Extreme Fighting Championship 3. My thoughts:

[Eternal Domain]

Hello.

Let's start off with the obvious! The production of this event is no where
near the quality of the Ultimate Fighting Championship. I could not
believe that during the Gene Labell interview they cut him off as he is
accepting an award of some type. Horrible. This events production, had
the professionalism of the local high school cable shows that are aired.

I'm sure that the announcers have their credentials for being selected to
announce and interview, but I can guarantee it isn't on quality of past
performance. This event is just horribly announced, horribly put together,
and horribly presented to us as viewers. On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being
best, the EFC 3 received a 3 (just above local cable channel events). It
was interesting how the announcer mentioned that the kicks to the kidney
don't cause any damage, when in the World Combat Championships, and the
Ultimate Fighting Championships, the announcers with actual grappling
backgrounds say that the kicks to the kidneys DO cause a cumulative effect
on the fighter receiving the blows. This is just one example that I can
think of off the top of my head.

Battlecade still has not learned from the Ultimate Fighting Championship on
how to put on a event.

The fights on the other hand were (for the most part) more entertaining to
watch, than Ultimate Fighting Championship 11. I do hope the Ultimate
Ultimate Fighting Championship #2 is more entertaining than the above.

--
,\ | /,
(o o)
~~~~~~~~~~~oOOo(_)oOOo~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Eternal Domain "Making tomorrows games"
Email us at: e_do...@earthlink.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~