Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere

[AJ]

Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually
cools atmosphere

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040448_solar_radiation_global_warming_debunked.html#ixzz2U3QF6h8Y

Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific
community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse
gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according
to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns
out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the
other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and
destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest
evidence.

As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin
Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions
from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar
storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the
vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense
coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather
than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts
claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases
are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using
Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry
(SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are
abundant in the earth's upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect
heating energy rather than absorb it.

"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," says James
Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators
for the groundbreaking SABER study. "When the upper atmosphere (or
'thermosphere') heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to
shed that heat back into space."

Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from
entering lower atmosphere by CO2

According to the data, up to 95 percent of solar radiation is
literally bounced back into space by both CO2 and NO in the upper
atmosphere. Without these necessary elements, in other words, the
earth would be capable of absorbing potentially devastating amounts of
solar energy that would truly melt the polar ice caps and destroy the
planet.

"The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the
so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more
warming for our planet," write H. Schreuder and J. O'Sullivan for PSI.
"[T]his compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge
embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his
team over at NASA's GISS."

Dr. Hansen, of course, is an outspoken global warming activist who
helped spark man-made climate change hysteria in the U.S. back in
1988. Just after the release of the new SABER study, however, Dr.
Hansen conveniently retired from his career as a climatologist at
NASA, and reportedly now plans to spend his time "on science," and on
"drawing attention to [its] implications for young people."

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040448_solar_radiation_global_warming_debunked.html#ixzz2U3QTUZQg

[FVH]

Yeah, science is wrong. Go dust a CD shelf, you're clearly in over
your head, Professor.

Hi, Killer! Hope you enjoyed reading this post!
FVH
Good ole RMAK. Where the majority swears off "scab KISS" then
wrights a review of the new album the week it comes out. LOL!-
Professor AJ
Yes I know that and I know they gained that power under Obama's
watch.-Professor AJ on China's nukes.
This was passed in 2008 under Obama.- AJ, political guru
Wait and see. Paul is not going to name the new KISS album what Gene
was
going to call his solo boxset.-AJ, KISS "expert"
Laughter is an emotion-Professor AJ Johnson, channeling his feminine
feelings.
You wrongfully misinterpreting another post noted.-AJ, English major
I love how people like you consternate so much time and effort-
Professor AJ Johnson.
10 years ago your posts were better written and your grammar was
better than what they are now.-AJ.
Pssst. Obama has been president for 7 years and you suck at math.-AJ,
2009
LOL! I doubt imergration is reading your posts.-Speeling bea
chaump, AJ.
McCain wins 2008 Election.This is what will be printed on every
newspaper next week. Wait and see.-AJ, proving that he's an idiot.
our new commander and chief.- AJ, talking politics.
Stadiums have no walls!- AJ
*Geeks with key boards aren't intimidating.-AJ
You made a boneheaded 'observation' about Ace, and you're a fool.
That's pretty much it.- Hidell, making a brilliant point about AJ.
Twinkle Toes Stanley hadn't quite picked up that Lick It Up/
Heaven's On Fire half a ballerina dance that he does.- db
How many times can the Greed Twins milk a cow? As many times as the
sheep will let them.-db

On May 22, 2:07 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually
> cools atmosphere
>

> Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/040448_solar_radiation_global_warming_debu...

> Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/040448_solar_radiation_global_warming_debu...

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Global warming debunked...

Reckon? Ask Oklahoma 'bout that AJ...

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

Look up Tornado alley. Happens every year.

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Look up Tornado alley. Happens every year.

I know, I live there. You think mile-wide,
multi-vortex tornado's are the norm? Guess again...

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

Are you going to be freak out and blame God when hurricanes hit FL and
the east coast like they do every year around September/October?

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Are you going to be freak out and blame God when hurricanes hit FL and
> the east coast like they do every year around September/October?

No, but I would ask why he'd allow all the death & destruction,
if has the power to prevent it. After all isnt he in control?

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

Well according to God, he has already flooded the world once and
according to God, worse things and worse weather is to come. Enjoy it
while it lasts. At least you atheists aren't feeding us to the lions
again.

