His posts did originally cause some of us (at least, me) to tend towards
sympathy for the Jewish, Zionist, Masonic, etc., sides of the arguments. I
was inclined to counter his posts mainly because his posts were so one sided
and hateful although sometimes I was incline to respond because I had actual
personal experience which were the opposite of some of his copied
claims/opinions and because he had no actual personal experience regarding
most of his claims/opinions.

His techniques were frequently of the same nature as his claims against the
Jewish/Zionists/Masons/etc.:

1) using old quotes (and complaining when I used old historical facts)

2) using old opinions which are no longer considered valid by the majority
of scholars/historians/scientists (again complaining when I used old
historical facts)

3) using older "historical" ideas which are no longer supported by
archeological evidence (again complaining when I used old historical facts)

4) constantly rehashing the same claims frequently by reposting the same
quoted/copied materials...over and over and over (as if by simple repetition
an argument is proved)

5) claiming to disprove scientific theories and evidence with no
proof/evidence of his own

6) resorting to demeaning name calling when unable to provide adequate
argument for "his" positions

7) visably unable to use accepted logical processes/techniques/arguments
when attempting to discuss/debate a position

8) etc.

All of which much are amazingly similar the techniques he constantly claimed
the "Zionist controlled" media (as he constantly called them) were using!

Many of us (again, at least, me) tried to remain neutral and provide some
balance while attempting to discover the truth about some of his
anti-Jewish, anti-Zionist, anti-Masonic, etc., claims.