Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Tech: Major Havoc adapter board.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Clay Cowgill  
View profile  
 More options Jan 15 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.games.video.arcade.collecting
From: c...@supra.com (Clay Cowgill)
Date: 1997/01/15
Subject: Re: Tech: Major Havoc adapter board.

In article <32DA9A24.3...@magenta.com>, j...@magenta.com wrote:
>    Second, to correct the X-deflection output. Space Duel, Gravitar and
> Tempest all used Wells-Gardner
>    monitors, while the dedicated Major Havoc game used the amplifone. Im
> not sure of the exact reason
>    but the Wells-Gardner monitors have a pincusion effect on a linear
> input. Because of this there was
>    corrective circuitry on the game PCB's of SD,G and T. These are
> analog multipliers that correct for
>    this non-linearity. Since Major Havoc used the Amplifone, none of the
> analog multipliers were needed.
>    No big deal, but if you run a Major Havoc game PCB on a Wells-Garner
> monitor you will have some    pincusioning(arched in top and bottom,
> looking at a drawn square box, such as self test). The adapter
>    board contain the necessary circuitry to remedy this. But to tell you
> the truth, when the game playing
>    it is hard to see any effect from this pincushioning.

> Any additions Clay??

Nope.  Well put. ;-)  I'm not sure if the Ampliphone has the correction in
the yolk response or on the deflection board somehow.  It looks like
Cinematronics might have solved it by using a smaller section of the
"sweep" developed by the analog integrators, although they also have some
funky analog stuff in there as well.  I guess Atari used more expensive
caps to try to get a more linear charge curve.  

At any rate, the WG monitor will "bow" as Jess describes unless a
correction board is used.  I've got a breadboard version of the correction
board working (mostly) in my garage, but I've yet to produce any PCB's for
it...

-Clay

Clayton N. Cowgill                                Engineering Manager                
_____________________________________________________________________
/\ Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc.                    c...@supra.com
\/ Communications Division                      http://www.supra.com/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google