salvador- too ashamed to admit who he is
johnny dupe
"who? what? where?"
what a schmuck
Salvadorwriter
> i called him up.
>
>"who? what? where?"
>
> what a schmuck
What are you talking about? Who did you call?
Was it that guy, Dave Sharp, from Gaithersburg, Maryland;
the guy who supports Israel and surrounds himself with
Jews? What else would you expect him to say?
Rather than harass people on the phone, read this:
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/wanted_cgauger.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/nuclear_explosion/justice.htm
------
Salvador Astucia, author of the following books:
- "Rethinking John Lennon's Assassination: The FBI's War on Rock Stars"; and
- "Opium Lords: Israel, the Golden Triangle, and the Kennedy Assassination".
johnny dupe
"Salvadorwriter" <salvado...@cs.com> wrote
> What are you talking about? Who did you call?
you write just like you talk. all questions and no answers.
you'll be hearing from me. again.
and again.
i have insomnia, so i hope you turn your ringer off for your own well-being.
Susan
wrote on 9/6/03 7:22 PM:
> i called him up.
>
> "who? what? where?"
>
> what a schmuck
>
>
>
Hmmm, when I called him, he admitted he was indeed David, but liked to use
Sal.
He also got a bit peeved at me when I refused his request for me to post in
rmb under another name to be 'his buddy' and ask him questions about his
theories. Then he also got rather mad when he emailed me asking me to
'denounce Charlie' in rmb, saying that if I did, he would take me off his
'list'.
What a sad little man he is.
Mister Charlie
"Susan" <susan...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:BB7FF0AE.F3EC%susan...@verizon.net...
McCarthy like, but worse. AND he also identified himself as David Sharp
when he called here to harass me right after hanging up talking to you.
The "man" is a twisted old fruit.
>
Teddy
OH, that's rich! Sorry this is going "real life" and bugging nice
people, but it's almost a valentine in its pathetic way. "Will you be
my sock puppet?" Oh Dave, oh Dave! If you only knew how
unintentionally funny you are!
Except you're still a bigot, and that's sick. :) :) :) fuckin smilies
know
> >
Salvadorwriter
>> > i called him up.
>> >
>> > "who? what? where?"
>> >
>> > what a schmuck
Who did you call? Salvador Astucia or David Sharp of
Gaithersburg, Maryland, the guy who supports Israel
and has lots of Jewish friends. (You really are anti-Jewish,
aren't you.)
[Susan:]
>> Hmmm, when I called him, he admitted he was indeed
>> David, but liked to use Sal.
Still trying to link me to David Sharp of Gaithersburg, Maryland,
the guy who supports Israel, has lots of Jewish friends, and is
completely Zionist. You guys accuse me of being anti-Semitic
while you secretly harass Jews and their friends. What gives?
You really are anti-Jewish, aren't you.
[Susan:]
>> Then he also got rather mad when he emailed me asking
>> me to 'denounce Charlie' in rmb, saying that if I did, he
>> would take me off his 'list'. What a sad little man he is.
Let's see the email. Who is it from? Salvador Astucia or David
Sharp of Gaithersburg, Maryland, the guy who supports
Israel? You really are anti-Jewish, aren't you.
[Charlie Gauger (aka, Mr. Charlie):]
> McCarthy like, but worse. AND he also identified himself
> as David Sharp when he called here to harass me right after
> hanging up talking to you.
Relax Charlie, you're becoming paranoid. True, I said some
negative things about you publicly. And you became obsessed
at proving my true identity is someone named David Sharp
of Gaithersburg, Maryland, a person who reportedly supports
Israel and has lots of Jewish friends. In your obsession and
paranoia you posted Mr. Sharp's name, address and phone
number on this newsgroup and spread the rumor that he
and I are the same person. Doesn't it seem logical that
Mr. Sharp might call you up to ask why you're doing this?
You really are anti-Jewish, aren't you.
Salvador Astucia
Susan
at salvado...@cs.com wrote on 9/7/03 10:58 AM:
> [John Web/Johnny Dupe:]
>>>> i called him up.
>>>>
>>>> "who? what? where?"
>>>>
>>>> what a schmuck
>
> Who did you call? Salvador Astucia or David Sharp of
> Gaithersburg, Maryland, the guy who supports Israel
> and has lots of Jewish friends. (You really are anti-Jewish,
> aren't you.)
>
> [Susan:]
>>> Hmmm, when I called him, he admitted he was indeed
>>> David, but liked to use Sal.
