Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Santa Barbara Mandatory Spay/Neuter

0 views
Skip to first unread message

John Yates

unread,
May 8, 2008, 2:02:40 PM5/8/08
to
Santa Barbara County Supervisors
Put Mandatory Spay/Neuter On Ice

Local Dog Owners Halt Animal Rights ‘Big Guns’

by John Yates
American Sporting Dog Alliance
http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org

SANTA BARBARA, CA – Dog owners from Santa Barbara County joined together
Tuesday to push back an all-out assault by the most powerful people in the
animal rights movement. Their efforts sent a proposed mandatory
spay/neuter ordinance back to the drawing board, and possibly to the
trashcan.

Reacting to local concerns and interference from major national and
statewide animal rights organizations, the county Board of Supervisors
voted 4-1 to shelve the proposed ordinance and set up a commission of
local residents to look at pet population issues.

Dog owners and local organizations that represent them had been shut out
of deliberations about the ordinance, which was drafted by animal rights
activists. The ordinance was presented to the supervisors on Tuesday, but
died on the table when a majority on the board put the brakes on the
process.

Animal rights groups threw their “top guns” into this fight, as well as
considerable financial resources. The supervisors were flooded with
letters from animal rights activists, almost none of whom reportedly live
in the county.

Humane Society of the United States President Wayne Pacelle visited Santa
Barbara County to rally his troops in the days leading up to the meeting,
and on Monday published a lengthy statement of support for the ordinance
in the local newspaper. HSUS is the most powerful animal rights group in
America. Judy Mancuso, an out-of-county activist who gained fame for
spearheading a failed statewide effort for mandatory pet sterilization,
also threw the weight of her entire organization into this battle.

But local dog owners stood up to these powerful groups and stopped them in
their tracks.

Tuesday’s hearing was packed. A strong contingent of local dog owners and
representatives from local organizations that represent them voiced strong
opposition. American Sporting Dog Alliance (ASDA) activists Susan Sakauye
and Allison Iwamoto, both from Santa Barbara, played major roles in
rallying local opposition to this ordinance, as did Diane Jones of the
Channel City Kennel Club.

ASDA directors from California lent their assistance, as did Cathie Turner
of Concerned Dog Owners of California, Bill Henby of Pet Pac and the
California Federation of Dog Clubs. However, Santa Barbara residents
deserve the greatest credit for this defeat of major animal rights groups.
Their dedication, sincerity and love of dogs was apparent in everything
they said and did. Members from all four county-based kennel clubs also
spoke out in opposition.

Local support for the ordinance was mostly from people who expressed
concern about feral cats. However, Dr. Ron Faoro, a local veterinarian and
key figure in statewide animal rights groups, addressed the supervisors,
and proudly announced that he was accepting an appointment to the board of
directors of the HSUS, a radical animal rights group that is trying to
advance an agenda in stages leading to the eventual elimination of animal
ownership.

A motion to proceed with the ordinance failed.

A second motion, which passed 4-1, shelved the ordinance and called for
the formation of a study commission. Each supervisor will appoint two
local residents to the commission, and the chairman will appoint three.
The supervisors expressed a desire to make sure the commission was
balanced between people who favor and oppose mandatory spay and neuter
ordinances.

The idea of a commission was proposed by the American Sporting Dog
Alliance last week.

Supervisor Brooks Firestone said he was concerned that an ordinance would
be an unreasonable intrusion into people’s lives, and expressed opposition
to it. Firestone expressed doubts about possible benefits of an ordinance,
and also about the probability of lawsuits. The City of Los Angeles was
sued last week for its new spay and neuter mandate.

Another strong opponent was Supervisor Joni Gray. Gray said she grew up on
a ranch and never had less than 15 dogs, for hunting, herding and as pets.
She said her main concern was with dog owners who break the law by failing
to license pets and allowing them to roam. She also said the issues of
dogs and feral cats should be separated.

Gray called for making any ordinance “mandatory for the irresponsible,”
but not mandatory for responsible pet owners. Some municipalities have
considered a “three strikes, you’re out” ordinance for strays that
repeatedly wind up at an animal shelter. After three strikes,
sterilization is ordered.

Supervisor Joseph Centeno agreed, saying that 90 percent of the people
take excellent care of their animals and are very responsible, and that
laws should concentrate on the few people who are not responsible. He said
laws should not penalize responsible dog owners. He also said he regrets
spaying his own favorite dog, and wishes he had been able to get a puppy
from her.

"I would really like to concentrate on the people that are causing this
problem and let's not be punitive to the great law abiding people,”
Centeno said. “Those animals are their property and they should be able
to decide with their veterinarian in terms of spay neuter…We have lost our
will to be free and I utterly oppose that. I am suggesting that we find
some kind of a solution that does something to the violators while not
being punitive to the great law abiding citizens of our county." ”

Supervisor Salud Carbajal initially supported the ordinance, but later in
the meeting conceded that the problem was that it is mandatory. He asked
people in the audience if an ordinance for voluntary pet sterilization
would be acceptable, and they said the issue was the word “mandatory.”

Supervisor Janet Wolf said she didn’t see any point in having an ordinance
that was not mandatory. Wolf said there were several things she liked
about the ordinance, and said she favored going ahead with it through a
process of further hearings and possible amendments.

Centano stressed that the study commission should be the work of the
people, not animal services staff members, who controlled the process
prior to Tuesday’s meeting.

The American Sporting Dog Alliance played a supportive role to local
residents. Our research showed the true statistics of the Santa Barbara
animal shelter program (which actually is one of the best in America – we
know of none better), medical issues and research that shows growing
concern about the health effects of sterilization (especially at a young
age), a strong influence by animal rights groups in the process and the
exclusion of dog owners, and the large influx of dogs into the county from
other states and countries to meet the demand for pets.

Please contact the Santa Barbara County supervisors to express your
appreciation of their courageous stance on Tuesday. They can be contacted
at:

· lst District: Salud Carbajal, Chair - Phone: 805.568.2186, Fax:
805.568.2534, E-mail: Superviso...@sbcbos1.org

· 2nd District: Janet Wolf -Phone: 805.568.2191, Fax:
805.568.2283, E-mail: jw...@sbcbos2.org

· 3rd District: Brooks Firestone - Phone: 805.568.2192, Fax:
805.568.2883, E-mail: bfire...@co.santa-barbara.ca.us

· 4th District: Joni Gray - Phone: 805.737-7700 or 805.346.8407,
Fax: 805.346.8498, E-mail: jg...@co.santa-barbara.ca.us

· 5th District: Joseph Centeno, Vice Chair - Phone: 805.346.8400,
Fax: 805.346.8404; E-mail: jcen...@co.santa-barbara.ca.us

The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, hobby breeders and
professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We
are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and
to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans
maintains its rightful place in American society and life. Please visit us
on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. We also need
your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog
owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to
the success of our mission. We are funded solely by the donations of our
members, and maintain strict independence.

PLEASE CROSS-POST THIS REPORT AND FORWARD IT TO YOUR FRIENDS

George

unread,
May 10, 2008, 10:33:19 PM5/10/08
to
" HSUS, a radical animal rights group that is trying to
advance an agenda in stages leading to the eventual elimination of animal
ownership."

It is nice to see this mentioned in the mainstream media. It would have been
better if the rest of their plans for use were mentioned.
George in Las Vegas

0 new messages