Re: Obama"s mom did porn

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:49:42 -0800 (PST), AJ <misfits...@aol.com>
wrote:

>http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/404932_10200613397997782_298744295_n.jpg

She probably did, but that's an old photoshop.

[AJ]

On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:49:42 -0800 (PST), AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/404932_10200613397997782_2...

>
> She probably did, but that's an old photoshop.

It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. Some say it's a model
that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.

[FVH]

But you were so sure in the subject title, Detective. Did she do porn or not? Which is it?

Hi, Killer! Hope you enjoyed reading this post!
FVH
Good ole RMAK. Where the majority swears off "scab KISS" then
wrights a review of the new album the week it comes out. LOL!-
Professor AJ
Yes I know that and I know they gained that power under Obama's
watch.-Professor AJ on China's nukes.
This was passed in 2008 under Obama.- AJ, political guru
Wait and see. Paul is not going to name the new KISS album what Gene
was
going to call his solo boxset.-AJ, KISS "expert"
Laughter is an emotion-Professor AJ Johnson, channeling his feminine
feelings.
You wrongfully misinterpreting another post noted.-AJ, English major
I love how people like you consternate so much time and effort-
Professor AJ Johnson.
10 years ago your posts were better written and your grammar was
better than what they are now.-AJ.
Pssst. Obama has been president for 7 years and you suck at math.-AJ,
2009
LOL! I doubt imergration is reading your posts.-Speeling bea
chaump, AJ.
McCain wins 2008 Election.This is what will be printed on every
newspaper next week. Wait and see.-AJ, proving that he's an idiot.
our new commander and chief.- AJ, talking politics.
Stadiums have no walls!- AJ
*Geeks with key boards aren't intimidating.-AJ
You made a boneheaded 'observation' about Ace, and you're a fool.
That's pretty much it.- Hidell, making a brilliant point about AJ.
Twinkle Toes Stanley hadn't quite picked up that Lick It Up/
Heaven's On Fire half a ballerina dance that he does.- db
How many times can the Greed Twins milk a cow? As many times as the
sheep will let them.-db

[steveh99]

In article <c065i8hp7f14ebadk...@4ax.com>,
ch...@cheese.net says...

The obsession lol

[steveh99]

In article <e89243ed-87ef-41ae-9fba-f1041aab0d19
@y4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...

WHo here other than you cares? All I see is a chick that has no top on
and even that is bleeted out

[Tattoo Vampire]

AJ wrote:


> It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. Some say it's a model
> that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
>

If you can't tell that's a pretty lousy Photoshop job, you need to go back to
photography school.

[Busboy Jefe]

"Some say, some said"

Nutshell: you're a fucking dummy.

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. Some say it's a model
>> that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
>
> "Some say, some said"
>
> Nutshell: you're a fucking dummy.

I made a reference in the past as to her/these pics,
and expecting backlash over it - spent probably an
hour trying to verify or debunk them. Snopes
had early on labeled them as fake <being someone
else>, then claimed it was "unverifiable", and have
since removed all reference to their page. Even
going so far as to 'clean' any reference to it via
'Wayback Machine' and other archival methods.
If you search Snopes now it merely states that the
subject violated their porno rules. Which is bullshit,
as there was/is no need to post the pictures <blurred or
not at all> to lay rest to the rumors/facts/claims.

Snopes wanted to claim the pics were indeed another
'lady', Marcy Moore. That has been totally proven wrong,
the pics are NOT Marcy Moore. Among all of this, there
has been no legitimate claims of photoshopping and
many foreign newspapers paid for the photos and published
them.

Let's not dance around any facts here -- his mom was
hardcore communist and very slutty. Actually, in todays
standards she'd be just kinda slutty... but for the time
period - his momma was a total 'ho. She didn't raise him
(much) so I'm not claiming he is what HE is due to her.
But plain and simple, the factz iz the factz - she was a 'ho.
My father was born in 1920 - and HIS father died a couple
months before my dad was even born. It is rumored his
mother took in a gentleman or two, and maybe the reason
he never returned home after the age of 13. Is is what it is.

[83LowRider]

steveh99 wrote:
> In article <e89243ed-87ef-41ae-9fba-f1041aab0d19
> @y4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>>

>> On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:49:42 -0800 (PST), AJ
>>> <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/404932_10200613397997782_2...
>>>
>>> She probably did, but that's an old photoshop.
>>
>> It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. Some say it's a model
>> that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
>
> WHo here other than you cares? All I see is a chick that has no top on
> and even that is bleeted out

Are you disappointed little stevie? It would seem you are.
Want me to point you to some titty websites? Married and
celibate is a bitch eh?

[AJ]

They're not photoshoped pics. Here's more from the same model that
may or may not be Obama's mom.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI11itY/s1600/Ann+Dunham1.jpg

[AJ]

Said the guy that's really hoping I'm wrong, but can't prove it.

[AJ]

His mom was a whore and she let a transvestite baby sit him that fed
him dog meat. Yeah, that really fits the typical mother of the 60's
doesn't it? ;-)

[Busboy Jefe]

I really couldn't care less...my life will not be impacted in any way
whether it's true or not. NO one's will be.

Talk about desperate -- now going after the guy's mother? Love the
childish mentality.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 19, 4:35 am, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

I repeat: "some say, some said". Got proof? Fire away. And while
you're at it, explain how it matters.

Otherwise, see my comments aimed at your acolyte re: being so
desperate that now the mother is a target. "Yo momma's a 'ho".
Childish mentality at its finest. And bonus points for the "slut" card
as well. That double standard never gets old.

El Jefe

[FVH]

You'd think the HOOD RATS would find a new hobby, but I guess they can't let go Obama being their leader for FOUR MORE YEARS.

