Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ‘AMMO Act’ to Prevent Feds from Stockpiling Ammo
11 views
Skip to first unread message
AJ
May 1, 2013, 5:24:00 PM5/1/13
to
Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ‘AMMO Act’ to Prevent Feds from
Stockpiling Ammo
http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-to-prevents-feds-from-stockpiling-ammo-video/
buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ‘AMMO Act’ to Prevent Feds from
Stockpiling Ammo
http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-to-prevents-feds-from-stockpiling-ammo-video/
AJ
May 1, 2013, 5:28:16 PM5/1/13
to
Another fine example of the ignorance of the left:
WARNING: DEMS PREDICT GLOBAL WARMING WILL INCREASE PROSTITUTION
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/04/30/warning-dems-predict-global-warming-will-increase-prostitution/
BTW, forgive me from posting a link from a site that isn't controlled
by the libtards or the usual spoon fed propaganda you're used to.
WARNING: DEMS PREDICT GLOBAL WARMING WILL INCREASE PROSTITUTION
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/04/30/warning-dems-predict-global-warming-will-increase-prostitution/
BTW, forgive me from posting a link from a site that isn't controlled
by the libtards or the usual spoon fed propaganda you're used to.
Tattoo Vampire
May 1, 2013, 6:18:50 PM5/1/13
to
AJ <misfits...@aol.com> wrote:
> BTW, forgive me from posting a link from a site that isn't controlled
> by the libtards or the usual spoon fed propaganda you're used to.
Glenn Beck is a loon.
> BTW, forgive me from posting a link from a site that isn't controlled
> by the libtards or the usual spoon fed propaganda you're used to.
Bought into his gold scheme yet, AJ?
steveh99
May 1, 2013, 7:02:38 PM5/1/13
to
In article <e36cf5bf-fe6f-49c1-a30a-
e81cce...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
> Stockpiling Ammo
> http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-to-prevents-feds-from-stockpiling-ammo-video/
You should see a doctor about your paranoid delusions
e81cce...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
>
> Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
>
>
> Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ?AMMO Act? to Prevent Feds from
> Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
>
>
> Stockpiling Ammo
> http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-to-prevents-feds-from-stockpiling-ammo-video/
You should see a doctor about your paranoid delusions
steveh99
May 1, 2013, 7:03:18 PM5/1/13
to
In article <XnsA1B3BA4CE42...@178.63.61.145>,
sit...@this.computer says...
You probably gave him a great idea lol
sit...@this.computer says...
FVH
May 2, 2013, 1:20:15 AM5/2/13
to
I love how you know deep within your cow heart that what you spew are
lies. I mean, we all know you're dumb as shit, but even you can see
the flaws in this bullshit you post. Why are you so dumb, Killer? Do
you not realize how stupid you are? Ask yourself that question.
Hi, Killer! Hope you enjoyed reading this post!
FVH
Good ole RMAK. Where the majority swears off "scab KISS" then
wrights a review of the new album the week it comes out. LOL!-
Professor AJ
Yes I know that and I know they gained that power under Obama's
watch.-Professor AJ on China's nukes.
This was passed in 2008 under Obama.- AJ, political guru
Wait and see. Paul is not going to name the new KISS album what Gene
was
going to call his solo boxset.-AJ, KISS "expert"
Laughter is an emotion-Professor AJ Johnson, channeling his feminine
feelings.
You wrongfully misinterpreting another post noted.-AJ, English major
I love how people like you consternate so much time and effort-
Professor AJ Johnson.
10 years ago your posts were better written and your grammar was
better than what they are now.-AJ.
Pssst. Obama has been president for 7 years and you suck at math.-AJ,
2009
LOL! I doubt imergration is reading your posts.-Speeling bea
chaump, AJ.
McCain wins 2008 Election.This is what will be printed on every
newspaper next week. Wait and see.-AJ, proving that he's an idiot.
our new commander and chief.- AJ, talking politics.
Stadiums have no walls!- AJ
*Geeks with key boards aren't intimidating.-AJ
You made a boneheaded 'observation' about Ace, and you're a fool.
That's pretty much it.- Hidell, making a brilliant point about AJ.
Twinkle Toes Stanley hadn't quite picked up that Lick It Up/
Heaven's On Fire half a ballerina dance that he does.- db
How many times can the Greed Twins milk a cow? As many times as the
sheep will let them.-db
> Stockpiling Ammohttp://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-...
lies. I mean, we all know you're dumb as shit, but even you can see
the flaws in this bullshit you post. Why are you so dumb, Killer? Do
you not realize how stupid you are? Ask yourself that question.
Hi, Killer! Hope you enjoyed reading this post!
FVH
Good ole RMAK. Where the majority swears off "scab KISS" then
wrights a review of the new album the week it comes out. LOL!-
Professor AJ
Yes I know that and I know they gained that power under Obama's
watch.-Professor AJ on China's nukes.
This was passed in 2008 under Obama.- AJ, political guru
Wait and see. Paul is not going to name the new KISS album what Gene
was
going to call his solo boxset.-AJ, KISS "expert"
Laughter is an emotion-Professor AJ Johnson, channeling his feminine
feelings.
You wrongfully misinterpreting another post noted.-AJ, English major
I love how people like you consternate so much time and effort-
Professor AJ Johnson.
10 years ago your posts were better written and your grammar was
better than what they are now.-AJ.
Pssst. Obama has been president for 7 years and you suck at math.-AJ,
2009
LOL! I doubt imergration is reading your posts.-Speeling bea
chaump, AJ.
McCain wins 2008 Election.This is what will be printed on every
newspaper next week. Wait and see.-AJ, proving that he's an idiot.
our new commander and chief.- AJ, talking politics.
Stadiums have no walls!- AJ
*Geeks with key boards aren't intimidating.-AJ
You made a boneheaded 'observation' about Ace, and you're a fool.
That's pretty much it.- Hidell, making a brilliant point about AJ.
Twinkle Toes Stanley hadn't quite picked up that Lick It Up/
Heaven's On Fire half a ballerina dance that he does.- db
How many times can the Greed Twins milk a cow? As many times as the
sheep will let them.-db
FVH
May 2, 2013, 1:23:54 AM5/2/13
to
Yet you're posting links that spoon feed dumbasses like you, who live
in fear and can't grasp simplicity. Seriously, do you realize how
embarrassingly dumb you are, fat stuff? I challenge you to an IQ test.
What say you, fat faggot?
in fear and can't grasp simplicity. Seriously, do you realize how
embarrassingly dumb you are, fat stuff? I challenge you to an IQ test.
What say you, fat faggot?
On May 1, 4:28 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> Another fine example of the ignorance of the left:
>
> WARNING: DEMS PREDICT GLOBAL WARMING WILL INCREASE PROSTITUTIONhttp://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/04/30/warning-dems-predict-global-w...
> Another fine example of the ignorance of the left:
>
FVH
May 2, 2013, 1:25:58 AM5/2/13
to
I'm not joking at all when I say Killer is schizo. He really is. You
don't have to be a doctor to see how mentally ill fat ass is.
don't have to be a doctor to see how mentally ill fat ass is.
AJ
May 3, 2013, 3:25:10 PM5/3/13
to
On May 1, 6:02 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <e36cf5bf-fe6f-49c1-a30a-
> e81cce2ef...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
> says...
>
>
>
> > Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> > buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> > hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> > they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> > will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
>
> > Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ?AMMO Act? to Prevent Feds from
> > Stockpiling Ammo
> >http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-...
>
>
>
> > Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> > buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> > hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> > they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> > will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
>
> > Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ?AMMO Act? to Prevent Feds from
> > Stockpiling Ammo
>
> You should see a doctor about your paranoid delusions
Like I said, the libs will deny the truth and facts. Either way, this
> You should see a doctor about your paranoid delusions
is really happening.
AJ
May 3, 2013, 3:26:05 PM5/3/13
to
On May 1, 5:18 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
Do you deny that this is a true story and is actually happening?
mss
May 3, 2013, 4:05:23 PM5/3/13
to
AJ spoke unto us saying:
>
> Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
>
>
> Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ?AMMO Act? to Prevent Feds from
> Stockpiling Ammo
> http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-to-prevents-feds-from-stockpiling-ammo-video/
<http://www.slate.com/blogs/crime/2013/05/03/crickett_keystone_spor
ting_arms_watch_an_ad_for_my_first_rifle_the_gun_a.html>
--
Later on,
Mike
>
> Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> they are. Sure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> will be moved and this will be twisted. Until then, enjoy the truth.
>
>
> Stockpiling Ammo
> http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-to-prevents-feds-from-stockpiling-ammo-video/
<http://www.slate.com/blogs/crime/2013/05/03/crickett_keystone_spor
ting_arms_watch_an_ad_for_my_first_rifle_the_gun_a.html>
--
Later on,
Mike
steveh99
May 3, 2013, 8:53:16 PM5/3/13
to
In article <13b1a5ce-08d3-47e7-a853-fd796c6d3e88
@n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
> > > will be moved and this will be twisted. ï¿œUntil then, enjoy the truth.
a lib
@n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>
> On May 1, 6:02ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <e36cf5bf-fe6f-49c1-a30a-
> > e81cce2ef...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
> > says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> > > buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> > > hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> > > they are. ï¿œSure this link is proof and factual, but the goal posts
> On May 1, 6:02ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <e36cf5bf-fe6f-49c1-a30a-
> > e81cce2ef...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
> > says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > Since a few dumb libs here don't believe that our own government is
> > > buying tons of guns and ammo and thinks it's just a few rednecks
> > > hoarding them, maybe this is a little more proof of how dumb and wrong
> > > will be moved and this will be twisted. ï¿œUntil then, enjoy the truth.