>
> Still trying to link me to David Sharp of Gaithersburg, Maryland,
> the guy who supports Israel, has lots of Jewish friends, and is
> completely Zionist. You guys accuse me of being anti-Semitic
> while you secretly harass Jews and their friends. What gives?
>
You looked like an idiot before, but now you are certainly proving it.
>
> [Susan:]
>>> Then he also got rather mad when he emailed me asking
>>> me to 'denounce Charlie' in rmb, saying that if I did, he
>>> would take me off his 'list'. What a sad little man he is.
>
> Let's see the email. Who is it from? Salvador Astucia or David
> Sharp of Gaithersburg, Maryland, the guy who supports
> Israel? You really are anti-Jewish, aren't you.
I am anti-David/Sal.
on 8/20/03 9:00 PM, <David>Salvado...@cs.com at wrote:
>
> Just publicly denounce Charlie Gauger.
>
> We both know he's scum.
>
> Salvador
The above is just one of the many emails you sent me.
No one is TRYING to link you with David Sharp, you are David Sharp.
And you know what David/Sal, who the fuck really cares?
Salvadorwriter
> He also got a bit peeved at me when I refused his request
> for me to post in rmb under another name to be 'his buddy'
> and ask him questions about his theories. Then he also got
> rather mad when he emailed me asking me to 'denounce
> Charlie' in rmb, saying that if I did, he would take me off his
> 'list'. What a sad little man he is.
Susan: Thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.
(see interview below) You've obviously had second
thoughts, but we did have an agreement, and I'm holding
you to it.
Regards.
Salvador
=========
Around August 20, 2003, I contacted a regular poster on rec.music.beatles named
Susan, who lives in York, Pennsylvania. York has a satellite FBI office which
reports to the Philadelphia field office located at the William J. Green Jr.
Federal Office Building, 600 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106. The
Philadelphia field office is run by Special Agent in Charge: Jeffrey A.
Lampinski, and assistant SACs: Rosanne Russo, Laura M. Laughlin, and Brian W.
Lynch. It is unknown if Susan works directly for any of these individuals, but
that is the administrative hierarchy for her geographic region as described in
the FBI’s official website. She likely reports to an agent who works for one
of the stated SACs.
Susan agreed to answer questions over the telephone while I recorded the
conversation. On August 4, 2003, I posted a list of ten suspected FBI
informants who police rec.music.beatles. Susan was on the list, along with
Charlie Gauger (aka, Mr. Charlie), Ian Hammond, and John Web (aka, Johnny
Dupe).
When I made contact with Susan via telephone, I was surprised that she would
reveal so much information. Her Usenet responses to me have been less than
cordial to say the least. Susan never admitted to working for the FBI, but at
one point she agreed with me that Lennon’s murder was probably sponsored by
the US Government, then she tried to link it to the CIA, instead of the FBI.
When I asked her why she was doing the tap dance, she claimed she cloaked the
FBI and the CIA together. Then she also paid me some compliments which were
quite surprising.
"I have been reading your stuff about the shooter and the different angles,"
Susan told me. "I’ll not admit on the newsgroup that I’m reading your
stuff, but yeah. It’s all very interesting. And I’d like to read a little
more about that. I hope you can take it a little further."
Susan claims she is about forty, has a degree in psychology but makes eight
dollars and seventy-four cents an hour working twelve hour days every day
including weekends. She repeated her working status several times, although she
did not specify her precise employment. Overall, Susan’s story does not seem
believable. Her interest in the Beatles is lukewarm, yet she finds time to read
and post messages to a Beatles newsgroup after coming home from a twelve-hour
work day. When cornered about Lennon’s murder, Susan agrees there was
probably a government sponsored conspiracy, but says she won’t say that
publicly. She quickly shifts blame from the FBI to the CIA. Here is an excerpt
from the phone interview with Susan:
Salvador: Do you talk to Charlie Gauger by phone?
Susan: I have talked to him.
Salvador: He lives a long ways off doesn’t he?
Susan: Yes he does...You’re very intriguing.
Salvador: Maybe you’d be interested in joining my team.
Susan: I’m not taking any sides.
Salvador: I might be able to pay you more than these others people are paying
you.
Susan: I make eight dollars and seventy-four cents an hour.
Salvador: That’s too much. [laughs]
Susan: I’ve been working twelve hour days every day and weekends and decided
I had to stop doing that because it’s killing me.
Salvador: Let me ask you something. Forget the whole FBI thing, does someone
ask you post things and you do it? Is that how it works?
