> On Oct 6, 7:20 pm, "who?" <yourimageunre
...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 2:33 pm, Tralfaz <w
...@woofwoofwoofwoofwoofwoofwoofwoof.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 04-Oct-12 17:06, topazgalaxy wrote:
>>>> On Oct 4, 5:06 pm, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 4, 5:03 pm, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 4, 5:02 pm, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Oct 4, 4:59 pm, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 6:41 am, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 10:51 am, c dubois <curtissdub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 9:23 am, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 12:06 am, "who?" <yourimageunre...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 24, 5:46 am, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 24, 3:50 am, Fattuchus <fattuc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 24, 1:09 am, topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 20, 2:20 am, Fattuchus <fattuc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 18, 6:27 pm, "RichL" <rpleav...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "P-Dub" <pwolf...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:JqUXr.5457$f31.4550@newsfe12.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It s impossible to even simply enjoy Lennon s memory (which she
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steadfastly curates.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What nonsense. Hey, I don't like her singing either, but I'm perfectly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capable of enjoying Lennon's memory despite that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Funny how you let a person you claim not to like rule your life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We would all like to enjoy Lennon's memory, but part of the problem is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that Yoko controls the estate. Hence, often when a book or movie is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yoko has her hand in it. She uses her power to control and influence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is released about John; Yoko uses her power over the Lennon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estate to sanitize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the truth or to give it a certain flavor that whitewashes some of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things she did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the saying goes from the book The Expected One, "history is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what actually happened; history is what gets written down."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yoko has the ability to make sure whatever history (of John with her)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is expressed in a Broadway show, a movie, a book is twisted/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exaggerated in her favor with any project that requires her stamp of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approval. She also probably can use her power and influence to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legally alter certain websites as well like wikipedia. I have read
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wikipedia from time to time , putting in Yoko Ono in the search box,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it is fascinating to say the least how the article on Yoko in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wikipedia has evolved over the years from controversial at best to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "walks on water, amazing goddess and artist".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikpedia also had a statement there that no further changes can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made to the article...very unusual for them . I wonder if a lawsuit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> led to that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree. Yoko is very protective of her legacy, and she uses John's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legacy and her power over the estate to make sure she gets good press.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I agree . She lost John and gained fame and a much more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> positive legacy.
>>>>>>>>>>>> How did she gain fame after John's death? I would have gone to
>>>>>>>>>>>> see him, (if it had worked out) and been "forced" to see her too.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Since she's now alone, I wouldn't go see her. I think I speak
>>>>>>>>>>>> for many people on this subject. So how did she gain fame?
>>>>>>>>>>>> And how does she have a much more positive legacy without
>>>>>>>>>>>> him? It makes no sense.
>>>>>>>>>>> she gained fame as the widow of John Lennon and she gained pity and
>>>>>>>>>>> attention and control of all his wealth.. Now that John was dead,
>>>>>>>>>>> fans and others who wanted to know the juicy details of John's last
>>>>>>>>>>> days, or other details of his personal life could no longer interview
>>>>>>>>>>> John or wait for new material, because he was dead, so Yoko became
>>>>>>>>>>> the "Cairo Geniza" of lost details and documents. People realized
>>>>>>>>>>> if they wanted more material on John they would often have to go
>>>>>>>>>>> through Yoko. They would have to go through her for movies, articles
>>>>>>>>>>> etc etc. She became the "Fountain of Truth" on the John and Yoko
>>>>>>>>>>> relationship. As a result, history could be re-interpreted through
>>>>>>>>>>> Yoko-- history of how he felt on the Beatles, his family in Britain,
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian etc etc.
>>>>>>>>>>> When John was alive , he was like a tall magnificent Oak tree and
>>>>>>>>>>> Yoko was living as a sapling buried in his shadow. The tree was
>>>>>>>>>>> cut down, and now the sapling could use his money and his
>>>>>>>>>>> reputation to have her own period in the sun. Then of course there
>>>>>>>>>>> is that little, minor point about cancelling security shortly before
>>>>>>>>>>> John was murdered....
>>>>>>>>>> After John died, Yoko and her representatives began to put out an
>>>>>>>>>> altered version of the John and Yoko story. There was this made for
>>>>>>>>>> TV movie about the two of them which portrayed Yoko as the more
>>>>>>>>>> important and talented and artustic member if the duo, and said
>>>>>>>>>> nothing about John Lennon's or the Beatles' importance to popular
>>>>>>>>>> culture. It was as if the people behind the project were trying to
>>>>>>>>>> build Yoko up and tear Lennon down. Also there was that weird,
>>>>>>>>>> rambling article in Rolling Stone magazine about how John was this
>>>>>>>>>> helpless child and Yoko wad this amazing artist and sorceress. Also
>>>>>>>>>> numerous interviews from Yoko and her promiters.
>>>>>>>>> thanks and yes I agree with you
>>>>>>>> Anyone watch the Presidential debates last night? One of the best
>>>>>>>> debates I have ever seen. It became very clear what a distinct choice
>>>>>>>> we will have in November
>>>>>>> Some of the commentators at MSNBC were very upset about Obama's
>>>>>>> performance however I think they were too hard on their
>>>>>>> candidate....well so much for objective news shows!
>>>>>>> The next debate later this month I believe is the town hall format in
>>>>>>> NY. I also am eager to see the VP candidate debates.
>>>>>> I wonder who Yoko will vote for....she is part of the 1% so they say.
>>>>> I thought Mitt Romney was very effective while the moderator was
>>>>> trying to keep the candidate's 'speeches' shorter; he (Jim Lehrer)
>>>>> just could not get the 2 candidates to stay within the time limits,
>>>>> especially Obama.
>>>> Well no matter how we look at it, November should be interesting!
>>> Who's "we"? You are the only one having the conversation. The rest of us
>>> are talking about the Beatles.
>>> You have been marginalised because of your hatred for Yoko and inability
>>> to post on topic.
>>> So you keep talking to yourself like a fruitcake and we will talk to
>>> each other about the Beatles.
>> I've never seen you talk about the Beatles.
> Thanks.
> And besides, talking about Yoko is on topic IMO
You don't come to talk about her. You come to bury her you fucking lying