> >
> > > Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ?AMMO Act? to Prevent Feds from
> > > Stockpiling Ammo
> > >http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-...
> >
> > You should see a doctor about your paranoid delusions
>
> Like I said, the libs will deny the truth and facts. Either way, this
> is really happening.
As always any person that doesn't agree with your paranoid delusions is
> > > Oklahoma Lawmakers Introduce ?AMMO Act? to Prevent Feds from
> > > Stockpiling Ammo
> > >http://www.guns.com/2013/04/30/oklahoma-lawmakers-introduce-ammo-act-...
> >
> > You should see a doctor about your paranoid delusions
>
> Like I said, the libs will deny the truth and facts. Either way, this
> is really happening.
a lib
Tattoo Vampire
May 3, 2013, 10:52:32 PM5/3/13
to
One of your favorite conservative sites, Breitbart, actually dismisses the
stockpiling story as a bunch of hogwash. My respect for them has increased
since they actually took the time to do the research to blow this latest tall
tale to smithereens, instead of taking the easy course of perpetuating it to
knuckle dragging right wingnuts.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammunition-
Stockpile-Myth
"There are dozens of articles hyping government purchases of ammunition over
the last nine months. After spending weeks researching this topic, this is a
collection of commonly held myths that are based more on panic than fact."
stockpiling story as a bunch of hogwash. My respect for them has increased
since they actually took the time to do the research to blow this latest tall
tale to smithereens, instead of taking the easy course of perpetuating it to
knuckle dragging right wingnuts.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammunition-
Stockpile-Myth
"There are dozens of articles hyping government purchases of ammunition over
the last nine months. After spending weeks researching this topic, this is a
collection of commonly held myths that are based more on panic than fact."
AJ
May 4, 2013, 11:04:22 AM5/4/13
to
On May 3, 9:52 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
proving they have stocked pilled massvive amounts of guns and ammo?
> AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Do you deny that this is a true story and is actually happening?
>
> One of your favorite conservative sites, Breitbart, actually dismisses the
> stockpiling story as a bunch of hogwash. My respect for them has increased
> since they actually took the time to do the research to blow this latest tall
> tale to smithereens, instead of taking the easy course of perpetuating it to
> knuckle dragging right wingnuts.
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
> > Do you deny that this is a true story and is actually happening?
>
> One of your favorite conservative sites, Breitbart, actually dismisses the
> stockpiling story as a bunch of hogwash. My respect for them has increased
> since they actually took the time to do the research to blow this latest tall
> tale to smithereens, instead of taking the easy course of perpetuating it to
> knuckle dragging right wingnuts.
>
> Stockpile-Myth
>
> "There are dozens of articles hyping government purchases of ammunition over
> the last nine months. After spending weeks researching this topic, this is a
> collection of commonly held myths that are based more on panic than fact."
Then why is Oklahoma doing this and why are there more legit sites
>
> "There are dozens of articles hyping government purchases of ammunition over
> the last nine months. After spending weeks researching this topic, this is a
> collection of commonly held myths that are based more on panic than fact."
proving they have stocked pilled massvive amounts of guns and ammo?
steveh99
May 4, 2013, 11:11:17 AM5/4/13
to
In article <XnsA1B5E8B4193...@178.63.61.145>,
sit...@this.computer says...
> http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammunition-
> Stockpile-Myth
>
Now watch AJ discount this
sit...@this.computer says...
> http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammunition-
> Stockpile-Myth
>
Now watch AJ discount this
FVH
May 4, 2013, 12:46:45 PM5/4/13
to
What's "really happening" is you spend your life walking around with a
stick up your fat ass, bitter at Obama and the world for no rational
reason. While you're sitting around on your ever expanding fat ass
dreaming of a "civil war" that will never happen, I'm enjoying my
life--and that greatly bothers you. The next time you fly into an
irrational rage over your sad and lonely life think about how happy
FVH is feeling at that particular moment. That should piss you off for
a good long while. LOL!!!
stick up your fat ass, bitter at Obama and the world for no rational
reason. While you're sitting around on your ever expanding fat ass
dreaming of a "civil war" that will never happen, I'm enjoying my
life--and that greatly bothers you. The next time you fly into an
irrational rage over your sad and lonely life think about how happy
FVH is feeling at that particular moment. That should piss you off for
a good long while. LOL!!!
FVH
May 4, 2013, 12:47:41 PM5/4/13
to
"Deny"? What's there to "deny", you moron? The FACT is this is all BS
that only mindless idiots like you believe. Deny...LOL, what a loser.
that only mindless idiots like you believe. Deny...LOL, what a loser.
FVH
May 4, 2013, 12:51:18 PM5/4/13
to
Please cite these "legit sites", Professor. This should be good!
steveh99
May 4, 2013, 3:07:15 PM5/4/13
to
In article <9c654207-c122-426b-928b-a6cc2c199f01
@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that
ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
AJ
May 4, 2013, 5:00:43 PM5/4/13
to
On May 4, 10:11 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <XnsA1B5E8B419397tattoovamp...@178.63.61.145>,
> sitt...@this.computer says...
>
> >http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) Like
I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. The
government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. The
very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. As we
speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
than the message.
https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=is+the+government+stockpiling+ammunition&oq=the+government+stoc&gs_l=hp.1.0.0i22i30l4.2006.10122.0.14008.19.13.0.6.6.1.289.1532.9j1j3.13.0...0.0...1c.1.12.psy-ab.NeBEq67IcsU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45960087,d.eWU&fp=a3f91beb4226fb3d&biw=1280&bih=666
> In article <XnsA1B5E8B419397tattoovamp...@178.63.61.145>,
> sitt...@this.computer says...
>
> >http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
> > Stockpile-Myth
>
> Now watch AJ discount this
The world isn't lying. Dude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
>
> Now watch AJ discount this
times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) Like
I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. The
government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. The
very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. As we
speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
than the message.
https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=is+the+government+stockpiling+ammunition&oq=the+government+stoc&gs_l=hp.1.0.0i22i30l4.2006.10122.0.14008.19.13.0.6.6.1.289.1532.9j1j3.13.0...0.0...1c.1.12.psy-ab.NeBEq67IcsU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45960087,d.eWU&fp=a3f91beb4226fb3d&biw=1280&bih=666
AJ
May 4, 2013, 5:02:16 PM5/4/13
to
On May 4, 2:07 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that
> ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
I've never claimed to have bought any guns or ammo in the past 10
> He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that
> ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
years.
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 12:07:04 AM5/5/13
to
In article <94182e5b-ef27-4d51-9d36-37e042c88657
@n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
You continue making the mistake of confusing me with someone that gives
a shit.I do not!
I know who is buying the guns/ammo and who isn't..
You continue to let your hate for Obama to cloud your judgement.
When idiots like you stop buying ammo and shit out of paranoia shit will
get back to normal and it will LOL
@n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
a shit.I do not!
I know who is buying the guns/ammo and who isn't..
You continue to let your hate for Obama to cloud your judgement.
When idiots like you stop buying ammo and shit out of paranoia shit will
get back to normal and it will LOL
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 12:12:45 AM5/5/13
to
In article <a6b6c705-9d6b-4c7e-86c8-
545539...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
Then why are you so worried about it? Another reason to bitch because a
democrat sits in the White House!? Get over it already and stop using
gun laws that dont exist to fuel your hate..
There are no new gun laws and wont be! Just people that know how to make
money off paranoid Obama haters
Can you say that AJ? NONE!
545539...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
democrat sits in the White House!? Get over it already and stop using
gun laws that dont exist to fuel your hate..
There are no new gun laws and wont be! Just people that know how to make
money off paranoid Obama haters
Can you say that AJ? NONE!
FVH
May 5, 2013, 2:47:01 AM5/5/13
to
What's funny is Killer's wannabe Rambo collection wouldn't stand a
chance against a drone. In his fat mind, if a civil war broke out he'd
have a viable excuse to kill FVH. That's all this is--Killer trying to
justify his irrational anger and daydreaming about his fantasies.
chance against a drone. In his fat mind, if a civil war broke out he'd
have a viable excuse to kill FVH. That's all this is--Killer trying to
justify his irrational anger and daydreaming about his fantasies.
On May 4, 2:07 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 2:48:05 AM5/5/13
to
In article <e40c7224-7c01-4054-9e60-
fd408a...@n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
fd408a...@n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 4, 2:07ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
what a warped warped world we live in
> > He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
FVH
May 5, 2013, 2:49:40 AM5/5/13
to
Psst, this "theory" has been debunked many times over. You are so far
in La La Land that you can't see the obvious in front of you. You're
so mentally fucked up that you've convinced yourself that the "Muslim
gov't" is out to get you, of all people. Then again, you're convinced
you've seen aliens. Can you be any more stereotypical redneck?
in La La Land that you can't see the obvious in front of you. You're
so mentally fucked up that you've convinced yourself that the "Muslim
gov't" is out to get you, of all people. Then again, you're convinced
you've seen aliens. Can you be any more stereotypical redneck?
