No one is interested in that God VS science thread?

who?

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 4:58:42 PM4/4/13

to

I would like to see your opinions. Thanks.

Jeff

Nooffa Subject

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 5:05:05 PM4/4/13

to

"who?" <yourimag...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> I would like to see your opinions. Thanks.
>
>
> Jeff

Then take it somewhere on topic.

Eric Ramon

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 6:48:28 PM4/4/13

to

On Apr 4, 1:58 pm, "who?" <yourimageunre...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I would like to see your opinions. Thanks.
>
> Jeff

why "versus"?

Nil

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 7:29:14 PM4/4/13

to

On 04 Apr 2013, "who?" <yourimag...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:

> I would like to see your opinions. Thanks.

There is no "versus." There is no conflict.

brilton

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 7:51:10 PM4/4/13

to

Good point.

Besides, I believe in avoiding talking CRAP.

(Collingwood, Religion And Politics)

who?

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 8:11:26 PM4/4/13

to

For you, that would be about me.

who?

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 8:13:36 PM4/4/13

to

That was the title of the original thread. You were interested
in continuing it. If not, we won't.

hislop

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 10:07:14 PM4/4/13

to

On 5/04/2013 7:58 AM, who? wrote:
> I would like to see your opinions. Thanks.
>
>
> Jeff

I'm waiting for proof from science that it knows everything.

RichL

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 10:23:35 PM4/4/13

to

"hislop" <takecar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kjlbg1$2h9$1...@dont-email.me...

"Science" makes no claim to knowing everything.

hislop

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 10:30:08 PM4/4/13

to

I'm not so sure. If something isn't known by science then it falls into
belief then.

RichL

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 10:37:31 PM4/4/13

to

"hislop" <takecar...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:kjlcqv$7d5$2...@dont-email.me...

But what isn't known by science changes constantly. The scope of things
that fall strictly into belief is constantly decreasing.

But as Nil said, there isn't necessarily a conflict.

rwalker

unread,

Apr 4, 2013, 11:30:15 PM4/4/13

to

Besides, there are whole newsgroups devoted to this topic. Start with
talk.origins, and leave this group for discussing Beatles.

who?

unread,

Apr 5, 2013, 12:22:37 AM4/5/13

to

Okay, Beatles talk: I was listening to "I'm happy just to dance
with you" the other day and noticed something I had never
heard before. It was the pounding of over-dubbed drums
like 1, 2 not long after the song starts. Heard it with head
phones on. It repeats like that throughout certain parts
of the song. Have you ever noticed it before?

Jeff

who?

unread,

Apr 5, 2013, 12:58:26 AM4/5/13

to

I'm wanting personal opinions. I'm not asking for science
to prove or disprove anything.

who?

unread,

Apr 5, 2013, 1:01:29 AM4/5/13

to

On Thursday, April 4, 2013 10:30:15 PM UTC-5, rwa...@despammed.com wrote:

Nobody wants to talk much about the Beatles in this group.
It usually gets to the topic of Yoko or other nonsense.

Jeff

mcnews

unread,

Apr 5, 2013, 8:28:18 AM4/5/13

to

yea, that tom dub has been there forever

who?

unread,

Apr 5, 2013, 8:54:33 PM4/5/13

to

There is a "versus" because I wrote it like that.

Jeff

who?

unread,

Apr 5, 2013, 8:56:20 PM4/5/13

to

It is not needed cause I never noticed it before:P

M C hammered

unread,

Apr 8, 2013, 3:35:27 PM4/8/13

to

My friend you are a Genius. That's exackly what scientist's
do....they clame they know everthing. When the reality is, they no
nuthin,,,,its all LIES! Just like books...ALL LIES.

Fokes, you can watch TV. You can eat McDonalds. You can read RMB and
agree wid me an RICH.

But you cannot read. And you CANNOT esplore science. Cuz its ALL
LIES.

