Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New pictures of my cocktail-style MAME cabinet

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Chad Hendrickson

unread,
Oct 13, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/13/99
to
I now have new pictures of my homebuilt cocktail-style MAME cabinet online.
This is not a gutted cabinet, it is completely built from scratch.

Check it out at:
http://people.ce.mediaone.net/chadh

I'd love to hear your comments.

Chad


Mike Gedeon

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
I have got to make one of those. Looks like a good Winter time project. I
have a 166 and 233 pentium no MMX, think those would work ? Mike : )

Come check us out !!!
http://www.videogameconnection.com/
BUY-SELL-TRADE
PONG to Nintendo 64 and More !
I Collect /I\ & NES

Sean

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to

That is so cool!!
I'd love to have one of those.
Nice job.

Sean


Robert McElwee

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
It looks great! Any chance of putting up some details on how you built it,
etc?

Chad Hendrickson <hendri...@REMOVEhcgi.com> wrote in message
news:s0a4a3...@corp.supernews.com...

Chad Hendrickson

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
Yes, I will defininately be putting up more info about how I built it,
dimensions, spinner details, and progress updates, etc. Keep an eye out for
updates.

Chad


Robert McElwee <rmce...@mymiata.com> wrote in message
news:7u3rgf$1vm4$1...@news.gate.net...

Chad Hendrickson

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
Yes, go for the Pentium 233. I use a Pentium 200 MMX and it works great for
the real classic games (pre-1985). For most newer games you can use the
command line option of -frameskip 7 and get by just fine.

Chad


Mike Gedeon <mgede...@aol.comSPAMENOT> wrote in message
news:19991013215334...@ng-fp1.aol.com...

Joe Fix

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
In the article dated Thu, 14 Oct 1999 08:35:03 -0500, Chad Hendrickson says...

>
>Yes, I will defininately be putting up more info about how I built it,
>dimensions, spinner details, and progress updates, etc. Keep an eye out for
>updates.
>
>Chad
>

It seems like I read somewhere that monitors would not operate properly in this
position (or would eventually not operate properly). Was this an urban legend,
or does it have some base in fact? Nice cabinet, BTW.

-Joe


Michael J Hayes

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
On 14 Oct 1999, Joe Fix wrote:

> It seems like I read somewhere that monitors would not operate properly in this
> position (or would eventually not operate properly). Was this an urban legend,
> or does it have some base in fact? Nice cabinet, BTW.

Many monitors were not intended to be operated sideways or upside-down.
The general rule-of-thumb is to do so at your own risk. Warnings were put in
the MAME readme with heavy emphasis in case some people were tempted to use the
command-line arguments to rotate the display and flip their monitors on their
sides to utilize the full screen dimensions for games that used vertical
monitors. It would be nice if newer monitors had a capability to physically
rotate the screen. Since most monitors have such features as flat screens and
energy conservation nowadays I guess it's only a matter of time before that
happens. The only question is: what other practical purpose would it have?

> -Joe
___________________________________
http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~mjhayes
mjh...@cse.buffalo.edu
"We are closed now!"


Andy S.

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
I've had my monitor on its back for months now and I've had no
problems. I have a cabinet identical to Chads (we built them together
in my basement). The only concern I have is heat. The monitor case
isn't designed to disipate heat when laid on it's back. The heat rises
and gets trapped underneath the front of the monitor. We have large
fans blowing directly on the monitors and that seems to work. I've
left mine on for 5 or 6 hours without having any problems. I have a
Komodo 17" monitor in mine.

We may be shortening the lives of our monitors by having them on
their back, but 17" monitors have gotten so inexpensive that it's no
big deal to replace them every few years.

pitfal...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
Whenever I view rgvc posts through deja news service, the subject lines
always get truncated. Your post was shortened to read

Re: New pictures of my cock


Please don't send me any pics.

-Ben


In article <19991013215334...@ng-fp1.aol.com>,


mgede...@aol.comSPAMENOT ( Mike Gedeon ) wrote:
> I have got to make one of those. Looks like a good Winter time
project. I
> have a 166 and 233 pentium no MMX, think those would work ? Mike : )
>
> Come check us out !!!
> http://www.videogameconnection.com/
> BUY-SELL-TRADE
> PONG to Nintendo 64 and More !
> I Collect /I\ & NES
>
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Scott L.

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
acually there is one company that made a monitor that could be rotated 90 degrees...
unforutuanly it was for a mac :p and there was a purpose for it... newpaper
publishing ... yeah I know go figure what a Mac user would do to make a
puplication... :)

Scotty

Chad Hendrickson

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
Haha, that is too funny!

And despite the message subject, you still opened the email and read it.
Hmmmm.... :)

Chad

<pitfal...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:7u5im9$a4i$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

The Maverick

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
Nice! Price?

the Mav


--

Ace of Aces Collector's Guide
http://maverick.brainiac.com/aoa/index.html

Space and Fantasy Gamer's Guide
http://www.brainiac.com/micro/sfgg/index.html

Chad Hendrickson

unread,
Oct 14, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/14/99
to
Price? For you, $10,000! But seriously, it's not for sale... it's just for
fun. Unless of course you have an extra $10,000 burning a hole in your
pocket. :)

The Maverick <thema...@volcano.net> wrote in message
news:380689...@volcano.net...

pitfal...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/15/99
to
The only reason I opened it was to see what the rest of the subject
line said (I knew it was truncated). Yet, because I did not think to
change the subject line in my reply post I unwittingly fell into the
same trap! My subject line was truncated in the exact same way. You
would think that I, of all people, would have foreseen and avoided such
an obvious Pitfall.