[FVH]

Well, Killer is a child trapped in a very fat "man's" body.

[Tattoo Vampire]

AJ wrote:


> They're not photoshoped pics. Here's more from the same model that
> may or may not be Obama's mom.
> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI11itY/s1600/Ann+Dunham1.jpg
>

Check the head on the pic in question and you'll see what I mean.

[Busboy Jefe]

> may or may not be Obama's mom.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI1...

"May or may not be"

"Some say, some said"

Dummies fall for that shit. Nuff said.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 19, 12:47 pm, FVH <jarjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, Killer is a child trapped in a very fat "man's" body.

You can just sense the desperation, can't you?

El Jefe

[steveh99]

In article <d8955e1a-e141-4039-8e8c-bb2cf99d39d3
@n2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>, busbo...@gmail.com says...
>
> On Feb 19, 11:55ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> > On Feb 18, 9:14ï¿œpm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
> >
> > > AJ wrote:

> > > > It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. ï¿œSome say it's a model

> > > > that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
> >
> > > If you can't tell that's a pretty lousy Photoshop job, you need to go back to
> > > photography school.
> >

> > They're not photoshoped pics. ï¿œHere's more from the same model that

> > may or may not be Obama's mom.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI1...
>
> "May or may not be"
>
> "Some say, some said"
>
> Dummies fall for that shit. Nuff said.
>
> El Jefe

Im still wondering who besides AJ and 83 even care?
I dont

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

> I repeat: "some say, some said". Got proof? Fire away.

Proof is in the puddin'... her high school yearbook pic is out
there, other pics as well --- ya look at them, you look at the
nude pics and you determine <or not> that it's his mom.
No DNA analysis, no CSI shit. I have no doubt that three of
those pics are his momma.

> And while
> you're at it, explain how it matters.

It doesn't 'matter', she's dead. If she was alive it
wouldn't matter much either. It's nothing more
than insight as to the total man. The most common,
the strongest bond there is - is between mother and
child. She played a lesser role than most mothers
would, but you cannot overlook it when you size up
the man Obama as a whole.

> Otherwise, see my comments aimed at your acolyte re: being so
> desperate that now the mother is a target. "Yo momma's a 'ho".
> Childish mentality at its finest. And bonus points for the "slut" card
> as well. That double standard never gets old.

I applied it to my own grandmother as well. Don't know
how much more 'fair' I can get than that. Tho she was
long dead before I came along, if we were to psychoanalyze
my father, she'd be the first thing we'd look at, no?

[FVH]

You really can. It's amazing how bitter he is over something that has ZERO effect in his life. A clear sign that he has nothing going on in life, so he's using this to fill the hours. Sad, really.

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 19, 7:18 pm, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

> It doesn't 'matter', she's dead. If she was alive it
> wouldn't matter much either. It's nothing more
> than insight as to the total man. The most common,
> the strongest bond there is - is between mother and
> child. She played a lesser role than most mothers
> would, but you cannot overlook it when you size up
> the man Obama as a whole.

Have it your way, Sigmund. But I'd say that for a guy you believe had
a 'ho for a momma....he has done damn well for himself.

On the other hand, I can think of a former president you hold in high
esteem that was born to a "non-'ho" momma...yet still turned out to be
a drunken, collossal failure and one of THE worst presidents in our
history.

So maybe the mom thing is a tad overrated?

> I applied it to my own grandmother as well. Don't know
> how much more 'fair' I can get than that. Tho she was
> long dead before I came along, if we were to psychoanalyze
> my father, she'd be the first thing we'd look at, no?

So you consider your grandmother a 'ho/slut?

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> It doesn't 'matter', she's dead. If she was alive it
>> wouldn't matter much either. It's nothing more
>> than insight as to the total man. The most common,
>> the strongest bond there is - is between mother and
>> child. She played a lesser role than most mothers
>> would, but you cannot overlook it when you size up
>> the man Obama as a whole.
>
> Have it your way, Sigmund. But I'd say that for a guy you believe had
> a 'ho for a momma....he has done damn well for himself.

Many people succeed in spite of their parents. I have
acquaintances that are totally useless or dumb as shit -
and yet they may have a very bright child. Obama has not
only done well for himself, he's reached the highest office
in the world.

> On the other hand, I can think of a former president you hold in high
> esteem that was born to a "non-'ho" momma...yet still turned out to be
> a drunken, collossal failure and one of THE worst presidents in our
> history.

Bush? Once more, you've never seen me do much (if any)
bragging on Bush other than to say he tried his best to keep
us safe. Fuck Bush for running up our debt and not tending
to it. Fuck him for The Patriot Act.

> So maybe the mom thing is a tad overrated?

Again, nothing more than insight.

>> I applied it to my own grandmother as well. Don't know
>> how much more 'fair' I can get than that. Tho she was
>> long dead before I came along, if we were to psychoanalyze
>> my father, she'd be the first thing we'd look at, no?
>
> So you consider your grandmother a 'ho/slut?

If those are the facts <that she took in men for
either food/favors/money> then yes - she was
a 'ho too.

[AJ]

On Feb 19, 5:15 pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can just sense the desperation, can't you?
>
> El Jefe

And you can't see how I can take a dead NG and get it talking again
with just one new topic. You're welcome. BUT, everyone can see how
you're so liberal and how you desperately try to turn negative posts
about your messiah into personal attacks and those that don't lick the
balls of Obama. NOW, would you like to tell the group who is in
those nude pics? Why would anyone pay big money for them? Would
anyone really pay big money for photos if they were photoshoped or
fake? OR, would you rather keep exposing your desperation to the
group by trying to belittle anyone or anything that shines a light on
the embarrassment that Obama and his supporters are?

