Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Genuinely not spam: an email recommendation

0 views
Skip to first unread message

ian smith

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 2:13:22 PM7/23/08
to
Thanks to Ewan for letting me know about Google's free email system. I can
wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone who is in the same boat I was :
broken email and/or reduced to using a second hand PC with somebody else's
mail on it. The Google mail thing is easy and quick to use.

--
----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----

Tosser

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 3:13:15 PM7/23/08
to
ian smith wrote:
> Thanks to Ewan for letting me know about Google's free email system. I can
> wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone who is in the same boat I was :
> broken email and/or reduced to using a second hand PC with somebody else's
> mail on it. The Google mail thing is easy and quick to use.
>

Welcome to the 21st Century Ian! Sorry you had to let Rhodesia go,
still, that Mugabe chap's made a good fist of it, what?! Tootle pip!

JugglerPeter

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 3:17:27 PM7/23/08
to

I actually will recommend you take a look at Yahoo's new email system,
since you are just now discovering efficient web based systems. They
changed it recently so it looks and feels like a stand-alone email client
when you use it. I'm kicking myself for switching away to gmail since I
really like yahoo's new interface.

^Tom_

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 4:44:59 PM7/23/08
to

Gmail's offering of IMAP and POP access is the big difference for me here
- you can get at your messages if you want to directly, whereas with a web
only system (as Yahoo has become for standard users I believe), you're
kinda stuffed if you want all your messages - in fact, whilst POP is
reasonably common, IMAP (the significantly better) is rare to offer.

That's why for free personal mail, I'll continue to use Gmail until things
change. (Yahoo don't totally fail at opening up their stuff, their aerial
imagery is libre, which is rare - and better than google's)

Little Paul

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 11:32:09 AM7/24/08
to
On 2008-07-23, JugglerPeter <pe...@jugglerpeter.com.nospam.com> wrote:
>
> I'm kicking myself for switching away to gmail since I
> really like yahoo's new interface.

If you're worried about switching email providers because that means
telling everyone that you've got a new email address - then I may
as well plug www.juggler.net - which is an email forwarding service
for jugglers, which gives you anythin...@juggler.net - which
you can then point at gmail, yahoo, msn or wherever.

Did I mention that juggler.net is free?

-Paul
--
paulseward.com - a photo a day for 2008
100jugglers.org - 100 pieces of signed juggling promotional material

ian smith

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 1:53:02 PM7/24/08
to

By the time I was at school, Ian Smith - the politician to whom you refer
- was old news; but the Aussie soap opera Neighbours was getting really
popular and my classmates noticed that I had the same name as the actor
who played Harold Bishop. So I was known as "Harold" for a while.

qrk

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 2:10:34 PM7/24/08
to
On 23 Jul 2008 19:17:27 GMT, pe...@jugglerpeter.com.nospam.com
(JugglerPeter) wrote:

Gmail's POP/SMTP service is free. All you need to do is check off a
box. Yahoo, at last look a couple years ago, want money to utilize
their POP/SMTP service.

--
Mark

JugglerPeter

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 8:44:04 PM7/24/08
to

> Gmail's offering of IMAP and POP access is the big difference for me here
> - you can get at your messages if you want to directly, whereas with a web
> only system (as Yahoo has become for standard users I believe), you're
> kinda stuffed if you want all your messages - in fact, whilst POP is
> reasonably common, IMAP (the significantly better) is rare to offer.
>
> That's why for free personal mail, I'll continue to use Gmail until things
> change. (Yahoo don't totally fail at opening up their stuff, their aerial
> imagery is libre, which is rare - and better than google's)
>
>


I used to care about that - in fact, my previous email provider was
selected primarily based on having imap. However, I realized recently
that I check my email from so many different computers (2 locations of
work, a laptop, and at home), that I really don't care about having
pop/imap since I'm going to use the web client exclusively. If having pop
access is important to you, then you're right, gmail is the way to go.
Yahoo will probably keep charging for non-web access for the foreseeable
future.

JugglerPeter

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 8:45:49 PM7/24/08
to
Little Paul wrote:
>
> On 2008-07-23, JugglerPeter <pe...@jugglerpeter.com.nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm kicking myself for switching away to gmail since I
> > really like yahoo's new interface.
>
> If you're worried about switching email providers because that means
> telling everyone that you've got a new email address - then I may
> as well plug www.juggler.net - which is an email forwarding service
> for jugglers, which gives you anythin...@juggler.net - which
> you can then point at gmail, yahoo, msn or wherever.
>
> Did I mention that juggler.net is free?
>
> -Paul

That would be the smart thing to do. In fact I own a couple domains. If
I were really smart, I would set up a forward on one of those. But that
might take 5 minutes of my time, so I probably won't bother.

