official "Take Back RMB" petition

[The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit]

We, the undersigned....

1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
how often it's repeated;

2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
often it's repeated;

3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
often it's repeated;

4) Do not care about "semen leakage";

5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
Charlie;

6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely.


Any claims henceforth will result in the offending poster(s) being
permanently killfiled; those using Google Groups will no longer
respond to offending poster(s) for any reason.

sign with [X]

-----------------

There, that should make 95% of future readable posts Beatle-related.

[Nooffa Subject]

Why isn't this marked Off-Topic?

[iL_WeReo]

On Apr 29, 12:37 am, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> We, the undersigned....
>
> 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
> how often it's repeated;
>
> 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
> often it's repeated;
>
> 3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
> often it's repeated;

A 6" x 10' mural hangs in the Hallowed Halls of the Citizen's Business
Bank Arena in Ontario. And besides that, I taught The Beatles and Jimi
how to play. And besides that. I'm the only one who entered the 100
year old arena with a movie camera where I saw The Beatles play live
on August 28th, 1964. And I'm here from the most awesome band on earth
Nuclear Warrior.

And among other things I would say that makes me a celebrity. I am the
only one who matters in the writing department. On topic. And I have a
$7mil record-breaking guitar auction up on eBay right now.

http://photosynth.net/view.aspx?cid=2386e0d1-7468-4283-a8bc-4662a5560d6e&m=false&i=0:0:0&c=0:0:0&z=503.5&d=-0.963229731368051:0.51363358111575:0.884919404340474&p=0:0&t=False

http://www.queensledger.com/view/full_story/21967197/article-Music--returning-to-West-Side-Tennis-Club?instance=home_news_right#cb_post_comment_21967197

I have 30 million hits to the Televisions and to Youtube regarding a
major newtork syndicated Television show I am doing. So suffice it to
say "I am the only only one who matters."

[Fattuchus]

On Apr 29, 7:17 am, Nooffa Subject <Nooffa...@cagecable.com> wrote:

LOL! Touche.

[hislop]

What about posters who talk to themselves under different names?

[The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit]

Examples? With links?

[wereoawl]

"hislop" <takecar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:klltod$g7f$2...@dont-email.me...

I doubt the poster hanging on the hallowed halls of the CBBArena in Ontario
talks to itsef. But then again...

[hislop]

I don't gossip.
If people can't tell, it doesn't matter, or I'm wrong.

[Marcus]

On Apr 29, 12:37 am, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

That's all well and good, but based on your subject title, exactly
what are you taking RMB back to? If you've posted here since before
the turn of the century, as I and many others have, you would know
there has always been contoversy and a proliferation of OT posts. In
fact, at one point, violence threatened between posters.

So, taking back RMB...to what?

Marc

[The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit]

On Apr 29, 11:47 am, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> That's all well and good, but based on your subject title, exactly
> what are you taking RMB back to?  If you've posted here since before
> the turn of the century, as I and many others have, you would know
> there has always been contoversy and a proliferation of OT posts.  In
> fact, at one point, violence threatened between posters.
>
> So, taking back RMB...to what?

How about back the time when the majority of the posts were about the
Fabs?

Yes, I remember the Marek crap, Psycho Sal, Nick, etc. -- but you'd at
least find Beatles discussions on the front page using Google Groups.
I see three right now - out of thirty.

Monthly posting totals are down to their lowest level since 1993. You
think there might be a correlation?

[Fattuchus]

On Apr 29, 9:52 am, hislop <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:

Bingo!. Two points for you.

[JBL626]

Might be. Might also be:

1) Newsgroups are virtually dead, except for a handful that host evolving topics or debates. It's the social media age.

2) I think a lot of the old-timers simply ran out of things to say. I was never one of the major contributors to RMB, but I'm down to two or three posts per year now, down from maybe 20-30 per month in the old days.

Face it, there's a finite amount of information about the Beatles. How many times can we offer our one-disc version of the White Album, or debate the Paul-Is-Dead nonsense? Many of us said what we had to say during our first few years on the Internet, back in the '90s.

And, yeah, the trolls and idiots and OT posts have a lot to do with it also.

John L

[The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit]

Fine points, but there are other forums with plenty of Beatles banter
-- Steve Hoffman's, for instance. No matter; I only stop by
occasionally to see if the cancer is in remission. It's obviously
taken over the body, and the actual Beatles fans in here just shrug.

Oh, and no backslaps from Fatass for you -- you didn't post anything
contrary. She loves the "enemy" of her enemies dearly, even if they
don't see themselves as such.

She's petty that way.

[iL_WeReo]

On Apr 29, 6:21 pm, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

She may be petty that way, but I'm still the only one who filmed the
stage where The Beatles played on August 28th, 1964 aside from being
at the concert itself. What are the odds of that happening nine years
after the fact?