Susan: No.
Salvador: Not the FBI, but some friend on the newsgroup [rec.music.beatles]
like Charlie Gauger or someone else?
Susan: I have told him, or asked him. I said look, quit replying to you.
Salvador: I’m familiar with the Usenet. Every newsgroup is like
rec.music.beatles.
Susan: Oh I know.
Salvador: They’ve got a bunch of people who guard the traffic. They’re
obviously paid because no one would do that for free.
Susan: No. Well in this newsgroup you have certain groups.
Salvador: I can tell you, this newsgroup is identical to all the other
newsgroups. They have people that act exactly the same way. Someone’s giving
you your marching orders. You may not realize it, but somebody is.
Susan: Well nobody’s gonna keep me from doing whatever I wanna do.
Salvador: I know, but you don’t do anything controversial, so there’s no
problem.
Susan: No, I don’t know. Yeah, I try not to be.
Salvador: But no one’s ever going to stop you from doing something if you
never make waves.
Susan: There’s nothing really that I need to make waves about. I got into
this stupid thing about "Paul should be thankful to God." Matt Fox posted how
Paul should thank God for his own talents. And now I did feel a little strongly
about that. I felt that what Paul says or does is his own business and why
should he publicly get up there and say "I thank God for my talents"? I got a
little bit sick of that.
Salvador: I saw that. It’s a recent post isn’t it?
Susan: It just came up again, but it’s been going on for about two months.
Salvador: I saw it but it assumed it was sort of a time killer.
Susan: [Laughs] I think most everything on rec.music.beatles is a time killer.
Like your recent posting, "How Old is Mr. Charle?" Now tell me, that’s a time
killer.
Salvador: No, that’s not a time killer. It’s kind of interesting if he’s
a little. [Originally, I thought Charlie Gauger was a teenage boy because I
called one his phone numbers and got a recorded message that sounded like a
teenage boy. Since then, I am satisfied that it was not the voice of Charlie
Gauger.]
Susan: No he’s not a little kid.
Salvador: He sure acts like one.
Susan: So do you.
Salvador: I don’t use four letter words...Changing the subject, what are
these posts that appear from time to time where someone says a regular on
rec.music.beatles defended a child molestor? What’s that about?
Susan: Talk about a troll, we had a troll. Have you ever seen the name Marek
mentioned? M-A-R-E-K. [My anonymous informant later told me of someone named
Marek Girsch. The informant told me Girsch works jointly with Nick Andrews and
they are "evil as can be."] These things pop up about certain people, and of
course they’re all anonymous and through a remailer. That’s all old Marek
stuff.
Salvador: Changing the subject, What benefit do you get from posting on
rec.music.beatles?
Susan: Well, some of the stuff I post, I like to read. I do learn about the
Beatles and how they make everybody feel. I don’t post all that often, except
lately because you’ve got everybody stirred up.
Salvador: Sounds like you don’t get much satisfaction out of posting here.
Susan: It’s not a matter of satisfaction. If it’s a topic seems interesting
I will respond to it.
Salvador: But it sounds like you don’t like the Beatles particularly. You
don’t get a lot of satisfaction from posting, and you claim you don’t post
all that often, except to "bug" me. [laughs]
Susan: Exactly. But I’m stopping. I’m not doing that now. Beatles stuff is
interesting. I appreciate the Beatles now more than I did. But the Beatles are
not my life. If someone asks how long it’s been since I listened to the
Beatles, I’m not going to reply to that because that’s neither here nor
there. I heard the Beatles in the grocery store the other day. There are
certain kinds of music I like and certain kinds of music I don’t like. I like
to hear a little bit of everything.
Salvador: Do you want to buy a copy of my book?
Susan: No, all I have to do is go to rec.music.beatles and read most of it. You
sound like an interesting person but you come across on rec.music.beatles as
highly annoying.
Salvador: I don’t really annoy you, do I?
Susan: Not really.
Salvador: You like me, don’t you.
Susan: Yeah, you amuse me. You keep coming back to the newsgroup.
Salvador: I’ll bet your salary’s increased since I came around.
Susan: No, I’m still at eight seventy-four an hour. I have no ties to
anybody.
Salvador: Don’t get me wrong. I’m not calling you a liar. But this story
you’re telling me doesn’t quite make sense. For example, I wouldn’t spend
time on a newsgroup discussing things I’m not particularly interested in.
Susan: I don’t spend time on the newsgroups talking about anything I’m not
interested in.
