How to post like RMAK conservatives

[Tattoo Vampire]

It's very easy. Just say "fuck" a lot and throw in "Obama" and "liberal".
Make sure you spit those last two words like a curse.

Bonus points for mentioning guns, the deficit, socialism and God.

[steveh99]

In article <XnsA1BEA960241...@178.63.61.145>,
sit...@this.computer says...

>
> It's very easy. Just say "fuck" a lot and throw in "Obama" and "liberal".
> Make sure you spit those last two words like a curse.
>
> Bonus points for mentioning guns, the deficit, socialism and God.

LOL well said

[FVH]

"Google me" seems to be a common phrase with RMAK conservatives as
well. Also, "America" and "we the people" get a lot of play.

Hi, Killer! Hope you enjoyed reading this post!
FVH
Good ole RMAK. Where the majority swears off "scab KISS" then
wrights a review of the new album the week it comes out. LOL!-
Professor AJ
Yes I know that and I know they gained that power under Obama's
watch.-Professor AJ on China's nukes.
This was passed in 2008 under Obama.- AJ, political guru
Wait and see. Paul is not going to name the new KISS album what Gene
was
going to call his solo boxset.-AJ, KISS "expert"
Laughter is an emotion-Professor AJ Johnson, channeling his feminine
feelings.
You wrongfully misinterpreting another post noted.-AJ, English major
I love how people like you consternate so much time and effort-
Professor AJ Johnson.
10 years ago your posts were better written and your grammar was
better than what they are now.-AJ.
Pssst. Obama has been president for 7 years and you suck at math.-AJ,
2009
LOL! I doubt imergration is reading your posts.-Speeling bea
chaump, AJ.
McCain wins 2008 Election.This is what will be printed on every
newspaper next week. Wait and see.-AJ, proving that he's an idiot.
our new commander and chief.- AJ, talking politics.
Stadiums have no walls!- AJ
*Geeks with key boards aren't intimidating.-AJ
You made a boneheaded 'observation' about Ace, and you're a fool.
That's pretty much it.- Hidell, making a brilliant point about AJ.
Twinkle Toes Stanley hadn't quite picked up that Lick It Up/
Heaven's On Fire half a ballerina dance that he does.- db
How many times can the Greed Twins milk a cow? As many times as the
sheep will let them.-db

[AJ]

On May 12, 3:39 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:

How to post like RMAK liberals:
Ignore current events, move the goal posts when they're brought up,
mock everyone that has an ounce of patriotism, get on a high horse and
pretend to be too smart to believe in a God and belittle anyone that
has faith while at the same time showing faith into a Muslim promising
hope and change, spend the whole 8 years Bush was in office bashing
him, then act totally shocked anyone has the nerve to say anything bad
about Obama, then defend Obama by blaming all his mistakes on Bush.

[FVH]

On May 14, 11:10 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> How to post like RMAK liberals: Ignore current events,

Says the guy who thought Obama was in office 7 years in 2009 and
thinks RR was pro-guns.

> move the goal posts when they're brought up,

You mean like you do in any debate that goes over your head.

> mock everyone that has an ounce of patriotism,

Patriotism is a word idiots like you use to hide behind the flag while
spreading your hate. Patriotism doesn't exist, except in your fat,
schizo head.

> get on a high horse and pretend to be too smart to believe in a God

Jefe has you in a rage, eh Killer?

> and belittle anyone that has faith

Which you have none.

> while at the same time showing faith into a Muslim

Solid proof Obama is Muslim, Detective.

> promising hope and change,

Pretty sure every politician runs on some sort of "hope and change"
platform, dummy.

> spend the whole 8 years Bush was in office bashing him,

Actually, Bush was more bashed during his 2nd term than in his 1st.
Idiot.

> then act totally shocked anyone has the nerve to say anything bad about Obama,

Who's "shocked", Professor? Shit, you and your HOOD RATS are reacting
exactly how we said you would. In fact, you're doing the very thing I
said you'd be doing by posting this rant. Psst, you're so predictable
and aren't surprising anyone.

> then defend Obama by blaming all his mistakes on Bush.

No, we point out Bush's mistakes when you try to blame things he did
on Obama or you bitch about something Obama is doing that Bush did
himself.

Nice rant, fat stack.

[steveh99]

In article <f8e73a4f-7c7d-4ba1-9c8a-063565eb7486
@j4g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, jarj...@gmail.com says...

