> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> about 3 years ago?
I think I know that you don't like it at all.
This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
I held it yesterday.
Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> On Oct 7, 9:50 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>> about 3 years ago?
>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> You did? I only recall mentioning "Pepper"
>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>> I held it yesterday.
> Really? Is there footage on it that wasn't before?
And what before am I supposed to be looking at? First time on bluray and DVD restored. There are a number of interesting extras. It should have included the All You Need Is Love video.
> > On Oct 7, 9:50 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> >>> about 3 years ago?
> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> > You did? I only recall mentioning "Pepper"
> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
> >> I held it yesterday.
> > Really? Is there footage on it that wasn't before?
> And what before am I supposed to be looking at?
I have no idea. The movie has never made sense to me.
I might like it if it did.
First time on bluray
> and DVD restored. There are a number of interesting extras. It should
> have included the All You Need Is Love video.
Does it have Penny Lane on it, or Strawberry Fields?
It would be worth it if it had these 2 videos.
I just assumed it was already released. I'll be happy if
they include extra footage on "Let It Be." Then they
could release the soundtrack separate. We have to
wait for the Elvis camp to release something new
first.
> On Oct 7, 10:06 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/10/2012 1:58 PM, who? wrote:
>>> On Oct 7, 9:50 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>>>> about 3 years ago?
>>>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>>> You did? I only recall mentioning "Pepper"
>>>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>>>> I held it yesterday.
>>> Really? Is there footage on it that wasn't before?
>> And what before am I supposed to be looking at?
> I have no idea. The movie has never made sense to me.
> I might like it if it did.
> First time on bluray
>> and DVD restored. There are a number of interesting extras. It should
>> have included the All You Need Is Love video.
> Does it have Penny Lane on it, or Strawberry Fields?
> It would be worth it if it had these 2 videos.
> I just assumed it was already released. I'll be happy if
> they include extra footage on "Let It Be." Then they
> could release the soundtrack separate. We have to
> wait for the Elvis camp to release something new
> first.
This is straight from the Amazon page on it.
Pity they didn't include more from 1967.
I think they first asked Paul, or thought of asking him, for something for the movie,
Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush.
Product Description
Content:
Original Film restored Running time 53 minutes
8 page booklet
Packaged in an amaray case
+ SPECIAL FEATURES
Director's Commentary by Paul McCartney
The Making of Magical Mystery Tour (19:05)
- Features interviews with Paul and Ringo, along with other cast members and crew. Includes unseen footage.
Ringo the actor (2:30)
- Ringo reflecting on his role in the film.
Meet The Supporting Cast (11:27)
- A feature on the background and careers of Nat Jackley, Jessie Robins, Ivor Cutler, The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band, Victor Spinetti, George Claydon, and Derek Royle.
'Your Mother Should Know' (2:35)
'Blue Jay Way' (3:53)
'The Fool On The Hill' (3:05)
- Three new edits of these performances all featuring footage not seen in the original film.
'Hello Goodbye' (3:24), as featured in Top of the Pops 1967
- The Beatles allowed the BBC to film them in the edit suite where they were working on Magical Mystery Tour. This was then turned into a promo by the BBC, who shot their own additional footage. It was then broadcast on Top of the Pops to mark the 'Hello Goodbye' single going to No 1 in December 1967.
Nat's Dream (2:50)
- A scene directed by John featuring Nat Jackley. Not included in the original film.
Ivor Cutler 'I'm Going In A Field' (2:35)
- Ivor performs 'I'm Going In A Field', in a field. Not included in the original film.
Traffic 'Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush' (1:53)
- The filming of Traffic acting out their 1967 hit single 'Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush' was commissioned by The Beatles for possible inclusion in Magical Mystery Tour but was not used in the final edit.
TECHNICAL SPEC
Aspect ratio - 1.33:1
Frame rate - 1080i 59.94
Audio Options:
DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1
Dolby Digital 5.1
PCM stereo for Blu-Ray
Subtitle language options for feature, extras and commentary:
English
Franļæ½ais
Deutsch
Espaļæ½ol
Italiano
Portuguļæ½s
Nederlande
Svenska
Norsk
Dansk
Suomi
History
In September 1967 The Beatles embarked on making their third film, this time conceived and directed by themselves.
Based on a loose unscripted narrative, in the spirit of the experimental mood of the time, and directed by The Beatles themselves, the film became the vehicle to present 6 new songs - Magical Mystery Tour, The Fool On The Hill, Flying, I Am The Walrus, Blue Jay Way and Your Mother Should Know.
Now, 45 years on, the virtually forgotten film has been fully restored and is being presented properly for the first time.
The restoration of Magical Mystery Tour has been overseen by Paul Rutan Jr. of Eque Inc., the same company that handled the much acclaimed restoration of Yellow Submarine. The soundtrack work was done at Abbey Road Studios by Giles Martin and Sam Okell.