On May 4, 4:00 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> The world isn't lying. Dude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
> sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) Like
> I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
> predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. The
> government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. The
> very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
> and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. As we
> speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
> you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> than the message.
>
> https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient...
> The world isn't lying. Dude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
> sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) Like
> I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
> predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. The
> government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. The
> very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
> and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. As we
> speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
> you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> than the message.
>
FVH
May 5, 2013, 2:50:21 AM5/5/13
to
But you claim you have stockpiled weapons for a future "civil war",
fat fuck.
fat fuck.
FVH
May 5, 2013, 2:52:03 AM5/5/13
to
Killer lives in fear because he has no backbone. I mean this is a guy
who can't let words on a screen roll off his back fat. All I have to
type is "Killer is a fat faggot" and he flies into a rage. He's so
weak it's embarrassing.
who can't let words on a screen roll off his back fat. All I have to
type is "Killer is a fat faggot" and he flies into a rage. He's so
weak it's embarrassing.
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 4:04:17 AM5/5/13
to
In article <a245c32d-60f1-4970-b156-
387131...@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 4, 4:00ï¿œpm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > The world isn't lying. ï¿œDude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> > government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. ï¿œThe
There was even a shop that sold shells for a 28 gauge shotgun?
387131...@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> > The world isn't lying. ï¿œDude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> > times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
> > sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) ï¿œLike
> > I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
> > predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. ï¿œThe
> > government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. ï¿œThe
> > very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
> > and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> > Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. ï¿œAs we
> > and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> > speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
> > you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> > than the message.
> >
> > https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient...
I saw a couple shops online that had ammo for handguns/rifles/shotguns
> > you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> > than the message.
> >
> > https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient...
There was even a shop that sold shells for a 28 gauge shotgun?
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 4:12:27 AM5/5/13
to
The funny thing is as far as AJ is concerned death to democrats for
wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
imposed a waiting period and background check..
He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
laws but he praised Reagan for supporting the same shit
In article <26439268-fc11-4374-807a-bd51fb2bc8e8
@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
imposed a waiting period and background check..
He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
laws but he praised Reagan for supporting the same shit
In article <26439268-fc11-4374-807a-bd51fb2bc8e8
@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
FVH
May 5, 2013, 1:46:13 PM5/5/13
to
I find kooks like Killer highly entertaining. We all know they're only
a threat to themselves, so the best thing to do is let them spew their
insane "thoughts" and laugh at them. Makes for great entertainment.
a threat to themselves, so the best thing to do is let them spew their
insane "thoughts" and laugh at them. Makes for great entertainment.
FVH
May 5, 2013, 1:51:01 PM5/5/13
to
It's disturbing what ammo and weaponry you can buy online and how easy
it is to legally get it. That's a problem that needs to be rectified,
but probably won't anytime soon.
it is to legally get it. That's a problem that needs to be rectified,
but probably won't anytime soon.
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 1:59:56 PM5/5/13
to
In article <32275ffc-be6f-42f8-b061-3b7e08b790a5
@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
sometimes even Hollywood has a hard time competing with our group for
entertainment points
@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
entertainment points
FVH
May 5, 2013, 2:00:02 PM5/5/13
to
The reality is the Dems don't want stricter gun laws. They are just as
gun happy as the republicans. Killer has it in his mind that Obama
wants to take his guns away because he's about to execute some sort of
silly war against the people.
If Killer paid attention to Obama, rather than hating him solely
because he's black, he'd see he VERY similar to Bush in regards to
killing "the enemy". Obama just does it in a more quiet way. Drones,
kill lists, etc. He doesn't have a Dick Cheney getting on tv pumping
out his cow chest telling everyone how tough America is. He keeps his
dirty work on the down low.
gun happy as the republicans. Killer has it in his mind that Obama
wants to take his guns away because he's about to execute some sort of
silly war against the people.
If Killer paid attention to Obama, rather than hating him solely
because he's black, he'd see he VERY similar to Bush in regards to
killing "the enemy". Obama just does it in a more quiet way. Drones,
kill lists, etc. He doesn't have a Dick Cheney getting on tv pumping
out his cow chest telling everyone how tough America is. He keeps his
dirty work on the down low.
steveh99
May 5, 2013, 3:37:20 PM5/5/13
to
In article <19764541-da52-4de3-9391-
c1eb8f...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
I never once feared having guns taken away. I don't think imposing
stiffer background checks and limiting magazine sizes on assault weapons
is overly unreasonable. IMO the average joe doesnt need a damn uzi or
anything like it..
You don't have to have the ability to cut a roomful of people down in
repid fire to get your point across, or protect your family
c1eb8f...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 5, 3:12ï¿œam, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > The funny thing is as far as AJ is concerned death to democrats for
> > wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
> > in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
> > imposed a waiting period and background check..
> > He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
> > laws ï¿œbut he praised Reagan for supporting the same shit
> > The funny thing is as far as AJ is concerned death to democrats for
> > wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
> > in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
> > imposed a waiting period and background check..
> > He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
I never once feared having guns taken away. I don't think imposing
stiffer background checks and limiting magazine sizes on assault weapons
is overly unreasonable. IMO the average joe doesnt need a damn uzi or
anything like it..
You don't have to have the ability to cut a roomful of people down in
repid fire to get your point across, or protect your family
FVH
May 6, 2013, 10:48:44 AM5/6/13
to
Over 90% of "we the people" want something, yet the Republicans say no
because OBAMA. This is the main problem with our government--the
whiny, crybabies in Washington who irrational hate Obama continue to
bog things down because OBAMA. That's why we can't get anything done.
There should be more through background checks and limitations on what
you can buy online. Anyone that can interpret the 2nd Amendment can
see that. See what I did there?
because OBAMA. This is the main problem with our government--the
whiny, crybabies in Washington who irrational hate Obama continue to
bog things down because OBAMA. That's why we can't get anything done.
There should be more through background checks and limitations on what
you can buy online. Anyone that can interpret the 2nd Amendment can
see that. See what I did there?
steveh99
May 6, 2013, 1:37:19 PM5/6/13
to
In article <040efe94-97b7-4332-b271-
c08dc8...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
c08dc8...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 5, 2:37ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > I never once feared having guns taken away. I don't think imposing
> > stiffer background checks and limiting magazine sizes on assault weapons
> > is overly unreasonable. IMO the average joe doesnt need a damn uzi or
> > anything like it..
> > You don't have to have the ability to cut a roomful of people down in
> > repid fire to get your point across, or protect your family
I totally agree!
> > I never once feared having guns taken away. I don't think imposing
> > stiffer background checks and limiting magazine sizes on assault weapons
> > is overly unreasonable. IMO the average joe doesnt need a damn uzi or
> > anything like it..
> > You don't have to have the ability to cut a roomful of people down in
> > repid fire to get your point across, or protect your family
AJ
May 6, 2013, 3:20:17 PM5/6/13
to
On May 4, 11:07 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <94182e5b-ef27-4d51-9d36-37e042c88657
> @n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
nothing to do with what anyone said in this thread.
> In article <94182e5b-ef27-4d51-9d36-37e042c88657
> @n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 10:11 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > In article <XnsA1B5E8B419397tattoovamp...@178.63.61.145>,
> > > sitt...@this.computer says...
>
> > > >http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
> > > > Stockpile-Myth
>
> > > Now watch AJ discount this
>
> > The world isn't lying. Dude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> > times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
> > sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) Like
> > I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
> > predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. The
> > government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. The
> > very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
> > and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> > Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. As we
> > speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
> > you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> > than the message.
>
> >https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 10:11 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > In article <XnsA1B5E8B419397tattoovamp...@178.63.61.145>,
> > > sitt...@this.computer says...
>
> > > >http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
> > > > Stockpile-Myth
>
> > > Now watch AJ discount this
>
> > The world isn't lying. Dude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> > times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
> > sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) Like
> > I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
> > predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. The
> > government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. The
> > very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
> > and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> > Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. As we
> > speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
> > you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> > than the message.
>
>
> You continue making the mistake of confusing me with someone that gives
> a shit.I do not!
> I know who is buying the guns/ammo and who isn't..
> You continue to let your hate for Obama to cloud your judgement.
> When idiots like you stop buying ammo and shit out of paranoia shit will
> get back to normal and it will LOL
And your reply has nothing to do with the topic, the truth, and has
> You continue making the mistake of confusing me with someone that gives
> a shit.I do not!
> I know who is buying the guns/ammo and who isn't..
> You continue to let your hate for Obama to cloud your judgement.
> When idiots like you stop buying ammo and shit out of paranoia shit will
> get back to normal and it will LOL
nothing to do with what anyone said in this thread.