He is such a fucking hypocrite.. Talks about faith while spewing hate

[FVH]

It's exactly like those who would protest bands like KISS in the early
80s. They would hide behind religion to promote their nutjob theories.
Killer has no faith, has never read the Bible, doesn't understand God,
nor understand what it means to be a true Christian. He's your
stereotypical dumb redneck who spews faith while hating those who
aren't white.

[Tattoo Vampire]

AJ <misfits...@aol.com> wrote:

> How to post like RMAK liberals:

How to follow up like an RMAK conservative:

muslimsocialistkenyaobamaobamaobamagodguns

[Busboy Jefe]

On May 12, 3:39 pm, Tattoo Vampire <sitt...@this.computer> wrote:

And don't forget: Benghazi!

El Jefe

[AJ]

On May 14, 10:18 pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And don't forget: Benghazi!

We won't.

[FVH]

"We" won't, as if you have anyone on your fat "side", Killer.

On May 15, 12:02 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> We won't.

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> Bonus points for mentioning guns, the deficit, socialism and God.
>
> And don't forget: Benghazi!

Carney and Hillary sure tried to get us to forget
about it. You want to constantly bring up past
deeds and have us forget about the present?

[AJ]

Liberal logic: "Pay no attention to what's going on this week. Let's
get back to blaming Bush for something that happened 12 years ago."

[AJ]

On May 14, 1:06 pm, steveh99 <steve...@roadrunner.com> wrote:

> He is such a fucking hypocrite.. Talks about faith while spewing hate

And if you can comprehend what I typed you will see that's exactly
what I didn't do. Again, you have no point or you just made up
another lie again, OR you're just really that fucking stupid.

[FVH]

Benghazi didn't happen last week, dummy. All that's "going on" in
regards to that is bitter idiots like you trying to find something
that isn't there--you know like WMDs in Iraq.

[FVH]

Ironic, isn't it?

[Busboy Jefe]

On May 16, 7:19 am, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

There's nothing TO Benghazi. You are all trying to make it into
something more than what it was. I brought up the past deeds simply to
illustrate the fact that no one in here currently whining about
BenghaziBenghaziBenghazi! did anything of the sort when any of the
events I listed happened.

As far as "forgetting"...don't make me laugh. Not when you have people
like Cheney out there trying to gloss over 9/11.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On May 16, 2:45 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

Benghazi was 8 months ago. Nuff said.

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> Carney and Hillary sure tried to get us to forget
>> about it. You want to constantly bring up past
>> deeds and have us forget about the present?
>
> There's nothing TO Benghazi.

That's just nonsense. It IS a story that was manipulated
to feed the masses. It IS a story of gov't failing to come
to the aid of americans... americans who were put there
BY the gov't. Americans who had a reasonable expectation
that the gov't would watch over them and respond to
any trouble. Is it a BIG story in the grand scheme of things?
No.. not by just looking at the body count. But this ain't
about the body count... this is about how we left those
americans there to die. And the entire time, those in
DC were actually watching the events take place. If it
had been YOUR father or son there -- it sure as hell
would have been a 'big deal'.

Obama sure called in the marines when HE was getting
rained on, but had no sympathy for those facing a rain
of gunfire.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/marines-called-in-to-hold-umbrellas-for-obamas-press-conference/2013/05/16/50adb7ac-0ad3-4bd6-a25b-a281bfc64b1a_video.html

> You are all trying to make it into
> something more than what it was. I brought up the past deeds simply to
> illustrate the fact that no one in here currently whining about
> BenghaziBenghaziBenghazi! did anything of the sort when any of the
> events I listed happened.

Why don't you tell us then, "what it was". Are you saying
it wasn't 'anything'... that we should just say 'fuckit, shit
happens'? Muslims attacked americans on 9-11 and
Bush took action against them. Should Bush have also
just said 'fuckit, shit happens'?

> As far as "forgetting"...don't make me laugh. Not when you have people
> like Cheney out there trying to gloss over 9/11.

Cheney can spew whatever he wishes. All you or I can
do is to agree or disagree with his individual statements.

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> Liberal logic: "Pay no attention to what's going on this week. Let's
>> get back to blaming Bush for something that happened 12 years ago."
>
> Benghazi was 8 months ago. Nuff said.

And? It wasn't until now that congress was allowed to
hear from those that were there at the time. In the world
of Washington DC, eight months is nothing. Are you
saying it would be appropriate to have senate hearings
four months ago, but that eight months is too long?

