Peaches problem
SteveB
peaches. Lots of them. Not a good crop this year. What is this, and what
do I do?
Steve
Bill who putters
"SteveB" <old...@deepends.com> wrote:
Hope it is not peach borer.
Bill we have them about
--
Garden in shade zone 5 S Jersey USA
Zootal
"Bill who putters" <b2fore...@snip.net> wrote in message
news:b2forewagner-799C...@news.supernews.com...
> In article <ae6ih6-...@news.infowest.com>,
> "SteveB" <old...@deepends.com> wrote:
>
>> My peach tree, I just noticed, has clear hard oozing sap coming from the
>> peaches. Lots of them. Not a good crop this year. What is this, and
>> what
>> do I do?
>>
>> Steve
>
> Hope it is not peach borer.
>
> Bill we have them about
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/lfe77m>
LOL that is just beautiful!
SteveB
"Zootal" <use...@spam.zootal.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:3oGdnXk2V_H86dvX...@giganews.com...
Oh, goody! Now there's no need for newsgroups. And all the people who
answer a question with a lame weak retort that has nothing to offer in the
way of help.
I hope it's not cancer, herpes, halitosis, gangrene, syphilis, or pink eye.
BTW, I did google peach borer, and all I got was pictures of larva, and
nothing that looks like my problem. Google is useful. Plain answers from
real live people are nice, too. BTW, in my Peach Borer search were included
peach cobbler, Miss Peach Pageant, Little Miss Peach Pageant, Junior Little
Miss Peach Pageant, Gay Peach Pageant, well, you get the idea.
Give some useful information. Sheesh.
Bill who putters
"SteveB" <old...@deepends.com> wrote:
Nothing mean here . Why not mention you googled Peach Borer up front?
Bill
Just Me
At least you've got peaches! Our trees were full of blossoms this
spring, just loaded with em. Then came threat of a late hard frost, so
we stayed up all night with the trees, keeping them warm with fires.
That was one full day of woodcutting for the job, and it worked. Not a
single leaf was singed, or curled from too much heat. First couple of
weeks after, the young fruit was coming along nicely--then they
started to shrivel and fall from the trees. Not one measly little
peach left. Same thing with the apple trees. Same thing with a
neighbor's apple tree, about 3 miles down the road (which is about as
"close" a neighbor as we like around here), and their tree last year
was simply loaded.
Sorry I can't help with your problem. On one forum I checked where
somebody had the same problem as mine, the expert on duty had only
this to say: "The honey bee population is severely depleted."
All this use of carbaryl, including my own, cannot be helping, if
that's where the problem lies.
--
JM
http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
SteveB
"Bill who putters" <b2fore...@snip.net> wrote
>
> Nothing mean here . Why not mention you googled Peach Borer up front?
>
> Bill
Why didn't you just say you knew nothing about the question being asked?
Billy
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT), Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >JM
> >http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
>
> WTF.
>
> Go hawk your teeny-porn writing elsewhere. I'll leave out the
> invectives.
>
> Any of the rest of you bother to read this crap this effer is amending
> to his posts?
>
> What a piece of..........
>
> A simple search shows this poster to be a troll and disturbing. And a
> race-baiter.
>
> http://alt.nntp2http.com/angst/2008/07/8c3a5767e76c5822e766f6bc94ec416f.html
>
> Charlie
I missed something? Am I getting old? Bloody hell!
--
- Billy
There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading. The few who
learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and
find out for themselves.
Will Rogers
http://green-house.tv/video/the-spring-garden-tour
http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/zinn
sherwin dubren
Some of the pests that can cause this kind of oozing from the peaches
are Oriental Fruit moths or plant bugs and stink bugs.
You should see some kind of debris at the site from the insect boring
in. If this is your problem, clean up all damaged fruit and find a
way to kill the bugs.
Check this web site for more details:
http://www.hgic.umd.edu/_media/documents/hg77.pdf
By far, the most common problem of this type with peaches is not the
fruit, but the trunk and branches having a problem of Gummosis.