AJ
May 6, 2013, 3:23:57 PM5/6/13
to
On May 4, 11:12 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <a6b6c705-9d6b-4c7e-86c8-
> 5455399f6...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
own or carry more than 8 bullets? Are YOU really this out of the loop
with current events? With every reply, YOU only expose that a typical
liberal like yourself, really has no idea what's going on.
> In article <a6b6c705-9d6b-4c7e-86c8-
> 5455399f6...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
> says...
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2:07 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that
> > > ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
>
> > I've never claimed to have bought any guns or ammo in the past 10
> > year
>
> Then why are you so worried about it? Another reason to bitch because a
> democrat sits in the White House!? Get over it already and stop using
> gun laws that dont exist to fuel your hate..
> There are no new gun laws and wont be! Just people that know how to make
> money off paranoid Obama haters
> Can you say that AJ? NONE!
They don't exist? Hmmm, is Chicago a gun free zone? Can New Yorkers
>
>
>
> > On May 4, 2:07 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > He doesn't want to shamefully admit to going out and buying all that
> > > ammo and those handguns his heroes told him to stockpile.
>
> > I've never claimed to have bought any guns or ammo in the past 10
> > year
>
> Then why are you so worried about it? Another reason to bitch because a
> democrat sits in the White House!? Get over it already and stop using
> gun laws that dont exist to fuel your hate..
> There are no new gun laws and wont be! Just people that know how to make
> money off paranoid Obama haters
> Can you say that AJ? NONE!
own or carry more than 8 bullets? Are YOU really this out of the loop
with current events? With every reply, YOU only expose that a typical
liberal like yourself, really has no idea what's going on.
AJ
May 6, 2013, 3:24:52 PM5/6/13
to
On May 5, 3:12 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> The funny thing is as far as AJ is concerned death to democrats for
> wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
> in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
> imposed a waiting period and background check..
> He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
> laws but he praised Reagan for supporting the same shit
Wrong and my past posts proves this.
> wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
> in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
> imposed a waiting period and background check..
> He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
> laws but he praised Reagan for supporting the same shit
AJ
May 6, 2013, 3:27:44 PM5/6/13
to
On May 6, 12:37 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> I totally agree!
You would. You still can't see as a liberal, you are willing to give
up more of your rights and let everyone else that lives in America
lose more of their's also.
> I totally agree!
You would. You still can't see as a liberal, you are willing to give
up more of your rights and let everyone else that lives in America
lose more of their's also.
AJ
May 6, 2013, 3:32:39 PM5/6/13
to
On May 5, 12:59 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> sometimes even Hollywood has a hard time competing with our group for
> entertainment points
Said the guy that's easily entertained and who actually reads and
> sometimes even Hollywood has a hard time competing with our group for
> entertainment points
replies to FVH. LOL! That alone belittles you more than anything I
could type back to you. You're too dumb to even notice you're being
used. If I was a liberal democrat loving Obama supporter, FVH would
be in here acting like the biggest Republican conservative.
AJ
May 6, 2013, 3:37:51 PM5/6/13
to
On May 5, 3:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> I saw a couple shops online that had ammo for handguns/rifles/shotguns
> There was even a shop that sold shells for a 28 gauge shotgun?
http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/03/Ammo-shortage.jpg
> There was even a shop that sold shells for a 28 gauge shotgun?
During the last panic—when ammo and components were in such short
supply—many people started throwing out conspiracy theories. Ammo
makers were deliberately making less ammo, or hoarding it to drive up
prices. That was not the case; the fact of the matter was avid
shooters and politically astute gun owners were worried about not
being able to get the ammo and components they needed, so they bought
a lot more than they usually did.
So why is it worse this time around?
First, ammunition manufacturers have been running at or near capacity
for at least 10 years. Some of their production is still earmarked for
military contracts, even though the U.S. military’s presence overseas
is being reduced. But the fact of the matter is most ammo makers have
barely recovered from the last ammo-buying panic. Nobody who makes
ammo has had it sitting around getting dusty on their shelves. They
were barely able to keep up with commercial demand before the country
went into panic-buying mode.
If the demand is so great, why aren’t Winchester, Remington and other
companies expanding so they can make and sell even more ammo? It’s not
that easy. First, to expand any business requires a lot of time and
money, and there are never any guarantees. Who’s to say next year
nobody buys any ammo because everybody bought it this year? In a
business as political as the gun and ammo industry, sales spikes are
common.
Hornady gets those questions so much they have a section on their
website that answers a lot of the frequently asked questions.
As to why they can’t just “make more,” Hornady’s response is simple:
“We’ve been steadily growing our production for a long time,
especially the last five years. We’ve added presses, lathes, CNC
equipment, people and space. Many popular items are produced 24 hours
a day. Several hundred Hornady employees work overtime every week to
produce as much as safely possible. If there is any question about that
—please take a tour of the factory. You’ll be amazed at what you see.”
As Hornady’s Neal Emery told me recently, “We are producing as much as
we can, much more than last year, which was a lot more than the year
before, etc. No one wants to ship more during this time than we do.”
That’s not to say ammunition makers aren’t expanding when and where
they can. Black Hills Ammunition recently moved into a much larger
facility. Remington has been toying around with the idea of expanding
their ammunition-making capabilities for quite some time.
“Even though we’re in the middle of panic buying, we don’t see the
demand for ammunition going away any time soon,” Keith Enlow, Freedom
Group’s senior vice president and ammunition manager, told a group of
writers recently.
Remington’s official line on their current ammunition production is as
follows: “Remington is at full capacity at this time in a majority of
categories of ammunition. We are continuing to look at how to increase
capacity and supply our ammunition products to the various channels of
distribution/sales that we support.”
Second, during the last big panic, it was really only the avid
shooters or politically active gun owners who saw a threat and
responded with hoarding—excuse me, “bulk purchasing.” This time, it
appears anyone who owned a gun perceived a threat, and anybody who
didn’t own a gun—but thought it might be a good idea to own one—not
only went out and bought a gun, but as much ammo as they could afford.
That’s another point. Since Obama took office, there have been 65
million NICS checks done. Even if only two-thirds of those resulted in
guns bought, that equates to 40 million new guns in the hands of
consumers. All those new guns need to be fed, in addition to all the
others still in the hands of consumers.
Is there a way to prevent such a shortage in the future? The only way
to sidetrack panic buying/hoarding is to have a huge surplus of ammo
on the market—which would probably drive the price down. Ammunition
makers aren’t keeping supplies in reserve to drive the price up;
honestly, at this point they could charge whatever they wanted—and
they would get it. As Emery told me, “As far as preventing this again,
we don’t have much to comment. We will continue to grow and expand our
capacity to meet high demand.”
I think the current situation is best summed up by what I heard a
clerk in my local gun store say to a customer: “We are not
experiencing a gun or ammo shortage. We are experiencing a customer
surplus.”
Read more: http://www.gunsandammo.com/2013/04/02/ammo-shortage/#ixzz2SXzf9xx3
FVH
May 7, 2013, 2:08:59 AM5/7/13
to
Why are you reading my posts, Killer, when you're supposed to be
"ignoring" FVH? Busted.
"ignoring" FVH? Busted.
FVH
May 7, 2013, 2:13:17 AM5/7/13
to
On May 6, 2:32 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> Said the guy that's easily entertained and who actually reads and replies to FVH. LOL!
You do it too, Professor. In fact, you're doing it right now. LOL!
> Said the guy that's easily entertained and who actually reads and replies to FVH. LOL!
> That alone belittles you more than anything I could type back to you.
word. Were you "belittled" when you got your ass kicked for loving
KISS?
> You're too dumb to even notice you're being used.
> If I was a liberal
> democrat loving Obama supporter,
You actually do support Obama...you just don't realize it, ya fucking
dummy. He's doing a LOT of the very things you claim to support. Psst,
he's closer to Bush than you want to admit.
> FVH would be in here acting like the biggest Republican conservative.
rant. Thanks for reading my posts!
FVH
May 7, 2013, 2:13:54 AM5/7/13
to
Guns and ammo? Nuff said.
On May 6, 2:37 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/03/Ammo-shortage.jpg
> http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/03/Ammo-shortage.jpg
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 3:02:56 AM5/7/13
to
In article <3ca4b4a0-835b-4078-842f-5e5f20a74117
@v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
> > > government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. ï¿œThe
@v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>
> On May 4, 11:07ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <94182e5b-ef27-4d51-9d36-37e042c88657
> > @n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 4, 10:11 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <XnsA1B5E8B419397tattoovamp...@178.63.61.145>,
> > > > sitt...@this.computer says...
> >
> > > > >http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
> > > > > Stockpile-Myth
> >
> > > > Now watch AJ discount this
> >
> > > The world isn't lying. ï¿œDude, go to your local gun store. 9 out of 10
> On May 4, 11:07ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <94182e5b-ef27-4d51-9d36-37e042c88657
> > @n11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 4, 10:11 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <XnsA1B5E8B419397tattoovamp...@178.63.61.145>,
> > > > sitt...@this.computer says...
> >
> > > > >http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/04/The-Great-DHS-Ammu...