Salvador: But you read the stuff. Isn’t that what you said before?
Susan: Yeah, basically.
Salvador: And then you reply, if you don’t like something.
Susan: Well I do reply if I do like something. I try not to deal in a whole lot
of negativity. If I don’t like something, I just move on to the next one.
Salvador: But it sounds like you spend a good bit of time on that newsgroup,
whether you’re reading or whether you’re posting. I know you post, I’ve
seen your posts.
Susan: Yeah.
Salvador: You post more than the average person, the average person doesn’t
post at all. They just read a little bit.
Susan: If you do a google search on all I’ve posted, you’ll see that most
of it deals with you.
Salvador: Deals with me?
Susan: Right, deals with you. Yeah.
Salvador: You don’t carry a gun do you? [laughs]
Susan: I don’t believe in violence because if I owned a gun, I would have to
use it at some point. I don’t know if I could do that.
Salvador: So I take it the answer is No.
Susan: No, I don’t have a gun, I don’t carry a gun, I don’t own a gun.
Salvador: That’s good to know since you don’t live that far from me.
[laughs]
Susan: I’ve got nothing against you other than you put down gay people----
Salvador: I really didn’t put down gay people. I made several jokes about J.
Edgar Hoover.
Susan: I see. [laughs]
Salvador: My objective was to get these people who claim not to be FBI to
reveal their true agendas. [laughing] They basically replied: "I do NOT work
for the FBI and you stop calling J. Edgar Hoover gay!"
Susan: Well we all know the man---well now, he was a cross-dresser. I don’t
know if the man was gay because I never had any dealings with him.
Salvador: Frankly, I’m not sure about the cross-dressing, but he was the
constant companion of another man who was the Number Two man at the FBI, Clyde
Tolson. Of course I don’t have photographs.
Susan: They were probably partners. Big deal. You know?
Salvador: I’m not condemning him, I’m just making a little joke because
these guys on the newsgroup claim they’re not FBI---
Susan: None of them are---
Salvador: And then as soon as I start making gay jokes about the guy who built
the FBI up so big, J. Edgar Sodomite, they get bent out of shape. [laughs] You
have to admit it’s funny.
Susan: Yeah, it is amusing. I probably know about five people on your list. I
don’t know a lot of the other people. I can guarantee you they’re not FBI.
They’re just regular people.
Salvador: Well people at the FBI, believe it or not, they’re people. [laughs]
Susan: I know, but you know what I mean.
Salvador: Can you guarantee that some of them are not doing what they do for
money?
Susan: I can’t guarantee anything.
Salvador: Because there are a lot of people, I’m sure, who take money for
what they do and they may not realize where it’s really coming from.
Susan: How could someone be getting money for posting in rec.music.beatles? I
wish someone would give me some money.
Salvador: A U.S. Marshall told me the FBI does that.
Susan: I used to live next door to a U.S. Marshall. It’s been a while ago.
You talk about a nut. That guy was a nut. He mowed his lawn in the middle of
the night. He claimed that I was out there talking to my bushes at midnight. I
mean this guy...everybody steered clear of him.
Salvador: They’re federal agents, but they’re different types than the FBI.
A lot of what the U.S. Marshalls do...from what I understand...is guard duty.
They sometimes step in for the Secret Service if the Secret Service doesn’t
have enough manpower. They guard judges, politicians and things like that.
It’s a different thing than the FBI. The FBI is almost pure propaganda, which
is the whole name of their game. When you’re dealing in propaganda, you’re
dealing in the flow of information, which is practically everything.
Susan: The government, the United States of America is totally screwed up. Take
the California governor’s race. You got Arnold Schwartzenegger, Gary Coleman,
from the TV show Different Strokes.
Salvador: I’m somewhat interested in Schwartzenegger. Number One, he’s
German. I have a warm spot in my heart for Germans. [laughs]
Susan: He’s Austrian.
Salvador: He speaks German. It’s about the same thing. Another reason I like
him is he’s married to the granddaughter of Joe Kennedy, Maria Shriver. I
suspect Schwartzenegger is not like by a lot of Jews. He’s German, he’s
married to a Kennedy, basically she’s a Kennedy. Anyway, I tend to think that
Schwartzenegger’s an outsider because he’s hooked up with the Kennedy and
he’s "Austrian" which is pretty damned closed to being German. [laughs]
Susan: Yeah, but I don’t know if he considers himself being German.