All of the packages contain a host of special features, packed with unseen footage. There are newly-filmed interviews with Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, and other members of the film's cast and crew, as well as a director's audio commentary recorded by Paul.
> > On Oct 7, 10:06 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 8/10/2012 1:58 PM, who? wrote:
> >>> On Oct 7, 9:50 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
> >>>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> >>>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> >>>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> >>>>> about 3 years ago?
> >>>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> >>> You did? I only recall mentioning "Pepper"
> >>>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
> >>>> I held it yesterday.
> >>> Really? Is there footage on it that wasn't before?
> >> And what before am I supposed to be looking at?
> > I have no idea. The movie has never made sense to me.
> > I might like it if it did.
> > First time on bluray
> >> and DVD restored. There are a number of interesting extras. It should
> >> have included the All You Need Is Love video.
> > Does it have Penny Lane on it, or Strawberry Fields?
> > It would be worth it if it had these 2 videos.
> > I just assumed it was already released. I'll be happy if
> > they include extra footage on "Let It Be." Then they
> > could release the soundtrack separate. We have to
> > wait for the Elvis camp to release something new
> > first.
> This is straight from the Amazon page on it.
> Pity they didn't include more from 1967.
> I think they first asked Paul, or thought of asking him, for something
> for the movie,
> Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush.
> Product Description
> Content:
> Original Film restored Running time 53 minutes
> 8 page booklet
> Packaged in an amaray case
> + SPECIAL FEATURES
> Director's Commentary by Paul McCartney
> The Making of Magical Mystery Tour (19:05)
> - Features interviews with Paul and Ringo, along with other cast members
> and crew. Includes unseen footage.
> Ringo the actor (2:30)
> - Ringo reflecting on his role in the film.
> Meet The Supporting Cast (11:27)
> - A feature on the background and careers of Nat Jackley, Jessie Robins,
> Ivor Cutler, The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band, Victor Spinetti, George
> Claydon, and Derek Royle.
> 'Your Mother Should Know' (2:35)
> 'Blue Jay Way' (3:53)
> 'The Fool On The Hill' (3:05)
> - Three new edits of these performances all featuring footage not seen
> in the original film.
> 'Hello Goodbye' (3:24), as featured in Top of the Pops 1967
> - The Beatles allowed the BBC to film them in the edit suite where they
> were working on Magical Mystery Tour. This was then turned into a promo
> by the BBC, who shot their own additional footage. It was then broadcast
> on Top of the Pops to mark the 'Hello Goodbye' single going to No 1 in
> December 1967.
> Nat's Dream (2:50)
> - A scene directed by John featuring Nat Jackley. Not included in the
> original film.
> Ivor Cutler 'I'm Going In A Field' (2:35)
> - Ivor performs 'I'm Going In A Field', in a field. Not included in the
> original film.
> Traffic 'Here We Go Round The Mulberry Bush' (1:53)
> - The filming of Traffic acting out their 1967 hit single 'Here We Go
> Round The Mulberry Bush' was commissioned by The Beatles for possible
> inclusion in Magical Mystery Tour but was not used in the final edit.
> TECHNICAL SPEC
> Aspect ratio - 1.33:1
> Frame rate - 1080i 59.94
> Audio Options:
> DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1
> Dolby Digital 5.1
> PCM stereo for Blu-Ray
> Subtitle language options for feature, extras and commentary:
> English
> Franļæ½ais
> Deutsch
> Espaļæ½ol
> Italiano
> Portuguļæ½s
> Nederlande
> Svenska
> Norsk
> Dansk
> Suomi
> History
> In September 1967 The Beatles embarked on making their third film, this
> time conceived and directed by themselves.
> Based on a loose unscripted narrative, in the spirit of the experimental
> mood of the time, and directed by The Beatles themselves, the film
> became the vehicle to present 6 new songs - Magical Mystery Tour, The
> Fool On The Hill, Flying, I Am The Walrus, Blue Jay Way and Your Mother
> Should Know.
> Now, 45 years on, the virtually forgotten film has been fully restored
> and is being presented properly for the first time.
> The restoration of Magical Mystery Tour has been overseen by Paul Rutan
> Jr. of Eque Inc., the same company that handled the much acclaimed
> restoration of Yellow Submarine. The soundtrack work was done at Abbey
> Road Studios by Giles Martin and Sam Okell.
> All of the packages contain a host of special features, packed with
> unseen footage. There are newly-filmed interviews with Paul McCartney,
> Ringo Starr, and other members of the film's cast and crew, as well as a
> director's audio commentary recorded by Paul.
You know, it does look pretty good. Thanks for posting
all the info. Hard to believe they advanced so much
in that short period of time.