> > > > > Stockpile-Myth
> >
> > > > Now watch AJ discount this
> >
> > > times they will tell you they are sold out of most of the ammo they
> > > sell. Here's a few hundred links you will ignore (posted below.) ï¿œLike
> > > I said in the first post of this thread, the libs here will do the
> > > predictable, move the goal post, and try to distort the truth. ï¿œThe
> > > government stockpiling guns and ammo is pretty common knowledge. ï¿œThe
> > > very fact that any of you even try to disprove this is pretty pathetic
> > > and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> > > Whether you want to believe the truth or not doesn't matter. ï¿œAs we
> > > and goes to show how much you don't know about this very topic.
> > > speak, some States are actually doing something about it. I now return
> > > you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> > > than the message.
> >
> > >https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient...
> >
> > You continue making the mistake of confusing me with someone that gives
> > a shit.I do not!
> > I know who is buying the guns/ammo and who isn't..
> > You continue to let your hate for Obama to cloud your judgement.
> > When idiots like you stop buying ammo and shit out of paranoia shit will
> > get back to normal and it will LOL
>
> And your reply has nothing to do with the topic, the truth, and has
> nothing to do with what anyone said in this thread.
As always when you dont have an argument were off topic
> > > you back to shooting the messengers that you're more interested in
> > > than the message.
> >
> > >https://www.google.com/webhp?source=search_app#safe=off&hl=en&sclient...
> >
> > You continue making the mistake of confusing me with someone that gives
> > a shit.I do not!
> > I know who is buying the guns/ammo and who isn't..
> > You continue to let your hate for Obama to cloud your judgement.
> > When idiots like you stop buying ammo and shit out of paranoia shit will
> > get back to normal and it will LOL
>
> And your reply has nothing to do with the topic, the truth, and has
> nothing to do with what anyone said in this thread.
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 3:04:47 AM5/7/13
to
In article <a066d649-834c-4bf8-bad6-
5208c3...@s18g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
whining about states you dont even live in
go download some new material
5208c3...@s18g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
whining about states you dont even live in
go download some new material
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 3:05:07 AM5/7/13
to
In article <9c26c617-e42c-4416-89c5-ad7c7d0d2634
@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>
> On May 5, 3:12ï¿œam, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > The funny thing is as far as AJ is concerned death to democrats for
> > wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
> > in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
> > imposed a waiting period and background check..
> > He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
> > laws ï¿œbut he praised Reagan for supporting the same shit
> On May 5, 3:12ï¿œam, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > The funny thing is as far as AJ is concerned death to democrats for
> > wanting stricter gun control laws. Reagan was his hero that was exempt
> > in his slams even though Reagan fully supported the Brady bill which
> > imposed a waiting period and background check..
> > He slams parents of slain 5 year olds for wanting stricter gun control
>
>
> Wrong and my past posts proves this.
LOLOL
>
> Wrong and my past posts proves this.
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 3:19:18 AM5/7/13
to
In article <c2053196-8c3b-416b-88ff-
04bc42...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
As usual you are totally clueless
04bc42...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 3:21:29 AM5/7/13
to
In article <cdfb26ef-bcbb-4f70-9703-7a002cae20b2
@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
.......But im not a liberal democrat
@e13g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 3:23:09 AM5/7/13
to
In article <abeb24d0-0c4d-45c6-9035-699395da3d01
@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
As always
@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 6, 2:37ï¿œpm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/03/Ammo-shortage.jpg
Its just another failed attempt to take jabs at parties he doesnt like
> > http://www.gunsandammo.com/files/2013/03/Ammo-shortage.jpg
As always
FVH
May 7, 2013, 3:32:59 AM5/7/13
to
I love how Killer gets upset that people don't see things in his
warped way. It has to frustrate him that people don't understand what
goes on in his schizo mind.
warped way. It has to frustrate him that people don't understand what
goes on in his schizo mind.
steveh99
May 7, 2013, 5:04:34 AM5/7/13
to
In article <c8074e3d-3ad3-44ed-8d87-8eaccdd217c7
@z10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
posting here for what? 16, 17 years now? I'm sure Aj was hoping to get
us all to follow in his beliefs that one party (his chosen party) is
more superior to the others and failed to do so.
He talks about rights taken away.. What about the rights of smokers in
many states where you cant smoke in a restaurant, bar, nightclub... What
about peoples rights to privacy? Should we say "PATRIOT ACT"?
AJ didn't seem to mind that too much did he
@z10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 7, 2:23ï¿œam, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > Its just another failed attempt to take jabs at parties he doesnt like
> > As always
I'm sure you're right about the frustration AJ has. We have all been
> > Its just another failed attempt to take jabs at parties he doesnt like
> > As always
posting here for what? 16, 17 years now? I'm sure Aj was hoping to get
us all to follow in his beliefs that one party (his chosen party) is
more superior to the others and failed to do so.
He talks about rights taken away.. What about the rights of smokers in
many states where you cant smoke in a restaurant, bar, nightclub... What
about peoples rights to privacy? Should we say "PATRIOT ACT"?
AJ didn't seem to mind that too much did he
Busboy Jefe
May 9, 2013, 2:30:08 PM5/9/13
to
On May 3, 2:26 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 5:18 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
>
> > AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > BTW, forgive me from posting a link from a site that isn't controlled
> > > by the libtards or the usual spoon fed propaganda you're used to.
>
> > Glenn Beck is a loon.
>
> > Bought into his gold scheme yet, AJ?
>
> Do you deny that this is a true story and is actually happening?
So let's review here:
Two dumb repubs from OK (I know, I know -- redundant) propose
legislation based on an Alex Jones conspiracy theory. Nuff said.
To quote James Inholfe, AMMO bill introductee and one colossally
stupid motherfucker: ..."there's no downside if I'm wrong about this."
So yay for repubs, introducing legislation to stop shit that ain't
happening! It doesn't matter if they're wrong! Well, I guess you need
something else to do when you're in between attempts at repealing
Obamacare.
The funny thing is, the bill basically says that Obama can't buy more
ammo than Bush did. Because you certainly don't want a black guy to
have more bullets than a white guy!
Simple fact: the amount of ammo purchased by DHS equaled 0.11% of the
entire firearms market.
Try reading this, Professor. I trust you won't claim that Military
Times is part of the "liberal media"? Here's a sample for you:
"Before we begin, it’s important to understand that an RFQ (request
for quote) or solicitation is not a purchase. When Infowars says
something like “the Department of Homeland Security is planning to buy
a further 750 million rounds of ammo in addition to the 450 million
rounds of hollow point bullets already purchased earlier this year,”
or “Following controversy over its purchase of around 1.2 billion
bullets in the last six months alone, the Department of Homeland
Security has put out a new solicitation for over 200 million more
rounds of ammunition,” the reader is led to assume, naturally, that
DHS has actually purchased that amount of ammunition. That is simply
not the case. A solicitation is the equivalent of a want-to-buy ad on
Craigslist, writ large. It’s not an actual purchase."
http://blogs.militarytimes.com/gearscout/2013/03/15/homeland-securitys-ammunition-purchases-should-not-worry-you/
El Jefe
> On May 1, 5:18 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
>
> > AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > BTW, forgive me from posting a link from a site that isn't controlled
> > > by the libtards or the usual spoon fed propaganda you're used to.
>
> > Glenn Beck is a loon.
>
> > Bought into his gold scheme yet, AJ?
>
> Do you deny that this is a true story and is actually happening?
So let's review here:
Two dumb repubs from OK (I know, I know -- redundant) propose
legislation based on an Alex Jones conspiracy theory. Nuff said.
To quote James Inholfe, AMMO bill introductee and one colossally
stupid motherfucker: ..."there's no downside if I'm wrong about this."
So yay for repubs, introducing legislation to stop shit that ain't
happening! It doesn't matter if they're wrong! Well, I guess you need
something else to do when you're in between attempts at repealing
Obamacare.
The funny thing is, the bill basically says that Obama can't buy more
ammo than Bush did. Because you certainly don't want a black guy to
have more bullets than a white guy!
Simple fact: the amount of ammo purchased by DHS equaled 0.11% of the
entire firearms market.
Try reading this, Professor. I trust you won't claim that Military
Times is part of the "liberal media"? Here's a sample for you:
"Before we begin, it’s important to understand that an RFQ (request
for quote) or solicitation is not a purchase. When Infowars says
something like “the Department of Homeland Security is planning to buy
a further 750 million rounds of ammo in addition to the 450 million
rounds of hollow point bullets already purchased earlier this year,”
or “Following controversy over its purchase of around 1.2 billion
bullets in the last six months alone, the Department of Homeland
Security has put out a new solicitation for over 200 million more
rounds of ammunition,” the reader is led to assume, naturally, that
DHS has actually purchased that amount of ammunition. That is simply
not the case. A solicitation is the equivalent of a want-to-buy ad on
Craigslist, writ large. It’s not an actual purchase."
http://blogs.militarytimes.com/gearscout/2013/03/15/homeland-securitys-ammunition-purchases-should-not-worry-you/
El Jefe
AJ
May 9, 2013, 6:58:29 PM5/9/13
to
On May 7, 4:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> I'm sure you're right about the frustration AJ has. We have all been
> posting here for what? 16, 17 years now? I'm sure Aj was hoping to get
> us all to follow in his beliefs that one party (his chosen party) is
> more superior to the others and failed to do so.