Salvador: I know a lady who claims to be Austrian, and she told me recently her
father fought in World War II. I said "Really? Your father?" And she said,
"Yeah, he was a Nazi." [laughs] I said, "That’s okay, I don’t have anything
against him. A Nazi’s just a person who lived in Nazi Germany, who was
German."
Susan: Yeah. It’s just like our service men.
Salvador: We were the enemy. Of course, the Nazis never attacked us. They never
did anything to us. It was the Japanese.
Susan: I yeah, it’s very controversial. Look at the swastika. They took it
from the Native Americans.
Salvador: The swastika’s a big symbol of hate now.
Susan: You can turn anything, like the gays took the rainbow.
Salvador: Now you’re talking some sense, except now you’re gay bashing...
Susan: I’m not gay bashing, but you can take anything and make it into
anything. People automatically associate the swastika with the Nazi, but hardly
anyone knows it came from the Native Americans. And now the rainbow is
associated with the gays. So people take these things and try to make people
think one way. I don’t like to think one way, I like to think for myself. I
like to have my own opinions.
Salvador: On a different note, do you think the US Government was involved in
John Lennon’s murder?
Susan: Most definitely.
Salvador: Well heck, why don’t put that in writing for God sakes?
Susan: I’ve put that in writing.
Salvador: You’ve never said that.
Susan: I said that a long time ago.
Salvador: All you ever say is "Nutcase, nutcase, nutcase." [laughs]
Susan: Who headed the CIA back then?
Salvador: It’s not CIA. CIA didn’t do it.
Susan: Yes but Bush headed the CIA.
Salvador: Bush? Oh, Bush, the father. But there’s no link to the CIA. Just
because Bush headed the CIA, that doesn’t mean they did it.
Susan: No. But then, who paid Mark David Chapman to take all of these trips?
Salvador: Oh yeah, someone else paid his expenses. But I don’t think it was
CIA. It was FBI.
Susan: Yeah, well, to me...that’s all the same thing.
Salvador: No, it’s not the same thing. [laughs]
Susan: Well, I cloak it all together because they’re all the same to me.
Salvador: That’s interesting. As many times as I’ve used the name FBI--you
won’t see many times on rec.music.beatles where I mention CIA. I always say
FBI.
Susan: Yes, you do.
Salvador: Why did you say you agreed with me about Lennon’s murder, then you
started talking about the CIA? It’s like you shifted it a bit.
Susan: No. I don’t have all the facts.
Salvador: But I’ve got this list, it’s an FBI list. It’s not a CIA list.
I’m just making the point that you should know that if you’re going to
agree with me about Lennon’s murder, it seems odd that on one hand you claim
to agree, but then you do this little tap dance where you say CIA instead of
FBI.
Susan: At the time Lennon was killed, Daddy Bush headed the CIA, and you had
Reagan. And I don’t know exactly what Reagan’s view was. But they all felt
very threatened by John Lennon because John Lennon was the kind of person who
said whatever was on his mind.
(NOTE: Susan is incorrect about the timeline of George H.W. Bush’s
directorship at the CIA. He was CIA director from January 30, 1976 to January
20, 1977. )
Salvador: Right.
Susan: I admire him for that, because I’m like that and it gets me into
trouble a lot. Some people just don’t want to hear certain things. Now I have
been reading your stuff about the shooter and the different angles. I’ll not
admit on the newsgroup that I’m reading your stuff, but yeah. It’s all very
interesting. And I’d like to read a little more about that. I hope you can
take it a little further.
Salvador: I’ve pretty much proved that Chapman didn’t shoot him. You guys
are just making a lot of noise. But I proved it.
Susan: I don’t like to get on rec.music.beatles and be totally controversial
and have people doing to me what they’re doing to you...
Salvador: Changing the subject...you know the United States supports Israel.
Susan: We support the whole friggin’ world. We support everybody.
Salvador: No we don’t. My point is we’re really should not support Israel.
In that entire area...in the Middle East...nobody in that area supports Israel.
None of their neighbors support them, but we support them.
Susan: I’m sure we must be getting something from them that’s useful.
Salvador: They’ve got nothing to offer us. The Arabs have all the oil.
Susan: I don’t know, the government to me is screwed up...
I turned the tape recorder off and Susan began to speak more openly about
Charlie Gauger. She said he had helped her out a few times when she was having
difficulties in her personal life, but she refused to elaborate on how he
helped her. She made it clear, however, that her loyalty to him was quite
strong, because he was friendly on a personal level. I advised her that most of
the more effective scoundrels are people who are friendly on a personal level.
That’s how they get things done.