> On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>> about 3 years ago?
>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>> I held it yesterday.
>> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
> no matter how crappy, I will never know.
Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
> On 08-Oct-12 07:31, hislop wrote:
>> On 8/10/2012 9:15 PM, Mister Snot wrote:
>>> On 07-Oct-12 22:32, hislop wrote:
>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>> The best price for this piece of shit is $0.
>>> Or better yet, give it away.
>>> Shit then. Shit now.
>>> An insult to the memory of the very gay Victor Spinetti who is Jeffie's
>>> hero.
>> Seeing that you probably only saw it a few years ago I don't know how
>> you know what it was like then.
> I have the movie. It sucks. I can watch it whenever I want to but it is
> better to use the DVD as a cheese platter during an Obama debate debacle.
I would throw that copy away if I was you, it's a bootleg.
> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> >>> about 3 years ago?
> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
> >> I held it yesterday.
> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
it.
<yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 8, 9:14 am, hislop <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/10/2012 11:43 PM, JPGRfan wrote:
>> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>> >>> about 3 years ago?
>> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>> >> I held it yesterday.
>> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
>> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
>> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
>> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
>I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
>it.
> <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 8, 9:14 am, hislop <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 8/10/2012 11:43 PM, JPGRfan wrote:
> >> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
> >> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> >> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> >> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> >> >>> about 3 years ago?
> >> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> >> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
> >> >> I held it yesterday.
> >> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> >> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
> >> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
> >> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
> >I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
> >it.
> Yup.
> -gj
You too huh? I don't mind "It's getting better" or "She's leaving
home." I don't like Harrison's crappy Indian music. It goes
well with his solo stuff.
<yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 8, 12:40 pm, gemjack <geminijackso...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:31:44 -0700 (PDT), Jeff
>> <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 8, 9:14 am, hislop <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 8/10/2012 11:43 PM, JPGRfan wrote:
>> >> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>> >> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>> >> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>> >> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>> >> >>> about 3 years ago?
>> >> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>> >> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>> >> >> I held it yesterday.
>> >> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
>> >> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
>> >> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
>> >> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
>> >I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
>> >it.
>> Yup.
>> -gj
>You too huh? I don't mind "It's getting better" or "She's leaving
>home." I don't like Harrison's crappy Indian music. It goes
>well with his solo stuff.
LSD intrigued me as a kid. As a 'song' it just doesn't do much for me
anymore. I like most of George's contributions, but the Indian
influenced songs aren't as preferable as say, Old Brown Shoe.
As an album, I place SP lower than Revolver and Rubber Soul both. Just
my preference, subject to change at a moments notice, but unlikely to
today.
-gj
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:27:34 -0700 (PDT), Jeff
> <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>On Oct 8, 12:40 pm, gemjack <geminijackso...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:31:44 -0700 (PDT), Jeff
>>> <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >On Oct 8, 9:14 am, hislop <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> On 8/10/2012 11:43 PM, JPGRfan wrote:
>>> >> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? >>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>> >> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>> >> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>> >> >>> about 3 years ago?
>>> >> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>>> >> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>>> >> >> I held it yesterday.
>>> >> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
>>> >> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their >>> >> > output
>>> >> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
>>> >> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
>>> >I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
>>> >it.
>>> Yup.
>>> -gj
>>You too huh? I don't mind "It's getting better" or "She's leaving
>>home." I don't like Harrison's crappy Indian music. It goes
>>well with his solo stuff.
> LSD intrigued me as a kid. As a 'song' it just doesn't do much for me
> anymore. I like most of George's contributions, but the Indian
> influenced songs aren't as preferable as say, Old Brown Shoe.
"Lucy" is OK. It just doesn't reach out and grab me like some of John's other stuff. But on that album, "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite" and "Good Morning Good Morning" are worse than "Lucy" (I know I have a minority opinion on this).
> As an album, I place SP lower than Revolver and Rubber Soul both. Just
> my preference, subject to change at a moments notice, but unlikely to
> today.
> -gj
Same here, although my preference is extremely unlikely to change. The only two "grabbers" in my estimation on "Pepper's" are "A Day in the Life" and, yes, "With a Little Help from My Friends". "Getting Better" and "She's Leaving Home" aren't half bad, nor is "Within You Without You" if I'm in the proper mood.
> >> >> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
> >> >> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> >> >> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> >> >> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> >> >> >>> about 3 years ago?
> >> >> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> >> >> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
> >> >> >> I held it yesterday.
> >> >> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> >> >> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
> >> >> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
> >> >> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
> >> >I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
> >> >it.
> >> Yup.
> >> -gj
> >You too huh? I don't mind "It's getting better" or "She's leaving
> >home." I don't like Harrison's crappy Indian music. It goes
> >well with his solo stuff.
