My attempts to a Rare Entries contest is over, and it was not a stunning
success. Rather it was a bit of a fiasco with only eight entrants. One
possible reason for this might be that the questions were more difficult
than I thought: no entrant was able to produce a fully correct slate.
Nevertheless, congratulations to the winner: PETER SMYTH!
Here is the total result list:
1) Peter Smyth 28.672
2) Mark Brader 39.2
3) Lieven Marchand 46.9762048
4) John Gerson 62.72
5) Björn Lundin 75.16192768
6) Bruce Bowler 200.704
7) Calvin 280.9856
Stephen W. Perry 280.9856
The not so secret theme for the quiz was Sweden, and answers relating to
Sweden and things Swedish gave the 0.8 multiplier bonus. Swedish
answers are indicated with (SW) in the list below. (WR) means that I
have score that answer as wrong.
> 1. Name a person who has been King of Sweden.
1 Adolf Fredrik (SW)
1 Gustav III (SW)
1 Gustav V (SW)
1 Hans / Johan II (SW)
1 Karl X Gustav (SW)
1 Karl XIV Johan (SW)
1 Kristian I (SW)
1 Ragnvald Knaphövde (SW)
I've listed the names here with the common Swedish spelling.
All entrants found a unique correct answer to the question. Not so
surprising since there are a few to choose from, but the question does
actually have some traps. Around 1500 there were some heads of state
that were only regents ("riksföreståndare") and not kings. And I thought
that someone might just enter Karl or Erik with a low number - Karl
starts at VII and Erik at VIII.
> 2. Name a company with business in at least 28 countries and which is
> commonly referred by a name or an abbreviation that includes one or
> more of the initials of one or more of the founders. There may be a
> full name of the company that includes a longer part of the names of
> the founders, but there must be a common form that consists of only
> the initials. Example: Say that there is a company of which the full
> name is Abraham & Joseph Corporation. If this company is commonly
> referred to as AJC, that is a correct answer. However, if the common
> short name is AbeJoe, that would not be a correct answer.
2 IKEA (SW)
1 DHL
1 Hewlett-Packard (HP)
1 JCB
1 LVMH (Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE)
1 RSA Security
............................................
1 A&W Root Beer (WR)
The examples I had in mind when wrote the question were IKEA and Hewlett-
Packard - and WalMart which I phrased the question to keep out.
A&W Root Beer is only a brand; it's not a company.
> 3. Name a country where I have spent at least 24 hours. Country here
> refers to a territory with an officially assigned country code in ISO
> 3166.
2 Ukraine
1 Canada
1 France
1 Italy
1 Sweden (SW)
1 USA
1 Czechoslovakia (WR)
For those who found the question silly: my web site is not difficult to
find and there is a photo gallery which should give some hints. Else
most countries in Europe would have done. However, it was a little too
brave to enter one of the countries no longer existing. I have been to
both the Czech and Slovak Republics, but I never visited Czechoslovakia
before the split.
> 4. Give a city with a population of at least 400 000 that is located on
> the sea, and which also has a border on a sweetwater lake with a >
> surface of at least 1 km². A lake which is entirely included within
> the city limits does not count; the borders of the city must traverse
> the lake or be on the shores of the lake. (Since it can be difficult
> to deduce whether the limits is on border exactly, I will permit for
> a leeway fitting a path or a road, but generally not any buildings.)
> "City" here refers to the city proper, not metropolitan area.
4 Stockholm (SW)
1 San José
1 Shanghai
1 Gdansk (WR)
1 Port Said (WR)
When I first thought of the question, the two cities I had mind were
Stockholm and Seattle. Unfortunately, the original phrasing of the question
was poor. In Sweden all we have is "communes" or municipalities; formally
there are no cities. Thus, if two communes border the same lake, the
border between the two will run in the lake. So that was my predisposition.
That is, in my mental map, there was a border in Lake Washington between
Seattle and Bellevue and the other cities across the lake from Seattle.