[AJ]

Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. Even some in this NG
think they're photoshopped.

[steveh99]

In article <496848ca-7054-4110-bd1a-
1fed23...@h17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...

Anytime you talk AJ you can bet there are people laughing in the
background

[steveh99]

In article <d54863a5-47f9-4133-899d-
a825ce...@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
>
> On Feb 19, 5:14ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 11:55ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> >
> > > On Feb 18, 9:14ï¿œpm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
> >
> > > > AJ wrote:

> > > > > It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. ï¿œSome say it's a model

> > > > > that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
> >
> > > > If you can't tell that's a pretty lousy Photoshop job, you need to go back to
> > > > photography school.
> >

> > > They're not photoshoped pics. ï¿œHere's more from the same model that

> > > may or may not be Obama's mom.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI1...
> >
> > "May or may not be"
> >
> > "Some say, some said"
> >
> > Dummies fall for that shit. Nuff said.
> >
> > El Jefe
>
> Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. Even some in this NG
> think they're photoshopped.

Who cares? If in fact his mother was a slothing whore he did more than
make up for it himself for himself. You cant do much better than win the
White House for a term, let alone a second term.
Regardless what his mother/father did, he did more than make up for it
himself!

[AJ]

On Feb 20, 10:51 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> Who cares?

Educated historians that want the truth. Do you really want teachers
in the future telling kids,
"OK class, today we are going to learn about our 44th president who
had a whore of a mother that did pornography?" This is the second
time you've claimed you don't care about this topic. If that's true,
then shut up and quit acting like you care so much for this worthless
piece of shit failure of a sorry excuse of a leader.

>If in fact his mother was a slothing whore he did more than
> make up for it himself for himself. You cant do much better than win the
> White House for a term, let alone a second term.
> Regardless what his mother/father did, he did more than make up for it

> himself!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If it is true, then this is just another example of how many lies and
how many more lengths he will go to lie or try to hide about his past.
You should research how many different names and Social Security Cards
Obama has used. He's a fake and you and other naive gullible idiots
fall for everything the man reads to you from a TelePrompTer that
someone else wrote for him to say to you.

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:51:41 -0500, steveh99 <stev...@roadrunner.com>
wrote:

>In article <d54863a5-47f9-4133-899d-
>a825ce...@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
>says...
>>

>> On Feb 19, 5:14�pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Feb 19, 11:55�am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

>> >
>> > > On Feb 18, 9:14�pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > AJ wrote:

>> > > > > It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. �Some say it's a model

>> > > > > that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
>> >
>> > > > If you can't tell that's a pretty lousy Photoshop job, you need to go back to
>> > > > photography school.
>> >

>> > > They're not photoshoped pics. �Here's more from the same model that

>> > > may or may not be Obama's mom.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI1...
>> >
>> > "May or may not be"
>> >
>> > "Some say, some said"
>> >
>> > Dummies fall for that shit. Nuff said.
>> >
>> > El Jefe
>>
>> Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. Even some in this NG
>> think they're photoshopped.
>
>Who cares? If in fact his mother was a slothing whore he did more than
>make up for it himself for himself. You cant do much better than win the
>White House for a term, let alone a second term.
>Regardless what his mother/father did, he did more than make up for it
>himself!

When I read something like this, all I can wonder is what would happen
if they were pictures of GW's mother. Would it still be who cares?
Besides the fact that there would be porno shots of some broad that
looked like George Washington?

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:18:42 -0500, "83LowRider"
<83low...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

>> And while
>> you're at it, explain how it matters.
>
>It doesn't 'matter', she's dead. If she was alive it
>wouldn't matter much either. It's nothing more
>than insight as to the total man. The most common,
>the strongest bond there is - is between mother and
>child. She played a lesser role than most mothers
>would, but you cannot overlook it when you size up
>the man Obama as a whole.

The way Jefe defends mothers that do porn makes you wonder why...

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:58:15 -0500, "83LowRider"
<83low...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

> Fuck him for The Patriot Act.

Yeah, good thing Obama did away with it. I feel so much better...

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 9:43 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 5:15 pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You can just sense the desperation, can't you?
>
> > El Jefe
>
> And you can't see how I can take a dead NG and get it talking again
> with just one new topic.  You're welcome. BUT, everyone can see how
> you're so liberal and how you desperately try to turn negative posts
> about your messiah into personal attacks and those that don't lick the
> balls of Obama.

*yawn*

Dude, we have four more years to go. Try to come up with SOME new
material, huh?

> NOW, would you like to tell the group who is in
> those nude pics?  Why would anyone pay big money for them?  Would
> anyone really pay big money for photos if they were photoshoped or
> fake?  OR, would you rather keep exposing your desperation to the
> group by trying to belittle anyone or anything that shines a light on
> the embarrassment that Obama and his supporters are?

What you don't get is that I DON'T CARE. I just think it's hilarious
that you feel this is worthy of due consideration.

Why would anyone pay for "photoshoped" pics? Because we know that
"controversy" sells? Because it's red mean for morons...like you.

All this shit stems from that stupid right-wing doc "Dreams From My
Real Father". Just another variation on the Birther nonsense. Only
dummies fall for and care about it.

You are being laughed at. Again. Nuff said.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

In other words, yet another theory you can't prove.

http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/11135/are-these-nude-photos-of-barack-obamas-mother

El Jefe

[AJ]

On Feb 20, 1:42 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
> The way Jefe defends mothers that do porn makes you wonder why...

I know why: http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/1491/eljeffe.jpg

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 1:23 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> Educated historians that want the truth.

A group which would NOT include you.