Forget about whatever Hillary says or the lady claiming
a video was at fault.... forget whatever the fuck they
had to say about it.... if you want to get to the real story
you have to ask those that were there. You have to
tell us what the communications at the time were. THEN
we can make the judgement on Hillary/Barrack/whoever.
There is a story here -- a story of what actually happened
and how those people were ignored. It doesn't deserve
being brushed under a rug. Within 3 days we knew every
single fucking detail of the Boston brothers. America
DEMANDED to know. This should be no different.

[AJ]

IRS and AP scandal this week AND liberal media finally reporting the
Benghazi incident and testimony about it from this week . Nuff said

[Busboy Jefe]

On May 17, 12:43 am, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

> > There's nothing TO Benghazi.
>
> That's just nonsense. It IS a story that was manipulated
> to feed the masses. It IS a story of gov't failing to come
> to the aid of americans... americans who were put there
> BY the gov't. Americans who had a reasonable expectation
> that the gov't would watch over them and respond to
> any trouble. Is it a BIG story in the grand scheme of things?
> No.. not by just looking at the body count. But this ain't
> about the body count... this is about how we left those
> americans there to die. And the entire time, those in
> DC were actually watching the events take place. If it
> had been YOUR father or son there -- it sure as hell
> would have been a 'big deal'.
>
> Obama sure called in the marines when HE was getting
> rained on, but had no sympathy for those facing a rain

> of gunfire.http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/marines-called-in-to-hold-umbr...

>
> > You are all trying to make it into
> > something more than what it was. I brought up the past deeds simply to
> > illustrate the fact that no one in here currently whining about
> > BenghaziBenghaziBenghazi! did anything of the sort when any of the
> > events I listed happened.
>
> Why don't you tell us then, "what it was". Are you saying
> it wasn't 'anything'... that we should just say 'fuckit, shit
> happens'?

No, that responsibility falls on YOU. Tell me: where is this "cover
up"? Where? You've all had months now to show your hand, and you have
jack shit. You're flinging shit against the wall, hoping something
will stick. Hell, even this big "revelation" about WH emails that were
"leaked" is a buncha nothing.

And yeah, not to belittle the loss of four lives -- but shit happens.
This is sometimes a price that's paid for doing business in areas of
the world don't that have people who don't fucking like us.

It's clear mistakes were made. This has been acknowledged. So again,
where's the cover up? Do you believe Obama "let Americans die"?"

> Muslims attacked americans on 9-11 and
> Bush took action against them. Should Bush have also
> just said 'fuckit, shit happens'?

You're really going to compare 9/11 to Benghazi in any capacity?
Scraping the bottom of the barrel, brutha.

Bush "took action" after repeated warnings, sure enough. And THEN had
a dozen Benghazi-like events happen afterwards. BUT Obama!

No, you don't just say "fuck it". You investigate. You determine if
and where mistakes were made and take steps to correct it. Is this not
what's happened re: Benghazi? Has anyone from the Obama admin come out
and said "fuck it"?

Benghazi is now little more than a continued attempt to rip on Obama
and to derail a Clinton 2016 run.

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

Again: 8 months to present this great "cover up"? Where is it?

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> Why don't you tell us then, "what it was". Are you saying
>> it wasn't 'anything'... that we should just say 'fuckit, shit
>> happens'?
>
> No, that responsibility falls on YOU. Tell me: where is this "cover
> up"? Where? You've all had months now to show your hand, and you have
> jack shit. You're flinging shit against the wall, hoping something
> will stick. Hell, even this big "revelation" about WH emails that were
> "leaked" is a buncha nothing.

I'm not much concerned with any 'cover-up'. It is a given
at this point that the original story was fabricated bullshit.
Who the 'blame' should be put on doesn't even really
matter... tho in the end, someone usually loses their job
over events such as this.

> And yeah, not to belittle the loss of four lives -- but shit happens.
> This is sometimes a price that's paid for doing business in areas of
> the world don't that have people who don't fucking like us.

> It's clear mistakes were made. This has been acknowledged. So again,
> where's the cover up? Do you believe Obama "let Americans die"?"

When you make a mistake in DC it usually has consequences.
I want to see Hillary or Obama come out and say 'we fucked
up' by not sending in backup. Then I want to see someone
lose their job. I don't think that's being too harsh, especially
considering lives were lost. I also want an accounting on why
others that were there, were not allowed to talk. Why did
the second in command get scolded for giving an interview
and then demoted to a lower position after the interview?
The incident wasn't huge, but this president promised us
a clean and open administration... then tried their best to
sweep this entire incident under the rug.