> He talks about rights taken away.. What about the rights of smokers in
> many states where you cant smoke in a restaurant, bar, nightclub... What
> about peoples rights to privacy? Should we say "PATRIOT ACT"?
> AJ didn't seem to mind that too much did he
He didn't? I say Google me. I've never approved of the Patriot Act.
> I'm sure you're right about the frustration AJ has. We have all been
> posting here for what? 16, 17 years now? I'm sure Aj was hoping to get
> us all to follow in his beliefs that one party (his chosen party) is
> more superior to the others and failed to do so.
> He talks about rights taken away.. What about the rights of smokers in
> many states where you cant smoke in a restaurant, bar, nightclub... What
> about peoples rights to privacy? Should we say "PATRIOT ACT"?
> AJ didn't seem to mind that too much did he
Follow along or shut up.
AJ
May 9, 2013, 7:05:56 PM5/9/13
to
On May 7, 2:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
> the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
> whining about states you dont even live in
> go download some new material
"states you dont even live in" That one phrase proves you're a
> LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
> the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
> whining about states you dont even live in
> go download some new material
libtard. Because we all know liberals don't give a fuck about anyone
else but themselves and don't care about any issue unless it's in
their backyard or happening to them personally. The topic and our
*continued* argument is about gun control on all levels. Keep up or
shut up. So far, you can't do either. Again, typical liberal.
AJ
May 9, 2013, 7:09:18 PM5/9/13
to
Does this mean you're finally going to have the balls to tell us what
Obama has done to piss you off like you claimed? No? Still can't
bring yourself to let your little liberal fingers type that out yet?
Figures.
Obama has done to piss you off like you claimed? No? Still can't
bring yourself to let your little liberal fingers type that out yet?
Figures.
AJ
May 9, 2013, 7:26:29 PM5/9/13
to
>
> El Jefe
And you still bow and try to defend your master Obama who is
threatening to take executive orders because he didn't get more with
his agenda with more gun control. Like I said in the very first post
of this thread, the libtards will move the goal posts and try to twist
and distort the facts and the truth. Maybe one day even you will
realize how predictable and gullible liberals like you are, and how
easy it is to manipulate dumb libs. Instead of desperately trying to
find any link to rely on, you should take a look outside, travel, and
experience the real world and find out just how wrong your ideology
is. Unless you're truly brain dead and haven't noticed, lawmakers
across the nation are trying to overturn many things this stupid
administration pulled out of their ass and slung at Americans.
steveh99
May 9, 2013, 9:39:19 PM5/9/13
to
In article <0e0b24f9-dbc7-4b29-a354-
e0d8b4...@i3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
LOL you never slammed your hero Bush either
e0d8b4...@i3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com
says...
steveh99
May 9, 2013, 9:41:20 PM5/9/13
to
In article <8b0d6c0c-7173-4d9a-92ec-e7b96e1b4052
@v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
I do care but not about the same tired, retarded crap you're always
whining about..
You knew as well as I did that there would be no new federal gun laws..
You're just a blowhard that got suckered into buying another handgun and
ammo for it
@v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
whining about..
You knew as well as I did that there would be no new federal gun laws..
You're just a blowhard that got suckered into buying another handgun and
ammo for it
steveh99
May 9, 2013, 9:51:35 PM5/9/13
to
In article <9882aeae-27d0-4e4f-b3b3-416f3d635867
@v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
lol why does this matter? I have spoken out about the President's FAILED
federal stimulus effort. How I disapproved of the pork barrel garbage
spending this stimulus involved.
I didn't disapprove of the stimulus effort because some stimulus was
needed to try and get the economy rolling again. But as I said before I
will say it again. There was too much tax payer money wasted on BS
projects.
I think he should have asked for a lot less money and actually spent it
on job creation not the bs..
I never claimed to have liked Obama. I never said I didn't like him..
Like most past presidents he has his good points and his not so good
points.. He seems weak in many critical areas and strong in others..
But unlike you I dont sit around stewing in my hatred for a president
because he is/was of a different party, different color, different
creed..
You are nothing less of a self adorning, self righteous,egotistical male
chauvenist bigot!
@v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
federal stimulus effort. How I disapproved of the pork barrel garbage
spending this stimulus involved.
I didn't disapprove of the stimulus effort because some stimulus was
needed to try and get the economy rolling again. But as I said before I
will say it again. There was too much tax payer money wasted on BS
projects.
I think he should have asked for a lot less money and actually spent it
on job creation not the bs..
I never claimed to have liked Obama. I never said I didn't like him..
Like most past presidents he has his good points and his not so good
points.. He seems weak in many critical areas and strong in others..
But unlike you I dont sit around stewing in my hatred for a president
because he is/was of a different party, different color, different
creed..
You are nothing less of a self adorning, self righteous,egotistical male
chauvenist bigot!
Busboy Jefe
May 9, 2013, 9:54:07 PM5/9/13
to
On May 9, 6:26 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> And you still bow and try to defend your master Obama who is
> threatening to take executive orders because he didn't get more with
> his agenda with more gun control.
Your hero Ronnie Raygun used executive orders like they were going out
> And you still bow and try to defend your master Obama who is
> threatening to take executive orders because he didn't get more with
> his agenda with more gun control.
of style. So did Bush 1 and The Shrub. BUT Obama!
> Like I said in the very first post
> of this thread, the libtards will move the goal posts and try to twist
> and distort the facts and the truth. Maybe one day even you will
> realize how predictable and gullible liberals like you are, and how
> easy it is to manipulate dumb libs.
laughing at this latest Alex Jones conspiracy theory. Fuck, if even
Faux News can perform actual acts of journalism in dismantling this
crap, what does that say about the few of you morons left who actually
believe in it?
Please prove that Obama has actually purchased all of this ammo as
your hero Alex Jones claims. James Inhofe can't despite proposing the
legislation. Let's see if you can, Professor.
> Instead of desperately trying to
> find any link to rely on, you should take a look outside, travel, and
> experience the real world and find out just how wrong your ideology
> is.
Infowars theories to back up your nutjob ideology.
> Unless you're truly brain dead and haven't noticed, lawmakers
> across the nation are trying to overturn many things this stupid
> administration pulled out of their ass and slung at Americans.
Bachmann, James "Climate Change Is A Hoax" Inhofe, and Paul "Never
Grew Out Of My Teenage Ayn Rand Worship" Ryan.
Be proud!
El Jefe
Busboy Jefe
May 9, 2013, 10:04:32 PM5/9/13
to
On May 9, 8:51 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> lol why does this matter? I have spoken out about the President's FAILED
> federal stimulus effort. How I disapproved of the pork barrel garbage
> spending this stimulus involved.
The stimulus didn't fail, Steve. It simply didn't.
> lol why does this matter? I have spoken out about the President's FAILED
> federal stimulus effort. How I disapproved of the pork barrel garbage
> spending this stimulus involved.
> I didn't disapprove of the stimulus effort because some stimulus was
> needed to try and get the economy rolling again. But as I said before I
> will say it again. There was too much tax payer money wasted on BS
> projects.
> I think he should have asked for a lot less money and actually spent it
> on job creation not the bs..
miraculous that he got what he did given the petulant children
opposing his every move.
History proves that you cannot get out of a recession without
spending. The austerity crap is failing everywhere. How anyone could
have believed otherwise is beyond me.
If we'd actually had a fiscally conservative president in office
between 2001 and 2009, things would be different. If we'd had a
president who followed proven history and *raised* fucking taxes while
starting two wars instead of just putting them on a credit card,
things would be different. If we'd had a president who'd enacted
socialized medicine that had been paid for rather than putting it said
credit card, things would be different.
But you won't hear that from The Professor. All that shit was just
fine then. BUT Obama....
El Jefe
FVH
May 9, 2013, 10:51:30 PM5/9/13
to
What Killer fails to understand is many of his fat rights were taken
away LONG before Obama took office. Killer clearly doesn't understand
the world around him, so he resorts to barking out right wing run of
mill babble.
away LONG before Obama took office. Killer clearly doesn't understand
the world around him, so he resorts to barking out right wing run of
mill babble.
FVH
May 9, 2013, 10:52:56 PM5/9/13
to
Getting frustrated because RMAK isn't "ignoring" FVH like you "are",
fat boy? LOL! I still have complete control over you.
fat boy? LOL! I still have complete control over you.
FVH
May 9, 2013, 10:53:51 PM5/9/13
to
You've freely admitted many times that you don't give a shit about
anyone else but yourself. Using your own "logic" that makes you a fat
liberal. LOL!!!!
anyone else but yourself. Using your own "logic" that makes you a fat
liberal. LOL!!!!
FVH
May 9, 2013, 10:54:52 PM5/9/13
to
You need to see a professional about your anger and delusions, schizo
faggot.
faggot.
FVH
May 9, 2013, 10:56:04 PM5/9/13
to
Why are you so damn bitter all the time, Mr. "I'm a happy go lucky
guy" Johnson? Calm down and enjoy life for a moment, you wound up
piece of shit.
guy" Johnson? Calm down and enjoy life for a moment, you wound up
piece of shit.