IMO, one who has faith will have their faith tested. Those who are
strong enough to keep their faith will be rewarded.

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Well according to God, he has already flooded the world once and
> according to God, worse things and worse weather is to come. Enjoy it
> while it lasts. At least you atheists aren't feeding us to the lions
> again.

Well, if the evidence was there, I might throw in with your claims,
I mean everybody wants a happy-ending right? But when the bible makes
claims about the world, or its history, then we can test those claims,
& unfortunately the claims are false.

> IMO, one who has faith will have their faith tested. Those who are
> strong enough to keep their faith will be rewarded.

Sure enough I hear you. But what about folks that have been tested,
stood by their stories even when they went against religious ideas?
Shouldn't they be rewarded? Galileo proclaimed the earth revolved
around the sun <not the sun around the earth> & was considered a
heretic by those who believed in christian-judeio mythology, it all
started over these two verses:

Psalm 104:5: 'the Lord set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved'

Ecclesiastes 1:5: 'the sun rises and sets and returns to its place'

So, if the bible is the word of god, then god got it wrong...

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

On Jun 3, 10:44 am, mss <em...@invalid.foo> wrote:
> AJ spoke unto us saying:
>
> > Well according to God, he has already flooded the world once and
> > according to God, worse things and worse weather is to come.  Enjoy it
> > while it lasts.   At least you atheists aren't feeding us to the lions
> > again.
>
> Well, if the evidence was there, I might throw in with your claims,
> I mean everybody wants a happy-ending right? But when the bible makes
> claims about the world, or its history, then we can test those claims,
> & unfortunately the claims are false.
>
> > IMO, one who has faith will have their faith tested.  Those who are
> > strong enough to keep their faith will be rewarded.
>
> Sure enough I hear you. But what about folks that have been tested,
> stood by their stories even when they went against religious ideas?
> Shouldn't they be rewarded?

IMO, that would depend on the individuals' situation.

>Galileo proclaimed the earth revolved
> around the sun <not the sun around the earth> & was considered a
> heretic by those who believed in christian-judeio mythology, it all
> started over these two verses:
>
> Psalm 104:5: 'the Lord set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved'
>
> Ecclesiastes 1:5: 'the sun rises and sets and returns to its place'
>
> So, if the bible is the word of god, then god got it wrong...
>
> --
> Later on,
> Mike

Depends on how you interpret that. Both could have been metaphors
that some misinterpreted. The Bible was written by man, not God, and
I'm sure mankind has gotten many things wrong.

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Depends on how you interpret that. Both could have been metaphors
> that some misinterpreted. The Bible was written by man, not God, and
> I'm sure mankind has gotten many things wrong.

Aye. Mankind has f*cked things up just as much as he's gotten it right.

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

Now you're starting to understand, "free will." ;-)

[Tattoo Vampire]

AJ <misfits...@aol.com> wrote:

> Well according to God, he has already flooded the world once and
> according to God, worse things and worse weather is to come. Enjoy it
> while it lasts. At least you atheists aren't feeding us to the lions
> again.

Atheists never fed Christians to the lions to start with.

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Now you're starting to understand, "free will." ;-)

I like free beer too! =)

--
Later on,
Mike

[El Jefe]

If the bible is the word of "god", there should be no need to debate
how it's interpreted.

'the sun rises and sets and returns to its place'

Seems quite certain to me.

> The Bible was written by man, as was "God".

Fixed that for you.

El Jefe

[El Jefe]

On Jun 3, 10:27 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> Well according to God, he has already flooded the world once and
> according to God, worse things and worse weather is to come.  Enjoy it
> while it lasts.

Wait, Professor...according to god, as written in the bible, a book
you admit was written by men and which is flawed? Or are you
suggesting that god is on your cell phone contact list (beneath Chaim,
of course, we all know who you *really* worship) and that he told you
himself?

And do you actually believe that noah's ark bullshit? Oh, please admit
that you do. It would confirm sooooo much.

> At least you atheists aren't feeding us to the lions
> again.

Romans were polytheists, and you are really fucking dumb.

Also: if we just fed YOU to the lions, they'd never have to eat again.

Class dismissed.