>> Muslims attacked americans on 9-11 and
>> Bush took action against them. Should Bush have also
>> just said 'fuckit, shit happens'?
>
> You're really going to compare 9/11 to Benghazi in any capacity?
> Scraping the bottom of the barrel, brutha.

What I'm saying is very simple.. and the scale doesn't matter
one bit. When we are attacked by muslim extremists... we do
whatever the fuck we can to make an example of them. It is
believed that we know the main guy behind this -- and he's
still walking around unpunished. When it happens in Boston
or at the World Trade Center --- is no different than it
happening at a US consulate flying the American flag.

> Bush "took action" after repeated warnings, sure enough. And THEN had
> a dozen Benghazi-like events happen afterwards. BUT Obama!

This really has nothing to do with Bush other than a comparison
I made following a different muslim attack. I think any president
would have done the same after 9-11. And apparently your
newest catchphrase is now "but Obama". Reagan, Carter,
Clinton, Bush and Bush are in the history books.

> No, you don't just say "fuck it". You investigate. You determine if
> and where mistakes were made and take steps to correct it. Is this not
> what's happened re: Benghazi? Has anyone from the Obama admin come out
> and said "fuck it"?

Uhh, yeah.. kinda. Hillary screaming "what difference does it make"
show me nothing but indifference.

Fuck all these hearings and media nonsense. The WH should
just fire a couple people and tell us 'yes, we should have
sent in some backup, we fucked up'. It was election time
and BO wanted to be seen as having some kind of handle
on terrorism. Which is a word he still virtually refuses to use.

> Benghazi is now little more than a continued attempt to rip on Obama
> and to derail a Clinton 2016 run.

He's not getting any more or less attention that any other
president has gotten over their mistakes. He watched those
people die and he went out the next day and had a nice round
of golf.

[83LowRider]

This just popped up on my homepage as well.

"At this point, according to CNN, most Americans
do not think Republicans have overplayed their
hand on either the Benghazi or IRS controversies.
Gallup finds that 74 percent on the IRS and 69
percent on Benghazi find these situations "serious
enough to warrant continuing investigation."

"More Republicans than Democrats or Independents
say these three issues are very important to the
nation, but even among Democrats, nearly half say
the matters are very serious," says CNN polling
director Keating Holland."

[Busboy Jefe]

So now a poll of the very people you consider to be not very bright
matters? I'll bet a lot of those same people thought Clinton getting
hummer was "very serious" as well...

El Jefe

[Busboy Jefe]

On May 19, 5:37 pm, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:

> This really has nothing to do with Bush other than a comparison
> I made following a different muslim attack. I think any president
> would have done the same after 9-11. And apparently your
> newest catchphrase is now "but Obama". Reagan, Carter,
> Clinton, Bush and Bush are in the history books.

It's a phrase that works very well in here. The Obama double standard
is obvious.

And you know quite well that a president's policies -- or lack thereof
-- can have effects felt long after they're in the books.

> > No, you don't just say "fuck it". You investigate. You determine if
> > and where mistakes were made and take steps to correct it. Is this not
> > what's happened re: Benghazi? Has anyone from the Obama admin come out
> > and said "fuck it"?
>
> Uhh, yeah.. kinda. Hillary screaming "what difference does it make"
> show me nothing but indifference.

Context matters:

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans.
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk
one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What
difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out
what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever
happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer
your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in
real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I
understand, going with the other committees to explain how these
talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my
perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these
militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to
justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the
meantime.

> Fuck all these hearings and media nonsense. The WH should
> just fire a couple people and tell us 'yes, we should have
> sent in some backup, we fucked up'. It was election time
> and BO wanted to be seen as having some kind of handle
> on terrorism. Which is a word he still virtually refuses to use.

I don't think Obama had to worry about having a handle on terrorism.

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> "More Republicans than Democrats or Independents
>> say these three issues are very important to the
>> nation, but even among Democrats, nearly half say
>> the matters are very serious," says CNN polling
>> director Keating Holland."
>
> So now a poll of the very people you consider to be not very bright
> matters? I'll bet a lot of those same people thought Clinton getting
> hummer was "very serious" as well...

