Juggling, not good news
Rootberry
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
--
----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----
Boppo
wrote:
> Google says:http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
>
> --
> ----== posted viawww.jugglingdb.com==----
It's even worse than you can possibly imagine:
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=poi%20&cmpt=q
-boppo
Adam Rowney
Thats all Italy's fault :P
Dave Altman
G.A.R
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=poi%20%2C%20juggling&cmpt=q
Currently it looks like they will intersect around 2012. Coincidence?
deenaf
that is super funny. i mean a graph chart?! for poi?! whats more...
new zealand, the cultural home of POI, is not even listed.
Boppo
> Boppo wrote:
>
> > On Dec 22, 7:39 pm, rootberryr...@gmail.com.nospam.com (Rootberry)
> > wrote:
>
> says:http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
>
>
>
> > > --
> > > ----== posted viawww.jugglingdb.com==----
>
> > It's even worse than you can possibly imagine:
>
> >http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=poi%20&cmpt=q
>
> > -boppo
>
>
> Currently it looks like they will intersect around 2012. Coincidence?
>
> --
> ----== posted viawww.jugglingdb.com==----
Maybe it means the Mayans were misunderstood. They might have meant
the world won't actually end in 2012, but rather, that, when poi
overtakes juggling, it won't make any difference whether it will end
or not, so you might as well toss your calendar.
-boppo
Sondre �verby
That seems fairly reasonable to me.
Sondre
Sondre �verby
Well, maybe this is an indicator that people have learned how to by now
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=how%20to%20juggle&cmpt=q
Sondre
Rhidders
>
> Rootberry wrote:
> >
> > Google says:
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> >
>
> Well, maybe this is an indicator that people have learned how to by now
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=how%20to%20juggle&cmpt=q
>
>
> Sondre
>
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=world%20juggling%20federation&cmpt=q
I am not suprised that the USA is a top result for a WJF search. But this
link
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=world%20juggling%20federation%2Cjason%20garfield&cmpt=q
shows Jason is more popular than his creation. Come on world! Sort
yourself out!!
LOL
Dave Altman
> shows Jason is more popular than his creation.
I thought it was interesting that it accurately had a spike at the release
(March 10, 2006) of the Chris Bliss Diss. Garfield did ride the coattails
of Chris Bliss, but that popularity has disappeared for both of them. They
may both still be getting some benefits from that period, though.
Dave Altman
Dave Altman
>
> Rhidders wrote:
>
> > shows Jason is more popular than his creation.
>
> I thought it was interesting that it accurately had a spike at the release
> (March 10, 2006) of the Chris Bliss Diss. Garfield did ride the coattails
> of Chris Bliss, but that popularity has disappeared for both of them. They
> may both still be getting some benefits from that period, though.
>
> Dave Altman
Comparing certainly put it in perspective for me, one is a little bump and
the other is a big dildo.
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=chris%20bliss%2Cjason%20garfield&cmpt=q
dave
Statistics are easy to misinterpret. Unless you know exactly how it was
calculated they are almost meaningless other than as fun conversation
starters or rhetorical tricks.
Is juggling dying? Look at this:
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=computers&cmpt=q
Based on this "statistic" computers are dropping in popularity fast. So
don't expect to see anyone using computers by 2012.
Or ... there might be more to the issue than shown by the simplistic graph.
Dave
Sondre �verby
I have an idea.
Let's all start googling "juggling" at least fifty times every day from
now on.
Should fix the problem pretty easily.
Sondre
Dave Altman
As a lark, I did another comparison. I did get a laugh out of it. Some of
you might think this is funny, too.
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=Dave%20Altman%2Cjason%20garfield&cmpt=q
I also what to thank Jonathan for this "new toy." I believe it is a
helpful marketing tool, if used correctly.
Dave Altman
Rhidders
pumpkineater23
Perhaps because the word computer is gradually being replaced by more
specific words - try laptop.
Rhidders
>
> Rootberry wrote:
> >
> > Google says:
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> >
>
> I have an idea.
>
> Let's all start googling "juggling" at least fifty times every day from
> now on.
>
> Should fix the problem pretty easily.
>
>
> Sondre
>
thought you usually did that anyway sondre
:P
Al Teal
>
>
> What does this mean?
>
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=horse%20shoes%20&cmpt=q
>
>
Al
Dave Altman
>
> Dave Altman wrote:
> >
> >
> > What does this mean?
> >
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=horse%20shoes%20&cmpt=q
> >
> >
> It looks like, in mid-2005, they were unicorn shoes.
>
> Al
If I'm reading the chart right, that spike was at the end of 2005 to the
beginning of 2006. I just picked something off of the top of my head to
see how it compared to juggling. I selected something that wasn't vastly
popular, but most people have heard of it. The results surprised me,
though. It doesn't seem like there should be a reason for it to be jumping
all over place like that. Maybe I'll do the comparison between horse shoes
and juggling.
Dave Altman
dave
> >
>
> Perhaps because the word computer is gradually being replaced by more
> specific words - try laptop.
I agree. That was my point. Many general terms have same basic trend as
"juggling" which probably says more about internet search savvy than the
popularity of the general terms field. I know I haven't done a search for
just plain "juggling" in years.