El Jefe

[AJ]

Is this another fine example of you trying to have a civil discussion
with me that you just cried about in another thread today? If you're
friends here were truly unbiased, then they can clearly see who the
real troll/instigator is.

[steveh99]

In article <afe0215c-36d5-4b78-a8c2-0e052b836fd4
@m8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, jefepickss...@gmail.com says...

The Bible (as admitted to by a priest I knew) is nothing more than a
collection of tales based on an alleged fact

[Busboy Jefe]

On Jun 4, 12:53 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> Is this another fine example of you trying to have a civil discussion
> with me

No. That time has passed.

> If you're
> friends here were truly unbiased, then they can clearly see who the
> real troll/instigator is.

Unlike you, I have never denied that I troll. You don't fool anyone.
You instigate as much as any other in here.

El Jefe

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Is this another fine example of you trying to have a civil discussion
> with me that you just cried about in another thread today? If you're
> friends here were truly unbiased, then they can clearly see who the
> real troll/instigator is.

Lets all just relax, easy as she goes. We don't have to agree. We're all
different & can learn from another. I bet Jefe too can see the sense
of debate <allowing others to freely speak their minds without reprisal>
is a welcome & civil thing. =)

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

The entire time you and I were discussing religion, did I once
belittle you or insult you? Or did I just answer questions you asked
me?

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> The entire time you and I were discussing religion, did I once
> belittle you or insult you? Or did I just answer questions you asked
> me?

Not once AJ. Hoping you & Jefe can chill without arguing...

--
Later on,
Mike

[mss]

mss spoke unto us saying:

What I mean is: Yes you answered all my questions with zero
'libtard vs. wingnut' rhetoric. And hoping it stays on the
light side between others here too that's all =)

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

On Jun 4, 3:16 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> The Bible (as admitted to by a priest I knew) is nothing more than a
> collection of tales based on an alleged fact

Aren't all non fiction books that way? Since this is a KISS NG let's
use Gene Simmons' bio book as an example. I think everyone here would
probably agree that many of the things in his book were over
exaggerated, hyped up, or just coming from his personal viewpoint
where he may have actually forgotten some details of the stories he
was writing about. One thing I can say and have researched, there's
usually a lot of truth in most folklore. Now let's use Ace's bio book
as an example. Ace admits he had forgotten most of the stories in his
own book and had to track down many of his friends to retell them to
him. Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is, maybe some of the
Bible is made up by man and some of it may not be. With what we
know today about the digestive system and stomach acids, it's hard to
believe that Jonah spent three days and three nights in a whale's
stomach and survived. For all we know, this story may be true and
the whale/fish word may have been used as a metaphor and not have
actually been a whale/fish at all.

Plus, one has to take into consideration how many times the Bible has
been translated over and over so many times throughout history and
what man may have left out or put in for personal reasons or for the
agendas of their time.

[AJ]

That's a two way street Mike. ;-)

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> That's a two way street Mike. ;-)

Sure enough & maybe others will read
our words & put to use.

--
Later on,
Mike

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> Plus, one has to take into consideration how many times the Bible has
> been translated over and over so many times throughout history and
> what man may have left out or put in for personal reasons or for the
> agendas of their time.

Interesting fact...

The earliest new testament gospel dates to the 2nd century after Christ
& is only an incomplete fragment the size of a business card. Now bear
in mind, that's 200 years after the events it describes. The earliest
*complete* copy of the new testament <the copy our bibles are based on>
dates to the 4th century after Christ. That's in excess of 400 years after
the events it describes. In either case its authors were not eyewitnesses.

--
Later on,
Mike

[steveh99]

In article <a76f5f7b-da50-45df-a56a-31c3bdbd7e65
@o2g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...

>
> On Jun 5, 12:27ï¿œam, mss <em...@invalid.foo> wrote:
> > AJ spoke unto us saying:
> >
> > > Is this another fine example of you trying to have a civil discussion

> > > with me that you just cried about in another thread today? ￜ If you're

> > > friends here were truly unbiased, then they can clearly see who the
> > > real troll/instigator is.
> >
> > Lets all just relax, easy as she goes. We don't have to agree. We're all
> > different & can learn from another. I bet Jefe too can see the sense
> > of debate <allowing others to freely speak their minds without reprisal>
> > is a welcome & civil thing. =)
> >
> > --
> > Later on,
> > Mike
>
> The entire time you and I were discussing religion, did I once
> belittle you or insult you? Or did I just answer questions you asked
> me?