Sherwin
Just Me
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT), Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >JM
> >http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
>
> WTF.
>
> Go hawk your teeny-porn writing elsewhere. I'll leave out the
> invectives.
You must be crazy, you miserable piece of uncured garden fertilizer--
or YOU GOT TO BE some kind of pedophile yourself to see anything of
the sort in it.
> Go hawk your . . .
DON'T be telling anybody in this world what to do, where to go, what
to say, what to write, how to think. Who the hell do you think you
are? Hitler? Ahmadinejad? Go jump in the hole in your outhouse,
jackass.
I defy anyone to find the least, single image of "porn" involving a
teenager in this . . .
What a COMPLETE crud-hopper from the hick sticks. How your sort does
infest the world with evil. If only there was something we could
spray, like Holy Water to be rid of it!
>
> Any of the rest of you bother to read this crap this effer is amending
> to his posts?
Ameding? You envious puddle of puke. Get a site of your own to provide
a link for, then you don't have to be so jealous.
>
> What a piece of..........
>
> A simple search shows this poster to be a troll and disturbing. And a
> race-baiter.
>
> http://alt.nntp2http.com/angst/2008/07/8c3a5767e76c5822e766f6bc94ec41...
Oh there's plenty of trash like you out there "Charlie" to spread such
stinking manure of slander around. And so many of those as there are,
there are just so many who are fool enough to fall for it and spread
it all the further.
Take a tip from Billy May, you crap-shoed, sick-headed
blabbermouth . . .
DROP DEAD.
*** Heads Up: Any unsolicited email on the subject of "Just Me" should
be received with all the credibility of a "Video Professor" promise of
"$10.00 in the mail if you don't like it," and then disinfected with a
solution of 20 Mule Team Borax--one cup to the gallon of fresh,
boiling whiz-water from a nunnery. A Word to the Wise from the
Wise . . .
"Nothing can be more contemptible than to suppose Public Records to be
True. Read them & judge, if you are not a Fool." -- William Blake,
*Marginalia*
--
JM
http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
http://vignettes-mackie.blogspot.com/
http://whosenose.blogspot.com
http://doo-dads.blogspot.com
http://jesusexegesis.blogspot.com
http://mackiemesser.zoomshare.com
Just Me
> In article <vq1e455af1itkglbgelkr63gqmat9mn...@4ax.com>, Charlie wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT), Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >JM
> > >http://jpdavid.blogspot.com/
>
> > WTF.
>
> > Go hawk your teeny-porn writing elsewhere. I'll leave out the
> > invectives.
>
> > Any of the rest of you bother to read this crap this effer is amending
> > to his posts?
>
> > What a piece of..........
>
> > A simple search shows this poster to be a troll and disturbing. And a
> > race-baiter.
>
>
> > Charlie
>
> I missed something? Am I getting old? Bloody hell!
In short, you are not seeing what he claims to see?
What's the matter with people like that? Maybe he's got a whole bunch
of those big, green, oozing pods growing out in his garden? And he's
not even human anymore?
Maybe somebody should sprinkle some Milky Spore on him. ;-)
A word to the wise . . .
http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
Bill who putters
"SteveB" <old...@deepends.com> wrote:
We tried to grow peaches here. The black 5/8 moths Peach borers made
it impossible. I guess this due to peach and apple commercial orchards
within 6 miles. This 35 years ago.
For some reason I think you will not show up on my machine.
SteveB
"Bill who putters" <b2fore...@snip.net> wrote in message
news:b2forewagner-4AB1...@news.supernews.com...
> In article <bjsih6-...@news.infowest.com>,
> "SteveB" <old...@deepends.com> wrote:
>
>> "Bill who putters" <b2fore...@snip.net> wrote
>>
>> >
>> > Nothing mean here . Why not mention you googled Peach Borer up front?
>> >
>> > Bill
>>
>> Why didn't you just say you knew nothing about the question being asked?
>
> We tried to grow peaches here. The black 5/8 moths Peach borers made
> it impossible. I guess this due to peach and apple commercial orchards
> within 6 miles. This 35 years ago.