The Supernatural side of the Lifshine comes shining through again by
example. Not by speculation nor canards. I again prove and reiterate
the fact that I am the only one who matters in music, and film. And as
you're now finding out I am awlso the one who taught The Beatles and
Jimi Hendrix how to play, and I am the only one on Earth to have
covered a 1974 mega-concert bigger and better than Woodstock. The
music industry's on his way out, the devil's on his way out. I have
said it, thus it is said and deemed.

[RichL]

"The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit" <belly...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e7007559-398f-4ec9...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...

> We, the undersigned....
>
> 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
> how often it's repeated;

Check.

>
> 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
> often it's repeated;

Check.

>
> 3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
> often it's repeated;

Scott who?

>
> 4) Do not care about "semen leakage";

At my age?

>
> 5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
> Charlie;
>
> 6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely.

Does anybody?

>
> Any claims henceforth will result in the offending poster(s) being
> permanently killfiled; those using Google Groups will no longer
> respond to offending poster(s) for any reason.

Does that include responding to others in threads based on 1) and 2) above,
even if to mock the offenders?
>
> sign with [X]

Dr. RPL

[wereoawl]

"RichL" <rple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lbWdnVZnoc4EZuPM...@supernews.com...

> "The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit" <belly...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:e7007559-398f-4ec9...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>> We, the undersigned....
>>
>> 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
>> how often it's repeated;
>
> Check.
>>
>> 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
>> often it's repeated;
>
> Check.
>>
>> 3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
>> often it's repeated;
>
> Scott who?

C'mon man please. You've been around here long enough to know that I am the
only one who matters in music.

Catch my breathtaking world smashing Nuclear Warrior Guitar Auction
currently being housed on eBay. At only seven million it's the most
important guitar, it's the HIGHEST guitar to date.

[Bernie Woodham]

On Apr 29, 12:37 am, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>

> 5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
> Charlie;
>

I've never had a problem with Mista Charlie. I didn't know his posts
were considered disruptive.

> 6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely.
>

I know this is an imposter, but I do wonder about the true intents of
this person. If you look at some of those poems, I think they take a
bit of work to compose. So, I sort of surmise that this is a creative
exercise for a writer.

These things just never bothered me.

> Any claims henceforth will result in the offending poster(s) being
> permanently killfiled; those using Google Groups will no longer
> respond to offending poster(s) for any reason.
>

Again, I'd like to see Fatts rehabilitated. She has made some
interesting Beatle related posts in the past.

Most times it's gossipy stuff and I know a lot of people frown on the
gossipy stuff. But, I think it's kind of like a box of chocolates.
Too much chocolate can make you spazz out, but every one likes a
little chocolate now and then.

[Marcus]

On Apr 29, 12:15 pm, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> On Apr 29, 11:47 am, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > That's all well and good, but based on your subject title, exactly
> > what are you taking RMB back to?  If you've posted here since before
> > the turn of the century, as I and many others have, you would know
> > there has always been contoversy and a proliferation of OT posts.  In
> > fact, at one point, violence threatened between posters.
>
> > So, taking back RMB...to what?
>
> How about back the time when the majority of the posts were about the
> Fabs?

I first posted here in the Spring of 1999...posters were complaining
about off topic posts then, and reminiscing about the "good old days"
of 1995.

Nothing has changed...in fact, despite off topic posts, I think
present day posts are much more Beatles relevant than the days of
Marek and Francie.

>
> Monthly posting totals are down to their lowest level since 1993. You
> think there might be a correlation?

Can you spell F-A-C-E-B-O-O-K

[Bernie Woodham]

On Apr 30, 9:51 am, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> > Monthly posting totals are down to their lowest level since 1993. You
> > think there might be a correlation?
>
> Can you spell F-A-C-E-B-O-O-K

I don't know about that Marcus. You're saying that people go to
Facebook when they want to talk about the Beatles?

I doubt that. I think that there is a great number of people that read
this forum that don't post.

Content would probably make them post.

[hislop]

> And, yeah, the trolls and idiots and OT posts have a lot to do with it also..
>
> John L

How about, what was the play order on the double cassette of The White
Album? I've lost one or more of the covers and can't remember entirely.
But I do recall very well that Revolution 9 concluded side 3 and wasn't
on side 4 which I think works better, on side 3. And Cry Baby Cry was
followed by Mother Natures Son, then Revolution 9. It worked better.
A web search has been futile.
This difference was on all 4 sides.