> Do you really want teachers
> in the future telling kids,
> "OK class, today we are going to learn about our 44th president who
> had a whore of a mother that did pornography?"

What difference would it make if it were true? Kids don't get a truly
accurate description of our presidents anyway. ALL of that shit is
glossed over.

Were your parents perfect? Maybe YOUR mother was a 'ho. Maybe your dad
was a toothless hillbilly mailman. Shall we judge you for it?

> If it is true, then this is just another example of how many lies and
> how many more lengths he will go to lie or try to hide about his past.
> You should research how many different names and Social Security Cards
> Obama has used.  He's a fake and you and other naive gullible idiots
> fall for everything the man reads to you from a TelePrompTer that
> someone else wrote for him to say to you.

Somebody forgot to take his meds this week...

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 1:41 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:

> When I read something like this, all I can wonder is what would happen
> if they were pictures of GW's mother.  Would it still be who cares?

It would be for me.

El Jefe

[AJ]

We know liberals like you "DON'T CARE." Unlike liberals, some hope an
American leader would be dignified, honest, American, and not a fake
from a slut of a whore. But that's just me.

[AJ]

> http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/11135/are-these-nude-phot...
>
> El Jefe- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

And one you can't disprove.

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 1:42 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:18:42 -0500, "83LowRider"
>

I think it's more telling that you all are so worked up over it.
Feeling sensitive about family histories, perhaps?

Makes one wonder just who was in those tranny tapes Deep Dish was
saleing...

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

How telling that you would have that handy...

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

You supported an alcoholic who believed Sky Daddy spoke directly to
him. Nuff said.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

The burden isn't on me to do so.

El Jefe

[AJ]

Well it was a hell of a lot more entertaining than this snooze fest:
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/7925/eljefedvd.jpg

[AJ]

Then accept what others claim to be his mother.

[AJ]

On Feb 20, 3:10 pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You supported an alcoholic who believed Sky Daddy spoke directly to
> him. Nuff said.
>

> El Jefe- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/74637_400315456721647_1724447675_n.jpg

[FVH]

On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:43:49 AM UTC-6, AJ wrote:
> And you can't see how I can take a dead NG and get it talking again with just one new topic. You're welcome.

All that shows is the NG LOVES to dog pile you because you're a) incredibly stupid and b) ultra sensitive and easily provoked. Psst, you're the butt of RMAK's jokes and have no idea. Priceless.

You above comment shows that you need this NG to fill the empty hours in your fat life. Busted.

> BUT, everyone can see how you're so liberal and how you desperately try to turn negative posts about your messiah into personal attacks and those that don't lick the balls of Obama.

I love how you think everyone "thinks" like you do. Psst, no one is "with" you, Detective. You're all alone in thinking Obama is the spawn of the devil. Think about it.

> NOW, would you like to tell the group who is in those nude pics? Why would anyone pay big money for them? Would anyone really pay big money for photos if they were photoshoped or fake? OR, would you rather keep exposing your desperation to the group by trying to belittle anyone or anything that shines a light on the embarrassment that Obama and his supporters are?

It's SO funny when you think you've proven something when in reality you've shown how dumb and desperate you truly are. You think you would have learned your fat lesson after Jefe and I EXPOSED you when you played online detective, but no you're too dumb and scared to learn anything.

[FVH]

What's funny is there are things you HOOD RATS could legitimately bitch about concerning Obama, but you clowns are too stupid to see that. Why don't you try keeping up with the world around you, instead of scouring gossip sites and tabloids looking for something to discredit your black leader, fat stuff?

[FVH]

On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:23:19 PM UTC-6, AJ wrote:
> Educated historians that want the truth.

You're neither educated nor a historian. You're just a dumb, fat redneck who has misplaced, irrational anger. You need to see a therapist.

> Do you really want teachers in the future telling kids, "OK class, today we are going to learn about our 44th president who had a whore of a mother that did pornography?"

Psst, there are many things they don't teach you about history in school. You're a prime example of this: I can tell you've never studied history on your own (not that you're capable of doing so). If you had studied, you'd a) shit fat bricks and b) not be so naive about 'Meruich.

> This is the second time you've claimed you don't care about this topic. If that's true, then shut up and quit acting like you care so much for this worthless piece of shit failure of a sorry excuse of a leader.

Calm down, Killer, you're getting angry (again). The truth making you uncomfortable? LOL!

> If it is true, then this is just another example of how many lies and how many more lengths he will go to lie or try to hide about his past.

If it isn't true, then you and your fellow HOOD RATS are wasting yet more time trying to discredit your black leader. In other words, you're HOPING it's real, but you don't know.

> You should research how many different names and Social Security Cards Obama has used. He's a fake and you and other naive gullible idiots fall for everything the man reads to you from a TelePrompTer that someone else wrote for him to say to you.

You need to change your tin foil hat, Tub o' Lard. It's starting to stink of stale pizza. LOL!

[FVH]

LOL!!! Damn, you are incredibly naive and live in a bubble, Walking Fart.

[steveh99]

In article <c56fe52b-92b6-4f22-9623-e0719ba238c2
@f6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...