Maybe its because you're an asshole?
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm could be!

[steveh99]

In article <MPG.2c1913174...@reader.albasani.net>,
em...@invalid.foo says...

When AJ first started coming here he was actually tollerable. A nice
chap to talk to

[mss]

steveh99 spoke unto us saying:

> When AJ first started coming here he was actually tollerable. A nice
> chap to talk to

Still is, he never tries to trip me up. We ALL gotta work at it steve.

--
Later on,
Mike

[steveh99]

In article <MPG.2c1a4f22d...@reader.albasani.net>,
em...@invalid.foo says...

He would if you show direct/indirect like/dislike for something or
someone he didn't like, or was opposed to

[AJ]

On Jun 5, 1:38 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <MPG.2c1913174e4c0fa5989...@reader.albasani.net>,

BULLSHIT. The very first post I made in this NG back in 96 or 97 you
were the first one to flame me.

[AJ]

On Jun 5, 1:25 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <a76f5f7b-da50-45df-a56a-31c3bdbd7e65

> @o2g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 12:27 am, mss <em...@invalid.foo> wrote:
> > > AJ spoke unto us saying:
>
> > > > Is this another fine example of you trying to have a civil discussion

> > > > with me that you just cried about in another thread today? If you're

> > > > friends here were truly unbiased, then they can clearly see who the
> > > > real troll/instigator is.
>
> > > Lets all just relax, easy as she goes. We don't have to agree. We're all
> > > different & can learn from another. I bet Jefe too can see the sense
> > > of debate <allowing others to freely speak their minds without reprisal>
> > > is a welcome & civil thing. =)
>
> > > --
> > > Later on,
> > > Mike
>
> > The entire time you and I were discussing religion, did I once
> > belittle you or insult you?  Or did I just answer questions you asked
> > me?
>
> Maybe its because you're an asshole?
> mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm could         be!

I can discuss anything in a civil way. You can't. That's when I
become an asshole and sling it back. AND you still fail to see after
all these years I stoop to your level and treat you like you treat
me.

[mss]

steveh99 spoke unto us saying:

> He would if you show direct/indirect like/dislike for something or
> someone he didn't like, or was opposed to

Well, its been my experience that there's allot AJ & I do not
agree with one real big exception - we've *agreed* to
disagree, same with 83. I lob punches at them both all
the time & they do as well back at me <for instance look
at the disagreement 83 & I just had, we still converse>.
The 'trick' is really simple IMO, argue against the point
& not the person. Here's an example <guys just roll with me here>


good...


83: 'Mike, you're full of crap, you darn well & good
everybody drinks 7up.'

Me: '83, it obvious you've not done your homework
because plainly, a google search will show that
Sprite is the number one choice.'


See, we took some good-natured jabs above but not too personal.


bad...


Me: '83 you're such a fuckwad, bite my ass cuz I'm right you libtard'

83: 'Mike, once again you've failed to use your only brain cell, now
fuck off & this time use some soap cuz you smell like wombat pussy.'


Since the above contains personnel remarks, that will get anyone up in arms,
rebut the point NOT the person. Shit steve, you guys have been buddies
for years...

--
Later on,
Mike

[AJ]

On Jun 6, 10:31 am, mss <em...@invalid.foo> wrote:
> steveh99 spoke unto us saying:
>
> > He would if you show direct/indirect like/dislike for something or
> > someone he didn't like, or was opposed to
>
> Well, its been my experience that there's allot AJ & I do not
> agree with one real big exception - we've *agreed* to
> disagree, same with 83. I lob punches at them both all
> the time & they do as well back at me <for instance look
> at the disagreement 83 & I just had, we still converse>.
> The 'trick' is really simple IMO, argue against the point
> & not the person. Here's an example <guys just roll with me here>
>
> good...
>
> 83: 'Mike, you're full of crap, you darn well & good
>      everybody drinks 7up.'
>
> Me: '83, it obvious you've not done your homework
>      because plainly, a google search will show that
>      Sprite is the number one choice.'