[hislop]

I might have Cry Baby Cry and Mother Natures Son order in reverse.
I found this, but it still isn't entirely the same as an Australian
release on cassette.
Actually, I think they have the order wrong on this. It had two
cassettes with 4 sides, not two sides only as here. Sides 3 and 4 are
reversed here from what I had.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/carousel/BtleCas3.html#Rearranged
Side 3 started with Birthday, then this is the same one from there.
I got my copy on cassette in about 1979 or 1978.
I think it should be Happiness is a Warm Gun starting side 3. I always
recall that song being more prominent in the running order than in the
more well known one.
I think it would be interesting to hear the White album in this running
order, remembering to have song 8. on the 'B Side' as the first song on
side 3 instead of side 4 as here.
Note Long Long Long ending side 2, which works quite well, and Goodnight
still ends the album.
Side 3 for Revolution 9 changes the feel of the album.

[hislop]

I'm pretty sure Martha My Dear ended side 1 on the cassette, making I'm
So Tired the first song on side 2.

[Marcus]

On Apr 30, 11:53 am, Bernie Woodham <birnhamw...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 9:51 am, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Monthly posting totals are down to their lowest level since 1993. You
> > > think there might be a correlation?
>
> > Can you spell F-A-C-E-B-O-O-K
>
> I don't know about that Marcus. You're saying that people go to
> Facebook when they want to talk about the Beatles?

What I meant is that people go to Facebook for any reason...Beatles or
otherwise...much more than use Usenet.

That's the reason why Usenet participation, and emails are not as
popular...people of all stripes are flocking to Facebook.

[Marcus]

I'm pretty sure that you meant to post this in a nother thread.

[hislop]

On 1/05/2013 3:31 AM, Marcus wrote:
> On Apr 30, 12:12 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 1/05/2013 2:09 AM, hislop wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 1/05/2013 1:55 AM, hislop wrote:
>>>> On 30/04/2013 8:12 AM, JBL626 wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, April 29, 2013 11:15:27 AM UTC-5, The Brooklyn Tomato
>>>>> Bandit wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 29, 11:47 am, Marcus<marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> That's all well and good, but based on your subject title, exactly
>>
>>>>>>> what are you taking RMB back to? If you've posted here since before
>>
>>>>>>> the turn of the century, as I and many others have, you would know
>>
>>>>>>> there has always been contoversy and a proliferation of OT posts. In
>>
>>>>>>> fact, at one point, violence threatened between posters.
>>
>>>>>>> So, taking back RMB...to what?
>>
>>>>>> How about back the time when the majority of the posts were about the
>>
>>>>>> Fabs?
>>
>>>>>> Yes, I remember the Marek crap, Psycho Sal, Nick, etc. -- but you'd at
>>

>>>>>> least find Beatles discussions on the front page using Google Groups..

>>
>>>>>> I see three right now - out of thirty.
>>
>>>>>> Monthly posting totals are down to their lowest level since 1993. You
>>
>>>>>> think there might be a correlation?
>>
>>>>> Might be. Might also be:
>>
>>>>> 1) Newsgroups are virtually dead, except for a handful that host
>>>>> evolving topics or debates. It's the social media age.
>>
>>>>> 2) I think a lot of the old-timers simply ran out of things to say. I
>>>>> was never one of the major contributors to RMB, but I'm down to two or
>>>>> three posts per year now, down from maybe 20-30 per month in the old
>>>>> days.
>>
>>>>> Face it, there's a finite amount of information about the Beatles. How
>>>>> many times can we offer our one-disc version of the White Album, or
>>>>> debate the Paul-Is-Dead nonsense? Many of us said what we had to say
>>>>> during our first few years on the Internet, back in the '90s.
>>
>>>>> And, yeah, the trolls and idiots and OT posts have a lot to do with it
>>>>> also..
>>
>>>>> John L
>>
>>>> How about, what was the play order on the double cassette of The White

>>>> Album? I've lost one or more of the covers and can't remember entirely..

I'm pretty sure I stared the thread afterwards.
Do I apologize or kick you or ignore you?
The subject came up of the White Album.
But don't expect me to conform to any of your rules.

[Marcus]

I was only pointing out that your posts about the White Album should
be in the "Running order of 1970s Australian White album cassette"
thread, and that you mistakenly put them in the "Take Back RMB
petition" thread.

Don't get your panties in a knot...sheesh.

[hislop]

I started in this thread, then started a new thread. I posted on this
subject twice here first. Though I don't recall ever reading posts
about a single disc version running order before.

[UsurperTom]

On Apr 29, 12:15 pm, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Monthly posting totals are down to their lowest level since 1993. You think there might be a correlation?

That's because usenet has gone the way of the dodo bird.

[who?]

On Monday, April 29, 2013 11:15:27 AM UTC-5, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit wrote:

Why don't you start a topic about the Beatles instead of
complaining to others about the topic, and waiting for
them to start the topic on the Beatles?