LOLOLOL

[steveh99]

In article <746c7406-6803-4e86-a8ca-ae3500d8c602@
9g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>
> On Feb 20, 2:44ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 9:43ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> >
> > > On Feb 19, 5:15ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > You can just sense the desperation, can't you?
> >
> > > > El Jefe
> >
> > > And you can't see how I can take a dead NG and get it talking again

> > > with just one new topic. ï¿œYou're welcome. BUT, everyone can see how

> > > you're so liberal and how you desperately try to turn negative posts
> > > about your messiah into personal attacks and those that don't lick the
> > > balls of Obama.
> >
> > *yawn*
> >
> > Dude, we have four more years to go. Try to come up with SOME new
> > material, huh?
> >
> > > NOW, would you like to tell the group who is in

> > > those nude pics? ï¿œWhy would anyone pay big money for them? ï¿œWould

> > > anyone really pay big money for photos if they were photoshoped or

> > > fake? ï¿œOR, would you rather keep exposing your desperation to the

> > > group by trying to belittle anyone or anything that shines a light on
> > > the embarrassment that Obama and his supporters are?
> >
> > What you don't get is that I DON'T CARE. I just think it's hilarious
> > that you feel this is worthy of due consideration.
> >
> > Why would anyone pay for "photoshoped" pics? Because we know that
> > "controversy" sells? Because it's red mean for morons...like you.
> >
> > All this shit stems from that stupid right-wing doc "Dreams From My
> > Real Father". Just another variation on the Birther nonsense. Only
> > dummies fall for and care about it.
> >
> > You are being laughed at. Again. Nuff said.
> >
> > El Jefe
>
> We know liberals like you "DON'T CARE." Unlike liberals, some hope an
> American leader would be dignified, honest, American, and not a fake
> from a slut of a whore. But that's just me.

LOL Why would you care what a president's mother did? What matters is
that he does the job he was elected to do, not her

[steveh99]

In article <557bb4a8-640c-4bf1-bc09-
cdaded...@k8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, busbo...@gmail.com says...
>
> On Feb 20, 2:55ï¿œpm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 2:44ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 20, 9:43ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> >
> > > > On Feb 19, 5:15ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > You can just sense the desperation, can't you?
> >
> > > > > El Jefe
> >
> > > > And you can't see how I can take a dead NG and get it talking again

> > > > with just one new topic. ï¿œYou're welcome. BUT, everyone can see how

> > > > you're so liberal and how you desperately try to turn negative posts
> > > > about your messiah into personal attacks and those that don't lick the
> > > > balls of Obama.
> >
> > > *yawn*
> >
> > > Dude, we have four more years to go. Try to come up with SOME new
> > > material, huh?
> >
> > > > NOW, would you like to tell the group who is in

> > > > those nude pics? ï¿œWhy would anyone pay big money for them? ï¿œWould

> > > > anyone really pay big money for photos if they were photoshoped or

> > > > fake? ï¿œOR, would you rather keep exposing your desperation to the

> > > > group by trying to belittle anyone or anything that shines a light on
> > > > the embarrassment that Obama and his supporters are?
> >
> > > What you don't get is that I DON'T CARE. I just think it's hilarious
> > > that you feel this is worthy of due consideration.
> >
> > > Why would anyone pay for "photoshoped" pics? Because we know that
> > > "controversy" sells? Because it's red mean for morons...like you.
> >
> > > All this shit stems from that stupid right-wing doc "Dreams From My
> > > Real Father". Just another variation on the Birther nonsense. Only
> > > dummies fall for and care about it.
> >
> > > You are being laughed at. Again. Nuff said.
> >
> > > El Jefe
> >

> > We know liberals like you "DON'T CARE." ï¿œUnlike liberals, some hope an

> > American leader would be dignified, honest, American, and not a fake

> > from a slut of a whore. ï¿œBut that's just me.

>
> You supported an alcoholic who believed Sky Daddy spoke directly to
> him. Nuff said.
>
> El Jefe

LOL

[steveh99]

In article <26134b06-d9e2-4bd8-b063-dff0e280fd05@
5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>
> On Feb 20, 3:10ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 2:56ï¿œpm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 20, 2:47ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Feb 20, 10:05ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Feb 19, 5:14ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 19, 11:55ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> >
> > > > > > > On Feb 18, 9:14ï¿œpm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > AJ wrote:

> > > > > > > > > It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. ï¿œSome say it's a model

> > > > > > > > > that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
> >
> > > > > > > > If you can't tell that's a pretty lousy Photoshop job, you need to go back to
> > > > > > > > photography school.
> >

> > > > > > > They're not photoshoped pics. ï¿œHere's more from the same model that

> > > > > > > may or may not be Obama's mom.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI1...
> >
> > > > > > "May or may not be"
> >
> > > > > > "Some say, some said"
> >
> > > > > > Dummies fall for that shit. Nuff said.
> >
> > > > > > El Jefe
> >

> > > > > Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. ï¿œEven some in this NG

> > > > > think they're photoshopped.
> >
> > > > In other words, yet another theory you can't prove.
> >
> > > >http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/11135/are-these-nude-phot...
> >
> > > > El Jefe- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > And one you can't disprove.
> >
> > The burden isn't on me to do so.
> >
> > El Jefe- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Then accept what others claim to be his mother.

**YAWN!!!**

[steveh99]

In article <1l9ai8d1jsina91k1...@4ax.com>,
ch...@cheese.net says...

>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:51:41 -0500, steveh99 <stev...@roadrunner.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <d54863a5-47f9-4133-899d-
> >a825ce...@w7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
> >says...
> >>

> >> On Feb 19, 5:14ï¿œpm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Feb 19, 11:55ï¿œam, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> >> >
> >> > > On Feb 18, 9:14ï¿œpm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > AJ wrote:

> >> > > > > It's not photoshop. That's a real nude model. ï¿œSome say it's a model

> >> > > > > that looks exactly like Obama's mom and others claim it's really her.
> >> >
> >> > > > If you can't tell that's a pretty lousy Photoshop job, you need to go back to
> >> > > > photography school.
> >> >

> >> > > They're not photoshoped pics. ï¿œHere's more from the same model that

> >> > > may or may not be Obama's mom.http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-V3Qsxey2fjg/UGZnWNl-sSI/AAAAAAAAW-g/6-u1MI1...
> >> >
> >> > "May or may not be"
> >> >
> >> > "Some say, some said"
> >> >
> >> > Dummies fall for that shit. Nuff said.
> >> >
> >> > El Jefe
> >>
> >> Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. Even some in this NG
> >> think they're photoshopped.
> >
> >Who cares? If in fact his mother was a slothing whore he did more than
> >make up for it himself for himself. You cant do much better than win the
> >White House for a term, let alone a second term.
> >Regardless what his mother/father did, he did more than make up for it
> >himself!
>
> When I read something like this, all I can wonder is what would happen
> if they were pictures of GW's mother. Would it still be who cares?
> Besides the fact that there would be porno shots of some broad that
> looked like George Washington?

