Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Who came-up with the Beatle bow?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

firefly

unread,
May 16, 2008, 2:23:25 AM5/16/08
to
?

---firefly


BLACKPOOLJIMMY

unread,
May 16, 2008, 2:27:40 AM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 2:23�am, "firefly" <firefly...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> ?
>
> ---firefly

Jack LaLanne

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 16, 2008, 3:16:41 AM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 1:23 am, "firefly" <firefly...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> ?
>
> ---firefly

It was Brian'sidea.

O'Leary III

unread,
May 16, 2008, 6:53:10 AM5/16/08
to
firefly wrote:

> ?

Way back, John put it on a birthday present for Paul. After that, it
became sort of a Beatle tradition! And we're glad it did.

firefly

unread,
May 16, 2008, 1:46:20 PM5/16/08
to
Very funny.

I saw Jack LaLane at the Pomona Fair back in the early sixties. My mother
used to watch his TV show and exercise with him, and always had a Glamour
Stretcher hanging on a door knob.

---firefly


"BLACKPOOLJIMMY" <Blackpo...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:2c42587f-3bfc-48c6...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

firefly

unread,
May 16, 2008, 1:48:06 PM5/16/08
to
I'm glad they embraced it enthusiastically. The classiest act in history
with a classy performance.

Isn't it interesting that they could all immediately fall-in to the bow at
precisely the same time, regardless of what they were doing with their
instruments or whatever. It was like they really were connected with ESP.

---firefly


<fatt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2fcac9ef-f7e4-4b8b...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

firefly

unread,
May 16, 2008, 4:33:48 PM5/16/08
to
I'm glad they embraced it enthusiastically. The classiest act in history
with a classy performance.

Isn't it interesting that they could all immediately fall-in to the bow at
precisely the same time, regardless of what they were doing with their
instruments or whatever. It was like they really were connected with ESP.

---firefly


<fatt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2fcac9ef-f7e4-4b8b...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Message has been deleted

firefly

unread,
May 16, 2008, 5:35:31 PM5/16/08
to
Well, it's pretty amazing to watch them fall in like someone was counting
down for it.

The amount of performances they made got them to be called together
precisely for the bow by a countdown inside their own heads by something
apparent to no one else. You never saw one missing out in the unison, and
it wasn't because they were watching each other.

That alone speaks for the innumerable times they appeared together.

---firefly


"poisoned rose" <pr...@definitive.com> wrote in message
news:OvmXj.281$Q57...@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...


> "firefly" <firef...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> The classiest act in history
>

> Oh please.


Message has been deleted

Bip Bop

unread,
May 16, 2008, 7:55:31 PM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 3:54 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> "firefly" <firefly...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > The classiest act in history
>
> Oh please.

Ha!

You sound like my old Aunt Thelma!

Yeah, the classiest!

Listen to "Till There Was You" at the command performance by The Queen
and think again... even if it actually is the first time!

Message has been deleted

Bip Bop

unread,
May 16, 2008, 9:13:12 PM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 7:01 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> Bip Bop <bip_...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > > The classiest act in history
>
> > > Oh please.
>
> > Ha!
>
> > You sound like my old Aunt Thelma!
>
> > Yeah, the classiest!
>
> > Listen to "Till There Was You" at the command performance by The Queen
> > and think again... even if it actually is the first time!
>
> A ridiculous fanboy hyperbole, and it's a basically unmeasurable trait
> anyway.
>
> Ending every sentence with an exclamation point does not make your
> argument any more powerful.

Sorry.

I guess I'm just an enthusiastic (and positive) kind of guy.

Message has been deleted

Bip Bop

unread,
May 16, 2008, 9:58:17 PM5/16/08
to
> You can't exalt the Beatles' cheeky irreverence AND their untouchable
> "classiness"...you'll have to pick one.

The Beatles were both those things and more! (Excuse the exclamation
point.)

You pick one and I'll pick all of the superlatives when discussing The
Beatles, sir.

Message has been deleted

RichL

unread,
May 16, 2008, 11:15:10 PM5/16/08
to
poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> You can't exalt the Beatles' cheeky irreverence AND their untouchable
> "classiness"...you'll have to pick one.

Classiness doesn't preclude humor.


D'you eat yet?

unread,
May 16, 2008, 11:18:41 PM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 2:23 am, "firefly" <firefly...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Who came up with the Beatle bow?


