Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Plants and Fire Good read

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Bill who putters

unread,
Jul 8, 2009, 9:52:09 AM7/8/09
to
NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.

<http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/>


Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
USA.

Bill

--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA

Cheryl Isaak

unread,
Jul 9, 2009, 7:28:30 AM7/9/09
to
On 7/8/09 9:52 AM, in article
b2forewagner-A9A1...@news.supernews.com, "Bill who putters"
<b2fore...@snip.net> wrote:

> NYT provide a interesting view of fire and plant life.
>
> <http://judson.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/on-fire/>
>
>
> Sort of reminded me of some national parks letting fires burn here in
> USA.
>
> Bill


When we were in Yosemite 20+ years ago, the rangers said the only way for
the sequoia cones to release their seed was to be burned.

C

Dioclese

unread,
Jul 10, 2009, 9:07:30 AM7/10/09
to
"Bill who putters" <b2fore...@snip.net> wrote in message
news:b2forewagner-A9A1...@news.supernews.com...

I'm of the opinion that where people build homes, they need to allow for
natural burning and consequential wind when maintaining a fire break as
well. A small footprint of land for this is not feasible, the owner has to
have a large enough plot to do this. Hillside acreage, its even more
important. And, I'm of the opinion its the homeowner's responsibility to
maintain such a firebreak, not the local or state government in the case of
a fire approaching said property.
--
Dave


0 new messages