LOL

[steveh99]

In article <685adc64-6986-49b0-9197-49a30b9ed1d4
@d11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...

>
> On Feb 20, 1:42ï¿œpm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
> > The way Jefe defends mothers that do porn makes you wonder why...
>
>
> I know why: http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/1491/eljeffe.jpg

tacky

[steveh99]

In article <1d64b1cf-716f-4866-81ad-
14518f...@d11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, busbo...@gmail.com says...

I think its just another way of telling people they are still sore that
Romney lost his ass

[Tattoo Vampire]

AJ wrote:


> Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. Even some in this NG
> think they're photoshopped.
>

They are. :)

[Tattoo Vampire]

Busboy Jefe wrote:


> What difference would it make if it were true? Kids don't get a truly
> accurate description of our presidents anyway. ALL of that shit is
> glossed over.
>
> Were your parents perfect? Maybe YOUR mother was a 'ho. Maybe your dad
> was a toothless hillbilly mailman. Shall we judge you for it?
>

We should bring this more on topic and speculate whether Gene fucked her or
not.

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 3:22 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> Then accept what others claim to be his mother.

I'm sure the above makes sense...if you're a fuckin' idiot.

I think your mother was a droopy-eyed whore who fucked a slack-jawed
mailman. My proof is that YOU were created as a result. Accept it! I
claim it!

Nuff said.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 3:21 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> Well it was a hell of a lot more entertaining than this snooze fest:http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/7925/eljefedvd.jpg

I'm touched to have struck your nerves so badly, you felt a need to
use your bush-league design "skills" to create stuff about me.
Obsessed much?

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 20, 3:24 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/74637_400315456721647_1724...

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Why_5d9d4a_2534490.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ge9X6GKB3Pc/Tpqkv1TUjXI/AAAAAAAAAOQ/W1afRGniIn4/s1600/creationist%2527s+logic.jpg

http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-02-12/1234411475881.jpg

El Jefe

[steveh99]

In article <06640129-66e8-4693-9962-18fd640deda1
@k4g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, busbo...@gmail.com says...

Wow! Thats pretty nasty but most certainly AJ

[steveh99]

In article <MPG.2b8f26198...@news.albasani.net>,
sit...@this.computer says...

LOL :D

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:57:09 -0800 (PST), Busboy Jefe
<busbo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Feb 20, 1:42�pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:18:42 -0500, "83LowRider"
>>
>> <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:
>> >> And while
>> >> you're at it, explain how it matters.
>>
>> >It doesn't 'matter', she's dead. If she was alive it
>> >wouldn't matter much either. It's nothing more
>> >than insight as to the total man. The most common,
>> >the strongest bond there is - is between mother and
>> >child. She played a lesser role than most mothers
>> >would, but you cannot overlook it when you size up
>> >the man Obama as a whole.
>>
>> The way Jefe defends mothers that do porn makes you wonder why...
>
>I think it's more telling that you all are so worked up over it.
>Feeling sensitive about family histories, perhaps?

Maybe you can post a link to where I'm worked up.

>Makes one wonder just who was in those tranny tapes Deep Dish was
>saleing...

Admit it, you typed that with one hand, didn't ya?

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:01:53 -0800 (PST), FVH <jarj...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>What's funny is there are things you HOOD RATS could legitimately bitch about concerning Obama, but you clowns are too stupid to see that. Why don't you try keeping up with the world around you, instead of scouring gossip sites and tabloids looking for something to discredit your black leader, fat stuff?

Because the thought of Obama's momma doing porn is more fun?

[FVH]

Hi, Sharon. I see you're still trying too hard to be funny. I admire your effort, but the execution is still piss poor. Good luck with that.

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:19:52 -0800 (PST), FVH <jarj...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Hi, Sharon. I see you're still trying too hard to be funny. I admire your effort, but the execution is still piss poor. Good luck with that.

Hi, Sharon, I see you're still evaluating others' performances. And
speaking to yourself in the third person while you're at it...

[FVH]

Your replies are getting weaker and weaker, Sharon. You're in way over your head.

[83LowRider]

>> Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not. Even some in this NG
>> think they're photoshopped.
>>
>
> They are. :)

No, no they're fucking not.
http://seeker401.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ann-dunham-nude1.jpg


This one --- well, okay -
<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4XTbNoXs6M/TGFImOUTkMI/AAAAAAAACCQ/TejirWC1DAs/s1600/obamamanaked.jpg>


This is who Snopes once claimed the photos were of -
this is NOT his mother but Marcy Moore -
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZIUXsKuiBnk/Ta9FSWU2vbI/AAAAAAAANn0/lyYa78euBeM/s400/this%2Bis%2Bmarcy%2Bmoore%2Bnude.jpg

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:19:21 -0800 (PST), FVH <jarj...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Your replies are getting weaker and weaker, Sharon. You're in way over your head.

"Your performance was robotic..."