However, in the US and many other countries there is a concept of being
"incorporated" and there are areas that are not incorporated. And
in these case, the border lake is simply not incorporated anywhere,
and no border traverse the lake. The original question said one thing
in the beginning and another at the end, and it appears that entrants
made different interpretations. Possibly this explains the collision on
Stockholm - it was a safe answer.
There is a second Swedish answer: Gothenburg, the second biggest city in
Sweden. The lake in that case is only 1.2 km², which explains the low
limit for the size of the lake. Alas, it was very difficult for
international entrants to find this answer, as neither Google nor Bing
maps show the municipality borders in Sweden. Swedish Eniro does, but
how would you know about it?
Gdansk is wrong because the lake in question is too small - only 35-37 ha
according to Polish Wikipedia. (And it can also be easily computed from
Google maps that the lake cannot be big enough.)
I do feel sad for the entrant who put down Port Said. Here is a case where
the border does traverse the lake. However, this is a lake that is part of
the Nile estuary and with decently wide openings to the Mediterranean and
Wikipedia confirmed that the water is brackish, and thus it is not a
sweetwater lake.
> 5. Name a person who was born after AD 1000 outside any nobility, but who
> reached a position as state ruler for which inheritance was the norm,
> or became the norm with this person.
2 Karl XIV Johan (SW)
1 Anastasio Somoza Garcia (Nicaragua)
1 Richard Cromwell (England etc)
1 Sverker I (SW)
1 Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (WR) (Iran)
1 Muammar Gaddafi (WR) (Libya)
1 Rama I (WR) (Thailand)
When I composed the question, I thought that there was a well-known
answer that everyone could fall back on - but when I looked it up
as the contest was running, I found that I was wrong!
Then again, there are still well-known answers if you are only able to
think a little outside the box - and several entrants did.
I purposely wrote the question to not talk about royalties, as one of the
most fascinating persons in this group is Hideyoshi Toyotomi, Japanese
Shogun at the end of the 16th century, who played a key role in the
reunification of Japan. I would have been very impressed if someone
had entered him.
Other persons I had in mind were Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il. No
one named them, but Kim Il Sung is not the only president to have started
a dynasty, and one entrant though of the Somozas in Nicaragua. Another
entrant though of Ghaddafi, and suggested that he had planned for one
of his son take over after him. However, while there is some evidence
for this, it does not seem to have been official or in some other
way been constituted as the norm, why I ruled this as wrong.
Karl XIV Johan of Sweden was born as Jean Baptise Bernadotte in Pau
in the province of Béarn (and that's why like bearnaise sauce so much
in Sweden :-). He first became a general and a marshal in Napoleon's
army. He quit, and later he was appointed as heir to the Swedish throne.
His son Oscar I would also have been a correct answer, as he was
born before Jean Baptiste became Prince of Montecorvo and thus entered
the nobility.
And speaking of Napoleon, he was the person I had mind as the well-known
answer. But while he came from very humble origins financially, his
family was of Tuscan nobility. So I was wrong.
Richard Cromwell inherited the job as Lord Protector from his father,
but his father was not noble when he was born, so that's a correct
answer. I'm glad to see that entrant found this possibility.
Sverker I of Sweden was an answer that was very difficult to assess,
simply because very little is known about this person who was king of
Sweden in the middle of the 12th century. I looked at different sources
who pointed in different directions, but one suggested that had been
a farmer, and I decided to give the entrant the benefit of the doubt.
Khomeini succeeded the Shah as the leader of Iran, but he never had the
position as Shah. First he was only the informal leader after his return.
With the new constitution he entered a new position as Supreme Leader,
and this position is not inherited.
The case of Rama I is similar to Napoleon. It was his military skills that
permitted him to become King, but his family was noble.
> 6. Name a team that at least on one occasion reached the semi-finals in
> FIFA World Cup in football, but which never has become World Champions.