> For some reason I think you will not show up on my machine.
>
> Bill
I can't wait not to get any help!
Just Me
> You are correct; I was wrong.
Correct? Not "correct". The word is "right" as opposed to wrong--it
is not as if you were being merely "incorrect" here! You were dead
wrong to trade in such dangerous slander you bastard, which is wrong
as anybody can get, and you are still wrong if you think what follows
in form of this phony, half-baked "apology," can change that. But as
to my being "correct"? Maybe, but only insofar as I said that you are
a miserable piece of uncured garden fertilizer, as is made quite plain
by the odor of this . . .
>
> Again, apologies for causing you to become apoplectic on account of my
> misreading.
>
> Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
That's some "apology" you got right there, Bub. That must have taken a
whole lot of soul-searching.
Yeah, what you know about my character is limited to just a few
things, such as might be judged, e.g. from what I said about a
neighbor at "3 miles away is close enough." But that might be just so
much a relevation about the character of my fellow human kind as it is
about me, that I should like that 3 miles distance so much. That
neighbor could be some kind of character like YOU, who goes around
spreading untrue tales about other people--and then can't so much as
offer the mere, simple, easy humility of a genuine apology for it.
But, I mean, shoot! You needn't be ashamed because in my experience
MOST people are like you, and that's another reason I like that 3
miles distance so much.
It is not the coyotes and the chipmunks who are out there clubbing
those poor Iranians over the head. Those animals are people, people
just like you, the sort who act not according to instinct and the laws
of survival but pursuant to perceptions of things that are not there,
slanders and rumors, opinions and attitudes having nothing to do with
nature or truth. That creep from central casting for Planet of the
Apes who rules over Iran says, "Bash in their heads, they are
terrorists!" It is not the jackals and the owls who are such easy
pushovers for such slander; it is not the jackasses, pigs and geese
who take it at face value and start the goose-step march, it is human
beings.
It is not the little birdies in the trees, the sparrow and the
chickadee sitting here with their beaks up their butts, bemoaning the
passing of their idols with the blonde feathered tresses and the fancy
Thriller leg-work, while heads of fellow freedom loving humans are
being bashed bloody on the rooftops of Iran. No, these bird-brains
looking on, are you and me doing nothing, just as we do every time,
when even that cat out on my lawn knows better than that. You damn
betcha. They defend one another, get together and run the intruder
off. That's what a common house cat can do, that the United States of
America is always and forever too "human" to do. Even a coup of
chickens in the barnyard has more humanity, when it comes to defending
their own. And do you need the list of the number of times that you
have said, "It's none of our business," while the bodies pile up to
rot under the sun, in Bosnia, in Kurdistan, in Rwanda?
Don't give ME any of your ever so high-falutin' "human" self-
righteousness, for I well might have, as you suggest, an apoplexy--but
only from laughing too hard.
That's what you can know of my "character," Jackson.
--
JM http://jesusexegesis.blogspot.com
http://mackiemesser.zoomshare.com
Billy
> You are correct; I was wrong. Upon re-reading, I don't now read what
> I thought I read and was hasty in my reply.
>
> Again, apologies for causing you to become apoplectic on account of my
> misreading.
>
> Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
>
> Charlie
OK, now if you 2 roosters would stop circling. Both of you seem to be on
the side of the angels, the true, the good, and the beautiful. The
response, in error, was made against one of the lowest forms of
degradation, which, justifiably, should illicit a strong response.
Gentlemen, it was a fair misunderstanding, apologies made, no harm done.
Let's move on.
Just Me
> In article <pamf45p67110mlvb6jpuu8rin76ss14...@4ax.com>, Charlie wrote:
> > You are correct; I was wrong. Upon re-reading, I don't now read what
> > I thought I read and was hasty in my reply.
>
> > Again, apologies for causing you to become apoplectic on account of my
> > misreading.
>
> > Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
>
> > Charlie
>
> OK, now if you 2 roosters would stop circling. Both of you seem to be on
> the side of the angels, the true, the good, and the beautiful. The
> response, in error, was made against one of the lowest forms of
> degradation, which, justifiably, should illicit a strong response.