[AJ]

On Feb 22, 8:04 am, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:
> >> Even Snopes wasn't sure if they're real or not.  Even some in this NG
> >> think they're photoshopped.
>
> > They are. :)
>

> No, no they're fucking not.http://seeker401.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/ann-dunham-nude1.jpg

>
> This one --- well, okay -

> <http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Q4XTbNoXs6M/TGFImOUTkMI/AAAAAAAACCQ/TejirWC...>

>
> This is who Snopes once claimed the photos were of -

> this is NOT his mother but Marcy Moore -http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ZIUXsKuiBnk/Ta9FSWU2vbI/AAAAAAAANn0/lyYa78e...

Marcy has bigger tits and darker areolas.

[AJ]

Said the guy that photoshopped my head onto a pic of some guy fucking
a horse. LOL!

[lab~rat >:-)]

C'mon, Jefe, everyone has their beliefs. Some believe that
"climatologists" have all the answers. I might log on tonight and get
my degree for the hell of it...

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:46:48 -0500, steveh99 <stev...@roadrunner.com>
wrote:

>LOL Why would you care what a president's mother did? What matters is
>that he does the job he was elected to do, not her

Ok, so let's run with that. Exactly what was it that he was elected
to do? Shut down Gitmo? Improve the economy? Unemployment? End the
senseless killing in the middle east? Stop torture? Bring an end to
the invasive homeland security? Improve America's standing in the
world? Use his "Peace Prize" to stabilize the world? Wasn't he
AGAINST gay marriage before he was for it? Stop the ridiculous
spending under the Bush administration? End racial tension? Promote
equality? Lower health care costs? Bring cheaper alternative energy
to the US?

What were you numb nuts voting for? Do you even remember?

And for the record:

>that he does the job he was elected to do, not her

No one claimed he did her, but given her morals and the fact Obama is
black, it would come as little surprise... ;)

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:14:26 -0500, steveh99 <stev...@roadrunner.com>
wrote:

>In article <1d64b1cf-716f-4866-81ad-
>14518f...@d11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, busbo...@gmail.com says...
>>

>> On Feb 20, 1:42�pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:18:42 -0500, "83LowRider"
>> >
>> > <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:
>> > >> And while
>> > >> you're at it, explain how it matters.
>> >
>> > >It doesn't 'matter', she's dead. If she was alive it
>> > >wouldn't matter much either. It's nothing more
>> > >than insight as to the total man. The most common,
>> > >the strongest bond there is - is between mother and
>> > >child. She played a lesser role than most mothers
>> > >would, but you cannot overlook it when you size up
>> > >the man Obama as a whole.
>> >
>> > The way Jefe defends mothers that do porn makes you wonder why...
>>
>> I think it's more telling that you all are so worked up over it.
>> Feeling sensitive about family histories, perhaps?
>>
>> Makes one wonder just who was in those tranny tapes Deep Dish was
>> saleing...
>>
>> El Jefe
>
>I think its just another way of telling people they are still sore that
>Romney lost his ass

I'm not sore that Romney lost his ass. In fact, I didn't even know he
had a donkey to begin with...

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 22, 11:18 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> Said the guy that photoshopped my head onto a pic of some guy fucking
> a horse. LOL!

No. It was your bulbous dome p'shopped onto a fat fuck who was
*standing next to* a horse. But somehow, I'm not surprised that your
imagination would take to you to a place that involves bestiality...

And that was ONE photo, made after you started with the "Jefe the
strawberry picker" images and other stuff. Compare my one to your
numerous, shoddy attempts. Not to mention your stalking and obsession
with saving pics of your imagined "enemies".

Struck nerves noted. Nuff said.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On Feb 22, 12:25 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheese.net> wrote:

> C'mon, Jefe, everyone has their beliefs.  Some believe that
> "climatologists" have all the answers.  I might log on tonight and get
> my degree for the hell of it...

Damn, you're right, lab. I really should disregard those silly
scientists and their librul degrees that mean nothing. INSTEAD, I
should take my cues from, say, someone who jockeys a Toro for a
living, and can find ONE article written by a Forbes hack that totally
demolishes everything those dumb "climatologists" are saying.

And hell, here you are -- a half-assed excuse for a troll, backing him
up! I mean, it just doesn't get any more real than that.

Thanks so much for showing me the light.

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:


> I should take my cues from, say, someone who jockeys a Toro for a
> living, and can find ONE article written by a Forbes hack that totally
> demolishes everything those dumb "climatologists" are saying.

I could have just as easily posted 50.

And is that what we are now - a lawn jockey (I've never owned
a Toro) and an alcohol pusher just bitchin' back and forth?

Does it make you feel a bit better to unload in such a way??

Here, lemme try it -

My landscaping business is 30 years old this coming season,
my education level exceeds yours, I've not had to answer
to another man/punch a timeclock in 3 full decades. I'll put
my wifes intelligence and beauty up against anyones in here.
What else you wanna compare? home? dicks? cars?

hmmm.. maybe I do feel just a hair bit better!

I don't think I've in any way ever degraded you as
a person or for what you do or for what you believe.

I'd appreciate the same courtesy.

[Busboy Jefe]

On Mar 1, 1:21 am, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

> I could have just as easily posted 50.

...and they wouldn't make a bit of difference. If you're in the denial
camp, you've aligned yourself with the same morons who believed the
world was flat.

> And is that what we are now - a lawn jockey (I've never owned
> a Toro) and an alcohol pusher just bitchin' back and forth?

Are you a scientist of some sort I'm not aware of?

> Does it make you feel a bit better to unload in such a way??

