2. I have a friend who asked me about a finished dog. He was specifically
interested in a Chesapeake Bay Retriever. I know some of the good and bad
points of CBR's but I wondered what advice you all would give. Amy Dahl, I
would be interested in hearing what you think, if you have finished dogs and
would you recommend them. This guy had a Chesapeake years ago that he hunted
with, however he knows little about training and I doubt if his dog would
have been considered trained by most on this list. He also has 4 kids ages
8-15. I have not and will not give him names of any people on this list
without first talking to you and making sure it was with your approval.
Thanks in advance,
Gary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:
http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
Sorry to ramble so much. I guess I don't have enough experience
at placing Chesapeakes to give neat generalities--just messy
accounts of my little experience! I do have a bitch with a
pretty much bullet-proof temperament whom I might sell--she's
well started, but not finished yet. I'd bet on her in almost
any home.
I think as in buying any dog, I'd suggest that your friend
look for a seller who shows an interest in making sure it's
a good match. The person selling the dog is probably better
equipped to evaluate that than anyone else.
Amy Dahl
My feeling about Chesapeakes is that they are at their best
when they have plenty of contact with their owner, as well
as mental and physical challenge. They tend to be deeply
devoted. Despite the Lab's reputation as a pet and family
dog, IME Labs are considerably more tolerant of isolation
and inactivity than are Chesapeakes. Of course Labs are
more adaptable in a number of ways.
Thanks again,
Gary
> From: Amy Dahl <a...@oakhillkennel.com>
> Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
> Reply-To: a...@oakhillkennel.com
> Newsgroups: rec.hunting.dogs
> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:13:37 GMT
> To: GUND...@listserv.tamu.edu
> Subject: Re: 2 questions
>