[who?]

People would rather use Facebook and make the owner
Mark rich, and have peaceful conversations. Or they
can Google what they want on the Beatles.

[Bernie Woodham]

On Apr 30, 1:30 pm, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I don't know about that Marcus. You're saying that people go to
> > Facebook when they want to talk about the Beatles?
>
> What I meant is that people go to Facebook for any reason...Beatles or
> otherwise...much more than use Usenet.
>
> That's the reason why Usenet participation, and emails are not as
> popular...people of all stripes are flocking to Facebook.
>

Gee, I never thought to look on Facebook for the Beatles. But, like I
said, I think there are a lot of people that continue to look at this
newsgroup but do not post.

It's not just facebook. People use their iPhones and iPads quite a
bit for things. Words For Friends. Stupid games. The only reason I
started posting again is I happened to need my laptop on the table to
watch an instructional dvd. If I put the laptop back to where it
usually sits, I would have continued using my iPad for browsing and
would never have come back here.

[Marcus]

My apologies...I didn't notice those posts till now.

[Marcus]

I don't use Facebook. I don't rule out using at some point in the
future, especially having to do with my writings, but I don't feel the
need to know what all my "friends" are doing at any given moment.
Also, I find the whole concept to be like something out of "1984".

[Mack A. Damia]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:20:34 -0700 (PDT), Marcus <marc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

It is, and it's soon to be "2014".

Use an alias and tell your "Friends" who you are. You will feel safer
and be safer.

--

[Marcus]

On Apr 30, 8:26 pm, Mack A. Damia <mybaconbu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Use an alias and tell your "Friends" who you are.  You will feel safer
> and be safer.
>
> --

Really? I didn't know one could do that.

I'm writing a book ( I write one every 20 years or so whether I need
to or not), and I will probably do a Facebook page for the book, as
opposed to one for myself.

Although, at this point, I don't know how to do that...but will learn.

Mar

[Mack A. Damia]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:58:56 -0700 (PDT), Marcus <marc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>On Apr 30, 8:26�pm, Mack A. Damia <mybaconbu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Use an alias and tell your "Friends" who you are. �You will feel safer
>> and be safer.
>>
>> --
>
>Really? I didn't know one could do that.

All you need for a Facebook page is a valid email address. You can
register the page under any name you want.

>I'm writing a book ( I write one every 20 years or so whether I need
>to or not), and I will probably do a Facebook page for the book, as
>opposed to one for myself.
>
>Although, at this point, I don't know how to do that...but will learn.

I just figure it's better to keep a low profile. If con artists and
thieves don't have you real name to begin with, what can they do? On
the other hand, if they have your real name, they can start hunting
for more information.

--

[Fattuchus]

Yes;; AFAIK usenet use is down all over.

[Fattuchus]

Well said, Jeff. It seems to me that the threads that are the most
active are the ones involving controversial off topic subjects and/or
people arguing and pointing fingers.

[dan...@realtime.net]

On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:45:15 PM UTC-5, Fattuchus wrote:
> AFAIK usenet use is down all over.

Trunuff dat. However, over the years, it's seemed like whenever a ng dwindled away abruptly, it was generally pretty easy to determine what new, better forum was drawing the regulars away.

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist (though my gf & I occasionally go out to dinner with Alex Jones and his lovely wife) but I've always had a creepy feeling that "The New Google Groups" was intended from day one as some sort of rapid self-immolation plan. At the very LEAST, the noogoogroops have failed miserably at increasing traffic!

As far as the subject of Beatledom being "finite" I'm not so sure about that -- the reason I stopped being a Beatles "collector" is because, to put it simply, that's a game you can NEVER hope to win!

-- Dr Ass

[RichL]

"poisoned rose" <pro...@poissonedrose.com> wrote in message
news:prose99-6386E2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> Usenet received two lethal blows, well before the reign of Facebook and
> RMB's hate-speaking twins.
>
> 1) MySpace
> 2) AOL dropping Usenet access

Lethal? Really?

MySpace was never much of a discussion medium. And AOL? What fraction of
usenet participants do you figure were using AOL by 2005? I'd think that
fraction would be pretty small.

Most of the newsgroups' participation is diminishing rapidly, which pretty
much rules out the "hate-speaking twins". And as far as any factor specific
to RMB, I'd think the fact that most Beatles-related material has already
been re-hashed ad nauseam would trump anything else.

One of the most active musician-oriented newsgroups (alt.guitar) had over
half its regulars move en masse to a "private" Facebook group. It's even
more active there than it was in its original form. The very threat of
moderation keeps the trolls out. Yet nobody who participates has been
bounced from its inception. I think this is a decent model, but it requires
Facebook participation (and use of real names)which is a turn-off to some.