Acknowledging a simple truth is "unloading" now? Again, are you a
scientist of some sort? Is that why you rely on some hack from Forbes
to argue against the majority of others? Is lab a scientist? Is there
some reason why I should accept your opinion, or his, over the
majority of people who actually have a scientific background?

> Here, lemme try it -
>
> My landscaping business is 30 years old this coming season,

And?

> my education level exceeds yours,

Your education level exceeds mine? Do explain that one, por favor.

> I've not had to answer
> to another man/punch a timeclock in 3 full decades.

This means nothing. A guy who's sold strawberries or played the sax on
the street for 30 years could claim the same shit.

I continue to find the rightie obsession with not having a boss
comical. Fuck, dude. There are far worse things in life.

> I'll put my wifes intelligence and beauty up against anyones in here.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And seeing that you view The
Professor as intelligent, I question your stance on just what that
entails.

> What else you wanna compare? home? dicks? cars?
>
> hmmm.. maybe I do feel just a hair bit better!
>
> I don't think I've in any way ever degraded you as
> a person or for what you do or for what you believe.
>
> I'd appreciate the same courtesy.

Oh, please. You've made your comments about what I do. Don't let your
skin get thin now.

If you feel a need to "compare" at all with anyone in here, you've
already demonstrated that you have a small dick.

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> I could have just as easily posted 50.

> ...and they wouldn't make a bit of difference. If you're in the denial
> camp, you've aligned yourself with the same morons who believed the
> world was flat.

But how can that be when I admit it is round?
And what the fuck am I denying? be specific...

>> And is that what we are now - a lawn jockey (I've never owned
>> a Toro) and an alcohol pusher just bitchin' back and forth?
>
> Are you a scientist of some sort I'm not aware of?

You're fully aware of the image/connotation you were
trying to relay. Not a bit different than if I had referred
to you as a drink pusher.

>> Does it make you feel a bit better to unload in such a way??
>
> Acknowledging a simple truth is "unloading" now? Again, are you a
> scientist of some sort? Is that why you rely on some hack from Forbes
> to argue against the majority of others? Is lab a scientist? Is there
> some reason why I should accept your opinion, or his, over the
> majority of people who actually have a scientific background?

No... the entire point of my point was this
(since you obviously missed it) ----

I have access to and read as much as you do, probably more
since I'm home (likely) much more than you are. Other
than the part-time work I've scaled back to in the last
couple years -- I'm on this computer, a LOT. And it ain't
fucking around with any porn or poker or video games.

Seeing the same articles, the same news stories, you and
I then have to EVALUATE what we see/read. Why?

Because all the best scientists in the world do NOT agree.
All the best SCIENCE and DATA in the world, is NOT conclusive.

When you reply to lab as you did you are trying to convey
the image that apparently I'm not as smart as you are,
not able to come to my own conclusions as well as you
are... or less viable or 'valid' than you are. My reply
was to say that ain't true.

I don't think you're stupid or less able to form an opinion
than myself. It's simply that we disagree. I can respect that --
what I can't respect is after all this time you blowing shit off
like I'm some kind of idiot pushing a mower for 8 bucks an
hour, either unable to think for myself or just ignorant.

>> Here, lemme try it -
>>
>> My landscaping business is 30 years old this coming season,
>
> And?

And it shows I'm capable of succeeding in my life without
relying on others. It shows a dedication/commitment/
ability to handle the responsibilities, and make a shitload
of correct decisions over three decades. I don't expect you
to know or understand how hard it is to keep a business
ongoing for 30 years, but brudda, it ain't easy. You
work fucking hard and you'd better be pretty damn smart.

>> my education level exceeds yours,
>
> Your education level exceeds mine? Do explain that one, por favor.

Did you not say that you gave college a short try at one time?

> Oh, please. You've made your comments about
> what I do. Don't let your skin get thin now.

Bullshit. Post it.

And it ain't about skin thickness -- I've been here far too long
for you to suddenly think this about thin skin.

> If you feel a need to "compare" at all with anyone in here, you've
> already demonstrated that you have a small dick.

And after thousands of posts - again you should know this
has nothing to do with making any comparisons. I don't
do that -- I argue shit with the best reasoning and facts I
can. The equivalent of me making YOUR comment would
be me telling mss -

"Yeah, I'm gonna take God advise from a new-age hippy
in Texas and a bouncer from Vegas".

Ever seen me say such a thing? Fuck no... and bringing
me up, in a back and forth between you and lab, why?
Say what you will to him, but this/that post to him had
no need of you mentioning me in any way.

[lab~rat >:-)]

Well I could go out and get an environmental science degree and become
a climatologist. If that didn't work out, I would be qualified to be
a forest ranger.

There are varying degrees of scientists. Maybe you could look into
the requirements you posted up there and see how stringent they are
for the hallowed climatologists.

Personally, I would LIKE to see a specific degree offered for the
vocation. I don't know why you insist on keeping it the requirement a
vague collection of requirements like geology and math.

Hell, to be a dimwitted weather-broad you need a degree in
meteorology, I just find it strange that a profession that people cite
so often and lean on so much doesn't have a standard.

[lab~rat >:-)]

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 04:09:04 -0800 (PST), Busboy Jefe
<busbo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is lab a scientist? Is there
>some reason why I should accept your opinion, or his, over the
>majority of people who actually have a scientific background?

No, but there is a reason that you should define the parameters of a
scientific background before committing yourself to it as the final
word.

And while I don't have a degree in science (although my degree IS in
Engineering and Applied Sciences), I'm enough of a novice to know that
when someone concludes a study final and complete, they aren't a true
scientist. Science is about continually learning and accepting new
information as it presents itself. Are you prepared to say the
science of ANY discipline is complete besides man made global warming?

Hell, they just discovered another radiation belt around Earth the
other day...