Jimmy Page?

Message has been deleted

D'you eat yet?

unread,
May 16, 2008, 11:26:31 PM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 11:23 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:
> Did you really want to debate this? Really?

Do you really want to debate *everything*? Really?

RichL

unread,
May 17, 2008, 12:38:17 AM5/17/08
to
poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> "RichL" <rple...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> You can't exalt the Beatles' cheeky irreverence AND their
>>> untouchable "classiness"...you'll have to pick one.
>>
>> Classiness doesn't preclude humor.
>
> Oh lordy. No, it does not. However, it does preclude vulgar humor,
> acting perverse in formal settings, performing with a toilet seat hung
> around your neck, nude pictures, being visibly stoned/drunk, etc.

I looked up the definition. The problem is that there are several, and
they conflict with each other. Anyway, some of them fit my perception
of the Beatles' early days. That's my story and I'm sticking with it.
Yeah! That's what I'm talkin' 'bout!

> Did you really want to debate this? Really?

I believe the debate was initiated when you questioned BipBop's
characterization. Anyway, I put my 2c in and I'm done ;-)


Bip Bop

unread,
May 17, 2008, 12:48:59 AM5/17/08
to
On May 16, 11:38 pm, "RichL" <rpleav...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

That is the only way to respond to Poisoned Rose.

Put your last comment in and then ignore any response by her / him /
it / whatever.

You then get the last word and her / he / it / whatever fails in her /
he / it / whatever's mission.

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 17, 2008, 12:57:31 AM5/17/08
to
On May 16, 8:58�pm, Bip Bop <bip_...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On May 16, 8:16�pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Bip Bop <bip_...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > > > Listen to "Till There Was You" at the command performance by The Queen
> > > > > and think again... even if it actually is the first time!
>
> > > > A ridiculous fanboy hyperbole, and it's a basically unmeasurable trait
> > > > anyway.
>
> > > > Ending every sentence with an exclamation point does not make your
> > > > argument any more powerful.
>
> > > Sorry.
>
> > > I guess I'm just an enthusiastic (and positive) kind of guy.
>
> > You can't exalt the Beatles' cheeky irreverence AND their untouchable
> > "classiness"...you'll have to pick one.
>
> The Beatles were both those things and more! (Excuse the exclamation
> point.)


Yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 17, 2008, 12:59:16 AM5/17/08
to
> he / it / whatever's mission.-


Don't forget the exclamations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Message has been deleted

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 17, 2008, 3:22:33 AM5/17/08
to
On May 17, 12:10 am, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:
> Bip Bop <bip_...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > I believe the debate was initiated when you questioned BipBop's
> > > characterization.  Anyway, I put my 2c in and I'm done ;-)
>
> > That is the only way to respond to Poisoned Rose.
>
> > Put your last comment in and then ignore any response by her / him /
> > it / whatever.
>
> > You then get the last word and her / he / it / whatever fails in her /
> > he / it / whatever's mission.
>
> It's amazing how the nitwits try to paint *me* as the unreasonable one
> during an issue like this.
>
> Characteristically, Bip Bop (and firefly, before him) gushes out a
> ridiculous, indefensible hyperbole, and then turns all huffy and snitty
> when anyone dares to dispute it. This pattern occurs over and over and
> over with Bip Bop, whether the subject is Jeff Lynne, Red Rose Speedway,
> his own YouTubings....
>
> And he knows he can't defend his claim, so all he can do is switch the
> above sort of broad, all-purpose dismissal.
>
> Feeble, feeble, feeble.
>
> What's next? The Beatles had the straightest teeth in music history?
> Maybe their toenails were the most neatly trimmed too. Come on people,
> get a grip.

What's next?

How 'bout they inspired the cutest kids:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKD_JAgh9hY&NR=1#

Message has been deleted

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 17, 2008, 4:02:35 AM5/17/08
to
I always thought it was something Brian Epstein insisted on and assumed
the Beatles hated doing it. It was cheeseball...corny...shmaltzy. Real
old school.
I'm pretty sure that by 1965, with playing in stadiums , getting Los
beatles out alive was like a military exercise.
Running from helicopters and departing by armored cars...at least in
America, seems to have put an end to bows and long good byes.

O'Leary III

unread,
May 17, 2008, 7:37:55 AM5/17/08
to
fatt...@yahoo.com wrote:

> What's next? How about they inspired the cutest kids:

That was done already.

