On Sat, 4 May 2013 21:28:42 +0000 (UTC), Bob Holtzman <
hol...@cox.net>
wrote:
#On 2013-05-04, Gunner Asch <
gunne...@gmail.com> wrote:
## I swapped a 1974 Ruger M77 (7 mag) for some machining. The rifle had
## been partially damaged in a fire, but had been restocked, Duracoated
## but never reassembled. Im missing a few bits and pieces...but nothing
## disturbing. Im trying to assemble the trigger group so I can take it
## out and test fire it to make sure there isnt any metal issues. (Tie
## the action to a tire, load a hot round and pull the trigger with a
## long string) Nothing leads me to believe that the heat treats were
## damaged...springs are all ok, but I need to check it out nonetheless.
#
#Firing "one hot round" probably won't tell you much about the metal.
#Best to have th Rockwell hardness of at least the front receiver ring
#checked.
Generally its accepted proceedure to fire a HOT round..visa vis any
and all the Proof houses...and as I stated..the springs were not
harmed and the aluminum trigger guard was only cracked..not melted.
I never saw the arm immediately after the fire..only a number of
years later. No pitting is noted on any of the parts ..which is very
common after fire/water. All the springs appear to be of normal
tension/compression. Including the magazine follower spring which
tends to go soft first, being of a very thin material. In fact..I held
in my fingers and flexed/unflexed a couple hundred times while
watching a movie on TV..and no issues were noted.
I have a 97 Winchester and Mod 12 Winchester which are dead soft as
the result of being in a different fire. All the springs are dead and
on the Mod 12. the barrel .has an obvious bend in it. I consider these
suitable for Some Parts/Hanger Queen. Both were badly pitted as well.
But having it Rockwell checked is very doable. Any idea of what the RC
of a Ruger of this age range is supposed to be?
I service machines in machine shops and hardness testers are quite
common in the QA departments
Gunner