> Gentlemen, it was a fair misunderstanding, apologies made, no harm done.
> Let's move on.
Boy! You must really be sore about that reply of mine to you the
other day to call THAT a "fair misunderstanding." Hm! I guess if
anyone around here should get an apology, it's YOU from me.
But, okay, moving right along . . .
I come to discover as of today that the terraces we dug into the
hillside below the garden for squashes and cucumbers are NOT going to
work without a much greater depth of soil. The sun beats down on them
mercilessly, so that no matter how often I water them, the leaves
still wilt miserably beneath that sun. We arrive at the conclusion
that with such rocky soil so close to the surface, the heat retention
from that stony ground is just cooking those poor plants to death, and
evaporating the water nearly so soon as we put it in. Next spring
we'll provide a much greater depth of soil, see how that works.
Where or where is a good, friendly, talkative Inca peasant farmer from
Machu Pichu when you need one? Maybe we should try Twitter/Peru?
--
JM
FarmI
> On Jun 28, 4:11 pm, Charlie wrote:
>
>> You are correct; I was wrong.
>
> Correct? Not "correct". The word is "right" as opposed to wrong
At the risk of being accused of telling you what to do, if you look in a
halfway decent ditionary you will find that "Correct" is quite OK in the
context in which it was used.
>> Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
> Yeah,
Yeah. OTT and vengeful.
SteveB
"Billy" <wildbilly@without_a.net> wrote in message
news:wildbilly-0AAD6...@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au...
> In article <pamf45p67110mlvb6...@4ax.com>, Charlie wrote:
>
>> You are correct; I was wrong. Upon re-reading, I don't now read what
>> I thought I read and was hasty in my reply.
>>
>> Again, apologies for causing you to become apoplectic on account of my
>> misreading.
>>
>> Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
>>
>> Charlie
>
> OK, now if you 2 roosters would stop circling. Both of you seem to be on
> the side of the angels, the true, the good, and the beautiful. The
> response, in error, was made against one of the lowest forms of
> degradation, which, justifiably, should illicit a strong response.
> Gentlemen, it was a fair misunderstanding, apologies made, no harm done.
> Let's move on.
> --
>
> - Billy
I'm all for that. Does anyone have any answers as to what's up with my
peaches?
Just Me
> "Just Me" <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > On Jun 28, 4:11 pm, Charlie wrote:
>
> >> You are correct; I was wrong.
>
> > Correct? Not "correct". The word is "right" as opposed to wrong
>
But don't you see even yet the banality of such futile effort?
> if you look in a
> halfway decent ditionary . . .
Without question the storehouse of all human knowledge in matters
etymological. And what need have we for any such study in the
universities, so long as we have (or had) Bennett Cerf and Random
House? Now, will the Mystery Guest please enter and sign in
please . . .
> you will find that "Correct" is quite OK in the
> context in which it was used.
When that context is entirely in the jaundiced eye of the present
pissy-eyed beholder. And yet again . . .
> you will find that "Correct" is quite OK in the
> context in which it was used.
Why does that sound like it came chirping from a beak instead of a
pair of lips?
>
> >> Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
> > Yeah,
>
> Yeah. OTT and vengeful.
Go plant some hemlock and make a tea of it, Mr. Green Jeans.
One thing that can be counted on, above all else in this world is the
never-ending parade of butthole ventriloquists.
--
JM
http://whosenose.blogspot.com/2008/03/i-dont-chill.html
http://whosenose.blogspot.com/2008/03/blue-steel-jews.html
Piet de Arcilla
> One thing that can be counted on, above all else in this world is the
> never-ending parade of butthole ventriloquists.
"I don't mind the sun sometimes
The images it shows
I can taste you on my lips
And smell you in my clothes
Cinnamon and sugary
And softly spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes
Some will die in hot pursuit
In fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain"
FarmI
On Jun 29, 12:53 am, "FarmI" <ask@itshall be given> wrote:
> "Just Me" <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > On Jun 28, 4:11 pm, Charlie wrote:
>
>> >> You are correct; I was wrong.