Dave The Rave

unread,
May 17, 2008, 11:22:36 AM5/17/08
to
> You can't exalt the Beatles' cheeky irreverence AND their untouchable
> "classiness"...you'll have to pick one.

Irreverence masquerading as classiness? (better than curtsying)


Dave The Rave

Dave The Rave

unread,
May 17, 2008, 11:27:05 AM5/17/08
to
On May 16, 11:18 pm, "D'you eat yet?" <jimmycarlwh...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> On May 16, 2:23 am, "firefly" <firefly...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > Who came up with the Beatle bow?
>
> Jimmy Page?

What does Jimmy Page have to do with the front of ocean craft?

Dave the Rave

firefly

unread,
May 17, 2008, 11:36:48 AM5/17/08
to
The problem with you is you can't see past your filth.

---firefly


"poisoned rose" <pr...@definitive.com> wrote in message

news:pNtXj.1365$qH4...@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com...


> Bip Bop <bip...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> > I believe the debate was initiated when you questioned BipBop's
>> > characterization. Anyway, I put my 2c in and I'm done ;-)
>>
>> That is the only way to respond to Poisoned Rose.
>>
>> Put your last comment in and then ignore any response by her / him /
>> it / whatever.
>>
>> You then get the last word and her / he / it / whatever fails in her /
>> he / it / whatever's mission.
>

Bip Bop

unread,
May 17, 2008, 12:02:40 PM5/17/08
to
On May 17, 12:10 am, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> Characteristically, Bip Bop (and firefly, before him) gushes out a
> ridiculous, indefensible hyperbole, and then turns all huffy and snitty
> when anyone dares to dispute it. This pattern occurs over and over and
> over with Bip Bop, whether the subject is Jeff Lynne, Red Rose Speedway,
> his own YouTubings....

Your saying it does not make it so.

Message has been deleted

Bip Bop

unread,
May 17, 2008, 4:01:19 PM5/17/08
to
On May 17, 2:25 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> Right, but your posting history does. And I don't know why you pretend
> otherwise. Your behavior in that thread about the Red Rose Speedway
> songlet with the circle-of-fifths chords was especially ridiculous.

Just because you are an idiot and had (and still have) no idea
what I was talking about doesn't make me wrong. What do you really
know about music except what you hear. What instrument do you play?
Have you studied music theory? I have and therefore, I know you are
not qualified to judge. Do you even know what The Circle of Fifths
importance to great music is? Obviously not. Again, just because you
have an opinion of someone does not make you right in that opinion.
Few respect you here, and I suspect even fewer respect you in your
life, so buzz off, Mr. Know It All, Debater and Asshole of the World
Extraordinaire. Oh, yeah... and just because I don't respond to
whatever you may post in response here does not mean you have won, or
hurt me as you intend to do with everyone you respond to here. You
will never hurt me, or my feelings, or be considered a winner because
you are... well, you know what I and the rest of RMB, your "friends"
and acquaintances think of you.
You know I seriously hate the saying, "Get a life", but seriously
do need to get one and grow up.

"While you attack, create offence
I'll put it down to your ignorance."

+ George Harrison +
"This Guitar (Can't Keep From Crying)"

Message has been deleted

Bip Bop

unread,
May 17, 2008, 4:19:58 PM5/17/08
to
On May 17, 3:10 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> And...you just ABUNDANTLY proved my point about the ridiculous tantrums
> you throw when people disagree with you. I couldn't have asked for a
> more illustrative response. Good grief...do you have ANY perspective on
> yourself at all?

It's not a tantrum. It's just the teacher in me trying to consul
someone who is disrupting the class by having no class.

> Pitiful. Just pitiful.

You certainly are. Now grow up and be civil. You don't know
everything.

> And there's nothing like being told to "get a life" by someone who
> spends his entire day switching between iMovie and YouTube.

I spent 30 years in the classroom teaching English and later Computer
Programming and how to use PowerPoint to creatively present all manner
of information to better one's grades in the educational system so
it's hard to stop what I do so well now that I am retired.

What do you do besides hide behind critical words that you cowardly
post conveniently set to self destruct after 6 days? What ARE you
afraid of?

Message has been deleted

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 17, 2008, 4:39:41 PM5/17/08
to

Sometimes it's best to just ignore PR. He acts like this with almost
everyone.

