a little secret. We also want to be lectured about the downfall of mail-order brides, the error of wearing top-siders, and the dangers inherent to claiming that the Mazda MX-5 (aka Miata) is a sports car. I know you have experience with these subjects and are anxious to provide guidance.
> The pulpit is yours, friend.
Funny! But really, all you needed to say was: "Yes, I too am a conformist. That is, like the rest, I too support the option to legally hire a surgical terrorist. And like them, I also believe that this places me atop the moral high ground." No need for the rest of the bullshit.
On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:14:35 PM UTC-7, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:09:47 PM UTC-7, Jonathan wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:38:04 PM UTC-4, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
> > > On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:17 PM UTC-7, Fadosolrélamisi wrote:
> > > > It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net.
> > > I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more! Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans. Everyone else in this thread has been processed. What's more, they believe that THEY occupy the moral high ground. Amazing indeed!
> > What exactly were you expecting when you started this thread?
> Dudes, he PLAYED us like a bunch of dumb surfers!!!
What you say might be true but have some respect for surfers. I love the purity of those guys - they are probably the keenest weather watchers around. Some of those skills have even rubbed off on me. They care little for politics or a lot of those practical questions that bug us every day. They only use what they need to survive. They are the only people I know that don't really need words to do what they do nor are they the ones most likely to use words to deceive others. Well that's my idealized version of these noble savages. Of course, sooner or later, life catches up with those guys. A tragedy!
You already know about Jeff Clark, who discovered one of the greatest big wave surfing spot in his own back yard and nobody took him seriously. He surfed Mavericks alone for well over a decade before others finally believed him. I'm told that Mavericks surpasses the waves that we get on our North shore during the winter months.
As far as Junior Boy goes, if he wants a little attention now and then, I'm happy to oblige. Who the heck doesn't want a little attention? His problem is that he's too greedy.
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:14:35 PM UTC-7, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:09:47 PM UTC-7, Jonathan wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:38:04 PM UTC-4, Alphonsus Jr. wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:33:17 PM UTC-7, Fadosolr lamisi wrote:
>>>>> It's amazing (not that word again!) to see how much is socially acceptable on the net.
>>>> I couldn't agree more. I couldn't agree more! Take this very thread, for example. There's only one person in it who doesn't support the legalized hiring of surgical hitmen to crush the skulls, liquify the brains, and mangle the limbs of fetal humans. Everyone else in this thread has been processed. What's more, they believe that THEY occupy the moral high ground. Amazing indeed!
>>> What exactly were you expecting when you started this thread?
On Monday, October 8, 2012 3:15:09 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> As far as Junior Boy goes, if he wants a little attention now and then, > I'm happy to oblige. Who the heck doesn't want a little attention? His
> problem is that he's too greedy.
He likes getting spanked just a little too much. If Al Gore hadn't invented the Internet, then Jr. would be having to pay for this kind of pro-grade abuse.
> On Monday, October 8, 2012 3:15:09 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
>> As far as Junior Boy goes, if he wants a little attention now and then,
>> I'm happy to oblige. Who the heck doesn't want a little attention? His
>> problem is that he's too greedy.
> He likes getting spanked just a little too much. If Al Gore hadn't invented the Internet, then Jr. would be having to pay for this kind of pro-grade abuse.
Fortunate indeed is he to be living in these times and to have access to Usenet. Had he been born most any other time, he would have been run out of the village by now or burnt at the stake. OTOH, he'd probably like that. :-)