>
>> > Correct? Not "correct". The word is "right" as opposed to wrong
>
>> At the risk of being accused of telling you what to do . . .
> But don't you see even yet the banality of such futile effort?
Given that I, like Charlie, thought that your diatribe revealed your
character, of course I realise that posting was futile.
However since you were also unfair, you needed to be told.
You are, as I said before OTT and vengeful.
> if you look in a
> halfway decent ditionary . . .
>> you will find that "Correct" is quite OK in the
>> context in which it was used.
> When that context is entirely in the jaundiced eye of the present
> pissy-eyed beholder. And yet again . . .
And just plain nasty.
Just Me
> Given that I, like Charlie, thought that your diatribe revealed your
> character, of course I realise that posting was futile.
But what you thought, was not thought. It was not anything of the
kind.
> However since you were also unfair, you needed to be told.
Get a load of that. Jesus jumping on a pogo-stick Kee-Rist!
Needed? Listen to that hick-talk jive. To be told? By what? By
somethin' like you? From which end cometh the noise of it? The
Charlie McCarthy or Edgar Bergen? Which is the bottom and which the
top? I could see while you were doing all this "telling" of yours
that it seemed to be coming out at your mouth, while the lips on your
butthole weren't even moving. Maybe you can do it while sucking water
through a straw?
That's quite a talent, Edgar. You oughta take it to Broadway.
--
JM http://whosenose.blogspot.com/
Just Me
> Try carefully re-reading my original post and my next post to you.
Hah-hah.
Try reading this . . .
DRIP DEAD.
brooklyn1
Charlie wrote:
> Try carefully re-reading my original post and my next post to you.
Hah-hah.
Try reading this . . .
DRIP DEAD.
~~~~~~~~~
TEW FUNNEE!
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . . .
Just Me
Hey! My SOUL BUDDY.
Now we goin' to start ta have SOME FUN! :-)
--
JM http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
Billy
<1f3fd9e0-5f10-465f...@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Just Me <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
Congratulations, you have just grabbed an anchor, and an anti-Christian.
On a more pertinent front, 3 of my Stupices have fruit on them. I
planted the last of my green beans yesterday (36 in total), bitter
melons (5), and trombocino (3). Potted 6 peppers (small but you never
know). Today, I start shoe horning in the plants that don't have a spot
to go to, mostly squash and melon.
Billy
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:20:32 -0700, Billy <wildbilly@without_a.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <pamf45p67110mlvb6...@4ax.com>, Charlie wrote:
> >
> >> You are correct; I was wrong. Upon re-reading, I don't now read what
> >> I thought I read and was hasty in my reply.
> >>
> >> Again, apologies for causing you to become apoplectic on account of my
> >> misreading.
> >>
> >> Also, thank you for providing some insight into your character.
> >>
> >> Charlie
> >
> >OK, now if you 2 roosters would stop circling. Both of you seem to be on
> >the side of the angels, the true, the good, and the beautiful. The
> >response, in error, was made against one of the lowest forms of
> >degradation, which, justifiably, should illicit a strong response.
> >Gentlemen, it was a fair misunderstanding, apologies made, no harm done.
> >Let's move on.
>
> You still stand by your assessment of which side I am upon and which
> side our new buddy stands, after reading his replies?
>
> You still lumping me in the same righteous category as that SW MO
> piece of shit that garnered the attention, and admiration of shel, and
> that RB who declared shel to be his SOUL BUDDY?
>
> Charlie
Having done a quick perusal of his web site he doesn't, at first blush,
seem at odds with the good the true and the beautiful, but I must concur
that he seems rash, inflexible, and given to poor choices. All I was
trying to do is point out that the world is a stage and in our turn, we
all get to play the sage and the dolt, and the friend and the scoundrel.
To err is human, to forgive is divine, to break is to buy.
As far as I know he is new here, and I would give him the benefit of the
doubt for awhile, as I tried to do with Shelly, earlier this year.