Message has been deleted

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 17, 2008, 6:02:04 PM5/17/08
to
On May 17, 3:50 pm, poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

> fattuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > > And...you just ABUNDANTLY proved my point about the ridiculous tantrums
> > > > you throw when people disagree with you. I couldn't have asked for a
> > > > more illustrative response. Good grief...do you have ANY perspective on
> > > > yourself at all?
>
> > > It's not a tantrum. ?It's just the teacher in me trying to consul

> > > someone who is disrupting the class by having no class.
>
> > > > Pitiful. Just pitiful.
>
> > > You certainly are. ?Now grow up and be civil. ?You don't know

> > > everything.
>
> > > > And there's nothing like being told to "get a life" by someone who
> > > > spends his entire day switching between iMovie and YouTube.
>
> > > I spent 30 years in the classroom teaching English and later Computer
> > > Programming and how to use PowerPoint to creatively present all manner
> > > of information to better one's grades in the educational system so
> > > it's hard to stop what I do so well now that I am retired.
>
> > > What do you do besides hide behind critical words that you cowardly
> > > post conveniently set to self destruct after 6 days? ?What ARE you

> > > afraid of?
>
> > Sometimes it's best to just ignore PR.  He acts like this with almost
> > everyone.
>
> Your intellectual dishonesty is, of course, legendary, but it's
> perfectly obvious to any reader who is the one who became unhinged here.


PR, if you are convinced that it is obvious that someone else became
unhinged, why discuss it further?

Let's try to make the post about the post . . . not the poster, OK?


Message has been deleted

The Walrus was Danny

unread,
May 17, 2008, 7:41:12 PM5/17/08
to

> Remind me why you're not scolding Bip Bop for calling me an asshole,
> etc.? Or scolding firefly for simply responding to my on-topic points by
> calling me filth? Oh, that's right...because you make posts about the
> posters rather than the post.


Put yer penis away Guru. It's an interesting question that has been
posed.

One wonders if the first beatle bow is recorded in "The Beatles Live!"
by Captain Lewie. I don't have it with me, somebody out there must
have the bugger. If he doesn't mention it it's a glaring omission
(IMO).

Danny

Message has been deleted

O'Leary III

unread,
May 17, 2008, 10:05:44 PM5/17/08
to
Bip Bop wrote:

> I spent 30 years in the classroom teaching English and later Computer
> Programming and how to use PowerPoint to creatively present all manner
> of information to better one's grades in the educational system so
> it's hard to stop what I do so well now that I am retired.

If you've gotten through to as many students as it seems you have,
you've done good in your life's work.

Now go make some movies!

Bip Bop

unread,
May 18, 2008, 12:47:17 AM5/18/08
to

You're too cool, O'Leary!

Your will be done!

Thanks.

Sean Carroll

unread,
May 18, 2008, 10:54:33 AM5/18/08
to
"Bip Bop" <bip...@sbcglobal.net> wrote
> poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:

>> A ridiculous fanboy hyperbole, and it's a basically unmeasurable trait
>> anyway.
>>
>> Ending every sentence with an exclamation point does not make your
>> argument any more powerful.

> Sorry.
>
> I guess I'm just an enthusiastic (and positive) kind of guy.

Serious character flaw. You'd better work on that!

--
--Sean
http://spclsd223.livejournal.com

House: Find my cane and motorcycle. Figure out where I went last night.

Kutner: [taking out a notepad] Where's your cane and motorcycle?

House: You're gonna trust me? I lie about everything.


Bip Bop

unread,
May 18, 2008, 11:49:51 AM5/18/08
to
On May 18, 9:54 am, "Sean Carroll" <seanc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Bip Bop" <bip_...@sbcglobal.net> wrote

>
> > poisoned rose <pr...@definitive.com> wrote:
> >> A ridiculous fanboy hyperbole, and it's a basically unmeasurable trait
> >> anyway.
>
> >> Ending every sentence with an exclamation point does not make your
> >> argument any more powerful.
> > Sorry.
>
> > I guess I'm just an enthusiastic (and positive) kind of guy.
>
> Serious character flaw. You'd better work on that!

You're right, Sean, and I will... promise!

A little side note to you here knowing that "House" is one of your
favorite shows (isn't it?).

Wasn't last weeks show ABSOLUTELY CLASSIC and FANTASTIC!