After speaking with Susan, my conclusion of her is the same: There is little
doubt that she is a tool used by the FBI. I suspect she is motivated by money,
that she makes low wages as she claims, but she picks up extra money by working
for Charlie Gauger. At one point in our discussion, I began to think she was
being manipulated and was unaware of her involvement with the FBI, but she did
two things that pointed to FBI training and loyalty. First, she continued to
defend J. Edgar Hoover against my light-hearted remarks about him being
homosexual. She tried to deflect my comments as homophobic claiming I was
attacking all gays, not just Hoover. Second, she was quick to shift blame to
the CIA for John Lennon’s murder. I think that’s something all FBI agents
and informants are trained to do because the FBI wants to take over the CIA’s
international charter.
Susan
at salvado...@cs.com wrote on 9/7/03 11:12 AM:
Again, remind me why you called me for an interview.
And while you're at it, since you say you have my phone number, why not go
ahead and post it here, I grant you permission.
Salvadorwriter
> Again, remind me why you called me for an interview.
> And while you're at it, since you say you have my phone
> number, why not go ahead and post it here, I grant you
> permission.
I make it a point never to disclose my investigative techniques.
Susan, you've obviously got a bad case of cold feet,
and I'm sorry if I've gotten you in trouble. But this little game
you're playing of claiming YOU called ME and demanded
I interview you is simply not believable. You know I'm a
writer. I've written two books. I investigate people, I ask
questions. Then I write. That's what I do.
You made a mistake. Get over it and move on. But I like
to think that a little part of you knows what you're doing
on rec.music.beatles is wrong. (and I'm not referring to
anything related to me personally) That's why you let
me interview you. At least that's what I like to think.
No hard feelings.
Peace, love & understanding.
Salvador
===========
Interview with Susan, Usenet informant from York, Pennsylvania
Salvadorwriter
>> Just publicly denounce Charlie Gauger.
>>
>> We both know he's scum.
>>
>> Salvador
[Susan:]
> The above is just one of the many emails you
> sent me. No one is TRYING to link you with
> David Sharp, you are David Sharp. And you
> know what David/Sal, who the fuck really cares?
Calm down, Susan; calm down. Just relax.
Everything's going to be okay.
Let's discuss things in a civilized manner.
First, I don't deny sending you an email, but
how does receiving an email from me prove
that I'm this guy who loves Jews from
Gaithersburg, Maryland named Dave Sharp?
Second, you stated in a previous email
that I became angry with you when you
refused to publicly denounce Charlie Gauger.
There's no anger in the email you
posted. I don't recall being angry
at you, not about the cited "Gauger incident"
anyway. Frankly, I enjoyed our chat.
Could it be that Dave Sharp phoned
you and expressed anger and in your
paranoia and obsession, you've gotten
the phone calls confused?
I'm not saying that's what happened.
I really don't know who got angry
with you or why, but you seem awfully
confused and you're not making much
sense.
Just take the day off, stay away from
the keyboard, and call the doctor
and get some medication. I don't think
you're completely nuts, but from time
to time people have meltdowns.
Have a nice day.
Peace,
Salvador Astucia
=================
johnny dupe
"Salvadorwriter" <salvado...@cs.com> wrote
> Who did you call? Salvador Astucia or David Sharp
don't you have a seperate phone line for each identity?
Susan
at salvado...@cs.com wrote on 9/7/03 12:18 PM:
> [Susan:]
>> Again, remind me why you called me for an interview.
>> And while you're at it, since you say you have my phone
>> number, why not go ahead and post it here, I grant you
>> permission.
>
> I make it a point never to disclose my investigative techniques.
> Susan, you've obviously got a bad case of cold feet,
> and I'm sorry if I've gotten you in trouble. But this little game
> you're playing of claiming YOU called ME and demanded
> I interview you is simply not believable. You know I'm a
> writer. I've written two books. I investigate people, I ask
> questions. Then I write. That's what I do.
>
> You made a mistake. Get over it and move on. But I like
> to think that a little part of you knows what you're doing
> on rec.music.beatles is wrong. (and I'm not referring to
> anything related to me personally) That's why you let
> me interview you. At least that's what I like to think.
>
> No hard feelings.
>
> Peace, love & understanding.
>
> Salvador
>
So, what you are saying is, that not only are you a liar, you are a
chickenshit. What a cop out.
Shall I feel honored that you think so highly of me as to create a bogus
interview?
I think you have the hots for me Daverino! Just admit it. You already posted
a while back that I turned you on.
Well, let's get this straight right now, I am not interested.
Enough of this. I won't be taking up anymore of rmb's time with you. If you
wish to continue this, you have my email addy, it's in plain sight here.
Oh yes, since you also have my telephone number, go ahead and give me a
call!!
ar ar
Susan
at salvado...@cs.com wrote on 9/7/03 12:50 PM:
>
>>> Just publicly denounce Charlie Gauger.
>>>
>>> We both know he's scum.
>>>
>>> Salvador
>
> [Susan:]
>> The above is just one of the many emails you
>> sent me. No one is TRYING to link you with
>> David Sharp, you are David Sharp. And you
>> know what David/Sal, who the fuck really cares?
>
> Calm down, Susan; calm down. Just relax.
> Everything's going to be okay.
>
> Let's discuss things in a civilized manner.
>
> First, snipitydodah
johnny dupe
"Susan" <susan...@verizon.net> wrote
> Enough of this. I won't be taking up anymore of rmb's time with you. If
you
> wish to continue this, you have my email addy, it's in plain sight here.
> Oh yes, since you also have my telephone number, go ahead and give me a
> call!!
i think i'll give davey-poo a call after the packer game. hopefully, they'll
win today, which will benefit david immensely. if they lose... well, i'm not
in a good mood if they lose.
Susan
wrote on 9/7/03 1:57 PM:
The Packers are playing?! Now?! Damn, I've got to turn it on.
Oh, I remember the days of Bart Starr. <sigh>
All I can find is the Ravens at Pittsburg and the Rams at the Giants.
Who are the Packers playing?
They must only be airing it in your area. :(
johnny dupe
"Susan" <susan...@verizon.net> wrote
> The Packers are playing?! Now?! Damn, I've got to turn it on.
> Oh, I remember the days of Bart Starr. <sigh>
> All I can find is the Ravens at Pittsburg and the Rams at the Giants.
> Who are the Packers playing?
> They must only be airing it in your area. :(
i have a satellite dish, so i see all the games. the packers are getting
their asses whooped by the vikings. 17-3. its half-time.
poor david sharp. if they lose, all my aggression is going to be aimed at
him.
>
Susan
wrote on 9/7/03 2:46 PM:
>
> "Susan" <susan...@verizon.net> wrote
>
>> The Packers are playing?! Now?! Damn, I've got to turn it on.
>> Oh, I remember the days of Bart Starr. <sigh>
>> All I can find is the Ravens at Pittsburg and the Rams at the Giants.
>> Who are the Packers playing?
>> They must only be airing it in your area. :(
>
> i have a satellite dish, so i see all the games. the packers are getting
> their asses whooped by the vikings. 17-3. its half-time.
They still may be able to pull it off.
> poor david sharp. if they lose, all my aggression is going to be aimed at
> him.
>
heh
Strabbo
news:BB80FB2D.F4F4%susan...@verizon.net:
>> i have a satellite dish, so i see all the games. the packers are
>> getting their asses whooped by the vikings. 17-3. its half-time.
>
> They still may be able to pull it off.
Terrible way to break in the new Lambeau. And what's worse, the damn
Seahwawks won in the afternoon. And I have to miss tonight's game.
>> poor david sharp. if they lose, all my aggression is going to be
>> aimed at him.
>>
>
> heh
Geez, you guys really got yourselves a new style of nutter here these
days. Freak-E.
Marty
Strabbo
news:20030907121839...@mb-m03.news.cs.com:
But this little game
> you're playing of claiming YOU called ME and demanded
> I interview you is simply not believable. You know I'm a
> writer. I've written two books.
I've got an award.
It's on the wall in my office.
Marty
Ehtue
> But this little game
>> you're playing of claiming YOU called ME and demanded
>> I interview you is simply not believable. You know I'm a
>> writer. I've written two books.
>
>
> I've got an award.
>
> It's on the wall in my office.
I've got a wall in my office, too!
-Ehtue
MikeSo
> Susan <susan...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:BB80FB2D.F4F4%susan...@verizon.net:
>
>
>>> i have a satellite dish, so i see all the games. the packers are
>>> getting their asses whooped by the vikings. 17-3. its half-time.
>>
>> They still may be able to pull it off.
>
> Terrible way to break in the new Lambeau. And what's worse, the damn
> Seahwawks won in the afternoon. And I have to miss tonight's game.
>
Holmgren envy???
>
>>> poor david sharp. if they lose, all my aggression is going to be
>>> aimed at him.
>>>
>>
>> heh
>
> Geez, you guys really got yourselves a new style of nutter here these
> days. Freak-E.
>
>
> Marty
If there are no playoffs for the Hawks this year, you can have him back!
--
Thanks,
Mike
(Go Hawks)
Strabbo
news:vlvkbkd...@news.supernews.com:
>> Terrible way to break in the new Lambeau. And what's worse, the damn
>> Seahwawks won in the afternoon. And I have to miss tonight's game.
>>
>
> Holmgren envy???
Geographic thing.
28 seasons of my life getting the network feed from Spokane, Washington,
which meant that I'd get every lousy Seahawks game - even if it was a
conference championship rematch, or the two hottest teams in the league,
if Seattle was playing the Chargers to see which of them would climb to
4-8 and which would drop to 3-9, that's the game I'd get.
Thus my bitterness grew. I cheered Holmgren's team to their Super Bowl
when he was a cheesehead.
>> Geez, you guys really got yourselves a new style of nutter here these
>> days. Freak-E.
>>
>>
>> Marty
>
> If there are no playoffs for the Hawks this year, you can have him
back!
Thanks Mike! ;-)
And what's with this Seahawksness? I thought you were a Bills fan - and
after last week's trouncing sans Price, I'd be stickin' with 'em...
Marty
MikeSo
> "MikeSo" <mike...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:vlvkbkd...@news.supernews.com:
>
>
>>> Terrible way to break in the new Lambeau. And what's worse, the damn
>>> Seahwawks won in the afternoon. And I have to miss tonight's game.
>>>
>>
>> Holmgren envy???
>
> Geographic thing.
>
> 28 seasons of my life getting the network feed from Spokane, Washington,
> which meant that I'd get every lousy Seahawks game - even if it was a
> conference championship rematch, or the two hottest teams in the league,
> if Seattle was playing the Chargers to see which of them would climb to
> 4-8 and which would drop to 3-9, that's the game I'd get.
LOL!! Fans in Seattle always get to see those prime matchups! We don't sell out
the home games so they are blacked out locally!
I was at that Hawk victory, by the way ... nice new stadium, same old team. Just
lucky this week.
> Thus my bitterness grew. I cheered Holmgren's team to their Super Bowl
> when he was a cheesehead.
>
>
>>> Geez, you guys really got yourselves a new style of nutter here these
>>> days. Freak-E.
>>>
>>>
>>> Marty
>>
>> If there are no playoffs for the Hawks this year, you can have him back!
>
>
> Thanks Mike! ;-)
>
> And what's with this Seahawksness? I thought you were a Bills fan - and
> after last week's trouncing sans Price, I'd be stickin' with 'em...
>
Must be another Mike. This one has been a Hawks fan since day one (and it ain't
been easy).
>
> Marty
--
Thanks,
Mike
(Hut one, hut two ... hut, hut)
Strabbo
news:vm23seg...@news.supernews.com:
>> 28 seasons of my life getting the network feed from Spokane,
>> Washington, which meant that I'd get every lousy Seahawks game - even
>> if it was a conference championship rematch, or the two hottest teams
>> in the league, if Seattle was playing the Chargers to see which of
>> them would climb to 4-8 and which would drop to 3-9, that's the game
>> I'd get.
>
> LOL!! Fans in Seattle always get to see those prime matchups! We
> don't sell out the home games so they are blacked out locally!
Y'see, if I lived a few hours to the south, I'd get my feed from
Seattle, so I'd be getting the prime matchups!
It's a shame the games aren't selling out. A winning season might do the
trick.
> I was at that Hawk victory, by the way ... nice new stadium, same old
> team. Just lucky this week.
I get vertigo looking at that stadium on TV! It looks so tall!
It looks nice though - so does Detroit's, as far as an indoor stadium
goes.
I'm a little disappointed I never got to see the old Soldier Field. A
buddy of mine (who lived in St. Louis and went to all the local Rams
games, but moved away before the season they stopped sucking ass) said
it was a great, classic looking building.
>> And what's with this Seahawksness? I thought you were a Bills fan -
>> and after last week's trouncing sans Price, I'd be stickin' with
>> 'em...
>>
>
> Must be another Mike. This one has been a Hawks fan since day one (and
> it ain't been easy).
Apologies, I'm mixing up my Mikes! (which never happens when we're
talking about hard lemonade...)
:-)
Ah well, we'll be at odds with one another then on this topic. At least
we seem to agree on music (or one band, anyhow)!
Marty