A similar effort to create a Beatles-related Facebook group has been a flop
by comparison (although I note today Brilton said on the group that he's
giving up on RMB, partially because bigpond, Australia's large ISP, just
switched off their usenet newsfeeds).

So it's really a whole lot of factors. Usenet's dying but it's not going
away slowly, and it's not clear whether it'll be really dead before I am.

[Bernie Woodham]

On May 1, 12:13 am, "RichL" <rpleav...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> So it's really a whole lot of factors.  Usenet's dying but it's not going
> away slowly, and it's not clear whether it'll be really dead before I am.

Did you mean "it's not going away quickly"?

[who?]

I just think the whole Facebook thing is stupid. No point
to it. Would rather call, or write someone. I don't keep
in touch with too many people. Would rather get another
cat.

Jeff

[wereoawl]

"hislop" <takecar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:klov2f$g7f$2...@dont-email.me...

Lifshine propose no rules. Lifshine only propose Nuclear Warrior and the
California Jam Wereo.

Clear the way to the garbage heap for your ENTIRE record collections >>>

[wereoawl]

"Bernie Woodham" <birnh...@insightbb.com> wrote in message
news:0b78f08a-25cd-4025...@w8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 29, 12:37 am, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>
> 5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
> Charlie;
>

I've never had a problem with Mista Charlie. I didn't know his posts
were considered disruptive.


> 6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely.
>

I know this is an imposter, but I do wonder about the true intents of
this person. If you look at some of those poems, I think they take a
bit of work to compose. So, I sort of surmise that this is a creative
exercise for a writer.

These things just never bothered me.




> Any claims henceforth will result in the offending poster(s) being
> permanently killfiled; those using Google Groups will no longer
> respond to offending poster(s) for any reason.
>

Again, I'd like to see Fatts rehabilitated. She has made some
interesting Beatle related posts in the past.

Most times it's gossipy stuff and I know a lot of people frown on the
gossipy stuff. But, I think it's kind of like a box of chocolates.
Too much chocolate can make you spazz out, but every one likes a
little chocolate now and then.

Yes, the rumors are true. I am the only one who matters in music, thank you.

[wereoawl]

"Fattuchus" <fatt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13cfc3de-063e-49b5...@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

http://www.ebay.com/sch/Rock-Pop-/108765/i.html?_sop=3
Current Guitar Auction

Everyone shall ye point to this. You still have brains left to think, don't
you? I taught The Beatles and Jimi Hendrix how to play!

[RichL]

"Bernie Woodham" <birnh...@insightbb.com> wrote in message

news:e3363aa5-0df2-4faf...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...

Yep. Sorry!

[UsurperTom]

On Apr 30, 6:08 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:

> AOL dropping Usenet access

And after that, a lot of ISP's dropped Usenet access as a result of
Andrew Cuomo's crackdown on child pornography.

[who?]

On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:45:15 PM UTC-5, Fattuchus wrote:

I copied and pasted a link that Ermitano gave to me to get
into this group the old Google way. I didn't use the link
this time, or I would be able to tell you the huge number
of people who lurk here but don't post. With all of the
disputes there are in this group, can you blame them for
not posting?

Jeff

[thewalruswasdanny]

On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:37:51 AM UTC+1, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit wrote:
> We, the undersigned....
>
>
>
> 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
>
> how often it's repeated;
>
>
>
> 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
>
> often it's repeated;
>
>
>
> 3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
>
> often it's repeated;
>
>
>
> 4) Do not care about "semen leakage";

>
>
>
> 5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
>
> Charlie;
>
>
>

> 6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely.
>
>
>
>
>

> Any claims henceforth will result in the offending poster(s) being
>
> permanently killfiled; those using Google Groups will no longer
>
> respond to offending poster(s) for any reason.
>
>
>

> sign with [X]
>
>
>
> -----------------
>
>
>
> There, that should make 95% of future readable posts Beatle-related.

YO is a manipulative, money grabbing, fame thirsty, Beatle breaker-upper..
Charlie is in fact Charlie..I didn't think he was either but he is!!
Rags is Rags AFAIK...

Usenet is out of favour (by me anyhows) because of the ease of anonymity...you know the way that folk hide themselves behind a computer cloak..it's less easy to do that via FB...and it's much easier to block (KF) people..same with YT...(YT is dead easy..any grief and it's a Block User Delete Post situation and they are gone forever!)

Saying that I imagine the authorities have contacted my (and Jazzy's) personal troll as he seems to have disappeared..so maybe Google groups is actually getting it's act together.

I agree that there's only so much Beatle talk to do before you run out..though I liked the bit about the running order of the WA cassette!!

Rock and roll.

Danny

[who?]