Always a great show, but this one was unbelievably great!

I can hardly wait for tomorrow's conclusion of this two-parter!

Sean Carroll

unread,
May 18, 2008, 12:02:22 PM5/18/08
to
"Bip Bop" <bip...@sbcglobal.net> wrote

> A little side note to you here knowing that "House" is one of your
> favorite shows (isn't it?).

Nope. Never heard of it. My sig lines are all added to my posts by the
government without my knowledge or consent.

> Wasn't last weeks show ABSOLUTELY CLASSIC and FANTASTIC!
>
> Always a great show, but this one was unbelievably great!
>
> I can hardly wait for tomorrow's conclusion of this two-parter!

Yep. Over in the House group, even people who think that the show's declined
somewhat lately are raving about how fantastic it was. It was just spot on
right from the very first scene -- unpredictable and complicated and one of
the most dramatically powerful episodes ever. It was uncharacteristically
light on the 'great witty lines' side of things, but the story was so
engrossing that I didn't feel like that was any kind of serious lack or
flaw. It was more than made up for by everything else.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 22, 2008, 8:35:27 AM5/22/08
to
Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.

Martin Hofner

unread,
May 22, 2008, 8:52:32 AM5/22/08
to
On May 22, 8:35 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
> Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.

==========================

As I recall the real answer being the German existentialis in Hamburg,
with Astrid acting as their personal channeler - first Stu, then the
rest.

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 22, 2008, 12:05:00 PM5/22/08
to
On May 22, 7:35�am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
> Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.

That was very, very funny. LOL.

O'Leary III

unread,
May 22, 2008, 9:56:30 PM5/22/08
to
fatt...@yahoo.com wrote:

>> Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
>
> That was very, very funny. LOL.


And almost fifty years old.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 23, 2008, 6:48:43 AM5/23/08
to

Re: Who came-up with the Beatle haircut ?

Group: rec.music.beatles Date: Thu, May 22, 2008, 5:52am (EDT-3) From:
yearo...@yahoo.com (Martin Hofner)
**********************************************
And they stole it from Moe Howard of The Three Stooges who was wearing
that hair cut-style back in the 1920's.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 23, 2008, 6:53:07 AM5/23/08
to
mom...@mogjod1.com (O'Leary III)
fatt...@yahoo.com wrote:

***********************************************
And Moe was wearing that style in the 20s, long before The Beatles had
it.
Hey, there's photographic evidence of this.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 23, 2008, 6:50:53 AM5/23/08
to
fatt...@yahoo.com
On May 22, 7:35�am,

RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.

That was very, very funny. LOL.

**********************************************
Why thank you kindly. ( takes a bow but not a Beatle bow, just a good
old fashioned stage bow )
I'm glad you found humor in it. But.....
it's true.

appe...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 23, 2008, 1:15:56 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 6:50 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
> fattuc...@yahoo.com
> On May 22, 7:35�am,

>
> RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
>
> Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
>
> That was very, very funny. LOL.
> **********************************************
> Why thank you kindly. ( takes a bow but not a Beatle bow, just a good
> old fashioned stage bow )
> I'm glad you found humor in it. But.....
> it's true.  

====================================================
No Manfred....

The exis say they took it from Roman Empire era statues. I think
that predated even old Moe

Bernie Woodham

unread,
May 23, 2008, 2:35:54 PM5/23/08
to

"Manfred Noland" <RockN...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2907-483...@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...

****************************************

1933:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1e/Horowitzmosesphoto.jpg


appe...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 23, 2008, 2:47:37 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 2:35 pm, "Bernie Woodham" <birnhamw...@insightbb.com>
wrote:
> "Manfred Noland" <RockNRo...@webtv.net> wrote in message

>
> news:2907-483...@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...
> mom...@mogjod1.com (O'Leary III)
>
> fattuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
>
> That was very, very funny. LOL.
>
> And almost fifty years old.
> ***********************************************
> And Moe was wearing that style in the 20s, long before The Beatles had
> it.
> Hey, there's photographic evidence of this.
> ****************************************
>
> 1933:
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1e/Horowitzmosesphoto.jpg


====================================================

Scroll down this page and you guys will see a couple of examples of
the haircuts the exis copied and gave to the Beatles.