^Tom_

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 7:17:31 AM7/25/08
to

I agree, I don't use the imap for my gmail usually, but the freedom to get
my messages from google if ever i decide to stop using their service is a
not insignificant feature.

popstar_dave

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 9:33:36 AM7/25/08
to
Little Paul wrote:
>
> On 2008-07-23, JugglerPeter <pe...@jugglerpeter.com.nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm kicking myself for switching away to gmail since I
> > really like yahoo's new interface.
>
> If you're worried about switching email providers because that means
> telling everyone that you've got a new email address - then I may
> as well plug www.juggler.net - which is an email forwarding service
> for jugglers, which gives you anythin...@juggler.net - which
> you can then point at gmail, yahoo, msn or wherever.
>
> Did I mention that juggler.net is free?
>
> -Paul

Whatever you do, don't direct anythin...@juggler.net to
anythin...@juggler.net. If you do that you'll break teh intanetz.

It's a bit like doing a google search for "google".

Dave

popstar_dave

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 9:37:33 AM7/25/08
to
ian smith wrote:
>
> By the time I was at school, the Aussie soap opera Neighbours was getting

really
> popular and my classmates noticed that I had the same name as the actor
> who played Harold Bishop.

Hehehe... I find it amusing that a fair population of the UK know the
name of that actor, yet I, living in Australia, don't. I'll just blame
the fact that I'm not usually home from work at 6.30-7.00pm weekdays to
watch it.

Dave

Little Paul

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 9:43:16 AM7/25/08
to
On 2008-07-25, popstar_dave <dche...@gmail.com.nospam.com> wrote:
>
> Whatever you do, don't direct anythin...@juggler.net to
> anythin...@juggler.net. If you do that you'll break teh intanetz.

Thankfully the redirection setup process is clever enough[1] to sort that
out.

-Paul
Well, most of them are. I can't vouch for all of them

markool89

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 9:59:12 AM7/25/08
to

You live in Australia?! How come i didnt know that?! :-/

ian smith

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 10:04:29 AM7/25/08
to

The thing is, Dave, when Neighbours got popular here, it was instantly
MASSIVE. I think it's due mainly to the I-discovered-it-myself factor,
back then there was no internet and no in-house advertising on television.
People would only find out about Neighbours if one of their pals told them
or if they happened to catch it themselves. The end result was that
schoolkids and housewives everyehere would discuss the latest plot
developments in awed and breathless tones. Maybe that's a lesson for
advertisers - minimalism works if the product is good enough!

crazy hippy

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 1:18:37 PM7/25/08
to
On Jul 23, 3:13 pm, Tosser <tos...@juggler.net.no.spam.ta> wrote:

> still, that Mugabe chap's made a good fist of it, what?! Tootle pip!

Wow. This is the most excellently brittish thing I've ever read.

KooKie

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 1:55:35 PM7/25/08
to

I was going to comment on it too :), It deserves a medal!

JugglerPeter

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 3:18:13 PM7/25/08
to

I remember why I didn't set up a forward when I set up my other emails -
It's because I wanted to be able to have the same outgoing as ingoing
email, without my emails looking like spam. Is there any way to have
juggler.net do that?

Fabio Pinna

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 4:32:47 PM7/25/08
to
On 25 Jul 2008 19:18:13 GMT, pe...@jugglerpeter.com.nospam.com (JugglerPeter)
wrote:

>I remember why I didn't set up a forward when I set up my other emails -
>It's because I wanted to be able to have the same outgoing as ingoing
>email, without my emails looking like spam. Is there any way to have
>juggler.net do that?

You can setup most email clients (and Gmail, too) to make sure that the
address you send from is always the same as the address you received with.

Fab.

popstar_dave

unread,
Jul 26, 2008, 8:57:19 AM7/26/08
to

"...if the product is good enough" Are you kidding me?! We're talking
about 'Neighbours' here. I must admit that I've never watched an episode
of 'Eastenders', but if 'Neighbours' is regarded as a good product over
there, then the UK soapie market has a lot to answer for. Although I must
admit that it must have something going for it, as it's got a fair
following in both our countries, which is a big ask for a low-budget TV
soap that's been around for 22 years.

Cheers,
Dave

popstar_dave

unread,
Jul 26, 2008, 9:00:18 AM7/26/08
to

Erm... because you didn't ask?

It's not really a secret. I've discussed it a fair bit in the past
(mainly as a vehicle for lamenting how few conventions I get to). But as
you "----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----" you'll be able to spot
my little Aussie flag below my profile picture.

Anyway, any reason for the curiosity? Got plans for a trip out here?
Maybe on the 26th-29th of September for the Melbourne Juggling Convention?
</shameless plug>

Cheers,
Dave

markool89

unread,
Jul 28, 2008, 10:00:03 AM7/28/08
to

Oh, how dumb am i?! i should of noticed the flag! :-/
Anyway i said it because i know someone which lives there. :-)
So now i will make sure i keep an eye on the flag for people from now on.
(^_^)

-Mark-

popstar_dave

unread,
Jul 29, 2008, 2:33:21 AM7/29/08
to

You're not going to ask if I know them? I mean, there's only 21 million
of us, so chances are that I do.

Dave

0 new messages