Now we may both be getting some unusual email. Oh, well.

-Ben


In article <s0cmgf...@corp.supernews.com>,

Dan Lingman

unread,
Oct 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/15/99
to
In article <38064945...@microdsi.net>, "Scott L." <Sluz...@microdsi.net> wrote:
>acually there is one company that made a monitor that could be rotated 90
> degrees...
>unforutuanly it was for a mac :p and there was a purpose for it... newpaper
>publishing ... yeah I know go figure what a Mac user would do to make a
>puplication... :)
>
>Scotty


It was called the Pivot, and I've got one of the original B&W ones. Still
works great. They also came out in color, and you could get one for the PC,
just was a pain getting a video card that would properly support it.

Dan Lingman
dlin...@home.com
Wanna make some bucks while you surf? Make some $ for me too.
http://www.alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=DVF796

Richard Burge

unread,
Oct 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/15/99
to
Scott L. <Sluz...@microdsi.net> wrote:

> acually there is one company that made a monitor that could be rotated 90
> degrees... unforutuanly it was for a mac :p and there was a purpose for
> it... newpaper publishing ... yeah I know go figure what a Mac user would
> do to make a puplication... :)

The Radius Pivot. This was back in the days when 21" monitors cost a
squillion dollars, so to get a 1:1 full page A4 display you could
instead get vertical monitors, like the Apple full page display.

--
Richard Burge
<ric...@lspace.freeserve.co.uk>

Loomis

unread,
Oct 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/15/99
to
Simply awesome


The Maverick

unread,
Oct 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/15/99
to
Chad Hendrickson wrote:
>
> Price? For you, $10,000! But seriously, it's not for sale... it's just for
> fun.

I'd build my own first before paying someone else for one... I was just
wondering what your total budget ended up being. ;-)

Chad Hendrickson

unread,
Oct 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/15/99
to
Oh, cost...

I already had a lot of the computer parts (monitor, motherboard, keyboard
matrix, etc.) so I had to purchase:

Wood $50
Happ and Wico Controls $60
Wiring, fans, power cables/outlets, paint, hinges, etc. $100

So materials cost me about $210.

The BIG part of it is labor. Of course, you need tools (such as drill,
jigsaw, router, circular saw, etc).

Chad

The Maverick <thema...@volcano.net> wrote in message

news:38074E...@volcano.net...

tssk...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/17/99
to rec.games.v...@list.deja.com

--

>> Many monitors were not intended to be operated sideways or upside-down.
>>The general rule-of-thumb is to do so at your own risk. Warnings were put in
>>the MAME readme with heavy emphasis in case some people were tempted to use the
>>command-line arguments to rotate the display and flip their monitors on their
>>sides to utilize the full screen dimensions for games that used vertical
>>monitors. It would be nice if newer monitors had a capability to physically
>>rotate the screen. Since most monitors have such features as flat screens and
>>energy conservation nowadays I guess it's only a matter of time before that
>>happens. The only question is: what other practical purpose would it have?
>>
>>> -Joe

It would be great for desktop publishing. If you could flip the monitor on its side you would be able to do page layout much easier.

tssk


--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Rob

unread,
Oct 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/18/99
to
" " <tssk...@my-Deja.com> wrote:
>>monitors. It would be nice if newer monitors had a capability to physically
>>rotate the screen. Since most monitors have such features as flat screens and
>>energy conservation nowadays I guess it's only a matter of time before that
>>happens. The only question is: what other practical purpose would it have?
>It would be great for desktop publishing. If you could flip
>the monitor on its side you would be able to do page layout
>much easier.

About half a year ago I evaluated a 15" LCD monitor that pivoted
90 degrees. It was good for DTP and also for web browsing. But
it was when I ran MAME and brought up Pac-Man in its correct
dimensions that everyone in the office (included me) wanted one.
They were about a grand and the client ended up going with
something cheaper, but they're out there.

Portrait CRT monitors for the Mac have been around for some time
as well, though I've never seen one in actual use. They seem to
start around $1500 last I looked. Cool, but I'd sooner get one
of those ArcadePC cabinets for $500 less and deal with the wrong
aspect ratio ;)

Rob

ku...@ties.org - http://kudla.org/raindog

Marc Naninck

unread,
Oct 18, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/18/99
to
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999 13:01:17 -0500, "Tom61" <to...@iland.net> wrote:

Mine DOES, but no thread here;-)

Anyway, guess he'd be talking about MAME.

Man, its getting greater each DAY!!!

>It's a reply to "New pictures of my cocktail style MAME cabinet"
>Apearently your news reader doesn't follow threads.
>
>Roger Matthews <te...@usa.net> wrote in message
>news:V5SN3.839$25.35723@nntp1...
>> > Simply awesome
>>
>> Yeah... now could you kindly tell us what you're talking about?
>>
>>
>


Greetz from Breda (NB), |\/|arc.

Legal Warning: Anyone sending me unsolicited/junk/spam E-mail will be charged a US$500.00 proof-reading and storage fee. Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, 227, any and all unsolicited E-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US. Do not send unsolicited advertisements and do not add this E-mail address to any list.

Olwynn

unread,
Oct 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/22/99
to

Scott L. wrote in message <38064945...@microdsi.net>...

>acually there is one company that made a monitor that could be rotated 90
degrees...
>unforutuanly it was for a mac :p and there was a purpose for it...
newpaper
>publishing ... yeah I know go figure what a Mac user would do to make a
>puplication... :)
>
>Scotty


Actually there are a few manufacturers making pivot type monitors designed
to make viewing we pages easier (longer monitor = less scrolling) ... I
don't know what the length would do though as the monitor is not even close
to square.

0 new messages