Google Caesar images and you see the same

www.white-history.com/hwr15.htm

BEFORE MOE


fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:04:31 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 12:15 pm, appeyr...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 23, 6:50 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
>
> > fattuc...@yahoo.com
> > On May 22, 7:35?am,

>
> > RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
>
> > Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
>
> > That was very, very funny. LOL.
> > **********************************************
> > Why thank you kindly. ( takes a bow but not a Beatle bow, just a good
> > old fashioned stage bow )
> > I'm glad you found humor in it. But.....
> > it's true.  
>
> ====================================================
> No Manfred....
>
> The exis say they took it from Roman Empire era statues.   I think
> that predated even old Moe

There is some debate in the Beatle literature about their
haircuts . . . . some books say the Beatles ended up with their famous
hair style after a trip to Paris.

fatt...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:08:19 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 12:15 pm, appeyr...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 23, 6:50 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
>
> > fattuc...@yahoo.com
> > On May 22, 7:35?am,

>
> > RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
>
> > Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
>
> > That was very, very funny. LOL.
> > **********************************************
> > Why thank you kindly. ( takes a bow but not a Beatle bow, just a good
> > old fashioned stage bow )
> > I'm glad you found humor in it. But.....
> > it's true.  
>
> ====================================================
> No Manfred....
>
> The exis say they took it from Roman Empire era statues.   I think
> that predated even old Moe

If anyone is interested, here is a link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatle_haircut#The_mop-top_haircut

Bernie Woodham

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:23:24 PM5/23/08
to

<appe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0fedd1b2-c4d1-4852...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...


====================================================

www.white-history.com/hwr15.htm

BEFORE MOE
************************

Yeah, that's interesting. But what kind of site is this, some kind of Nazi
site? Nefertiti was not white, she was black.

appe...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:34:22 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 3:23 pm, "Bernie Woodham" <birnhamw...@insightbb.com>
wrote:
> <appeyr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> site?  Nefertiti was not white, she was black.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

===================

Geez. I just quickly googled images, looked at the pictures and
copied it.

The point was the photos of guys with hair

Bernie Woodham

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:59:55 PM5/23/08
to

<appe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f4d940a1-fd4c-4912...@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

===================

*******************************************
Not a good enough answer. Time for the waterboarding!


O'Leary III

unread,
May 24, 2008, 1:08:28 AM5/24/08
to
fatt...@yahoo.com wrote:

> If anyone is interested, here is a link:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatle_haircut#The_mop-top_haircut

Oy. Wiki.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 24, 2008, 7:50:02 AM5/24/08
to

Re: Who came-up with the Beatle haircut ?

Group: rec.music.beatles Date: Fri, May 23, 2008, 10:15am (EDT-3) From:
appe...@yahoo.com
On May 23, 6:50 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
fattuc...@yahoo.com
On May 22, 7:35�am,
RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
That was very, very funny. LOL.
**********************************************
Why thank you kindly. ( takes a bow but not a Beatle bow, just a good
old fashioned stage bow )
I'm glad you found humor in it. But..... it's true.  
==============================================
No Manfred....
The exis say they took it from Roman Empire era statues.   I think
that predated even old Moe
***********************************************
And you're going to believe those freaks ? there's no photographic
evidence of peole wearing the Moe Howard hair style in Roman times.
There may have been. And aliens may have built the pyramids. We can't be
certain. We can be cetain Moe Howard had that hair style before the
Beatles, Astrid, or limp wristed Stu and his hint o' mint crew.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 24, 2008, 7:53:39 AM5/24/08
to

Re: Who came-up with the Beatle haircut ?

Group: rec.music.beatles Date: Fri, May 23, 2008, 11:47am (EDT-3) From:
appe...@yahoo.com
On May 23, 2:35 pm, "Bernie Woodham" <birnhamw...@insightbb.com>
wrote:
"Manfred Noland" <RockNRo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:2907-483...@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...
mom...@mogjod1.com (O'Leary III)
fattuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
That was very, very funny. LOL.
And almost fifty years old.
**********************************************
And Moe was wearing that style in the 20s, long before The Beatles had
it.
Hey, there's photographic evidence of this.
****************************************
1933:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1e/Horowitzmosesphoto.jpg
==============================================
Scroll down this page and you guys will see a couple of examples of the
haircuts the exis copied and gave to the Beatles.
Google Caesar images and you see the same
www.white-history.com/hwr15.htm
BEFORE MOE
**********************************************
Drawings, paintings, etchings and sketches are weak. There are
photographs of Moe Howard. Ancient people painted or drew gods with
lions' heads on human bodies and gnomes and elves. Hardly a reason to
conclude that they existed.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 24, 2008, 7:58:22 AM5/24/08
to
fatt...@yahoo.com
On May 23, 12:15 pm, appeyr...@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 23, 6:50 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
fattuc...@yahoo.com
On May 22, 7:35?am,
RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
Moe Howard of the Three Stooges.
That was very, very funny. LOL.
**********************************************
Why thank you kindly. ( takes a bow but not a Beatle bow, just a good
old fashioned stage bow )
I'm glad you found humor in it. But..... it's true.  
==============================================
No Manfred....
The exis say they took it from Roman Empire era statues.   I think
that predated even old Moe