Jay Linn
<davea...@hughes.net.nospam.com> wrote:
> What does this mean?
>
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=horse%20shoes%20&cmpt=q
I don't know.
But the strong upward rtend of
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=horse%20feathers%20&cmpt=q
is plainly reliable and relevant evidence in this debate.
--
Jay Linn
Semper eadem.
AverageJoggler
In May 2009, Jogglers were more popular the Jugglers
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=joggler%2Cjuggler&cmpt=q
(Let's pretend that some company didn't launch an electronic gadget
called the Joggler)
Norbi
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=vova%20galchenko%2Canthony%20gatto&cmpt=q
Michał
>
> Sondre �verby wrote:
> >
> > Rootberry wrote:
> > >
> > > Google says:
> > > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> > >
> >
> > I have an idea.
> >
> > Let's all start googling "juggling" at least fifty times every day from
> > now on.
> >
> > Should fix the problem pretty easily.
> >
> >
> > Sondre
> >
>
> thought you usually did that anyway sondre
>
> :P
>
:)))
I'll try to improve statistics too:)
Sondre �verby
>
> Sondre �verby wrote:
> >
> > Rootberry wrote:
> > >
> > > Google says:
> > > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> > >
> >
> > I have an idea.
> >
> > Let's all start googling "juggling" at least fifty times every day from
> > now on.
> >
> > Should fix the problem pretty easily.
> >
> >
> > Sondre
> >
>
> thought you usually did that anyway sondre
>
> :P
>
Yeah, see, I wrote "let's ALL.."
Sondre
Sondre �verby
All may not be lost...
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=beards&cmpt=q
Erik Jernqvist
>
> Rootberry wrote:
> >
> > Google says:
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> >
>
> All may not be lost...
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=beards&cmpt=q
>
>
> Sondre
>
pwn'd:
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=sk%C3%A4gg%2Cskjegg&cmpt=q
Sondre �verby
>
> Sondre �verby wrote:
> >
> > Rootberry wrote:
> > >
> > > Google says:
> > > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> > >
> >
> > All may not be lost...
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=beards&cmpt=q
> >
> >
> > Sondre
> >
>
> pwn'd:
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=sk%C3%A4gg%2Cskjegg&cmpt=q
>
Yeah, as if you aren't aware that there are way more Swedes to google
sk�gg than Norwegians to google skjegg... I bet you guys are doing it more
for instructions on how to grow a good Norwegian beard than to get to see
nice ones already grown out, anyway...!
Sondre
Sondre �verby
>
> Sondre �verby wrote:
> >
> > Rootberry wrote:
> > >
> > > Google says:
> > > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=juggling&cmpt=q
> > >
> >
> > All may not be lost...
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=570&q=beards&cmpt=q
> >
> >
> > Sondre
> >
>
> pwn'd:
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=sk%C3%A4gg%2Cskjegg&cmpt=q
>
Speaking of which, this graph is interesting
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=norsk%2Csvensk&cmpt=q notice that
there are still way less Norwegians than Swedes. Makes us have way more
searches per citizen than you..
Sondre
Erik Jernqvist
It helps if you don't write Swedish in Norwegian:
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=norsk%2Csvenska&cmpt=q
Dave Altman
Google Insights is a fun little toy. I noticed that other people are
playing with it, too.
I came up with a game. I was trying to "light up" certain countries, for
example, I wanted to highlight Australia, so I typed in "kangaroos" I
typed in "oil fields" and of course, the US lit up, all by itself.
It would be interesting to see what English words would light up each
country or region. Using other languages would be too easy, as some people
have discovered already. If anyone comes up with a funny or interesting
combination, please post them.
Dave Altman
Norbi
Dave Altman
>
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#content=1&cat=20&q=curling&cmpt=q
This one surprised me, I was going for Iceland:
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=174&q=Thermal%20power&cmpt=q
Dave Altman
Sondre �verby
>
> Norbi wrote:
> >
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#content=1&cat=20&q=curling&cmpt=q
>
> This one surprised me, I was going for Iceland:
>
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=174&q=Thermal%20power&cmpt=q
>
> Dave Altman
>
>
>
Hmm.. Icelandic isn't quite English though.
Sondre
Norbi
>
> Dave Altman wrote:
> >
> > Norbi wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#content=1&cat=20&q=curling&cmpt=q
> >
> > This one surprised me, I was going for Iceland:
> >
> > http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=174&q=Thermal%20power&cmpt=q
> >
> > Dave Altman
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hmm.. Icelandic isn't quite English though.
>
>
> Sondre
>
It's closer than Hindi
Norbi
Emman
>
> http://www.google.com/insights/search/#content=1&cat=20&q=curling&cmpt=q
>
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=20&q=hockey&cmpt=q
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=20&q=maurice%20richard&cmpt=q
And here's one to make you laugh :) (Just Norbi)
http://www.google.com/insights/search/#cat=20&q=kettle&cmpt=q
AlexTrendler
Erik Jernqvist
> It's closer than Hindi
>
>
> Norbi
There's no country that's got a larger English speaking population than
India and Hindi is only one of the many Indian languages.