1 Croatia
1 Czechoslovakia
1 Hungary
1 Netherlands
1 Portugal
1 South Korea
1 Sweden (SW)
1 China (WR)
One would that this is a question where you cannot go wrong, but one
entrant tried to bend the question and bent himself out of shape. China
has reached the semi-finals in FIFA Women's World Cup, but the question
was about another competition.
> 7. Name a person who simultaneously was, or still is, the head of state of
> two countries that for all other practical matters were entirely
> independent from each other during the entire rule of this person.
1 Elizabeth II (UK, Canada, Australia, etc)
1 George VI (UK, Canada, Australia, etc)
1 Henri III (France and Poland)
1 Jacques Chirac (France and Andorra)
1 James II/VII (England and Scotland)
1 Sigismund (SW) (Sweden and Poland)
1 Gustav V (WR) (Sweden)
1 Karl XIV Johan (WR) (Sweden-Norway)
The most well-known answers here are probably the Commonwealth monarchs.
The second best-known group, at least in the English-speaking world,
is likely to be the 17th century monarchs in the personal union between
England and Scotland. However, the biggest pool of name to choose from
are all French heads of state (starting with Henri IV or so) who also
have been co-heads of state of Andorra (together with the bishop of
La Seu de Urgell).
A second Swedish correct answer is Magnus Eriksson who was king of
Sweden and Norway from 1319 to 1340 when he ceded the Norwegian crown
to one of his sons.
Karl XIV Johan was also king of Sweden and Norway, but that was a union
which was forced on the Norwegians by war. While they enjoyed autonomy
in many areas, defence and foreign policy was controlled from Stockholm.
Thus, Norway was not independent. And when Gustav V entered the throne,
the union was abolished since two years.
> 8. Name a person who was assassinated while holding a position as head of
> state, head of government or foreign minister, and who had reached that
> position, directly or indirectly, as a result of democratic elections,
> generally considered free and fair by today's standards.
2 Olof Palme (SW) (Prime Minister, died 1986)
1 Anna Lindh (SW) (Foreign Minister, 2003)
1 Walther Rathenau (Germany, Foreign Minister, 1922)
1 Abraham Lincoln (WR)
1 Hendrik Verwoerd (WR) (South Africa, Prime Minister, 1966)
1 James Garfield (WR)
1 William McKinley (WR)
No less than three entrants entered US presidents that were elected by
men only. That was the standards in those days, but it is not good
enough in AD 2016. And being elected only by people with a certain
skin colour was a contestable standard already when Lincoln was
elected, and Verwoerd was elected that way 100 years later.
Correct answers that were not given that I can think of are: JFK,
Indira Gandhi and Yitzhak Rabin.
> 9. Name a person who is generally considered to have been involved in
> the discovery or the first isolation of one or more chemical element
> with an atomic number <= 96.
1 Albertus Magnus
1 Carl Gustaf Mosander (SW)
1 Daniel Rutherford
1 Jöns Jacob Berzelius (SW)
1 Marie Curie
1 Pierre Curie
1 Ernest Rutherford
1 Theodore Richter
There are plenty of people to choose from. Two more Swedish persons
I know are Carl Wilhelm Scheele and Per Teodor Cleve.
> 10. Give a word used in English that is of Swedish origin, and which
> entered the English language in the 19th century or later. The word
> should be present in an online general dictionary for English. That
> is, a dictionary for a certain field does not qualify.
2 gravlax (SW)
2 ombudsman (SW)
1 ombudsmen (SW)
1 snus (SW)
1 ångström (SW)
1 tungsten (WR)
"Tungsten" is of Swedish origin, but Merriam-Webster Online says that
first known use is 1796.
It was not my intention to handle inflexions as different words, but
I did not account for it in the question, so I saw but no choice to
accept "ombudsmen" as a separate entry.
The case for "snus" is weak; I can only find it in the wiktionary at
yourdictionary.com, but I never asked the entrant for a better reference.
Two words that were not given are "smorgasbord" and "moped".
Thanks to everyone who played!