***********************************************
Next you'll be insisting Buster Brown influenced Moe Howard.
Keep in mind, Brian Epstein liked his "boys" ,the Beatles, to look like
elfin boys..... thus the stupid hair cuts.

Manfred Noland

unread,
May 24, 2008, 8:07:36 AM5/24/08
to
Moe Howard was asked if he was aware that the Beatles stole his
trade-mark hair cut. He made it very clear that he didn't care for them.
Do you think John Lennon ever felt awful that he was responsible for
Brian Epstein's covered up suicide on August 27th, 1967 ?
Brian didn't blame John in his suicide note ( since destroyed ). Earlier
that night John saw Brian in the studio while recording " Baby
You're A Rich Man ".
During the fade out, John looked at Brian an sang " Baby you're a rich
fag jew ".
Brian was aghast and fled the studio in tears. John had done and said
cruel tings to and about Brian for years ignoring that the guy had on
previous occasions attempted suicide and left suicide notes.
This time was the time Brian succeeded.
Do you think John felt responsible and lived with the enormous guilt ?

Jeff

unread,
May 24, 2008, 9:58:21 AM5/24/08
to
On May 24, 7:07 am, RockNRo...@webtv.net (Manfred Noland) wrote:
> Moe Howard was asked if he was aware that the Beatles stole his
> trade-mark hair cut. He made it very clear that he didn't care for them.
> Do you think John Lennon ever felt awful that he was responsible for
> Brian Epstein's covered up suicide on August 27th, 1967 ?


What??? Where did you get this info..about Lennon? He wasn't
responsible. Source please. Thanks.


Manfred Noland

unread,
May 25, 2008, 10:25:06 AM5/25/08
to
yourimag...@sbcglobal.net (Jeff)

*********************************************
Hmmm, I thought it was fairly common knowledge amongst Beatle fans.
I can't specifically say.....
It may have been in " Shout" or Lewison's book or Pete Shotton's book.
Keep in mind, there is no conclusive evidence that John's singing " Baby
you're a rich fag jew " is what actually caused Brian to commit suicide.
In fact, all evidence of the suicide was hidden to make it appear he had
overdosed.
The speculation is that by 1967 Brian was major DEPRESSED. His boys, the
Beatles, didn't need Brian anymore. They weren't touring and had been
finding out how Brian had cost them millions with bad business deals.
John was especially caustic. When Brian had asked years earlier what a
good title for his book should be, John replied, " How about ' Queer
Jew' ? " which made Brian burst into tears and John loved it.
John also referred to Brian's book, " Cellar Full Of Noise " as "
Cellar Full Of Boys" . ( that IS funny ).
By 1967 Brian had overdosed several times and written several suicide
notes.
He was a severely depressed homosexual English Jew. He tried to be one
of the boys with the Beatles, combing his hair forward and wearing funky
psychedelic clothing which caused the Beatles to laugh hysterically at
him and behind his back. Not a good environment for a depressed gay
manager; he felt useless and ashamed and mocked. I wondered if John's
nasty anti-gay, anti-jewish remark could've driven Brian over the edge ?
The coincidence of Brian's demise happening on the same evening could
not have been lost on John. I'm sure John was aware of Brian's previous
suicide attempts. John probably thought they were a pathetic girlish cry
for attention and never dreamt that Brian might actually succeed.
I wonder how or if this affected John in any way. Did he suffer
torturous guilt ?
Some fans still think if Brian hadn't died that Paul wouldn't have
become the un-named megalomaniacal leader and the band might've lasted
longer. I disagree with this last suggestion.

0 new messages