Tattoo Vampire
May 10, 2013, 7:24:01 AM5/10/13
to
FVH <jarj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why are you so damn bitter all the time, Mr. "I'm a happy go lucky
> guy" Johnson? Calm down and enjoy life for a moment, you wound up
> piece of shit.
Hard core right wingers are, by and large, a bitter and angry lot.
> Why are you so damn bitter all the time, Mr. "I'm a happy go lucky
> guy" Johnson? Calm down and enjoy life for a moment, you wound up
> piece of shit.
83LowRider
May 10, 2013, 8:16:30 AM5/10/13
to
> Hard core right wingers are, by and large, a bitter and angry lot.
difference, if politics take your life over to the point of
being 'hard-core', you're destined to be pretty miserable.
Just ask Bill Ayers...
FVH
May 10, 2013, 1:46:57 PM5/10/13
to
True, but Killer seems more bitter than his fellow right wingers.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 11:31:55 AM5/11/13
to
On May 9, 8:39 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <0e0b24f9-dbc7-4b29-a354-
> e0d8b46c8...@i3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
You should really Google me instead of trying to rewrite our past
arguments.
> In article <0e0b24f9-dbc7-4b29-a354-
> e0d8b46c8...@i3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com
arguments.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 11:33:10 AM5/11/13
to
On May 9, 8:41 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <8b0d6c0c-7173-4d9a-92ec-e7b96e1b4052
> @v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
> In article <8b0d6c0c-7173-4d9a-92ec-e7b96e1b4052
>
>
>
> > On May 7, 2:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
> > > the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
> > > whining about states you dont even live in
> > > go download some new material
>
> > "states you dont even live in" That one phrase proves you're a
> > libtard. Because we all know liberals don't give a fuck about anyone
> > else but themselves and don't care about any issue unless it's in
> > their backyard or happening to them personally. The topic and our
> > *continued* argument is about gun control on all levels. Keep up or
> > shut up. So far, you can't do either. Again, typical liberal.
>
> I do care but not about the same tired, retarded crap you're always
> whining about..
> You knew as well as I did that there would be no new federal gun laws..
> You're just a blowhard that got suckered into buying another handgun and
> ammo for it
Again, not true and again, watch the fucking news and know the world
>
>
> > On May 7, 2:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
> > > the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
> > > whining about states you dont even live in
> > > go download some new material
>
> > "states you dont even live in" That one phrase proves you're a
> > libtard. Because we all know liberals don't give a fuck about anyone
> > else but themselves and don't care about any issue unless it's in
> > their backyard or happening to them personally. The topic and our
> > *continued* argument is about gun control on all levels. Keep up or
> > shut up. So far, you can't do either. Again, typical liberal.
>
> I do care but not about the same tired, retarded crap you're always
> whining about..
> You knew as well as I did that there would be no new federal gun laws..
> You're just a blowhard that got suckered into buying another handgun and
> ammo for it
around you.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 11:35:32 AM5/11/13
to
On May 9, 8:51 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> In article <9882aeae-27d0-4e4f-b3b3-416f3d635867
> @v14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
card.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 11:45:43 AM5/11/13
to
typed out. BTW, Obama has already spent more in 2013 than he did in
2012 and we're only into the fifth month of this year. But yeah,
"there isn't a spending problem." Obama spent more in his first term
than Bush did in two terms. BUT what do we see here in the now in
good ole 2013? Well it's the same irresponsible copout from weak tit
liberals still blaming Bush and never accepting responsibility for the
mistakes from their own side.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 11:48:53 AM5/11/13
to
On May 10, 6:24 am, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
> Hard core right wingers are, by and large, a bitter and angry lot.
Especially when an incompetent leader orders a stand down and lets
Americans die and then lies to us so he can get back to campaigning.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 11:50:13 AM5/11/13
to
FVH
May 11, 2013, 12:26:43 PM5/11/13
to
"Google me" doesn't get you off the fat hook, Detective.
FVH
May 11, 2013, 12:27:04 PM5/11/13
to
Ironic, isn't it?
FVH
May 11, 2013, 12:28:10 PM5/11/13
to
Calling you racist isn't "playing the race card", you fat slob. You
ARE racist, and you've freely admitted that several times over the
years. "Google" yourself if you want SOLID PROOF.
ARE racist, and you've freely admitted that several times over the
years. "Google" yourself if you want SOLID PROOF.
FVH
May 11, 2013, 12:31:51 PM5/11/13
to
On May 11, 10:45 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> And anyone who works for a living knows that's a pile of shit you just typed out.
Sitting behind a counter, trolling RMAK and "googling" "Jarid Jones"
> And anyone who works for a living knows that's a pile of shit you just typed out.
all day isn't work, Professor.
> BTW, Obama has already spent more in 2013 than he did in 2012 and we're only into the fifth month of this year.
> But yeah, "there isn't a spending problem." Obama spent more in his first term than Bush did in two terms.
mean he didn't spend, you moron.
> BUT what do we see here in the now in good ole 2013? Well it's the same irresponsible copout from weak tit liberals still blaming Bush and never accepting responsibility for the mistakes from their own side.
to bring yourself to acknowledge his strengths. It KILLS you to see a
black man running OUR country. By the way, how's the "civil war" prep
coming along? LOL!!!!
FVH
May 11, 2013, 12:33:29 PM5/11/13
to
On May 11, 10:48 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> Especially when an incompetent leader orders a stand down and lets Americans die
Bush lets thousands of Americans die. Where's your fat rage about
> Especially when an incompetent leader orders a stand down and lets Americans die
that?
> and then lies to us so he can get back to campaigning.
Racist liberal.
FVH
May 11, 2013, 12:34:27 PM5/11/13
to
It's so sad that you have only one HOOD RAT on your "side", Killer. On
the bright side that's one more friend than what you have in real
life!
On May 11, 10:50 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> Obama did, lol.
the bright side that's one more friend than what you have in real
life!
> Obama did, lol.
AJ
May 11, 2013, 4:08:02 PM5/11/13
to
steveh99
May 11, 2013, 4:51:23 PM5/11/13
to
In article <3d3659e6-0013-46b5-8c08-0f1eb9da6084
@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
> > > libtard. ï¿œBecause we all know liberals don't give a fuck about anyone
> > > *continued* argument is about gun control on all levels. ï¿œKeep up or
> > > shut up. ï¿œSo far, you can't do either. ï¿œAgain, typical liberal.
> >
> > I do care ï¿œbut not about the same tired, retarded crap you're always
@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, misfits...@aol.com says...
>
> On May 9, 8:41ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <8b0d6c0c-7173-4d9a-92ec-e7b96e1b4052
> > @v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 7, 2:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > > LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
> > > > the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
> > > > whining about states you dont even live in
> > > > go download some new material
> >
> > > "states you dont even live in" ï¿œThat one phrase proves you're a
> On May 9, 8:41ï¿œpm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > In article <8b0d6c0c-7173-4d9a-92ec-e7b96e1b4052
> > @v9g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>, misfitskiss...@aol.com says...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 7, 2:04 am, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:
> > > > LOL when this topic started out it was a federal matter now even after
> > > > the feds voted the law measure down you jump from federal level to
> > > > whining about states you dont even live in
> > > > go download some new material
> >
> > > libtard. ï¿œBecause we all know liberals don't give a fuck about anyone
> > > else but themselves and don't care about any issue unless it's in
> > > their backyard or happening to them personally. ï¿œThe topic and our
> > > *continued* argument is about gun control on all levels. ï¿œKeep up or
> > > shut up. ï¿œSo far, you can't do either. ï¿œAgain, typical liberal.
> >
> > I do care ï¿œbut not about the same tired, retarded crap you're always
> > whining about..
> > You knew as well as I did that there would be no new federal gun laws..
> > You're just a blowhard that got suckered into buying another handgun and
> > ammo for it
>
> Again, not true and again, watch the fucking news and know the world
> around you.
SSDD
> > You knew as well as I did that there would be no new federal gun laws..
> > You're just a blowhard that got suckered into buying another handgun and
> > ammo for it
>
> Again, not true and again, watch the fucking news and know the world
> around you.
Tattoo Vampire
May 11, 2013, 5:28:25 PM5/11/13
to
AJ <misfits...@aol.com> wrote:
> Obama did, lol.
Your hero held hands with a member of the Saudi royal family, which has
tacitly approved acts of terrorism.
I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on average
aren't as smart as liberals.
Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
> Obama did, lol.
Your hero held hands with a member of the Saudi royal family, which has
tacitly approved acts of terrorism.
I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on average
aren't as smart as liberals.
Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
Armin Von Roon
May 11, 2013, 7:04:33 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 16:51:23 -0400, steveh99 wrote:
> SSDD
Dude, you're one stupid fucker. 99 percent of your replies are idiotic
jumbles of shit consisting of a few words or one paragraph. You've
probably never started an original thread in any group.