> LSD intrigued me as a kid. As a 'song' it just doesn't do much for me
> anymore. I like most of George's contributions, but the Indian
> influenced songs aren't as preferable as say, Old Brown Shoe.
> As an album, I place SP lower than Revolver and Rubber Soul both. Just
> my preference, subject to change at a moments notice, but unlikely to
> today.
> -gj
I can only remember 4 albums that knocked me out from
start to finish: Rubber Soul, (I didn't even hear it until 1972)
The White Album, Abbey Road, and Harrison's Living in
the material world. I actually played all their albums
non stop, and I should include Revolver. The only
thing I didn't like, was/is the way Taxman was recorded.
That tambourine is corny, and louder than the drums, that
come out of only one speaker. I prefer the live version
of Taxman because the drumming was mixed and played
right.
The best of the Raspberries and Turtles knocked me
out too as well as the Guess who. Wrong newsgroup
for those though.
> >>> >> > On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who?
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
> >>> >> >>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
> >>> >> >>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
> >>> >> >>> about 3 years ago?
> >>> >> >> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
> >>> >> >> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
> >>> >> >> I held it yesterday.
> >>> >> >> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> >>> >> > Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their
> >>> >> > output
> >>> >> > no matter how crappy, I will never know.
> >>> >> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
> >>> >I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
> >>> >it.
> >>> Yup.
> >>> -gj
> >>You too huh? I don't mind "It's getting better" or "She's leaving
> >>home." I don't like Harrison's crappy Indian music. It goes
> >>well with his solo stuff.
> > LSD intrigued me as a kid. As a 'song' it just doesn't do much for me
> > anymore. I like most of George's contributions, but the Indian
> > influenced songs aren't as preferable as say, Old Brown Shoe.
> "Lucy" is OK. It just doesn't reach out and grab me like some of John's
> other stuff. But on that album, "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite" and
> "Good Morning Good Morning" are worse than "Lucy" (I know I have a minority
> opinion on this).
I like "Good Morning" cause it's probably the best song on the album.
I just forgot to list it. I like "Kite" but have to be in the right
mood.
> > As an album, I place SP lower than Revolver and Rubber Soul both.
There you go, Rich.
Just
> > my preference, subject to change at a moments notice, but unlikely to
> > today.
> > -gj
> Same here, although my preference is extremely unlikely to change. The only
> two "grabbers" in my estimation on "Pepper's" are "A Day in the Life" and,
> yes, "With a Little Help from My Friends". "Getting Better" and "She's
> Leaving Home" aren't half bad, nor is "Within You Without You" if I'm in the
> proper mood.
> On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>> about 3 years ago?
>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>> I held it yesterday.
>> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
> Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
> no matter how crappy, I will never know.
> On 8/10/2012 11:43 PM, JPGRfan wrote:
>> On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>>> about 3 years ago?
>>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>>> I held it yesterday.
>>> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
>> Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
>> no matter how crappy, I will never know.
> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
How about cause its a shit song?
Very over rated song on the most over rated album of all time.
> On 8/10/2012 11:18 PM, Mister Snot wrote:
>> On 08-Oct-12 07:31, hislop wrote:
>>> On 8/10/2012 9:15 PM, Mister Snot wrote:
>>>> On 07-Oct-12 22:32, hislop wrote:
>>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>>> The best price for this piece of shit is $0.
>>>> Or better yet, give it away.
>>>> Shit then. Shit now.
>>>> An insult to the memory of the very gay Victor Spinetti who is Jeffie's
>>>> hero.
>>> Seeing that you probably only saw it a few years ago I don't know how
>>> you know what it was like then.
>> I have the movie. It sucks. I can watch it whenever I want to but it is
>> better to use the DVD as a cheese platter during an Obama debate debacle.
> I would throw that copy away if I was you, it's a bootleg.
> On Oct 8, 9:14 am, hislop <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/10/2012 11:43 PM, JPGRfan wrote:
>>> On 07-Oct-12 22:50, hislop wrote:> On 8/10/2012 1:47 PM, who? wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 7, 9:32 pm, hislop<takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I saw it in the store yesterday. Price not right yet.
>>>>> It's a pretty crappy film, IMO, but it was way ahead
>>>>> of it's time like Rev no 9. Wasn't this released
>>>>> about 3 years ago?
>>>> I think I know that you don't like it at all.
>>>> This is a new release. It's still on pre-order on Amazon.
>>>> I held it yesterday.
>>>> Why you disregard part of Beatle history I will never know.
>>> Why you feel that a Beatle fan has to like every part of their output
>>> no matter how crappy, I will never know.
>> Why people dislike Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds I will never know.
> I dislike that song more than the rest of the album. I can't stand
> it.
It is better than Harrison's funeral dirge, but not by much.