And then I chime in and be a smartass and say something like, "Be a
real man and drink Pepsi you homo. I'm surprised you fucking liberals
put the Kool Aid down to actually try another drink." LOL!

[mss]

AJ spoke unto us saying:

> And then I chime in and be a smartass and say something like, "Be a
> real man and drink Pepsi you homo. I'm surprised you fucking liberals
> put the Kool Aid down to actually try another drink." LOL!

That's it! =)

--
Later on,
Mike

[Busboy Jefe]

On Jun 6, 10:23 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

> > When AJ first started coming here he was actually tollerable. A nice
> > chap to talk to
>
> BULLSHIT.  The very first post I made in this NG back in 96 or 97 you
> were the first one to flame me.

LOL! Still butthurt about it over 15 years later? Look like Steve
struck a nerve.

El Jefe

[AJ]

On Jun 6, 1:23 pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 10:23 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > When AJ first started coming here he was actually tollerable. A nice
> > > chap to talk to
>
> > BULLSHIT.  The very first post I made in this NG back in 96 or 97 you
> > were the first one to flame me.
>
> LOL! Still butthurt about it over 15 years later?

Nope.

>Look like Steve
> struck a nerve.
>
> El Jefe

Nope.

[steveh99]

In article <073a4fb7-cf45-4708-8dae-
d79399...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...

>
> On Jun 5, 1:38ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <MPG.2c1913174e4c0fa5989...@reader.albasani.net>,
> > em...@invalid.foo says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > AJ spoke unto us saying:
> >
> > > > The entire time you and I were discussing religion, did I once

> > > > belittle you or insult you? ï¿œOr did I just answer questions you asked

> > > > me?
> >
> > > Not once AJ. Hoping you & Jefe can chill without arguing...
> >
> > When AJ first started coming here he was actually tollerable. A nice
> > chap to talk to
>
> BULLSHIT. The very first post I made in this NG back in 96 or 97 you
> were the first one to flame me.

Your asinine posts were far fewer then.
Nobody in the group attacked you anymore than you attacked us

[steveh99]

In article <710de3bd-030b-459f-bc6b-edb5b6c3ffd2
@c3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...

>
> On Jun 5, 1:25ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <a76f5f7b-da50-45df-a56a-31c3bdbd7e65
> > @o2g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 5, 12:27 am, mss <em...@invalid.foo> wrote:
> > > > AJ spoke unto us saying:
> >
> > > > > Is this another fine example of you trying to have a civil discussion
> > > > > with me that you just cried about in another thread today? If you're
> > > > > friends here were truly unbiased, then they can clearly see who the
> > > > > real troll/instigator is.
> >
> > > > Lets all just relax, easy as she goes. We don't have to agree. We're all
> > > > different & can learn from another. I bet Jefe too can see the sense
> > > > of debate <allowing others to freely speak their minds without reprisal>
> > > > is a welcome & civil thing. =)
> >
> > > > --
> > > > Later on,
> > > > Mike
> >
> > > The entire time you and I were discussing religion, did I once

> > > belittle you or insult you? ï¿œOr did I just answer questions you asked

> > > me?
> >
> > Maybe its because you're an asshole?

> > mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm could ￜ ￜ ￜ ￜ be!

>
> I can discuss anything in a civil way. You can't. That's when I
> become an asshole and sling it back. AND you still fail to see after
> all these years I stoop to your level and treat you like you treat
> me.

LOL Civil my ass. You dont like shit and call people liberals, assholes
and whatever else you choose to call us. You are anything but civil when
things dont go your way

[steveh99]

In article <6f3a9704-4213-4948-8336-b703fc180a70@
20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...

Yeah you are. If you want someone to resurrect all those messages you
posted way back then I am sure someone can find them.
You are only civil when people kiss your ass or tell you what you want
to hear

[AJ]

On Jun 6, 2:07 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> LOL Civil my ass. You dont like shit and call people liberals, assholes
> and whatever else you choose to call us. You are anything but civil when
> things dont go your way

And do you honestly think you've acted any better?