Nuff said

mcnews

unread,

Apr 10, 2013, 10:13:38 AM4/10/13

to

maybe yer ears are getting better
it's a little off from the drum beat, but it kind of makes it *swing*
heh

Message has been deleted

IBen Getiner

unread,

Apr 15, 2013, 9:21:02 PM4/15/13

to

On Apr 4, 10:37 pm, "RichL" <rpleav...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "hislop" <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:kjlcqv$7d5$2...@dont-email.me...
>
> > On 5/04/2013 1:23 PM, RichL wrote:

> >> "hislop" <takecarebew...@gmail.com> wrote in message

> >>news:kjlbg1$2h9$1...@dont-email.me...
> >>> On 5/04/2013 7:58 AM, who? wrote:
> >>>> I would like to see your opinions. Thanks.
>
> >>>> Jeff
>
> >>> I'm waiting for proof from science that it knows everything.
>
> >> "Science" makes no claim to knowing everything.
>
> > I'm not so sure. If something isn't known by science then it falls into
> > belief then.
>
> But what isn't known by science changes constantly. The scope of things
> that fall strictly into belief is constantly decreasing.
>
> But as Nil said, there isn't necessarily a conflict.

Yeah... Well, then... When you can tell me where the original kernel
of matter that started the Big Bang came from, then I will feel
obligated to offer proof of the existence of a higher power. Of
course, you will then be asked to prove where the thing that created
the original kernel came from… and where its creator came from before
that. And so-on and so-forth. Until the end of time. Because, as you
can see, you'll NEVER be able to get to bottom of it. Not in a million
years. So it's just like Beatle George said... "The more you learn,
the less you know".. Or... "All that I know it that I know that I know
nothing". And I certainly don't see THAT decreasing.

And anyway.... Christ will be back long before then... Then you can
present Him with your final figures!

Mack A. Damia

unread,

Apr 15, 2013, 9:58:45 PM4/15/13

to

On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:21:02 -0700 (PDT), IBen Getiner
<LloydsE...@AOL.com> wrote:

>And anyway.... Christ will be back long before then... Then you can
>present Him with your final figures!

Don't hold your breath, fella.

--

Bernie Woodham

unread,

Apr 16, 2013, 12:32:59 AM4/16/13

to

On Apr 15, 9:21 pm, IBen Getiner <LloydsEelAa...@AOL.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah... Well, then... When you can tell me where the original kernel
> of matter that started the Big Bang came from, then I will feel
> obligated to offer proof of the existence of a higher power. Of
> course, you will then be asked to prove where the thing that created
> the original kernel came from… and where its creator came from before
> that. And so-on and so-forth. Until the end of time. Because, as you
> can see, you'll NEVER be able to get to bottom of it. Not in a million
> years. So it's just like Beatle George said... "The more you learn,
> the less you know".. Or... "All that I know it that I know that I know
> nothing". And I certainly don't see THAT decreasing.
>
> And anyway.... Christ will be back long before then... Then you can
> present Him with your final figures!

Sure, but then you're obligated to explain where god came from. And
how whatever created him was created. And on and on and on...

and you'll never get to the bottom of. Not in a million years. So it's
just like old Jesus said, "How can you say you love god, who you have
not seen, when you hate your brother, who you have seen?".

Nooffa Subject

unread,

Apr 16, 2013, 9:45:23 AM4/16/13

to

IBen Getiner <LloydsE...@AOL.com> wrote:
> Yeah... Well, then... When you can tell me where the original kernel
> of matter that started the Big Bang came from

New Jersey? Or was it Liverpool?

Bernie Woodham

unread,

Apr 16, 2013, 10:49:58 AM4/16/13

to

On Apr 16, 9:45 am, Nooffa Subject <Nooffa...@cagecable.com> wrote:

> IBen Getiner <LloydsEelAa...@AOL.com> wrote:
> > Yeah... Well, then... When you can tell me where the original kernel
> > of matter that started the Big Bang came from
>
> New Jersey? Or was it Liverpool?

Yeah, seems to me the Big Bang discussion belongs in the Margaret
Thatcher thread.