"
clarkm...@gmail.com" <
clarkm...@gmail.com> on Fri, 10 May
2013 02:52:15 +0000 (UTC) typed in rec.guns the following:
#
|I only spend a few weeks hunting per year, so I look for other ways
|to spend my time in gun related activities.
Pretty much, it all depends on what sort of "gun nut" you want to be
"(Standard, or metric?).
My definition of "gun nut" is someone who goes "nuts" when the subject
is guns. Sort of like "car nuts" or "Chess Nuts", or any other
collection of those who get wound up on a topic, and you can't
get them to shut up, or change the subject.
That said, most gun nuts tend also to have a magical belief in the
power of assemblages of machined metal, wood or plastic, to manipulate
the world about them, for weal or woe. (In ye old days, we called
such people "idol worshippers", or magical thinkers). Doesn't really
matter whether the "gun nut" believes that firearms are Amulets of
Evil, the mere existence of which causes murder, robber,
procrastination (see sig), ring around the collar and denture breath,
or whether the "gun loon" believes that firearms are Talismans of
Protection, the mere possession of which, while still in the box, will
auto-magically ward off rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty
hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits,
vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers,
buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes,
train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers and
Methodists!; they are still a "gun-nut". Nuts, bonkers, bereft of
sense, not pulling in many stations the old aerial, five cans short of
a six-pack, too many bells in the batfry. The lights are on, the
stereo is playing, but no one is there to change the records. One
brick short of a door stop.
In other words, they are not really capable of being more than a
TV journalist or weather girl.
Now, it has been my experience that the first group of Gun Nuts
(those who believe firearms are Amulets of Evil) make up the majority
of "gun nuts". Actually, I postulate the existence of the second group
for symmetry, having found no real evidence consistent with their
actual existence. They are similar to the theoretical physicists,
whose existence is postulated in order to account for the consumption
of resources in a budget, and explain where all the coffee went.
have fun and try to play nice.
pyotr