>BACKLASH QUO VADIS
>
>Richard Barrett
>
>News-outlets around the country have been reporting on the "backlash"
>against "Obamanation". I have been quoted, numerous times, saying
>that the raising of the flag of the "Republic of New Africa" over the
>White House would be considered, by many, as an "act of war," which
>would so polarize the nation as to bring about a complete turnabout.
>"Obamanation" would wind up, ironically, catapulting the majority
>over the minorities and democracy over tyranny. But, "quo vadis"? How
>will it happen? "Backlash" has, already, been characterized, by some,
>as mere handfuls of disgruntled electors or, even, of psychos, bent
>on re-enacting some sort of bizarre "B-movie."
>
>With the elevation of Barack Obama, however, "all bets are
>off," so far as Obamans predicting the ultimate outcome. The
>political-cauldron has simply boiled over, so intensely as to scorch
>the very process which has allowed for an orderly state-of-affairs,
>up to this point. My own appeal has been for peaceful solutions,
>ousting "Omanamation" through impeachment, resignation or attrition.
>But, sentiment, such as the "Black Hand" in Serbia and the
>"Republican Army" in Ireland, is notorious for not listening. One
>newspaper even accused me of being a "moderate," for not calling for
>assassination. Instead, I summon protest, pressure and defiance,
>peacefully.
>
>However, with the economic-system in collapse and the
>social-structure in ruins, the bottom falling out will generate disorder.
>The "race-war" against Americans by Negroes has been going on
>since the Civil Rights Bill, forcing Americans to move away from
>cities and slums. However, the backlash is only now erupting through
>riots in prisons, civil-disobedience in schools and desertion in the
>military. Bringing order out of such chaos must be the priority for
>the New America, but organizing the clamor is the key to success.
>This means that emerging backlash-spokesmen must attract sufficient
>attention, to draw support, but, also, reflect discernment, to avoid
>hotheadedness.
>
>It is not necessary to sport outlandish attire, provocative grimaces
>or vulgar language. A clear message, stout-hearted posture and
>personal charisma will suffice. It is counter-productive to woo the
>people to phantom groups, imaginary numbers and vaunted promises.
>The objective must be to raise the level of resentment and channel
>energy down productive avenues, such as speaking, running for
>office, broadcasting, publishing and writing. Not to say that the
>flood-waters of backlash will not overflow their banks, but the
>yeoman engineering-feat is now to keep the waterway of social-change
>confined within the bounds of ostracism, without spilling over into
>anarchy.
>
>There could be such occurrences as general strikes or boycotts, where
>the masses simply refuse to cooperate in their own destruction. There
>will be the more personal offensives, where Americans refuse to buy
>from minorities, truck with aliens or even speak to Obamans. Such
>a great "silence" will, in and of itself, speak louder than any clash
>on the streets. Civil-disobedience is bound to take place and is
>perfectly proper, provided that it does not go over-the-top, in terms
>of repelling, rather than attracting, public-sentiment. Some will
>suffer injury, be jailed and be martyred, but the upheaval will begin
>remaking the nation and, even, the world, all over again.
>
>To unsubscribe from Crosstarlist:
>http://www.nationalist.org/contact/unsubscribe.php
>
>To subscribe to Crosstarlist:
>http://www.nationalist.org/contact/subscribe.php
>
>To comment on Crosstarlist:
>http://www.nationalist.org/contact/comment.php
>
>To read this article on the Crosstar website:
>http://www.nationalist.org/freetip/2008/120701.html
>
>To listen to this piece through Crosstar audio:
>http://www.nationalist.org/news/pod/pod.mp3
>
>Crosstarlist
>Trademark/service of nationalist.org
>Not necessarily Crosstarlist views
>Copyright 2008 The Nationalist Movement
>
Worth reading and forwarding to one and all.
ted
What with modern telecommunications, there's no reason not to disperse
white power across the country side and in small towns where there are
no rich target zones for terrorism.
"Day Brown" <dayh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ae6d1c7$0$21934$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com...
Negroes are attacking native americans? Never heard of that one before. Or
do you mean white immigrants?
I believe he is blithering about the white immigrants being attacked by
their baggage.
Gunner, Ojibawa
"Upon Roosevelt's death in 1945, H. L. Mencken predicted in his diary
that Roosevelt would be remembered as a great president, "maybe even
alongside Washington and Lincoln," opining that Roosevelt "had every
quality that morons esteem in their heroes.""
He was to much of a socialist with a bit to little respect for the
constitution for my taste. The new deal didn't seem to work either. It did
provide jobs but as with nearly all government jobs they failed to create
wealth. We recovered more slowly than most other nations.
As a person who gets his power from the TVA I do have to admit this
government project does seem to have worked out rather well but it and the
Park service are kind of unique that way.
Okay the post office works. They didn't always lose money either. Times they
are a changing.
Recently researchers have been studying the Great Depression..and have
determined that if FDR had simply kept his hands off the economy..it
would only have lasted 5 yrs..not the 11 that everyone rode out. Ending
only with the US becoming supplier for those fighting the Axis Powers.
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409.aspx?RelNum=5409
Of course this is simply another similarity to the Great Depression Part
Deux that we are currently moving into. But this time it wont last
nearly as long, because the far leftwing will be dead in less than 3
yrs.
Gunner
"IMHO, some people here give Jeff far more attention than he deserves,
but obviously craves. The most appropriate response, and perhaps the
cruelest, IMO, is to simply killfile and ignore him. An alternative, if
you must, would be to post the same standard reply to his every post,
listing the manifold reasons why he ought to be ignored. Just my $0.02
worth."
Maybe I need to put aside my other small knives and just keep this handy?