> SSDD
Dude, you're one stupid fucker. 99 percent of your replies are idiotic
jumbles of shit consisting of a few words or one paragraph. You've
probably never started an original thread in any group.
mss
May 11, 2013, 7:14:15 PM5/11/13
to
Armin Von Roon spoke unto us saying:
> Dude, you're one stupid fucker. 99 percent of your replies are idiotic
> jumbles of shit consisting of a few words or one paragraph. You've
> probably never started an original thread in any group.
Sooo... what you're saying is: it takes *you* twice as many
words to say the same thing? Chuckle riiiiiight.
--
Later on,
Mike
> Dude, you're one stupid fucker. 99 percent of your replies are idiotic
> jumbles of shit consisting of a few words or one paragraph. You've
> probably never started an original thread in any group.
words to say the same thing? Chuckle riiiiiight.
--
Later on,
Mike
steveh99
May 11, 2013, 7:15:59 PM5/11/13
to
In article <kmmiq1$3gb$3...@dont-email.me>, he...@socks.r.us says...
..And I care what you think because?
steveh99
May 11, 2013, 7:22:50 PM5/11/13
to
It leaves you one less invalid thing to whine about.
83LowRider
May 11, 2013, 8:09:18 PM5/11/13
to
Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on
> average aren't as smart as liberals.
>
> Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
Wow. A two line generic statement with no evidence.
> I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on
> average aren't as smart as liberals.
>
> Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
Let's put that to the test in real terms...
Do you think the average registered conservative
makes more or less than a registered democrat?
"Financially, Republicans fare better than either
Democrats or Independents, and tend to identify
themselves as such. Republican candidates gain a
significantly higher percentage of votes from
individuals with incomes over $50,000 per year,
and the advantage increases along with the income
level, to a height of 63 percent of individuals
earning $200,000 or more a year supporting
Republicans. This level is the direct inverse of
individuals earning less than $15,000 a year, who
support Democrats at 63 percent and Republicans
at only 36 percent."
Did you catch that? Just how fucking smart is a
democrat who can't earn above 15k a year?
"Republicans also express a much higher level of
satisfaction with their personal financial
situation than either Democrats or Independents.
Before the U.S. economy's downturn, an all-time
high of 81 percent of Republicans expressed
satisfaction with their personal financial situation.
That number dropped to 61 percent in 2009, but it
is still significantly higher than the corresponding
52 percent of Independents and 49 percent of Democrats."
So fuck you again... you're spouting unsupported claims
in this arena.
If you strictly want to speak 'education'... would it
be a surprise that most college students over the last
few decades have been churned out thru a very
liberal education system? Does it surprise you that
all the liberal arts students tend to lean democrat?
Let's continue --
"On average, Republicans are more charitable financially
and otherwise than either Democrats or Independents.
Despite the perception that they're stingy - either because
of personal wealth or policy positions that don't advocate
for a government-backed public safety net - numerous studies
have found American Republicans to be among the most generous
people on earth, and not just financially. Republicans also
provide more volunteer hours and donate blood more frequently."
Dems... always talking about helping others. Proof is in the
puddin'.
And finally --
"For the past several decades, Republicans have
also won a larger percentage of votes from white
voters with undergraduate degrees, although this
support has been eroding over the past few election
cycles, from an impressive 20-point advantage in
1988 to a 4-point advantage in 2008."
http://www.debt.org/faqs/americans-in-debt/economic-demographics-republicans/
Flying Fickle Finger of Fate
May 11, 2013, 9:36:47 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 19:22:50 -0400, steveh99 wrote:
> If you dislike my posts so much then killfile them lol It leaves you one
> less invalid thing to whine about.
What's the highest grade you completed, hairball?
> If you dislike my posts so much then killfile them lol It leaves you one
> less invalid thing to whine about.
Busboy Jefe
May 12, 2013, 2:39:37 PM5/12/13
to
On May 11, 7:09 pm, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> > I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on
> > average aren't as smart as liberals.
>
> > Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
>
> Wow. A two line generic statement with no evidence.
> Let's put that to the test in real terms...
It appears you overlooked the smiley he put at the end of his
> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> > I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on
> > average aren't as smart as liberals.
>
> > Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
>
> Wow. A two line generic statement with no evidence.
> Let's put that to the test in real terms...
(obvious) crack.
The proof is in the puddin', alright...just look at who those
"educated" repubs attempt to elect.
Also noted: funny that you have stated that you don't hold degrees in
high esteem, yet will trot out these polls/blog posts when it fits
your desired narrative.
El Jefe
Busboy Jefe
May 12, 2013, 2:50:03 PM5/12/13
to
On May 11, 4:28 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:
> I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on average
> aren't as smart as liberals.
>
> Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
Let's add some fuel to the fire:
"The authors predicted that a lower cognitive ability, as measured by
the subject’s intelligence quotient or I.Q., would lead to greater
social prejudice in adulthood. The authors also hypothesized
beforehand that the social prejudice would lead the subjects to
endorse “right-wing ideologies”, namely “social conservatism” and
“right-wing authoritarianism.”
Turns out, the authors were right on all counts."
"Democrats, it seems, have a greater tolerance for uncertainty have
because of their larger anterior cingulate cortexes, and Republicans
are more sensitive to fear, because of their larger right amygdalas."
"Dodson noted that conservative ideologies lend themselves to
“structure and order” and might be better suited to those with less
cognitive capacity."
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/studies-continue-to-show-that-liberals-are-smarter-than-conservatives/question-3335313/
Scared with a lower cognitive capacity. Now who does THAT remind me
of...
El Jefe
> AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> > Obama did, lol.
>
> Your hero held hands with a member of the Saudi royal family, which has
> tacitly approved acts of terrorism.
BUT Obama!
> > Obama did, lol.
>
> Your hero held hands with a member of the Saudi royal family, which has
> tacitly approved acts of terrorism.
> I read a study a while back. It concluded that conservatives on average
> aren't as smart as liberals.
>
> Thanks for helping to bear out their findings, AJ. :-D
"The authors predicted that a lower cognitive ability, as measured by
the subject’s intelligence quotient or I.Q., would lead to greater
social prejudice in adulthood. The authors also hypothesized
beforehand that the social prejudice would lead the subjects to
endorse “right-wing ideologies”, namely “social conservatism” and
“right-wing authoritarianism.”
Turns out, the authors were right on all counts."
"Democrats, it seems, have a greater tolerance for uncertainty have
because of their larger anterior cingulate cortexes, and Republicans
are more sensitive to fear, because of their larger right amygdalas."
"Dodson noted that conservative ideologies lend themselves to
“structure and order” and might be better suited to those with less
cognitive capacity."
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/studies-continue-to-show-that-liberals-are-smarter-than-conservatives/question-3335313/
Scared with a lower cognitive capacity. Now who does THAT remind me
of...
El Jefe
83LowRider
May 12, 2013, 8:31:41 PM5/12/13
to
> It appears you overlooked the smiley he put at the end of his
> (obvious) crack.
putting AJ down. None of it was addressed to me
regardless... so the smiley didn't play into my reply.
> The proof is in the puddin', alright...just look at who those
> "educated" repubs attempt to elect.
NONE of them represented a majority. Not Gingrich, Bachmann
nor Romney. That said, let's flip it around. Who would you say are
three great dem candidates? Who of those three would a majority
of dems want to see elected? Hillary??? because her last name is
Clinton? Another Kerry or maybe a Pelosi or Reid? No... there's
not a standout candidate on either side of the aisle. No one person
will be a representation of 100 million people.... much less 300
million. These bozos we have in DC are crooked to the core for
the most part. The fact a Reid or a Mark Sanford can be elected
over and over just fucking amazes me.
> Also noted: funny that you have stated that you don't hold degrees in
> high esteem, yet will trot out these polls/blog posts when it fits
> your desired narrative.
2) I have NEVER said a degree wasn't to be held in esteem.
NEVER. I HAVE said that a degree is not a guarantee of
having common sense. I've said attaining a degree is nothing
more than perseverance and determination. And what the
degree is IN can always be a factor as well.
FVH
May 12, 2013, 11:16:14 PM5/12/13
to
You probably actually DO have posters on your wall because you're 13,
fat boy.
fat boy.
FVH
May 12, 2013, 11:16:48 PM5/12/13
to
Oh look, a sock puppet.
FVH
May 12, 2013, 11:17:46 PM5/12/13
to
Oh look, someone found a new sock puppet toy and is using it taking
their fat anger out on Steve. LOL!!!
On May 11, 8:36 pm, Flying Fickle Finger of Fate <he...@socks.r.us>
wrote:
their fat anger out on Steve. LOL!!!
wrote:
steveh99
May 13, 2013, 8:08:45 AM5/13/13
to
In article <437356b3-ce48-4021-aba5-98d2d943c7d5
@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...
> On May 11, 6:04ï¿œpm, Armin Von Roon <he...@socks.r.us> wrote:
> > Dude, you're one stupid fucker. 99 percent of your replies are idiotic
> > jumbles of shit consisting of a few words or one paragraph. You've
> > probably never started an original thread in any group.
Its probably Bronco
> > Dude, you're one stupid fucker. 99 percent of your replies are idiotic
> > jumbles of shit consisting of a few words or one paragraph. You've
> > probably never started an original thread in any group.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages