Busboy Jefe wrote:
>> If you are trying to say Bush got a pass on ANYTHING
>> without criticism, you'd simply be wrong.
>
> <tremendous evasion of the point snipped>
Evasion? Bullshit... I addressed it directly.
> Did dems seriously chirp about impeaching him as the right is now re:
> Obama? No. That's not quite the same as "criticism".
More bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_impeach_George_W._Bush
> BenghaziBenghaziBenghazi! At least a dozen Benghazi-like incidences
> post-9/11...did the left go apeshit and keep harping on them 9 months
> after they happened? No. And it goes without saying that no one on the
> right did. Hell, the right doesn't even count 9/11 into it's official
> record anymore. "We kept you safe (except for that one day...)."
Name a dozen then... Hell, name two or three, where our citizens
were begging for help while murderers were at the door... and
we did nothing.
> Your attempt to dismiss what I wrote because I used examples from the
> Bush admin is laughable.
Bush has been out of office for 5 years. When foreigners killed
our citizens Bush fucking invaded and overthrew an entire
motherfucking country to seek revenge. There isn't a single
logical comparison you can make.
> That would be the point you evaded: the same
> people now shitting themselves over this IRS/Teabagger thing (which
> you can also thank the Citizen's United decision for, by the way)
> uttered not a sound when those other things happened. Kind of like how
> they said nothing when our national credit card was being maxed out.
> Or when unpaid for, socialized medicine was enacted.
You seem not to be able to address a single thing without
bringing past happenings into comparison. How about you
simply address issues on their own merit? Bush was wrong
to run up our debt... that's a given.. but you can't spit out
the name Obama without throwing out a "Bush" to go with it.
Bush was wrong (in the eyes of many) for invading Iraq,
wrong in enacting the Patriot Act.... those are valid points
on their own. No one is disagreeing with many of the
points you make... problem is -- they are past history, they
were made issues of (by thousands... or even millions of
people)... yet to hear you harp on it, you'd have us believe
he was simply given a free pass. And that ain't true.
> So all i'm saying is: you want to chirp about one thing, don't just
> dance around the others. Of course, I've tried to make this point many
> times before and it falls on deaf/finger-plugged ears. I expect no
> different this time around.
Lies. I addressed many of those points along the way.
In this very reply even.