Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Building a wall....

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Noctaire

unread,
Feb 24, 2003, 4:44:59 PM2/24/03
to
All -- I'm looking to build a wall to hold back the hill, frame up a new
patio, etc.. I'll also be making some planting beds with thes same
materials. The idea is to use 6x6 beams, much like one sees on many of the
landscape shows.

I was looking about at my local Home Depot today and came across their 6x6s.
A thought came to me -- treated lumber contains a variety of chemicals that
are not the most friendly. Anybuddy know what type of wood, treatments,
painting/staining, etc. I should be looking at for this task?

Noc.


Pam

unread,
Feb 24, 2003, 6:54:37 PM2/24/03
to

Noctaire wrote:

Suggest you consider another, more permanent material for your wall. Even
treated landscape timbers will decompose over a period of time, jeopardizing the
integrity of the wall. Seems like too much work and expense just to have to
re-do after 10 years or so. While you're at it, the same material could be used
to make raised beds - something like a dry stack stone. This would eliminate any
concerns for toxic compounds leaching into planting areas, as well as tie the
various elements of your garden together. A similar or complimentary type of
flagstone could be used for your new patio. All you need to frame up a flagstone
patio is a flexible metal edging material, available at most landscape supply
outfits.

pam - gardengal

TakeThisOut

unread,
Feb 24, 2003, 7:36:30 PM2/24/03
to
Think Brick!


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TAKETHISOUT budysbackagain(@)THAT TOO a-oh-ell dot com

J Kolenovsky

unread,
Feb 24, 2003, 8:48:49 PM2/24/03
to Noctaire
Stone, brick or cinder would be durable and non-toxic.

--
J. Kolenovsky, A+, Network +, MCP
ô¿ô - http://www.celestialhabitats.com - commercial
ô¿ô - http://www.hal-pc.org/~garden/personal.html

silvasurfa

unread,
Feb 25, 2003, 2:36:38 AM2/25/03
to

"Noctaire" <noct...@infobin.org> wrote in message
news:8q2dnYrd46j...@giganews.com...

Look around for modular interlocking retaining wall systems made of
concrete. Not sure if they have them in the USA, but they are common in
Australia. They are very easy to take apart and rebuild if your ideas change
later.

Exercise extreme caution in building a retaining wall over 3 ft tall... if
you want taller than that it will need drainage behind the base of the wall
to prevent water build up and landslide.


Shelly

unread,
Feb 25, 2003, 11:08:33 AM2/25/03
to
I am going to try a similar project, and have thought brick would be nice,
but it seems like it would be very expensive! Anyone have any tips for
finding cheaper sources of brick? And what do you need to look for in brick
for this sort of application? My dad used some really pretty Cream City, but
it crumbled in a few years...

"TakeThisOut" <budysba...@aol.com.net.gov> wrote in message
news:20030224193630...@mb-mu.aol.com...

bryan lafleur

unread,
Feb 26, 2003, 8:16:36 AM2/26/03
to
> Exercise extreme caution in building a retaining wall over 3 ft tall... if
> you want taller than that it will need drainage behind the base of the wall
> to prevent water build up and landslide.

I second that statement and a couple of others. Whatever you use, if
you go over 3 feet, or over 2 feet if it the hill rises very high
behind it, you will have to do your homework on the drainage.
Drainage takes a little planning, not much work compared to the wall,
and is life or death for a retaining wall.

A 6x6 landscape treated timber will last a while, but as others have
said, it will decompose, leaving you with a lot of cleanout and
replacement. Also, treated wood will probably be unavailable by the
time you have to replace it.

It is much cheaper in the long run to use the interlocking blocks,
which is a do-it-yourself project; or a stone wall which can be a DIY
project if you have strong inclination for very hard work and do some
research first. Brick is also good but is definately for the pros
and seem to look worse after a few years when the wall has flexed a
few times and cracked and/or broken in places.

Good luck,
Bryan

Snooze

unread,
Feb 27, 2003, 3:18:38 AM2/27/03
to
As others have suggested, you should use brick, landscape blocks, or
something else a bit more permenant. Wood rots over time, and it will fail
when it's needed the most (on the biggest storm of the season)

Also be aware that some places require that retaining walls above a certain
height, usually 3ft, be permitted. So check with local regulations, an
unpermitted retaining wall that failed to hold back a mudslide would
probably not be covered by insurance. Plus it could become a hassle when you
sell the house.

Sameer

"Noctaire" <noct...@infobin.org> wrote in message
news:8q2dnYrd46j...@giganews.com...

0 new messages