Who is it that I don't consider 'bright'? There are people
that know about shit going on in the political world... and
there's those that don't. Those that don't -- maybe it just
ain't their 'thang... I'm not judging them as being bright or
stupid or anything else. Those that DO keep up with politics
have (usually) very rigid opinions.. but that has nothing to
do with who is bright or who isn't. You can't take 100 million
libs or repubs and say one side is smarter than the other, it's
way too huge a sampling size. And regarding the poll... it was
released today and deals exactly with what we were speaking
about... so I posted it. Nothing more.. nothing less. And by the
poll ---> it says that half of the dems think it's a very serious
matter.

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

> I'll bet a lot of those same people thought Clinton getting
> hummer was "very serious" as well...

Getting some head isn't 'very serious'. Telling lies while
under oath to congress OTOH, is quite serious.

[AJ]

On May 19, 1:48 pm, Busboy Jefe <busboyj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, that responsibility falls on YOU. Tell me: where is this "cover
> up"? Where?

Psssst. Keep up. Last week they proved the White House changed the
their report 12 times. 12 times to the point of what was released was
a lie.

[AJ]

Does any poll change the fact of what's really happening now? No.

[FVH]

Who is this "they" you speak of, dumbass? Lemme guess: a chain e-mail
told you this, right?

[FVH]

Do chain e-mails, blogs, youtube, or things created in your fat schizo
mind change the fact of what's really happening now? No.

[Busboy Jefe]

On May 20, 4:21 pm, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:

Tell it to your master, padawan -- I'm not the one who posted the
poll.

El Jefe

[83LowRider]

Busboy Jefe wrote:

>> This really has nothing to do with Bush other than a comparison
>> I made following a different muslim attack. I think any president
>> would have done the same after 9-11. And apparently your
>> newest catchphrase is now "but Obama". Reagan, Carter,
>> Clinton, Bush and Bush are in the history books.
>
> It's a phrase that works very well in here. The Obama double standard
> is obvious.

Would you not agree that Bush took a lot of shit
during his time in office? He was burned in effigy,
painted as a modern day Hitler, had tons of websites
talking the evils of him, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. There
were many Bush protests and dems aplenty that hated him in
both the political and citizen arenas. Where is this double
standard you speak of??? is it just in here that you're
constantly claiming this happened?

>> Uhh, yeah.. kinda. Hillary screaming "what difference does it make"
>> show me nothing but indifference.

> Context matters:

Yes, it does. And she played it like a drama queen.
She shouted it like it was a personal insult that she
was ultimately responsible. This would be considerably
less 'bad' had they not been begging for more security.
They asked and were denied. Then they were attacked and
asked for help... and they were denied. This falls squarely on
the desk on Hillary.

>> Fuck all these hearings and media nonsense. The WH should
>> just fire a couple people and tell us 'yes, we should have
>> sent in some backup, we fucked up'. It was election time
>> and BO wanted to be seen as having some kind of handle
>> on terrorism. Which is a word he still virtually refuses to use.
>
> I don't think Obama had to worry about having a handle on terrorism.

Again, this isn't a huge event in the course of American History.
But it IS on a scale of many other political disasters. Careers
are often made or lost on such events... and they should be.
While this isn't 100% Hillarys fault, it is CERTAINLY
PARTIALLY her fault. And isn't that how we judge and
elect our officials? We look at their history of how they
have dealt with shit, the shit they've said <or mis-said>
and form our opinions. Fuck dude... why would ANYONE
back Hillary as a politician in the first place? She was
everything I'd think you would hate -- a corporate lawyer
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2008/03/14/hillary-clinton-corporate-lawyer/
that married a career politician. They lucked into the
WH <thanks to Ross Perot> and then became lifelong
political figures by moving to NY <a state she had no
affiliation with> to use her name to become senator.

Another classic example of the status quo, a Yale/Harvard
type lawyer with political aspirations of riches and grandeur.
And it worked like a fucking charm.

[AJ]

On May 21, 4:52 am, "83LowRider" <83lowri...@nywilldo.com> wrote:
> Would you not agree that Bush took a lot of shit

Like the Patriot Act that Joe Biden wrote/drafted.


https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/946898_648422395171569_2103232359_n.jpg

[FVH]

LOL! I love how you think you've made a point, but in reality you
haven't. Keep 'em coming, fat ass in stockings.

On May 21, 10:12 am, AJ <misfitskiss...@aol.com> wrote:
> Like the Patriot Act that Joe Biden wrote/drafted.
>

> https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/946898_6484223...