On Thursday, May 2, 2013 5:09:35 AM UTC-5, thewalruswasdanny wrote:
> On Monday, April 29, 2013 5:37:51 AM UTC+1, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit wrote:
>
> > We, the undersigned....
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
>
> >
>
> > how often it's repeated;
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
>
> >
>
> > often it's repeated;
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
>
> >
>
> > often it's repeated;
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 4) Do not care about "semen leakage";
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
>
> >
>
> > Charlie;
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Any claims henceforth will result in the offending poster(s) being
>
> >
>
> > permanently killfiled; those using Google Groups will no longer
>
> >
>
> > respond to offending poster(s) for any reason.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > sign with [X]
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > -----------------
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > There, that should make 95% of future readable posts Beatle-related.
>
>
>
> YO is a manipulative, money grabbing, fame thirsty, Beatle breaker-upper..

> Charlie is in fact Charlie..I didn't think he was either but he is!!

It's not the same Charlie, unless he is impersonating himself?

> Rags is Rags AFAIK...
>
>
>
> Usenet is out of favour (by me anyhows) because of the ease of anonymity...you know the way that folk hide themselves behind a computer cloak..it's less easy to do that via FB...and it's much easier to block (KF) people..same with YT...(YT is dead easy..any grief and it's a Block User Delete Post situation and they are gone forever!)


> Saying that I imagine the authorities have contacted my (and Jazzy's) personal troll as he seems to have disappeared..so maybe Google groups is actually getting it's act together.

You haven't been here for them to harass you.

> Rock and roll.


> Danny

Rock and roll.

Jeff

[Marcus]

On May 2, 6:09 am, thewalruswasdanny <thewalruswasda...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Danny-

Danny, you are 100% wrong about this...the present Mista Charlie is
not the Mister Charlie from years past. I email Charlie
occasionally. He is very happy that he left RMB in 2006, and has
never looked back. I emailed him today with your accusation, and he
denied it emphatically...and I believe him.

[Bernie Woodham]

On May 2, 12:26 pm, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>.  I emailed him today with your accusation,

Not really my business, but the word accusation is a bit harsh. I
think "belief" would be a better word.

Not that I'm a poet or an english teacher, but that sounded a bit
conspiratorial.

[Marcus]

You're right, that was a bit harsh...guess I've been reading too many
posts in various newsgroups from people who think the government is
going to take away their guns.

WATCH OUT...there goes another black helicopter!!!

[who?]

Danny will never believe it's not the real Mr. Charlie that posts.
Look at all the evidence that points to Yoko to not being the sole
reason the Beatles the Beatles broke up. He's very stubborn. When
he has his mind made up, there's no turning back.

Jeff

[Nooffa Subject]

"who?" <yourimag...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Danny will never believe it's not the real Mr. Charlie that posts.
> Look at all the evidence that points to Yoko to not being the sole
> reason the Beatles the Beatles broke up. He's very stubborn. When
> he has his mind made up, there's no turning back.
>
> Jeff

And Danny still believes he's a talented singer!

[thewalruswasdanny]

> And Danny still believes he's a talented singer!

Not particularilypeculiar..I just sing...

I probably sing better than you though....but you know post up a vid of you singing on YT with yer name..and we can all judge..there are countless vids of me singing on yt..passed the million views now..but you know..

You could always just carry on hiding hiding..like a penis in underpants.

Anyway onto the Charlie thing..I kind of sense it's the man..maybe maybe not..does it matter? Bless him anyway..I always quite liked Charlie..you know he's part of the great parcel..

Marcus - Yeah Accusations!!! Harsh indeed!!

Danny

[thewalruswasdanny]

He's very stubborn. When
>
> he has his mind made up, there's no turning back.
>
>
>
> Jeff

Ahem...two words..Roag Best.

Danny

[wereoawl]

"poisoned rose" <pro...@poissonedrose.com> wrote in message
news:prose99-6386E2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> Usenet received two lethal blows, well before the reign of Facebook and
> RMB's hate-speaking twins.
>
> 1) MySpace
> 2) AOL dropping Usenet access
>

> I'm not sure about this, but I *think* I first discovered Usenet via AOL.
>
> Jan '05: http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/40122.html

Correct. We awl started on AOL lol.

[wereoawl]

"RichL" <rple...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7bidndXW6u19gBzM...@supernews.com...

It would be best to go away quickly.

[wereoawl]

"Fattuchus" <fatt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:c4a437ba-4cc2-4f14...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

Nuclear Warrior and Wereo use should be up awl over.

[wereoawl]

"who?" <yourimag...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:367b5504-81fd-4e28...@googlegroups.com...

Rock and roll sucks! We have things so much better now, such as Nuclear
Warrior, the California Jam Wereo...I'm doing my part.

[who?]

Ahem...? ?

[Fattuchus]

On May 2, 7:12 pm, Nooffa Subject <Nooffa...@cagecable.com> wrote:

Danny is very talented as a singer, songwriter, artist, etc.

[who?]

He's angry at me but I never said an unkind word about
his guitar playing or his voice.

Jeff

[Fattuchus]

I am fond of both of you. I wish everyone would just shake hands and
move past any disagreement.

[who?]

I don't have any dislike of Danny. I just said what I said, he did
the same thing and it's over. I've seen so many people get along
in this group and suddenly without warning, posters hate each
other. Makes my stomach churn. I'll drop it and move on. Life
is too short. (Shaking hands with Danny though my computer)

Jeff

[wereoawl]

"who?" <yourimag...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message

news:14a0a3d7-306a-4176...@googlegroups.com...

He's angry at everyone.

[M C hammered]

On May 3, 6:11 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:

> thewalruswasdanny <thewalruswasda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Saying that I imagine the authorities have contacted my (and Jazzy's)
> > personal troll as he seems to have disappeared..so maybe Google groups is
> > actually getting it's act together.
>

> Crucial word here: "imagine."

"Imagine all the people..."

Nuff said

[M C hammered]

On Apr 29, 12:37 am, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>

wrote:
> We, the undersigned....
>
> 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
> how often it's repeated;
>
> 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
> often it's repeated;
>
> 3) Do not believe that Scott Lifshine is a celebrity, no matter how
> often it's repeated;
>
> 4) Do not care about "semen leakage";
>
> 5) Do not believe that "Mista Charlie" is the former RMB poster Mister
> Charlie;

Slow down their big guy. Let's talk. Come on ova here. Take a seat.
Just put thdm McDonalds rappa's on the floor. Good. Now take a
seat. Right here, real close.

Now what was that you saud their a few moment's ago? Bout Mista
Friggin Charlie? Hmm?

Do you think you might want to refraze that? Hmm?

Nuff said

[thewalruswasdanny]

> He's angry at me but I never said an unkind word about
>
> his guitar playing or his voice.

No I'm not..dunno where that's come from?

Danny

[who?]

I'm glad to hear that, Danny. Thanks for your response.

Jeff

[Marcus]

On May 3, 4:19 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:

> Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > guess I've been reading too many
> > posts in various newsgroups from people who think the government is
> > going to take away their guns.
>
> > WATCH OUT...there goes another black helicopter!!!
>

> Marcus sniffs at OTHERS for having overblown paranoia about government
> persecution. Now that takes the cake.

Spoken by Usenet's co-dependent drama queen.

[Marcus]

> And yet another boneheaded personal shot of no relevance to the current
> dialogue. I object to Marcus's topical content...he just belches up
> feeble personal insults. Somehow, he still deludes himself that he's
> "above" Usenet.
>
> You really should leave Usenet and make it permanent. You're simply
> unequipped to deal with a dissenting word on the most fundamental level.

You're not playing with a full deck.

[Marcus]

> Just another generic personal insult.
>
> You really are scraping the bottom.
>
> Below is what I originally wrote. You know, a content-based objection to
> something you posted. Rather than just a stupid, nyaah-nyaah shot with
> no connection to anything except your own lingering delusions of
> unassailability.

>
>
>
> > Marcus sniffs at OTHERS for having overblown paranoia about government
> > persecution. Now that takes the cake.

Living vicariously through another person's passion as he has none
himself, and always exaggerating and acting like it's the end of the
world...Eric Broome, Usenet's official Co-dependent Drama Queen.

[rwalker]

On Fri, 3 May 2013 19:36:19 -0700 (PDT), Marcus <marc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Oh God. It's back.

[c dubois]

On Apr 29, 12:37 am, The Brooklyn Tomato Bandit <bellyfl...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> We, the undersigned....
>
> 1) Do not believe that Islam is an inherently evil religion, no matter
> how often it's repeated;
>
> 2) Do not believe that Yoko Ono is inherently evil, no matter how
> often it's repeated;

I've never seen a post in here suggesting Yoko is inherently evil.
Was Yoko born this way or warped be experiences? The question might
make for good debate, but I don't think it has been much addressed,
let alone repeated, that her ethically dubious behavior is intrinsic.
>
> 6) Do not believe that "rags" is the former RMB poster R.A.G. Seely

I have no problem with the people who use RMB as or their creativity,
whether it's Rags' poems or Danny's covers. They 're adding something
positive to the group.

[topazgalaxy]

Marcus, Mr Rose is not happy unless he is expressing his
voluminous disdain for a number of people here. That is what gives
him a purpose in life . It is sad really.

[Marcus]

On May 4, 3:58 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:
> >If insulting RMBers is my "purpose of life," how come I left the newsgroup for two years or so and, even
> now, am not posting regularly?

You did so to be able to say that you left the ng for two years. You
suffer from a massive martyr complex.

[topazgalaxy]

Bravo.

[Marcus]

On May 4, 7:59 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:
.
>
> I really don't consider myself "here," even now.

Then you have some serious problems.

[Fattuchus]

On May 3, 9:20 pm, thewalruswasdanny <thewalruswasda...@gmail.com>
wrote:

I AM SO HAPPY!

[Fattuchus]

PR broke my irony meter. If there is one person on usenet who goes
around sniffing other people's butts, waiting to make some unkind
remark, it's PR.

[Fattuchus]

On May 3, 11:05 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:



>
> And yet another boneheaded personal shot of no relevance to the current

> dialogue. I object to PR's topical content...he just belches up

> feeble personal insults. Somehow, he still deludes himself that he's
> "above" Usenet.

I corrected your comments. Take a look. Take a long, hard and
objective look.

The majority of your posts are personal insults!

[Fattuchus]

On May 4, 3:58 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:

> topazgalaxy <topazgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Marcus,     Mr Rose is not happy unless he is  expressing his
> > voluminous disdain  for a number of people here.  That is what gives
> > him a purpose in life . It is sad really.
>

> Sorry to have taken you away from indulgently screeching about Muslims
> for a moment.
>
> Question for the disingenuous ratbag: If insulting RMBers is my "purpose

> of life," how come I left the newsgroup for two years or so and, even
> now, am not posting regularly?

You probably left rmb, and went to the Dylan group or some other group
to insult people.

[Fattuchus]

On May 4, 7:30 pm, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:

ROTFLM FAT AO.

[Fattuchus]

LOL!. PR is pulling a Yoko Ono. "this is not HERE." No, it's not
really PR . . . . . It's one of his other personalities. Sybil
perhaps?

[Fattuchus]

On May 5, 1:03 am, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:

> Way to clip out all the "meat" of my post, in typically cowardly fashion.
>
> I'll be out of this thread, as soon as you stop pettily mewling about
> me. Any idea when you'll stop?

People will be more inclined to "stop" when you demonstrate you can
behave. Are you capable of participating here without insulting other
people? If so, show us. Let's see if
you can be civil for a whole week.

[iL_WeReo]

On May 5, 1:03 am, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:
> Walking Wounded <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Way to clip out all the "meat" of my post, in typically cowardly fashion.
>
> I'll be out of this thread, as soon as you stop pettily mewling about
> me. Any idea when you'll stop?

Come come now. None of this matters. The only thing that matters is
Nuclear Warrior and the California Jam Wereo.

[topazgalaxy]

On May 4, 7:59 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:

> the walking wounded <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 4, 3:58 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:
> > > >If insulting RMBers is my "purpose of life," how come I left the newsgroup
> > > >for two years or so and, even
> > > now, am not posting regularly?
>
> > You did so to be able to say that you left the ng for two years.
>

> Your petty pecks are so, so silly. OVER TWO YEARS? I could have made the
> same point with just a few months.
>
> I really don't consider myself "here," even now. I'm just dropping in.

The reason you were gone for 2 years and you are just dropping in now
is because you are really Dr Smith in Lost in Space on another planet
and it takes you a while to get "here'

http://youtu.be/-mF6dCD8n2E

Notice the number of times Dr Smith has a compliment for anyone and
his dramatic emotional style -- it has/had to be you!


http://youtu.be/MUqV1HoEYLw

[Fattuchus]

Dr. Smith's insults:

http://irwinallen.wikia.com/wiki/Dr._Smith%27s_Insults

[c dubois]

On May 5, 3:10 am, Fattuchus <fattuc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 4, 9:43 pm, Marcus <marcus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 4, 7:59 pm, poisoned rose <pros...@poissonedrose.com> wrote:
> > .
>
> > > I really don't consider myself "here," even now.
>
> > Then you have some serious problems.
>
> LOL!.  PR is pulling a Yoko Ono.  "this is not HERE."

I'm trying to stay out of this (though not to the point of denying I'm
here), but that was good!

[wereoawl]

In article
<1812702e-91bc-4449...@o2g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,

YEA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i be agreeing to this take over thingie
--
I didn't invite them into the shower but once there, they got
naturally curious. Kids like to explore. One of the reasons kids go
to camp is sex ed. But make no mistake, it was NOT kiddie korn!
They're all adults now worshipping at the altar of their Lord and
Savior SCOTT LIFSHINE. They are tuned into the NEW INTELLECT.
I am AWL that matters! -Scot Lifshine Sat, 30 Sep 2006