This will sort itself out in time.
Peace.
(Ya know, this is what old guys are supposed to do;o)
--
- Billy
There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading. The few who
learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence and
find out for themselves.
Will Rogers
http://www.map-uk.org/regions/opt/news/view/-/id/348/
http://www.tomdispatch.com/p/zinn
FarmI
>> Given that I, like Charlie, thought that your diatribe revealed your
>> character, of course I realise that posting was futile.
> But what you thought, was not thought. It was not anything of the
> kind.
Now I don't need to think about it, now I know. OTT, vengeful, nasty AND
loonie.
> > However since you were also unfair, you needed to be told.
> Get a load of that. Jesus jumping on a pogo-stick Kee-Rist!
> Needed? Listen to that hick-talk jive. To be told? By what? By
> somethin' like you? From which end cometh the noise of it? The
> Charlie McCarthy or Edgar Bergen? Which is the bottom and which
> the
> top? I could see while you were doing all this "telling" of yours
> that it seemed to be coming out at your mouth, while the lips on your
> butthole weren't even moving. Maybe you can do it while sucking
> water through a straw?
And you keep on giving us an insight into your character. Keep it up, as
it's quite a spectacle.
Billy
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:19:22 -0700, Billy <wildbilly@without_a.net>
> Yes, this is charitable and I respect this, but surely you are of a
> different mind after reading this person's further posts and his
> alignment with our resident ginrummy yutz, shel.
>
> In addition.........as you may recall from past postings, I am very
> familiar with the area in which he claims to live. I am suspect when
> I hear someone hails from SW MO. Lots of good folk there, for
> sure.....lots of, uh.........
>
> >
> >As far as I know he is new here, and I would give him the benefit of the
> >doubt for awhile, as I tried to do with Shelly, earlier this year.
>
> And you still harbor doubt?
>
> >
> >This will sort itself out in time.
> >Peace.
> >(Ya know, this is what old guys are supposed to do;o)
>
> Yeah, yeah......off to find find some suitable quote....gimme a
> minute.....
>
> Oh, this works......
>
> "When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his
> friends." ---- Japanese Proverb
>
>
> >>
> >> TEW FUNNEE!
> >>
> >> Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. . .
>
> (above is the yutz, shel)
>
> >
> >Hey! My SOUL BUDDY.
> >
> >Now we goin' to start ta have SOME FUN! :-)
> >--
> >JM http://bobbisoxsnatchers.blogspot.com
>
> (above is the putz, mackie)
>
> From previous posts to this thread.
>
>
> Peace (here's a good rock, bro)
> Charlie
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6oWvAGmiCo
Charlie, when you're in a fight, you strike with what ever you have.
Mac picked up sick, twisted Shelly, com'on, that's funny;O)
To be fair, bro', you threw the first rock, as well intentioned as it
may be. I think you should let him throw the last rock. Then we can suck
it up and garden. Give peace a chance. The seeds of tomorrow are planted
today.
Billy kickin' with Michael Franti
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vwq4fdugU4
dr-...@wi.rr.com
oozing out of the trees. Ingrid
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:53:28 -0600, "SteveB" <old...@deepends.com> wrote:
>My peach tree, I just noticed, has clear hard oozing sap coming from the
>peaches. Lots of them. Not a good crop this year. What is this, and what
>do I do?
>
>Steve
>
Somewhere between zone 5 and 6 tucked along the shore of Lake Michigan
on the council grounds of the Fox, Mascouten, Potawatomi, and Winnebago
Bud
>My peach tree, I just noticed, has clear hard oozing sap coming from the
>peaches. �Lots of them. �Not a good crop this year. �What is this, and
>what do I do?
Probably something (an insect) that likes peaches. Takes a bite and moves on
to another one. Ever try tanglefoot at the lowest part of the trunk to keep
them away from your peaches? Unless it is a flying beetle then you'll just
have to share some of the sap with them. I bet you'll just have a few bumps
in the ripened peaches.
--
Bud